Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Stanley I. Dodson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Stanley I. Dodson.


Ecology | 2001

What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity

Gary G. Mittelbach; Christopher F. Steiner; Samuel M. Scheiner; Katherine L. Gross; Heather L. Reynolds; Robert B. Waide; Michael R. Willig; Stanley I. Dodson; Laura Gough

Understanding the relationship between species richness and productivity is fundamental to the management and preservation of biodiversity. Yet despite years of study and intense theoretical interest, this relationship remains controversial. Here, we present the results of a literature survey in which we examined the relationship between species richness and productivity in 171 published studies. We extracted the raw data from published tables and graphs and subjected these data to a standardized analysis, using ordinary least-squares (OLS) regression and generalized linear-model (GLIM) regression to test for significant positive, negative, or curvilinear relationships between productivity and species diversity. If the relationship was curvilinear, we tested whether the maximum (or minimum) of the curve occurred within the range of productivity values observed (i.e., was there evidence of a hump?). A meta-analysis conducted on the distribution of standardized quadratic regression coefficients showed that ...


Ecology | 2000

THE RELATIONSHIP IN LAKE COMMUNITIES BETWEEN PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY AND SPECIES RICHNESS

Stanley I. Dodson; Shelley E. Arnott; Kathryn L. Cottingham

An understanding of the relationship between species richness and productivity is crucial to understanding biodiversity in lakes. We investigated the relationship between the primary productivity of lake ecosystems and the number of species for lacustrine phytoplankton, rotifers, cladocerans, copepods, macrophytes, and fish. Our study includes two parts: (1) a survey of 33 well-studied lakes for which data on six major taxonomic groups were available; and (2) a comparison of the effects of short- and long-term whole-lake nutrient addition on primary productivity and planktonic species richness. In the survey, species richness of all six taxa showed a significant quadratic response to increased annual primary productivity ( 14 C estimate, g C-m -2 -yr -1 ) when lake area is taken into account. However, the richness-productivity relationship for phytoplankton and fish was strongly dependent on lake area. The relationship for phytoplankton, rotifers, cladocerans, copepods, and macrophytes was significantly unimodal. Species richness generally peaked at levels of primary productivity in the range of 30-300 g C-m -2 -yr -1 . For the average lake size, the highest biodiversity tended to occur in lakes with relatively low primary productivity, such as those found in the Northern Temperate Lakes Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) site in the upper Midwest (United States) and in the Experimental Lakes Area of Ontario (Canada). Based on short-term (3 yr) and long-term (21-24 yr) experiments, we tested whether individual lakes respond to whole-lake enrichment experiments in the manner suggested by analyses of survey data. Experimental addition of nutrients produced varied and unpredictable responses in species richness, probably due to transient dynamics and time lags. Responses to nutrient addition were taxon and lake specific. Phytoplankton showed a variety of relationships between species richness and pelagic primary productivity (PPR), depending on the history of enrichment and recovery. No significant effect of primary productivity on rotifer richness occurred in any of the experimental lakes, whereas richness of crustacean zooplankton was negatively correlated with primary productivity in both the short- and long-term experiments.


Ecology | 1974

Zooplankton Competition and Predation: An Experimental Test of the Size‐Efficiency Hypothesis

Stanley I. Dodson

Twelve 42—liter plankton cages were used in an alpine Colorado pond to test a size—efficiency hypothesis: to determine why small herbivorous zooplankton species tend not to coexist with large species. The size—efficiency hypothesis, that large species exclude the smaller ones through competition for food, was not substantiated. An alternate hypothesis extends the understanding of the importance of size—selective predators to include invertebrates selecting small prey. A predaceous copepod Diaptomus shoshone excluded the small Daphnia minnehaha from an association with the large D. middendorffiana within 1 mo. By implication, the predacious copepod is responsible for the absence of the small species in ponds occupied by the large Daphnia species. See full-text article at JSTOR


Journal of The North American Benthological Society | 1994

Non-visual communication in freshwater benthos: an overview

Stanley I. Dodson; Todd A. Crowl; Barbara L. Peckarsky; Lee B. Kats; Alan P. Covich; Joseph M. Culp

This overview of non-visual communication in freshwater benthic animals emphasizes recent studies of the effect of chemical and mechanical signals on predator-prey interactions of benthic macroinvertebrates and amphibians. Prey species use chemical signals to modify their morphological development, life history strategy, feeding, and predator avoidance behavior. The advantages of chemical signals are that they can be used in dark or turbid environments by animals that do not have image-forming eyes. Chemical signals are more persistent than mechanical signals, and they allow species-level identification of predator species. In streams, prey species may use mechanical signals (hydrodynamic pressure waves or sound) to avoid predators approaching from downstream (a situation characteristic of streams and in which chemical signals are unreliable) and to initiate escape responses. Predators often depend on chemical signals to stimulate or inhibit feeding, and they use species-specific mechanical signals to locate or track prey or potential mates. The exact nature of non-visual signals depends on ecological constraints of both the sender and receiver. Responses to non-visual signals may be adapted to local predator conditions. Non-visual signals are effectively used over a wide range of temporal and spatial scales in all aquatic habitats. Organisms often adjust their responses as ontogenic development results in changing size, diet, and habitat.


Ecology | 2008

Intraspecific variation in a predator affects community structure and cascading trophic interactions.

David M. Post; Eric P. Palkovacs; Erika G. Schielke; Stanley I. Dodson

Intraspecific phenotypic variation in ecologically important traits is widespread and important for evolutionary processes, but its effects on community and ecosystem processes are poorly understood. We use life history differences among populations of alewives, Alosa pseudoharengus, to test the effects of intraspecific phenotypic variation in a predator on pelagic zooplankton community structure and the strength of cascading trophic interactions. We focus on the effects of differences in (1) the duration of residence in fresh water (either seasonal or year-round) and (2) differences in foraging morphology, both of which may strongly influence interactions between alewives and their prey. We measured zooplankton community structure, algal biomass, and spring total phosphorus in lakes that contained landlocked, anadromous, or no alewives. Both the duration of residence and the intraspecific variation in foraging morphology strongly influenced zooplankton community structure. Lakes with landlocked alewives had small-bodied zooplankton year-round, and lakes with no alewives had large-bodied zooplankton year-round. In contrast, zooplankton communities in lakes with anadromous alewives cycled between large-bodied zooplankton in the winter and spring and small-bodied zooplankton in the summer. In summer, differences in feeding morphology of alewives caused zooplankton biomass to be lower and body size to be smaller in lakes with anadromous alewives than in lakes with landlocked alewives. Furthermore, intraspecific variation altered the strength of the trophic cascade caused by alewives. Our results demonstrate that intraspecific phenotypic variation of predators can regulate community structure and ecosystem processes by modifying the form and strength of complex trophic interactions.


Oecologia | 1989

The ecological role of chemical stimuli for the zooplankton: predator-induced morphology in Daphnia

Stanley I. Dodson

SummaryNumerous adaptive predator-induced responses occurred when eight clones representing seven Daphnia (Crustacea: Cladocera) species were tested against three common predators: fourth instar larval phantom midge Chaoborus americanus, adult backswimmer Notonecta undulata, and small sunfish Lepomis macrochirus. The predators were confined within small mesh bags, suggesting that the signal for induction is chemical. The induced responses included longer tail spines, longer heads, smaller bodies, increased egg clutches, and decreased lipid reserves. Each Daphnia species responded to each of the three predators in a unique manner. Induced responses in the above characters showed no significant association. The induced morphological changes are generally consistent with current theories of what is an adaptive response for the various sizes of Daphnia exposed to tactile and visual predators. The abundance of induced responses in these experiments suggests that predator-induced responses are a widespread and ecologically important phenomenon of the freshwater zooplankton.


Evolution | 1991

The evolutionary ecology of an antipredator reaction norm : Daphnia pulex and Chaoborus americanus

Ken Parejko; Stanley I. Dodson

Ponds containing the parthenogenetic zooplankter Daphnia pulex with and without chaoborid predators were sampled over the course of a season. A significant (P < 0.05) Spearman rank correlation was found between predator density and the expression of an antipredator defense (neckteeth) by the Daphnia. The reaction norms (percent induction of a single genotype versus predator density) of clones isolated from predator‐free and predator‐rich habitats were determined in a laboratory setting. There was a statistically significant different response among the six clones tested (P < 0.05). Clones isolated from chaoborid ponds showed significantly greater sensitivity to the presence of predator than clones from predator‐free ponds (P < 0.05). In the laboratory, food levels under which prey were cultured affected induction of the antipredator response. Highest induction was found at the lowest food level used.


Ecology | 1980

DO STONEFLY PREDATORS INFLUENCE BENTHIC DISTRIBUTIONS IN STREAMS

Barbara L. Peckarsky; Stanley I. Dodson

Experimental manipulations were conducted within the substrate of a Wisconsin stream and a Colorado stream to measure the effect of stonefly predators on the distribution of benthic invertebrates. Screen cages containing free predators, predators restricted from foraging, or no pred- ators, allowed prey migration but no predator migration over 3-d periods. The presence of Acroneuria lycorias (Perlidae) in the Wisconsin stream significantly depressed the establishment of prey popu- lations within cage microhabitats. Mechanisms for reduction were consumption of prey by the stone- fly, and predator-avoidance by prey using contact and non-contact cues. The presence of Megarcys signata (Perlodidae) reduced prey colonization in the Colorado stream by the same mechanisms, but restricted predators produced less consistent effects. This result could be due to colonization of cages by prey that could not detect predators without contact. Pteronarcella badia (Pteronarcidae), a large stonefly detritivore that takes occasional prey, did not affect colonization of Colorado stream cages by prey. This differential response by prey to two morphologically similar, but functionally different, stonefly species suggests that predator avoidance was not purely tactile. Chemotactile and non-contact chemical cues are possible mechanisms by which prey differentiated these stoneflies. The presence of A. lycorias and M. signata in experimental cages significantly increased the attrition of mayfly prey, compared to that from cages with no stonefly or a restricted stonefly in each stream. This result suggests that predation and avoidance by prey of contact with foraging predators were responsible for the higher disappearance of mayflies from cages. Free P. badia had a similar effect, probably due to tactile avoidance of this large detritivorous stonefly by some prey in the Colorado stream.


Oecologia | 1990

Demographic costs of Chaoborus-induced phenotypic plasticity in Daphnia pulex.

A. Ross Black; Stanley I. Dodson

SummaryIt has been proposed that morphological defenses against predation have demographic costs. We measured the cost of a predator-induced morphological defense, using predaceous phantom midge larvae Chaoborus americanus (Insecta, Diptera) and the prey species Daphnia pulex (Crustacea, Cladocera). The induced defense is a neck tooth (and other pleiotropic structures) developed in juvenile D. pulex in the presence of C. americanus. Laboratory life table experiments, in the absence of predation, indicated the population growth rate of typical D. pulex was 11% to 39% greater than that of D. pulex exposed to C. americanus extract, or C. americanus-conditioned water. The reduction in population growth rate was most frequently associated with an increase in the time between birth and first reproduction. Induced individuals required twenty more hours at 23°C, and twenty five more hours at 20°C, to develop to the age of first reproduction. Under limiting food conditions age-specific survivorship and the number of offspring produced per female by the induced form were reduced relative to the typical form. As a result, the difference in population growth rates among forms was greater at the low food level as indicated by a highly significant food by form interaction effect. In addition to neck teeth and lowered reproductive rates, the offspring of induced form individuals had significantly longer tail-spines (7.2–7.5%), and primiparous adults from the induction treatment were significantly shorter than controls (3–8%).


Ecology | 1972

Mortality in a Population of Daphnia Rosea

Stanley I. Dodson

A Daphnia rosea population was observed over a 2—year period in order to compare mortality with natural predation pressure. A technique is presented for estimating the instantaneous death rate of Daphnia from population dynamics data as derived from quantitative, serial, plankton samples. The effect of predation by a specific predator (Chaoborus larvae) on daphniid mortality is shown by the comparison between (1) the number of daphniid deaths and number of predator—prey encounters (per unit time and volume), (2) the probability of daphniid deaths and the relative probability of a Daphnia encountering a predator, and (3) the Chaoborus feeding rate implied by the daphniid mortality and independently observed Chaoborus feeding rates. The Daphnia population had six generations per year. For the last four generations, Chaoborus predation accounted for about 93% of the daphniid mortality. Daphnia mortality due to salamander larvae (Ambystoma tigrinum) averaged 3.5%, never more than 10%, that of Chaoborus larvae. These results support the hypothesis that Chaoborus larvae are significant predators of the D. rosea population, and that the rate of the Daphnia populations growth is significantly influenced by predation pressure.

Collaboration


Dive into the Stanley I. Dodson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Donna R. Kashian

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John E. Havel

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard A. Lillie

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anthony R. Ives

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Barbara L. Peckarsky

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James F. Kitchell

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kenneth J. Forshay

United States Environmental Protection Agency

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge