Stefan J. Scherer

Bevacizumab in Combination With Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Biomarker Evaluation From the AVAGAST Randomized Phase III Trial

PURPOSE The AVAGAST study showed that adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer improves progression-free survival and tumor response rate but not overall survival. To examine the hypothesis that angiogenic markers may have predictive value for bevacizumab efficacy in gastric cancer, AVAGAST included a prospective, mandatory biomarker program. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer were randomly assigned to bevacizumab (n = 387) or placebo (n = 387) in combination with chemotherapy. Blood and tumor tissue samples were collected at baseline. Prespecified biomarkers included plasma vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), protein expression of neuropilin-1, and VEGF receptors-1 and -2 (VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2). Correlations between biomarkers and clinical outcomes were assessed by using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS Plasma was available from 712 patients (92%), and tumor samples were available from 727 patients (94%). Baseline plasma VEGF-A levels and tumor neuropilin-1 expression were identified as potential predictors of bevacizumab efficacy. Patients with high baseline plasma VEGF-A levels showed a trend toward improved overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.93) versus patients with low VEGF-A levels (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.31; interaction P = .07). Patients with low baseline expression of neuropilin-1 also showed a trend toward improved overall survival (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.97) versus patients with high neuropilin-1 expression (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.40; interaction P = .06). For both biomarkers, subgroup analyses demonstrated significance only in patients from non-Asian regions. CONCLUSION Plasma VEGF-A and tumor neuropilin-1 are strong biomarker candidates for predicting clinical outcome in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with bevacizumab.

VEGF pathway genetic variants as biomarkers of treatment outcome with bevacizumab: an analysis of data from the AViTA and AVOREN randomised trials

BACKGROUND No biomarkers that could guide patient selection for treatment with the anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody bevacizumab have been identified. We assessed whether genetic variants in the VEGF pathway could act as biomarkers for bevacizumab treatment outcome. METHODS We investigated DNA from white patients from two phase 3 randomised studies. In AViTA, patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine and erlotinib plus either bevacizumab or placebo. In AVOREN, patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma were randomly assigned to receive interferon alfa-2a plus either bevacizumab or placebo. We assessed the correlation of 138 SNPs in the VEGF pathway with progression-free survival and overall survival in a subpopulation of patients from AViTA. Significant findings were confirmed in a subpopulation of patients from AVOREN and functionally studied at the molecular level. FINDINGS We investigated DNA of 154 patients from AViTA, of whom 77 received bevacizumab, and 110 patients from AVOREN, of whom 59 received bevacizumab. Only rs9582036, a SNP in VEGF receptor 1 (VEGFR1 or FLT1), was significantly associated with overall survival in the bevacizumab group of AViTA after correction for multiplicity (per-allele hazard ratio [HR] 2·1, 95% CI 1·45-3·06, p=0·00014). This SNP was also associated with progression-free survival (per-allele HR 1·89, 1·31-2·71, p=0·00081) in bevacizumab-treated patients from AViTA. AC and CC carriers of this SNP exhibited HRs for overall survival of 2·0 (1·19-3·36; p=0·0091) and 4·72 (2·08-10·68; p=0·0002) relative to AA carriers. No effects were seen in placebo-treated patients and a significant genotype by treatment interaction (p=0·041) was recorded, indicating that the VEGFR1 locus containing this SNP serves as a predictive marker for bevacizumab treatment outcome in AViTA. Fine-mapping experiments of this locus identified rs7993418, a synonymous SNP affecting tyrosine 1213 in the VEGFR1 tyrosine-kinase domain, as the functional variant underlying the association. This SNP causes a shift in codon usage, leading to increased VEGFR1 expression and downstream VEGFR1 signalling. This VEGFR1 locus correlated significantly with progression-free survival (HR 1·81, 1·08-3·05; p=0·033) but not overall survival (HR 0·91, 0·45-1·82, p=0·78) in the bevacizumab group in AVOREN. INTERPRETATION A locus in VEGFR1 correlates with increased VEGFR1 expression and poor outcome of bevacizumab treatment. Prospective assessment is underway to validate the predictive value of this novel biomarker. FUNDING F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Predictive Impact of Circulating Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Four Phase III Trials Evaluating Bevacizumab

Purpose: We evaluated the prognostic and predictive use of circulating VEGF-A levels in phase III trials of bevacizumab in colorectal cancer, lung cancer, and renal cell carcinoma. Methods: Baseline plasma samples from 1,816 patients were analyzed for VEGF-A using an ELISA, which recognizes the major isoforms with equivalent sensitivity. HR and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for study end points were estimated using Cox regression analysis. A subset of matched archival tumor samples was analyzed for VEGF-A expression using in situ hybridization. Results: Higher VEGF-A levels showed trends toward adverse prognostic significance in the control arms of multiple trials, reaching statistical significance for overall survival (OS) in AVF2107 (highest vs. lowest 50%: HR = 1.76; 95% CI, 1.28–2.41), AVAiL (HR = 1.52; 95% CI, 1.16–2.00), and AVOREN (HR = 1.67; 95% CI, 1.18–2.36). In predictive analyses, the HRs for progression-free survival were similar across low and high VEGF-A subgroups and favored bevacizumab-containing treatment. In the low VEGF-A subgroups, HRs (95% CIs) were 0.61 (0.43–0.87) in AVF2107, 0.71 (0.43–1.16) in E4599, 0.74 (0.59–0.94) in AVAiL (low-dose), 0.89 (0.70–1.13) in AVAiL (high-dose), and 0.56 (0.40–0.78) in AVOREN. Analyses of OS data have shown similar results. No correlation between primary tumor VEGF-A expression and plasma VEGF-A levels was observed. Conclusions: In this comprehensive evaluation, pretreatment total circulating VEGF-A was prognostic for outcome in metastatic colorectal, lung, and renal cell cancers, but it was not predictive for bevacizumab-based treatment benefit. Clin Cancer Res; 19(4); 929–37. ©2012 AACR.

Biomarker results from the AVADO phase 3 trial of first-line bevacizumab plus docetaxel for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer

Background:Combining bevacizumab with first-line chemotherapy significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). However, identification of patients benefitting most from bevacizumab remains elusive. The AVADO trial included an extensive optional exploratory biomarker programme.Methods:Patients with HER2-negative mBC were randomised to receive docetaxel with placebo or bevacizumab. The primary end point was PFS. Plasma samples were analysed using a multiplex ELISA. Blood mRNA expression was assessed using quantitative PCR. Tumour tissue samples were analysed by immunohistochemistry. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) involved in the VEGF pathway were analysed in germline DNA.Results:Samples for biomarker analysis were available from 24–54% of the 736 treated patients (depending on specimen type). The most consistent potential predictive effect was observed with plasma VEGF-A and VEGFR-2; high baseline concentrations were associated with greater treatment effect. Blood mRNA analyses suggested a greater bevacizumab effect in patients with high VEGF121. No consistent predictive effect was seen for tumour neuropilin or other candidate tumour markers by immunohistochemistry, or for any of the SNPs investigated.Conclusion:Plasma VEGF-A and VEGFR-2 are potential predictive markers for bevacizumab efficacy, supporting findings in gastric and pancreatic cancers. Plasma VEGF-A is being evaluated prospectively in mBC in the MERiDiAN trial.

Primary Colorectal Cancers and Their Subsequent Hepatic Metastases Are Genetically Different: Implications for Selection of Patients for Targeted Treatment

Purpose: In the era of DNA-guided personalized cancer treatment, it is essential to conduct predictive analysis on the tissue that matters. Here, we analyzed genetic differences between primary colorectal adenocarcinomas (CRC) and their respective hepatic metastasis. Experimental Design: The primary CRC and the subsequent hepatic metastasis of 21 patients with CRC were analyzed using targeted deep-sequencing of DNA isolated from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded archived material. Results: We have interrogated the genetic constitution of a designed “Cancer Mini-Genome” consisting of all exons of 1,264 genes associated with pathways relevant to cancer. In total, 6,696 known and 1,305 novel variations were identified in 1,174 and 667 genes, respectively, including 817 variants that potentially altered protein function. On average, 83 (SD = 69) potentially function-impairing variations were gained in the metastasis and 70 (SD = 48) variations were lost, showing that the primary tumor and hepatic metastasis are genetically significantly different. Besides novel and known variations in genes such as KRAS, BRAF, KDR, FLT1, PTEN, and PI3KCA, aberrations in the up/downstream genes of EGFR/PI3K/VEGF-pathways and other pathways (mTOR, TGFβ, etc.) were also detected, potentially influencing therapeutic responsiveness. Chemotherapy between removal of the primary tumor and the metastasis (N = 11) did not further increase the amount of genetic variation. Conclusion: Our study indicates that the genetic characteristics of the hepatic metastases are different from those of the primary CRC tumor. As a consequence, the choice of treatment in studies investigating targeted therapies should ideally be based on the genetic properties of the metastasis rather than on those of the primary tumor. Clin Cancer Res; 18(3); 688–99. ©2011 AACR.

89Zr-Bevacizumab PET Visualizes Heterogeneous Tracer Accumulation in Tumor Lesions of Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients and Differential Effects of Antiangiogenic Treatment

No validated predictive biomarkers for antiangiogenic treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) exist. Tumor vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) level may be useful. We determined tumor uptake of 89Zr-bevacizumab, a VEGF-A–binding PET tracer, in mRCC patients before and during antiangiogenic treatment in a pilot study. Methods: Patients underwent 89Zr-bevacizumab PET scans at baseline and 2 and 6 wk after initiating either bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 wk) with interferon-α (3–9 million IU 3 times/wk) (n = 11) or sunitinib (50 mg daily, 4 of every 6 wk) (n = 11). Standardized uptake values were compared with plasma VEGF-A and time to disease progression. Results: 89Zr-bevacizumab PET scans visualized 125 evaluable tumor lesions in 22 patients, with a median SUVmax (maximum standardized uptake value) of 6.9 (range, 2.3–46.9). Bevacizumab/interferon-α induced a mean change in tumor SUVmax of −47.0% (range, −84.7 to +20.0%; P < 0.0001) at 2 wk and an additional −9.7% (range, −44.8 to +38.9%; P = 0.015) at 6 wk. In the sunitinib group, the mean change in tumor SUVmax was −14.3% at 2 wk (range, −80.4 to +269.9; P = 0.006), but at 6 wk the mean change in tumor SUVmax was +72.6% (range, −46.4 to +236%; P < 0.0001) above baseline. SUVmax was not related to plasma VEGF-A at all scan moments. A baseline mean tumor SUVmax greater than 10.0 in the 3 most intense lesions corresponded with longer time to disease progression (89.7 vs. 23.0 wk; hazard ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.05–1.00). Conclusion: Tumor uptake of 89Zr-bevacizumab is high in mRCC, with remarkable interpatient and intrapatient heterogeneity. Bevacizumab/interferon-α strongly decreases tumor uptake whereas sunitinib results in a modest reduction with an overshoot after 2 drug-free weeks. High baseline tumor SUVmax was associated with longer time to progression.

Identification and Analysis of In Vivo VEGF Downstream Markers Link VEGF Pathway Activity with Efficacy of Anti- VEGF Therapies

Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify conserved pharmacodynamic and potential predictive biomarkers of response to anti-VEGF therapy using gene expression profiling in preclinical tumor models and in patients. Experimental Design: Surrogate markers of VEGF inhibition [VEGF-dependent genes or VEGF-dependent vasculature (VDV)] were identified by profiling gene expression changes induced in response to VEGF blockade in preclinical tumor models and in human biopsies from patients treated with anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies. The potential value of VDV genes as candidate predictive biomarkers was tested by correlating high or low VDV gene expression levels in pretreatment clinical samples with the subsequent clinical efficacy of bevacizumab (anti-VEGF)-containing therapy. Results: We show that VDV genes, including direct and more distal VEGF downstream endothelial targets, enable detection of VEGF signaling inhibition in mouse tumor models and human tumor biopsies. Retrospective analyses of clinical trial data indicate that patients with higher VDV expression in pretreatment tumor samples exhibited improved clinical outcome when treated with bevacizumab-containing therapies. Conclusions: In this work, we identified surrogate markers (VDV genes) for in vivo VEGF signaling in tumors and showed clinical data supporting a correlation between pretreatment VEGF bioactivity and the subsequent efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy. We propose that VDV genes are candidate biomarkers with the potential to aid the selection of novel indications as well as patients likely to respond to anti-VEGF therapy. The data presented here define a diagnostic biomarker hypothesis based on translational research that warrants further evaluation in additional retrospective and prospective trials. Clin Cancer Res; 19(13); 3681–92. ©2013 AACR.

Tumor‐derived microparticles induce bone marrow‐derived cell mobilization and tumor homing: A process regulated by osteopontin

Acute chemotherapy can induce rapid bone‐marrow derived pro‐angiogenic cell (BMDC) mobilization and tumor homing, contributing to tumor regrowth. To study the contribution of tumor cells to tumor regrowth following therapy, we focused on tumor‐derived microparticles (TMPs). EMT/6 murine‐mammary carcinoma cells exposed to paclitaxel chemotherapy exhibited an increased number of TMPs and significantly altered their angiogenic properties. Similarly, breast cancer patients had increased levels of plasma MUC‐1+TMPs following chemotherapy. In addition, TMPs from cells exposed to paclitaxel induced higher BMDC mobilization and colonization, but had no increased effect on angiogenesis in Matrigel plugs and tumors than TMPs from untreated cells. Since TMPs abundantly express osteopontin, a protein known to participate in BMDC trafficking, the impact of osteopontin‐depleted TMPs on BMDC mobilization, colonization, and tumor angiogenesis was examined. Although EMT/6 tumors grown in mice inoculated with osteopontin‐depleted TMPs had lower numbers of BMDC infiltration and microvessel density when compared with EMT/6 tumors grown in mice inoculated with wild‐type TMPs, no significant difference in tumor growth was seen between the two groups. However, when BMDCs from paclitaxel‐treated mice were injected into wild‐type EMT/6‐bearing mice, a substantial increase in tumor growth and BMDC infiltration was detected compared to osteopontin‐depleted EMT/6‐bearing mice injected with BMDCs from paclitaxel‐treated mice. Collectively, our results suggest that osteopontin expressed by TMPs play an important role in BMDC mobilization and colonization of tumors, but is not sufficient to enhance the angiogenic activity in tumors.

Tumor‐Initiating Cells of Various Tumor Types Exhibit Differential Angiogenic Properties and React Differently to Antiangiogenic Drugs

Tumor‐initiating cells (TICs) are a subtype of tumor cells believed to be critical for initiating tumorigenesis. We sought to determine the angiogenic properties of TICs in different tumor types including U‐87MG (glioblastoma), HT29 (colon), MCF7 (breast), A549 (non‐small‐cell lung), and PANC1 (pancreatic) cancers. Long‐term cultures grown either as monolayers (“TIC‐low”) or as nonadherent tumor spheres (“TIC‐high”) were generated. The TIC‐high fractions exhibited increased expression of stem cell surface markers, high aldehyde dehydrogenase activity, high expression of p21, and resistance to standard chemotherapy in comparison to TIC‐low fractions. Furthermore, TICs from U‐87MG and HT29 but not from MCF7, A549, and PANC1 tumor types possess increased angiogenic activity. Consequently, the efficacy of vascular endothelial growth factor‐A (VEGF‐A) neutralizing antibody is limited only to those tumors that are dependent on VEGF‐A activity. In addition, such therapy had little or reversed antiangiogenic effects on tumors that do not necessarily rely on VEGF‐dependent angiogenesis. Differential angiogenic activity and antiangiogenic therapy sensitivity were also observed in TICs of the same tumor type, suggesting redundant angiogenic pathways. Collectively, our results suggest that the efficacy of antiangiogenic drugs is dependent on the angiogenic properties of TICs and, therefore, can serve as a possible biomarker to predict antiangiogenic treatment efficacy. Stem Cells2012;30:1831–1841

Differential Therapeutic Effects of Anti–VEGF-A Antibody in Different Tumor Models: Implications for Choosing Appropriate Tumor Models for Drug Testing

We previously reported that the host response to certain chemotherapies can induce primary tumor regrowth, angiogenesis, and even metastases in mice, but the possible impact of anti–VEGF-A therapy in this context has not been fully explored. We, therefore, used combinations of anti–VEGF-A with chemotherapy on various tumor models in mice, including primary tumors, experimental lung metastases, and spontaneous lung metastases of 4T1-breast and CT26-colon murine cancer cell lines. Our results show that a combined treatment with anti–VEGF-A and folinic acid/5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) but not with anti–VEGF-A and gemcitabine/cisplatinum (Gem/CDDP) enhances the treatment outcome partly due to reduced angiogenesis, in both primary tumors and experimental lung metastases models. However, neither treatment group exhibited an improved treatment outcome in the spontaneous lung metastases model, nor were changes in endothelial cell numbers found at metastatic sites. As chemotherapy has recently been shown to induce tumor cell invasion, we tested the invasion properties of tumor cells when exposed to plasma from FOLFOX-treated mice or patients with cancer. While plasma from FOLFOX-treated mice or patients induced invasion properties of tumor cells, the combination of anti–VEGF-A and FOLFOX abrogated these effects, despite the reduced plasma VEGF-A levels detected in FOLFOX-treated mice. These results suggest that the therapeutic impact of antiangiogenic drugs varies in different tumor models, and that anti–VEGF-A therapy can block the invasion properties of tumor cells in response to chemotherapy. These results may implicate an additional therapeutic role for anti–VEGF-A when combined with chemotherapy. Mol Cancer Ther; 13(1); 202–13. ©2013 AACR.