Stefan Fruehauf

Plerixafor and G-CSF versus placebo and G-CSF to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma.

This phase 3, multicenter, randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the safety and efficacy of plerixafor with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma. Patients received G-CSF (10 microg/kg) subcutaneously daily for up to 8 days. Beginning on day 4 and continuing daily for up to 4 days, patients received either plerixafor (240 microg/kg) or placebo subcutaneously. Starting on day 5, patients began daily apheresis for up to 4 days or until more than or equal to 6 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg were collected. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who collected more than or equal to 6 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in less than or equal to 2 aphereses. A total of 106 of 148 (71.6%) patients in the plerixafor group and 53 of 154 (34.4%) patients in the placebo group met the primary endpoint (P < .001). A total of 54% of plerixafor-treated patients reached target after one apheresis, whereas 56% of the placebo-treated patients required 4 aphereses to reach target. The most common adverse events related to plerixafor were gastrointestinal disorders and injection site reactions. Plerixafor and G-CSF were well tolerated, and significantly more patients collected the optimal CD34(+) cell/kg target for transplantation earlier compared with G-CSF alone. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00103662.

Synergistic activity of the new ABL-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571 and chemotherapeutic drugs on BCR-ABL-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia cells.

The ABL-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571 (formerly CGP57148B) induced cytogenetic remissions in 33% of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients in a phase I trial (Druker et al 1999). Combination therapy may increase this proportion. We tested whether combinations of STI571 and cytarabine or other chemotherapeutic agents such as hydroxyurea, mafosfamide or etoposide would display synergistic activity in BCR-ABL-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) cell lines derived from patients in blast crisis. In addition, the toxicity of these combinations on BCR-ABL-negative cells was investigated. A tetrazolium-based MTT assay was used to quantify growth inhibition after 48 h of exposure to cytotoxic agents alone and in simultaneous combination with STI571. The drug interactions were analyzed using the median-effect method of Chou and Talalay. The combination index (CI) was calculated according to the classic isobologram equation. At growth inhibition levels of over 50%, STI571 + cytarabine as well as STI571 + etoposide were significantly synergistic (CI < 1, P < 0.05) in the BCR-ABL-positive cell lines evaluated. At 60% inhibition or higher, a similar synergistic pattern became apparent for STI571 + mafosfamide (P < 0.05), while STI571 + hydroxyurea showed ambiguous, cell line-dependent synergism (BV173), additivity (EM-3) or antagonism (K562) in CML cell lines. Furthermore, the BCR-ABL-negative HL-60, KG1A and normal CD34+ progenitor cells were not affected by 0.8 μM STI571, a concentration which produced more than 50% growth inhibition in all BCR-ABL-positive cells tested, and no potentiation of growth inhibition was observed in these BCR-ABL-negative cells when STI571 was combined with chemotherapeutic agents. Our in vitro data with CML blast crisis cell lines strongly suggest that combinations of STI571 with cytarabine or etoposide be rapidly considered for clinical testing.

Dynamics of BCR-ABL mRNA expression in first-line therapy of chronic myelogenous leukemia patients with imatinib or interferon α/ara-C

We sought to determine dynamics of BCR-ABL mRNA expression levels in 139 patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in early chronic phase, randomized to receive imatinib (n=69) or interferon (IFN)/Ara-C (n=70). The response was sequentially monitored by cytogenetics from bone marrow metaphases (n=803) and qualitative and quantitative RT-PCR from peripheral blood samples (n=1117). Complete cytogenetic response (CCR) was achieved in 60 (imatinib, 87%) vs 10 patients (IFN/Ara-C, 14%) after a median observation time of 24 months. Within the first year after CCR, best median ratio BCR-ABL/ABL was 0.087%, (imatinib, n=48) vs 0.27% (IFN/Ara-C, n=9, P=0.025). BCR-ABL was undetectable in 25 cases by real-time PCR, but in only four patients by nested PCR. Median best response in patients with relapse after CCR was 0.24% (n=3) as compared to 0.029% in patients with continuous remission (n=52, P=0.029). We conclude that (i) treatment with imatinib in newly diagnosed CML patients is associated with a rapid decrease of BCR-ABL transcript levels; (ii) nested PCR may reveal residual BCR-ABL transcripts in samples that are negative by real-time PCR; (iii) BCR-ABL transcript levels parallel cytogenetic response, and (iv) imatinib is superior to IFN/Ara-C in terms of the speed and degree of molecular responses, but residual disease is rarely eliminated.

A combination of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and plerixafor mobilizes more primitive peripheral blood progenitor cells than G-CSF alone: results of a European phase II study

BACKGROUND AIMS Previous studies in xenograft models have shown that human peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) mobilized with the CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor (AMD3100) have a higher bone marrow (BM) reconstitution potential than granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized PBPC. METHODS PBPC obtained during G-CSF-supported mobilization before and after a supplementary administration of AMD3100 from patients with multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkins lymphoma (n=15; phase II study) were investigated for co-expression of primitive and lineage-associated markers, their proliferative activity in vitro and repopulation potential after clinical transplantation. RESULTS A significant increase in primitive CD34+ CD38(-) cells was observed in intraindividual comparisons of all patients after administration of G-CSF+AMD3100 (peripheral blood: median 8-fold, range 2,4-fold - 39-fold) compared with G-CSF alone. Using a long-term culture-initiating cell assay, this increase was confirmed. After transplantation of G-CSF+AMD3100-mobilized PBPC, the time to leukocyte reconstitution > 1 x 10(3)/microL and platelet reconstitution > 2 x 10(4)/microL was 14 (10-19 days) and 13 days (10-15 days), respectively. A complete and stable hematologic reconstitution (platelets > 1.5 x 10(5)/microL) was observed in 91% of all patients within 35 days. CONCLUSIONS An additional application of AMD3100 to a standard G-CSF mobilization regimen leads to a significant increase in primitive PBPC with high repopulation capacity.

Synergistic activity of imatinib and 17-AAG in imatinib-resistant CML cells overexpressing BCR-ABL – Inhibition of P-glycoprotein function by 17-AAG

Overexpression of BCR-ABL and P-glycoprotein (Pgp) are two of the known mechanisms of imatinib resistance. As combination therapy may allow to overcome drug resistance, we investigated the effect of combination treatment with imatinib and 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG), a heat-shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitor, on different imatinib-sensitive and imatinib-resistant CML cell lines. In imatinib-sensitive cells, combination index (CI) values obtained using the method of Chou and Talalay indicated additive (CI=1) or marginally antagonistic (CI>1) effects following simultaneous treatment with imatinib and 17-AAG. In imatinib-resistant cells both drugs acted synergistically (CI<1). In primary chronic-phase CML cells additive or synergistic effects of the combination of imatinib plus 17-AAG were discernible. Annexin V/propidium iodide staining showed that the activity of imatinib plus 17-AAG is mediated by apoptosis. Combination treatment with imatinib plus 17-AAG was more effective in reducing the BCR-ABL protein level than 17-AAG alone. Monotherapy with 17-AAG decreased P-glycoprotein activity, which may increase intracellular imatinib levels and contribute to the sensitization of CML cells to imatinib. The results suggest that combination of imatinib and 17-AAG may be useful to overcome imatinib resistance in a clinical setting.

It's moving day: factors affecting peripheral blood stem mobilization and strategies for improvement

Mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) have become the main source for autologous or allogeneic transplantation following myeloablative therapy in patients with haematolymphoid malignancies or solid tumours. Classical strategies for PBSC mobilization include administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone or in combination with other cytokines or myelosuppressive chemotherapy. PBSC mobilization and collection have been optimized in numerous clinical trials, but a significant proportion of patients fails mobilization. In recent years, some of the underlying physiology has been elucidated, leading to the development of new mobilization strategies. Expression of the G-CSF receptor on stem cells is not required for mobilization. G-CSF or myelosuppressive therapy act via secondary pathways, including the chemokine stromal-derived factor-1 and its receptor CXCR4. New chemokine receptor agonists lead to a rapid and substantial PBSC mobilization. The most advanced data are available for AMD-3100, which acts synergistically with G-CSF in normal donors. This CXCR4 ligand appears to mobilize more primitive PBSC with increased repopulation capacity when compared with G-CSF. Wider recognition of these new developments may enable sufficient PBSC to be obtained for transplantation in poorly mobilizing patients, thus enabling them to receive potentially curative treatment.

Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells for autologous transplant in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma patients by plerixafor and G-CSF and detection of tumor cell mobilization by PCR in multiple myeloma patients

This report describes the first investigational use of plerixafor in Europe and the determination of tumor cell mobilization by polymerase chain-reaction after plerixafor treatment in a subset of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Thirty-five patients (31 MM and 4 NHL) received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (10 μg/kg) each morning for 4 days. Starting the evening of Day 4, patients recieved plerixafor 0.24 mg/kg. Apheresis was initiated 10–11 h later, in the morning of Day 5. This regimen of G-CSF treatment each morning before apheresis and plerixafor treatment in the evening was repeated for up to 5 consecutive days. Mobilization with plerixafor and G-CSF resulted in a median 2.6-fold increase in peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cell count compared with before plerixafor treatment. All patients collected ⩾2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg and 32 of 35 patients collected ⩾5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. After plerixafor treatment, 3 of 7 patients had a small increase and 4 of 7 patients had a small decrease in PB tumor cells. No G-CSF was given post transplant. The median number of days to polymorphonuclear leukocyte and platelet engraftment was 14.0 and 11.0, respectively. There were no reports of graft failure. Plerixafor was generally well tolerated. Mobilization of PB CD34+ cells was consistent with previous clinical trials. The addition of plerixafor did not significantly increase the relative number of PB MM tumor cells.

Plerixafor inhibits chemotaxis toward SDF-1 and CXCR4-mediated stroma contact in a dose-dependent manner resulting in increased susceptibility of BCR-ABL+ cell to Imatinib and Nilotinib.

Despite Imatinibs remarkable success in chronic myelogenous leukemia treatment, monotherapy frequently causes resistance, underlining the rationale for combination chemotherapy. A potential approach would be interrupting the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis using the selective CXCR4 antagonist Plerixafor (previously AMD3100), as this axis has been reported to provide survival-enhancing effects to myeloid progenitor cells. By efficient CXCR4 blocking in the CXCR4+/BCR-ABL+ cell line BV-173, plerixafor (1–100 μM) significantly inhibits SDF-1α-mediated chemotaxis and cell migration toward the murine stroma cell line FBMD-1. Furthermore, plerixafor also significantly (10–100 μM) increased the detachment rate of SDF-1-mediated/VCAM-1-associated cell adherence under shear stress. Using a stroma-dependent coculture assay, plerixafor sensitized BCR-ABL+ cells toward tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Because the level of cell killing nearly reached that of samples cultured without stroma, a cell–cell interaction disruption seems to improve the efficacy of BCR-ABL-targeting drugs. In addition, we could show that exposure of BCR-ABL+ cells to Imatinib or Nilotinib induced an increase in surface CXCR4 expression. Our data suggest that for BCR-ABL+ leukemia, the selective blocking of the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis by plerixafor is a potential mechanism to overcome the protective effect of the bone marrow environment, thereby increasing the therapeutic potency of anti-BCR-ABL drugs and the therapeutic window.

Level of CD 20-expression and efficacy of rituximab treatment in patients with resistant or relapsing B-cell prolymphocytic leukemia and B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Rituximab (IDEC C2B8) is a chimeric human-mouse monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody that has been proven to be effective for the treatment of patients with CD20 positive leukemia and lymphoma. The level of CD20-expression in patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) is low in comparison to other B-cell lymphomas and normal B-cells. Previous experience with rituximab treatment in small series of patients with B-CLL suggest that it is less effective in B-CLL than in follicular lymphomas. We analyzed the correlation between CD20-expression level and efficacy of rituximab treatment in eight patients with refractory or relapsed B-CLL and two patients with B-cell prolymphocytic leukemia (B-PLL). We could not identify any correlation between CD20-expression and efficacy of rituximab treatment.

Imatinib combined with mitoxantrone/etoposide and cytarabine is an effective induction therapy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in myeloid blast crisis.

Despite advances in drug therapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo‐SCT), the prognosis of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in blast crisis remains poor. Imatinib has demonstrated synergistic effects in vitro with mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine.