Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Stans Verhagen is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Stans Verhagen.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2006

Effects of Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Severely Fatigued Disease-Free Cancer Patients Compared With Patients Waiting for Cognitive Behavior Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

M.F.M. Gielissen; Stans Verhagen; Fred Witjes; Gijs Bleijenberg

PURPOSE Persistent fatigue is a long-term adverse effect experienced by 30% to 40% of patients cured of cancer. The main objective of this randomized controlled trial was to show the effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) especially designed for fatigue in cancer survivors. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 112 cancer survivors with somatically unexplained fatigue were allocated randomly to immediate cognitive behavior therapy or to a waiting list condition for therapy. Both conditions were assessed two times, at baseline and 6 months later. The primary outcome variables were fatigue severity (Checklist Individual Strength) and functional impairment (Sickness Impact Profile). Data were analyzed by intention to treat. RESULTS Analyses were based on 50 patients in the intervention condition and 48 patients in the waiting list condition. Patients in the intervention condition reported a significantly greater decrease than patients in the waiting list condition in fatigue severity (difference, 13.3; 95% CI, 8.6 to 18.1) and in functional impairment (difference, 383.2; 95% CI, 197.1 to 569.2). Clinically significant improvement for the CBT group compared with the waiting list group was seen in fatigue severity (54% v 4% of the patients, respectively) and in functional impairment (50% v 18% of the patients, respectively). CONCLUSION Cognitive behavior therapy has a clinically relevant effect in reducing fatigue and functional impairments in cancer survivors.


Supportive Care in Cancer | 2001

Fatigue in disease-free cancer patients compared with fatigue in patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Petra Servaes; Sieberen P. van der Werf; J.B. Prins; Stans Verhagen; Gijs Bleijenberg

Abstract The goal of our work was to assess fatigue in disease-free cancer patients with help of a validated fatigue questionnaire. Furthermore, we wished to analyse the relationship between severe fatigue and former treatment modalities, problems of concentration and motivation, physical activity, functional impairment, depression and anxiety and finally, to compare severely fatigued disease-free cancer patients and patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS). The participants were 85 adult cancer patients and 16 patients with CFS. The cancer patients were all disease-free and had been off treatment for a minimum of 6 months. They were asked to participate in this study by their physician when they came to the hospital for control visits. Patients who were willing to participate completed four questionnaires. The Checklist Individual Strength was used to measure fatigue. In addition, the Beck Depression Inventory, the Spielberger Trait Anxiety Inventory and the Nottingham Health Profile were used. Results indicate that 19% of the disease-free cancer patients were severely fatigued. Their fatigue experience is comparable to that of patients with CFS. Severe fatigue is associated with problems of concentration and motivation, reduced physical activity, emotional health problems and pain. Furthermore, a relation was found between fatigue and depression and anxiety. No relation was found between fatigue and type of cancer, former treatment modalities, duration of treatment and time since treatment ended. In conclusion, for one fifth of a group of disease-free cancer patients fatigue is a severe problem long after treatment. In addition to fatigue, these patients experience several psychological and physical problems.


Journal of Psychosomatic Research | 2002

Fatigue after breast cancer and in chronic fatigue syndrome: similarities and differences.

Petra Servaes; J.B. Prins; Stans Verhagen; Gijs Bleijenberg

OBJECTIVE Fatigue is investigated in 57 severely fatigued disease-free breast cancer patients and in 57 gender- and age-matched patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) using multidimensional and multimethod assessment. A comparison between these groups of patients is important to determine whether a cognitive behavioural intervention to reduce fatigue in CFS patients would be appropriate as well for severely fatigued disease-free breast cancer patients. METHODS Measurement included computerised questionnaires and a standardised neuropsychological test. Furthermore, patients filled out a daily Self-Observation List (SOL) and wore an actometer during a period of 12 days. RESULTS In comparison to severely fatigued disease-free breast cancer patients, CFS patients score more problematic with regard to the level of fatigue, functional impairment, physical activity, pain and self-efficacy. However, a subgroup of severely fatigued disease-free breast cancer patients reports the same amount of problems as CFS patients with regard to psychological well-being, sleep and concentration. Finally, CFS patients and severely fatigued breast cancer patients score equal on measures of social support. CONCLUSION There seem to be some similarities but also many differences between severely fatigued breast cancer survivors and females with CFS. Therefore, cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) to reduce fatigue after treatment for cancer should also differ in certain aspects from cognitive behaviour therapy as it has been developed for patients with CFS.


Palliative Medicine | 2007

Obstacles to the delivery of primary palliative care as perceived by GPs

Marieke Groot; Myrra Vernooij-Dassen; Stans Verhagen; Ben J. P. Crul; Richard Grol

Introduction: In order to facilitate GPs in their work and increase the possibilities for patients to remain at home, it is important to identify the obstacles which hinder the delivery of primary palliative care. From previous research we learned about some of the problems experienced by GPs. In this survey we aimed to identify the prevalence of such problems in providing palliative care and its determinants. Methods: The prevalence of obstacles and its determinants were identified by a questionnaire to 320 GPs in three regions of the Netherlands. Obstacles were grouped as follows: communication, organisation & co-ordination of care, knowledge & expertise, integrated care, time for relatives. The potential determinants were GP characteristics and expertise development activities. Results: The response rate was 62.3%. GPs experienced considerable obstacles in all aspects of palliative care. The most prevalent were: problems with bureaucratic procedures (83.9%), the time necessary to arrange home care technology (61.1%) and the difficulties accompanied with the wish or necessity to obtain extra care (56.3%). In general, more years of GP experience and the participation in (multidisciplinary) case discussions were associated with less perceived obstacles. Discussion: Based on the results of our survey policymakers and practitioners can plan and set priorities in handling the obstacles. There is a high necessity of firstly overcoming the barriers within organisation and coordination of care. Furthermore, our study can help in choosing the (additional) expertise needed in the future and in the realisation of the preferred expertise advancement activities. Palliative Medicine 2007; 21 : 697—703


British Journal of General Practice | 2012

Early identification of palliative care patients in general practice: development of RADboud indicators for PAlliative Care Needs (RADPAC)

Bregje Thoonsen; Yvonne Engels; Eric van Rijswijk; Stans Verhagen; Chris van Weel; Marieke Groot; Kris Vissers

BACKGROUND According to the World Health Organization (WHO) definition, palliative care should be initiated in an early phase and not be restricted to terminal care. In the literature, no validated tools predicting the optimal timing for initiating palliative care have been determined. AIM The aim of this study was to systematically develop a tool for GPs with which they can identify patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and cancer respectively, who could benefit from proactive palliative care. DESIGN A three-step procedure, including a literature review, focus group interviews with input from the multidisciplinary field of palliative healthcare professionals, and a modified Rand Delphi process with GPs. METHOD The three-step procedure was used to develop sets of indicators for the early identification of CHF, COPD, and cancer patients who could benefit from palliative care. RESULTS Three comprehensive sets of indicators were developed to support GPs in identifying patients with CHF, COPD, and cancer in need of palliative care. For CHF, seven indicators were found: for example, frequent hospital admissions. For COPD, six indicators were found: such as, Karnofsky score ≤50%. For cancer, eight indicators were found: for example, worse prognosis of the primary tumour. CONCLUSION The RADboud indicators for PAlliative Care Needs (RADPAC) is the first tool developed from a combination of scientific evidence and practice experience that can help GPs in the identification of patients with CHF, COPD, or cancer, in need of palliative care. Applying the RADPAC facilitates the start of proactive palliative care and aims to improve the quality of palliative care in general practice.


Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 2010

The practice of continuous palliative sedation in elderly patients: a nationwide explorative study among Dutch nursing home physicians.

Rogier H.P.D. van Deijck; Petrus J.C. Krijnsen; Jeroen Hasselaar; Stans Verhagen; Kris Vissers; Raymond T. C. M. Koopmans

OBJECTIVES: To study the practice of continuous palliative sedation (CPS) by Dutch nursing home physicians in 2007.


BMC Family Practice | 2011

Early identification of and proactive palliative care for patients in general practice, incentive and methods of a randomized controlled trial

Bregje Thoonsen; Marieke Groot; Yvonne Engels; J.B. Prins; Stans Verhagen; Cilia Galesloot; Chris van Weel; Kris Vissers

BackgroundAccording to the Word Health Organization, patients who can benefit from palliative care should be identified earlier to enable proactive palliative care. Up to now, this is not common practice and has hardly been addressed in scientific literature. Still, palliative care is limited to the terminal phase and restricted to patients with cancer. Therefore, we trained general practitioners (GPs) in identifying palliative patients in an earlier phase of their disease trajectory and in delivering structured proactive palliative care. The aim of our study is to determine if this training, in combination with consulting an expert in palliative care regarding each palliative patients tailored care plan, can improve different aspects of the quality of the remaining life of patients with severe chronic diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure and cancer.Methods/DesignA two-armed randomized controlled trial was performed. As outcome variables we studied: place of death, number of hospital admissions and number of GP out of hours contacts.DiscussionWe expect that this study will increase the number of identified palliative care patients and improve different aspects of quality of palliative care. This is of importance to improve palliative care for patients with COPD, CHF and cancer and their informal caregivers, and to empower the GP. The study protocol is described and possible strengths and weaknesses and possible consequences have been outlined.Trial RegistrationThe Netherlands National Trial Register: NTR2815


Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care | 2009

When cancer symptoms cannot be controlled: the role of palliative sedation.

Jeroen Hasselaar; Stans Verhagen; Kris Cp Vissers

Purpose of reviewPalliative sedation, the intentional lowering of consciousness for refractory and unbearable distress, has been much discussed during the last decade. In recent years, much research has been published about this subject that will be discussed in this review. The review concentrates on: a brief overview of the main developments during the last decade, an exploration of current debate regarding ethical dilemmas, the development of clinical guidelines, and the application of palliative sedation. Recent findingsMain findings are that palliative sedation is mostly described in retrospective studies and that the terminology palliative sedation in now common in the majority of the studies. In addition, life-shortening effects for palliative sedation are scarcely reported, although not absent. A number of guidelines have been developed and published, although systematic implementation needs more attention. Consequently, palliative sedation has become more clearly positioned as a medical treatment, to be distinguished from active life shortening. SummaryCaregivers should apply palliative sedation proportionally, guided by the symptoms of the patient without striving for deep coma and without motives for life shortening. Clinical and multidisciplinary assessment of refractory symptoms is recommended as is patient monitoring during sedation. Future research should concentrate on proportional sedation rather than continuous deep sedation exclusively, preferably in a prospective design.


BMC Pulmonary Medicine | 2014

PROLONG: a cluster controlled trial to examine identification of patients with COPD with poor prognosis and implementation of proactive palliative care

Ria G Duenk; Yvonne F. Heijdra; Stans Verhagen; Richard Pnr Dekhuijzen; Kris Cp Vissers; Yvonne Engels

BackgroundProactive palliative care is not yet common practice for patients with COPD. Important barriers are the identification of patients with a poor prognosis and the organization of proactive palliative care dedicated to the COPD patient. Recently a set of indicators has been developed to identify those patients with COPD hospitalized for an acute exacerbation who are at risk for post-discharge mortality. Only after identification of these patients with poor prognosis a multi disciplinary approach to proactive palliative care with support of a specialized palliative care team can be initiated.Methods/DesignThe PROLONG study is a prospective cluster controlled trial in which 6 hospitals will participate. Three hospitals are selected for the intervention condition based on the presence of a specialized palliative care team. The study population consists of patients with COPD and their main informal caregivers. Patients will be included during hospitalization for an acute exacerbation. All patients in the study receive standard care (usual care). Besides, patients in the intervention condition who meet two or more criteria of the set of indicators for proactive palliative care will have additionally regular consultations with a specialized palliative care team. The objectives of the PROLONG study are: 1) to assess the discriminating power of the proposed set of indicators (indicator study) and 2) to assess the effects of proactive palliative care for qualifying patients with COPD on the wellbeing of these patients and their informal caregivers (intervention study). The primary outcome measure of the indicator study is time to death for any cause. The primary outcome measure of the intervention study is the change in quality of life measured by the St George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) three months after inclusion.DiscussionThe PROLONG study may lead to better understanding of the conditions to start and the effectiveness of proactive palliative care for patients with COPD. Innovative aspects of the PROLONG study are the use of a set of indicators for proactive palliative care, the active involvement of a specialized palliative care team and the use of a patient-tailored proactive palliative care plan.Trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTR4037


Pain Practice | 2013

Guidelines for neuropathic pain management in patients with cancer: a European survey and comparison

Virginie Piano; Annelies Schalkwijk; Jako Burgers; Stans Verhagen; Hans G. Kress; Yechiel A. Hekster; Michel Lanteri-Minet; Yvonne Engels; Kris Vissers

Between 19% and 39% of patients with cancer pain suffer from neuropathic pain. Its diagnosis and treatment is still challenging. Yet, national clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been developed in several European countries to assist practitioners in managing these patients safely and legally. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of the development and reporting of these CPGs.

Collaboration


Dive into the Stans Verhagen's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kris Vissers

Radboud University Nijmegen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Yvonne Engels

Radboud University Nijmegen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gijs Bleijenberg

Radboud University Nijmegen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeroen Hasselaar

Radboud University Nijmegen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Annelies Schalkwijk

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bregje Thoonsen

Radboud University Nijmegen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J.B. Prins

Radboud University Nijmegen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marieke Groot

Radboud University Nijmegen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Petra Servaes

Radboud University Nijmegen

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge