Stavros Chrysidis

A nationwide non-medical switch from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 in 802 patients with inflammatory arthritis: 1-year clinical outcomes from the DANBIO registry

Objectives According to guidelines, a nationwide non-medical switch from originator (INX, Remicade) to biosimilar infliximab (Remsima, CT-P13) was conducted in Danish patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA). We investigated disease activity before/after switching and retention rates in the DANBIO registry. Methods Disease activities 3 months before and after switch and changes over time were calculated. Flare was defined as change in 28 Joint Disease Activity Score (∆DAS28) ≥1.2 (RA/PsA) or Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (∆ASDAS) ≥1.3 (AxSpA). Crude and adjusted retention rates were compared with a historic cohort of INX-treated patients. Results Eight hundred and two patients switched (403 RA/120 PsA/279 AxSpA; 51% women, age (median (IQR): 55 (44-66)) years). Follow-up was 413 (339–442) days. Prior INX treatment duration was 6.8 (4.3–9.5) years. Disease activities were similar 3 months before/after switch. Crude 1-year CT-P13 retention rate (84.1 (95% CI 81.3 to 86.5)) was similar to the historic IFX cohort (86.2 (95% CI 84.0 to 88.0), p=0.22). The adjusted absolute retention rates were 83.4 (95% CI 80.8 to 86.2) and 86.8% (95% CI 84.8 to 88.8), respectively (p=0.03). In total 132 patients withdrew (lack of effect: 71/132=54%, adverse events: 37/132=28%). Patients with previous INX treatment duration >5 years had longer CT-P13 retention. Conclusion In 802 arthritis patients treated with INX for median >6 years, a nationwide non-medical switch to CT-P13 had no negative impact on disease activity. Adjusted 1-year CT-P13 retention rate was slightly lower than for INX in a historic cohort.

Concomitant fibromyalgia in rheumatoid arthritis is associated with the more frequent use of biological therapy: a cross-sectional study

Objectives: To compare the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and its components in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with and without concomitant fibromyalgia (FM), and to investigate the use of biological treatment in the two groups. Method: Questionnaires developed to diagnose FM were handed out among RA patients during their planned visits. Values for DAS28 were obtained from the DANBIO registry. Demographic data and data on patients’ medical treatment, disease duration, serological and radiological status were retrieved from patients’ files. The χ2 test and an unpaired t-test were applied to investigate group differences in the use of biological therapy, baseline characteristics, patient-reported outcomes, and DAS28 between groups when appropriate. Results: Questionnaires were completed by 162 out of 264 (61%) patients. Twenty-five patients (15.4%) with concomitant FM were identified. No group differences were found regarding disease duration, age, gender, and serological status. Of the RA patients with concomitant FM, 64% were treated with biological therapy vs. 32% of RA patients without concomitant FM (p = 0.002). The mean DAS28 in the FM group was 4.4 compared to 2.9 in the non-FM group (p < 0.001). Elevated DAS28 in the FM group resulted from a high tender joint count (p = 0.003) and a high visual analogue scale (VAS)-global score (p < 0.001). Erosions were more frequent in the non-FM group (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Concomitant FM in patients with RA is associated with a higher DAS28 due to subjective parameters and with the more frequent use of biological treatments. This raises the question of whether the more frequent use of biologics in these patients is justified by inflammation, or is instead due to persistent pain and other centrally mediated symptoms.

Feasibility of a standardized ultrasound examination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a quality improvement among rheumatologists cohort

BackgroundQuality improvement is important to facilitate valid patient outcomes. Standardized examination procedures may improve the validity of US.The aim of this study was to investigate the learning progress for rheumatologists during training of US examination of the hand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsRheumatologists with varying degrees of experience in US were instructed by skilled tutors. The program consisted of two days with hands-on training followed by personal US examinations performed in their individual clinics. Examinations were sent to the tutors for quality control. The US examinations were evaluated according to a scoring sheet containing 144 items. An acceptable examination was defined as > 80% correct scores.ResultsThirteen rheumatologists participated in the study. They included a total of 104 patients with RA. Only few of the initial examinations were scored below 80%, and as experience increased, the scores improved (p = 0.0004). A few participants displayed decreasing scores.The mean time spent performing the standardized examination procedure decreased from 34 min to less than 10 minutes (p = 0.0001).ConclusionWith systematic hands-on training, a rheumatologist can achieve a high level of proficiency in the conduction of US examinations of the joints of the hand in patients with RA. With experience, examination time decreases, while the level of correctness is maintained. The results indicate that US may be applied as a valid measurement tool suitable for clinical practice and in both single- and multi-centre trials.

The role of ultrasound in diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis, what do we know?: An updated review

To clarify if musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) improves early diagnosis of RA when added to the clinical examination of patients with possible arthritis. We performed a systematic literature review of original studies dealing with the value of MSUS in the early diagnosis of RA. Studies were identified using the databases of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library. Only studies in English investigating populations with non-classified arthritis or arthralgia were included. Fifteen original studies investigating the added value of MSUS in diagnosing RA were identified. They differed in sample size, study population, serology status, number of joints investigated and regarding the ultrasound machines and probes used. Thirteen out of 15 studies concluded that use of MSUS had an added value compared to clinical examination and laboratory evaluation alone for diagnosing RA. One study found that MSUS did not add substantial discriminatory value for predicting RA in an early arthritis cohort when added to routine assessment. However, in this study only 16 joints were examined (wrists and MTP 3–5 were not included). One study investigated only seropositive patients and found no significant advantage of MSUS on patient level although a trend was noted. Accordingly, two other studies found MSUS to be useful especially in seronegative patients. The use of MSUS adds value in diagnosing early RA, especially in seronegative arthritis. However, no study to date has documented any effect of DMARD initiation based on MSUS findings (subclinical arthritis) alone. More studies investigating this matter are warranted.

Definitions and reliability assessment of elementary ultrasound lesions in giant cell arteritis: a study from the OMERACT Large Vessel Vasculitis Ultrasound Working Group

Objectives To define the elementary ultrasound (US) lesions in giant cell arteritis (GCA) and to evaluate the reliability of the assessment of US lesions according to these definitions in a web-based reliability exercise. Methods Potential definitions of normal and abnormal US findings of temporal and extracranial large arteries were retrieved by a systematic literature review. As a subsequent step, a structured Delphi exercise was conducted involving an expert panel of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) US Large Vessel Vasculitis Group to agree definitions of normal US appearance and key elementary US lesions of vasculitis of temporal and extracranial large arteries. The reliability of these definitions on normal and abnormal blood vessels was tested on 150 still images and videos in a web-based reliability exercise. Results Twenty-four experts participated in both Delphi rounds. From originally 25 statements, nine definitions were obtained for normal appearance, vasculitis and arteriosclerosis of cranial and extracranial vessels. The ‘halo’ and ‘compression’ signs were the key US lesions in GCA. The reliability of the definitions for normal temporal and axillary arteries, the ‘halo’ sign and the ‘compression’ sign was excellent with inter-rater agreements of 91–99% and mean kappa values of 0.83–0.98 for both inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities of all 25 experts. Conclusions The ‘halo’ and the ‘compression’ signs are regarded as the most important US abnormalities for GCA. The inter-rater and intra-rater agreement of the new OMERACT definitions for US lesions in GCA was excellent.

Assessing Vasculitis in Giant Cell Arteritis by Ultrasound: Results of OMERACT Patient-based Reliability Exercises

Objective. To test the reliability of Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) consensus-based ultrasound definitions for normal and vasculitic temporal and axillary arteries in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) and in controls. Methods. A preliminary 1-day meeting and a full 3-day meeting fulfilling OMERACT Ultrasound Group guidelines were held. Temporal and axillary arteries were examined at 2 timepoints by 12 sonographers on 4 patients with GCA and 2 controls. The aim was to test inter- and intrareader reliability for normal findings, halo sign, and compression sign. In both meetings, patients had established GCA. Pathology was more recent in the full meeting, which was preceded by 6 h of training. Scanning time was 15–20 min instead of 10–13 min. Results. In the preliminary exercise, interreader reliabilities were fair to moderate for the overall diagnosis of GCA (Light κ 0.29–0.51), and poor to fair for identifying vasculitis in the respective anatomical segments (Light κ 0.02–0.46). Intrareader reliabilities were moderate (Cohen κ 0.32–0.64). In the main exercise, interreader reliability was good to excellent (Light κ 0.76–0.86) for the overall diagnosis of GCA, and moderate to good (Light κ 0.46–0.71) for identifying vasculitis in the respective anatomical segments. Intrareader reliability was excellent for diagnosis of GCA (Cohen κ 0.91) and good (Cohen κ 0.71–0.80) for the anatomical segments. Conclusion. OMERACT-derived definitions of halo and compression signs of temporal and axillary arteries are reliable in recent-onset GCA if experienced sonographers (> 300 examinations) have 15–20 min for a standardized examination with prior training and apply > 15 MHz probes.

One year follow-up of a nationwide cohort of patients with inflammatory arthritis, who switched from originator to biosimilar etanercept, focusing on patients who switched back to originator. An observational DANBIO study

Background In Denmark, patients (pts) treated with originator etanercept (ETA) 50 mg SC conducted a mandatory non-medical switch to biosimilar SB4 in April 2016 (switchers). Pts treated with 25 mg ETA or 50 mg powder-solution were not mandated to switch (non-switchers). Some switchers resumed ETA during follow-up (back-switchers). Objectives To investigate the frequency of back-switching after the non-medical switch from ETA to SB4, and in back-switchers to study, 1) baseline characteristics at the time of initial switch (ETA->SB4), 2) reasons for SB4 withdrawal, 3) changes in disease activity during treatment with SB4 and after back-switching. Methods Patient data were retrieved from the DANBIO registry (censored August 2017). For back-switchers, disease activity at the start of SB4 (=baseline) and at the time of back-switching to ETA were compared, and changes in disease activity between the two time points were calculated (=delta values), stratified by indication (RA/PsA/AxSpA). Baseline characteristics of back-switchers were compared to the rest of the switch population (Chi-sq, Mann-Whitney U-test). Abbreviations are shown in table 1. Results 1641 pts switched from ETA to SB4. Of these, 299 (18%) withdrew SB4 therapy during 1 year follow-up and either switched back to ETA (n=120, 7%), started another bDMARD (n=104), died (n=9), were lost to follow-up (n=1) or did not re-start bDMARDs (n=65). Among the 120 back-switchers, SB4 was withdrawn due to LOE (52%), AE (39%), or other/unknown reasons (9%). The reasons for withdrawal of SB4 in back-switchers are listed in table 1. No major safety events occurred. The median time on SB4 before back-switching was 120 (IQR 73–193) days, and the time between stop of SB4 and re-start of ETA was 11–1 days. Baseline characteristics of back-switchers vs the rest of the switch population were similar (all p>0.05). Among back-switchers who stopped SB4 due to LOE, PGA increased during SB4 treatment, whereas CRP and SJC were largely unchanged (table 1). At the date of censoring, 104/120 back-switchers (87%) were still treated with originator ETA (median treatment duration 236 (155–302) days).Abstract FRI0103 – Table 1 Description of ETA-SB4-ETA back-switchers (n=120) Conclusions In a nationwide cohort of 1621 arthritis patients that were switched from ETA to SB4, 7% switched back to ETA. Back-switchers had no distinct clinical or disease characteristics upon start of SB4. AEs prior to back-switching were largely unspecific. In pts who withdrew SB4 due to LOE, PGA had increased. Reasons for back-switching appeared to be predominantly subjective rather than objective (nocebo effect). Originator drug was still available (25 mg or 50 mg powder-solution), which may have encouraged back-switching. References [1] Glintborg, et al. Arthritis Rheum2017;69(suppl 10). [2] Glintborg, et al. Abstract, EULAR2018. Acknowledgements Partly sponsored by Biogen Disclosure of Interest B. Glintborg Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Biogen, Pfizer, I. Sørensen: None declared, E. Omerovic: None declared, F. Mehnert: None declared, N. Manilo: None declared, K. Danebod: None declared, D. Jensen: None declared, H. Nordin: None declared, A. G. Loft Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, O. Hendricks Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Roche, Novartis, S. Chrysidis: None declared, B. Andersen: None declared, J. Raun: None declared, H. Lindegaard: None declared, J. Espesen: None declared, S. Jakobsen: None declared, I. M. Hansen Grant/research support from: Roche, E. Dalsgaard: None declared, D. Pedersen: None declared, S. Kristensen: None declared, A. Linauskas: None declared, L. Andersen: None declared, J. Grydehøj: None declared, N. Krogh: None declared, M. Hetland Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, CellTrion, MSD, Novartis, Orion, Pfizer, Samsung, UCB

Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis—three challenges—consequences of the vasculitis process, osteoporosis, and malignancy: A prospective cohort study protocol

Introduction: Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and giant cell arteritis (GCA) are common inflammatory conditions. The diagnosis of PMR/GCA poses many challenges since there are no specific diagnostic tests. Recent literature emphasizes the ability of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) to assess global disease activity in inflammatory diseases. 18F-FDG PET/CT may lead to the diagnosis at an earlier stage than conventional imaging and may also assess response to therapy. With respect to the management of PMR/GCA, there are 3 significant areas of concern as follows: vasculitis process/vascular stiffness, malignancy, and osteoporosis. Methods and analysis: All patients with suspected PMR/GCR referred to the Rheumatology section of Medicine Department at Svendborg Hospital, Denmark. The 4 separate studies in the current protocol focus on: the association of clinical picture of PMR/GCA with PET findings; the validity of 18F-FDG PET/CT scan for diagnosis of PMR/GCA compared with temporal artery biopsy; the prevalence of newly diagnosed malignancies in patients with PMR/GCA, or PMR-like syndrome, with the focus on diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT scan compared with conventional workup (ie, chest X-ray/abdominal ultrasound); and the impact of disease process, and also steroid treatment on bone mineral density, body composition, and vasculitis/vascular stiffness in PMR/GCA patients. Ethics and dissemination: The study has been approved by the Regional Ethics Committee of the Region of Southern Denmark (identification number: S-20160098) and Danish Data Protection Agency (J.nr 16/40522). Results of the study will be disseminated via publications in peer-reviewed journals, and presentation at national and international conferences.

One-Year Clinical Outcomes in 1623 Patients with Inflammatory Arthritis Who Switched from Originator to Biosimilar Etanercept – an Observational Study from the Danish Danbio Registry

For a searchable version of these abstracts, please visit www.acrabstracts.org.

FRI0518 Ultrasound Definitions for Vasculitis in Cranial and Large Vessel Giant Cell Arteritis: Results of A Delphi Survey of The Omeract Ultrasound Large Vessel Vasculitis Group

Background In a systematic literature review (SLR), we identified halo sign, stenosis, occlusion, compression sign and a decreased vessel wall pulsation as elementary ultrasound (US) lesions in giant cell arteritis (GCA). Objectives To establish consensus-based definitions for the key elementary US lesions in GCA. Methods We invited 25 rheumatologists from 13 countries experienced in musculoskeletal and vascular US to participate in a Delphi exercise. Based on the results from the SLR and international expert consensus a questionnaire was developed including 12 statements on the definitions of normal temporal and extra-cranial large arteries, arteriosclerosis, halo sign, stenosis, occlusion, compression sign, and vessel wall pulsation. The experts were asked to express their level of agreement or disagreement with the proposed statements. A consensus was defined as agreement of ≥75% of participants. Results The response rate was 24/25 (96%) in round 1 and 24/24 (100%) in round 2. A consensus was achieved for 9/9 Delphi statements [normal temporal and extra-cranial large arteries, arteriosclerosis, halo sign, stenosis of temporal and extra-cranial large arteries, occlusion, compression sign (temporal arteries), US assessment of compression sign (temporal arteries) in round 1. In round 2, 3/3 Delphi statements (arteriosclerosis, halo sign, stenosis of temporal arteries) were redefined. The statements on vessel wall pulsation (definition and assessment) and measurement of vessel wall thickness did not reach the threshold for consensus. The halo and compression signs were deemed to be the most important US signs for GCA with 100% and 83.3% expert agreement, respectively. Conclusions This is the first international consensus on definitions for elementary US lesions in GCA. The next steps of the OMERACT project will be web- and patients based exercises testing the reliability of the new definitions. Disclosure of Interest None declared