Stefania Di Marco

HDACS, HISTONE DEACETYLATION AND GENE TRANSCRIPTION: FROM MOLECULAR BIOLOGY TO CANCER THERAPEUTICS

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) and histone acetyl transferases (HATs) are two counteracting enzyme families whose enzymatic activity controls the acetylation state of protein lysine residues, notably those contained in the N-terminal extensions of the core histones. Acetylation of histones affects gene expression through its influence on chromatin conformation. In addition, several non-histone proteins are regulated in their stability or biological function by the acetylation state of specific lysine residues. HDACs intervene in a multitude of biological processes and are part of a multiprotein family in which each member has its specialized functions. In addition, HDAC activity is tightly controlled through targeted recruitment, protein-protein interactions and post-translational modifications. Control of cell cycle progression, cell survival and differentiation are among the most important roles of these enzymes. Since these processes are affected by malignant transformation, HDAC inhibitors were developed as antineoplastic drugs and are showing encouraging efficacy in cancer patients.

The crystal structure of the quorum sensing protein TraR bound to its autoinducer and target DNA

The quorum sensing system allows bacteria to sense their cell density and initiate an altered pattern of gene expression after a sufficient quorum of cells has accumulated. In Agrobacterium tumefaciens, quorum sensing controls conjugal transfer of the tumour‐ inducing plasmid, responsible for plant crown gall disease. The core components of this system are the transcriptional regulator TraR and its inducing ligand N‐(3‐oxo‐octanoyl)‐L‐homoserine lactone. This complex binds DNA and activates gene expression. We have determined the crystal structure of TraR in complex with its autoinducer and target DNA (PDB code 1h0m). The protein is dimeric, with each monomer composed of an N‐terminal domain, which binds the ligand in an enclosed cavity far from the dimerization region, and a C‐terminal domain, which binds DNA via a helix–turn–helix motif. The structure reveals an asymmetric homodimer, with one monomer longer than the other. The N‐terminal domain resembles GAF/PAS domains, normally fused to catalytic signalling domains. In TraR, the gene fusion is between a GAF/PAS domain and a DNA‐binding domain, resulting in a specific transcriptional regulator involved in quorum sensing.

Substrate binding to histone deacetylases as shown by the crystal structure of the HDAC8-substrate complex.

Histone deacetylases (HDACs)—an enzyme family that deacetylates histones and non‐histone proteins—are implicated in human diseases such as cancer, and the first‐generation of HDAC inhibitors are now in clinical trials. Here, we report the 2.0 Å resolution crystal structure of a catalytically inactive HDAC8 active‐site mutant, Tyr306Phe, bound to an acetylated peptidic substrate. The structure clarifies the role of active‐site residues in the deacetylation reaction and substrate recognition. Notably, the structure shows the unexpected role of a conserved residue at the active‐site rim, Asp 101, in positioning the substrate by directly interacting with the peptidic backbone and imposing a constrained cis‐conformation. A similar interaction is observed in a new hydroxamate inhibitor–HDAC8 structure that we also solved. The crucial role of Asp 101 in substrate and inhibitor recognition was confirmed by activity and binding assays of wild‐type HDAC8 and Asp101Ala, Tyr306Phe and Asp101Ala/Tyr306Phe mutants.

Interdomain Communication in Hepatitis C Virus Polymerase Abolished by Small-Molecule Inhibitors Bound to a Novel Allosteric Site

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) polymerase is required for replication of the viral genome and is a key target for therapeutic intervention against HCV. We have determined the crystal structures of the HCV polymerase complexed with two indole-based allosteric inhibitors at 2.3- and 2.4-Å resolution. The structures show that these inhibitors bind to a site on the surface of the thumb domain. A cyclohexyl and phenyl ring substituents, bridged by an indole moiety, fill two closely spaced pockets, whereas a carboxylate substituent forms a salt bridge with an exposed arginine side chain. Interestingly, in the apoenzyme, the inhibitor binding site is occupied by a small α-helix at the tip of the N-terminal loop that connects the fingers and thumb domains. Thus, these molecules inhibit the enzyme by preventing formation of intramolecular contacts between these two domains and consequently precluding their coordinated movements during RNA synthesis. Our structures identify a novel mechanism by which a new class of allosteric inhibitors inhibits the HCV polymerase and open the way to the development of novel antiviral agents against this clinically relevant human pathogen.

The three-dimensional structure of caspase-8: an initiator enzyme in apoptosis.

BACKGROUND In the initial stages of Fas-mediated apoptosis the cysteine protease caspase-8 is recruited to the cell receptor as a zymogen (procaspase-8) and is incorporated into the death-signalling complex. Procaspase-8 is subsequently activated leading to a cascade of proteolytic events, one of them being the activation of caspase-3, and ultimately resulting in cell destruction. Variations in the substrate specificity of different caspases have been reported. RESULTS We report here the crystal structure of a complex of the activated human caspase-8 (proteolytic domain) with the irreversible peptidic inhibitor Z-Glu-Val-Asp-dichloromethylketone at 2.8 A resolution. This is the first structure of a representative of the long prodomain initiator caspases and of the group III substrate specificity class. The overall protein architecture resembles the caspase-1 and caspase-3 folds, but shows distinct structural differences in regions forming the active site. In particular, differences observed in subsites S(3), S(4) and the loops involved in inhibitor interactions explain the preference of caspase-8 for substrates with the sequence (Leu/Val)-Glu-X-Asp. CONCLUSIONS The structural differences could be correlated with the observed substrate specificities of caspase-1, caspase-3 and caspase-8, as determined from kinetic experiments. This information will help us to understand the role of the various caspases in the propagation of the apoptotic signal. The information gained from this investigation should be useful for the design of specific inhibitors.

Potent Inhibitors of Subgenomic Hepatitis C Virus RNA Replication through Optimization of Indole-N-Acetamide Allosteric Inhibitors of the Viral NS5B Polymerase

Infections caused by hepatitis C virus (HCV) are a significant world health problem for which novel therapies are in urgent demand. Compounds that block replication of subgenomic HCV RNA in liver cells are of interest because of their demonstrated antiviral effect in the clinic. In followup to our recent report that indole-N-acetamides (e.g., 1) are potent allosteric inhibitors of the HCV NS5B polymerase enzyme, we describe here their optimization as cell-based inhibitors. The crystal structure of 1 bound to NS5B was a guide in the design of a two-dimensional compound array that highlighted that formally zwitterionic inhibitors have strong intracellular potency and that pregnane X receptor (PXR) activation (an undesired off-target activity) is linked to a structural feature of the inhibitor. Optimized analogues devoid of PXR activation (e.g., 55, EC(50) = 127 nM) retain strong cell-based efficacy under high serum conditions and show acceptable pharmacokinetics parameters in rat and dog.

The 1.2 A crystal structure of hirustasin reveals the intrinsic flexibility of a family of highly disulphide-bridged inhibitors.

BACKGROUND Leech-derived inhibitors have a prominent role in the development of new antithrombotic drugs, because some of them are able to block the blood coagulation cascade. Hirustasin, a serine protease inhibitor from the leech Hirudo medicinalis, binds specifically to tissue kallikrein and possesses structural similarity with antistasin, a potent factor Xa inhibitor from Haementeria officinalis. Although the 2.4 A structure of the hirustasin-kallikrein complex is known, classical methods such as molecular replacement were not successful in solving the structure of free hirustasin. RESULTS Ab initio real/reciprocal space iteration has been used to solve the structure of free hirustasin using either 1.4 A room temperature data or 1.2 A low temperature diffraction data. The structure was also solved independently from a single pseudo-symmetric gold derivative using maximum likelihood methods. A comparison of the free and complexed structures reveals that binding to kallikrein causes a hinge-bending motion between the two hirustasin subdomains. This movement is accompanied by the isomerisation of a cis proline to the trans conformation and a movement of the P3, P4 and P5 residues so that they can interact with the cognate protease. CONCLUSIONS The inhibitors from this protein family are fairly flexible despite being highly cross-linked by disulphide bridges. This intrinsic flexibility is necessary to adopt a conformation that is recognised by the protease and to achieve an optimal fit, such observations illustrate the pitfalls of designing inhibitors based on static lock-and-key models. This work illustrates the potential of new methods of structure solution that require less or even no prior phase information.

A new structural class of serine protease inhibitors revealed by the structure of the hirustasin–kallikrein complex

BACKGROUND Hirustasin belongs to a class of serine protease inhibitors characterized by a well conserved pattern of cysteine residues. Unlike the closely related inhibitors, antistasin/ghilanten and guamerin, which are selective for coagulation factor Xa or neutrophil elastase, hirustasin binds specifically to tissue kallikrein. The conservation of the pattern of cysteine residues and the significant sequence homology suggest that these related inhibitors possess a similar three-dimensional structure to hirustasin. RESULTS The crystal structure of the complex between tissue kallikrein and hirustasin was analyzed at 2.4 resolution. Hirustasin folds into a brick-like structure that is dominated by five disulfide bridges and is sparse in secondary structural elements. The cysteine residues are connected in an abab cdecde pattern that causes the polypeptide chain to fold into two similar motifs. As a hydrophobic core is absent from hirustasin the disulfide bridges maintain the tertiary structure and present the primary binding loop to the active site of the protease. The general structural topography and disulfide connectivity of hirustasin has not previously been described. CONCLUSIONS The crystal structure of the kallikrein-hirustasin complex reveals that hirustasin differs from other serine protease inhibitors in its conformation and its disulfide bond connectivity, making it the prototype for a new class of inhibitor. The disulfide pattern shows that the structure consists of two domains, but only the C-terminal domain interacts with the protease. The disulfide pattern of the N-terminal domain is related to the pattern found in other proteins. Kallikrein recognizes hirustasin by the formation of an antiparallel beta sheet between the protease and the inhibitor. The P1 arginine binds in a deep negatively charged pocket of the enzyme. An additional pocket at the periphery of the active site accommodates the sidechain of the P4 valine.

Discovery of (7R)-14-Cyclohexyl-7-{(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl)(methyl) amino}-7,8-dihydro-6H- indolo(1,2-e)(1,5)benzoxazocine-11-carboxylic Acid (MK-3281), a Potent and Orally Bioavailable Finger-Loop Inhibitor of the Hepatitis C Virus NS5B Polymerase †

Infections caused by hepatitis C virus (HCV) are a significant world health problem for which novel therapies are in urgent demand. The polymerase of HCV is responsible for the replication of viral genome and has been a prime target for drug discovery efforts. Here, we report on the further development of tetracyclic indole inhibitors, binding to an allosteric site on the thumb domain. Structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies around an indolo-benzoxazocine scaffold led to the identification of compound 33 (MK-3281), an inhibitor with good potency in the HCV subgenomic replication assay and attractive molecular properties suitable for a clinical candidate. The compound caused a consistent decrease in viremia in vivo using the chimeric mouse model of HCV infection.

Structure of the complex of leech-derived tryptase inhibitor (LDTI) with trypsin and modeling of the LDTI–tryptase system

BACKGROUND Tryptase is a trypsin-like serine proteinase stored in the cytoplasmic granules of mast cells, which has been implicated in a number of mast cell related disorders such as asthma and rheumatoid arthritis. Unlike almost all other serine proteinases, tryptase is fully active in plasma and in the extracellular space, as there are no known natural inhibitors of tryptase in humans. Leech-derived tryptase inhibitor (LDTI), a protein of 46 amino acids, is the first molecule found to bind tightly to and specifically inhibit human tryptase in the nanomolar range. LDTI also inhibits trypsin and chymotrypsin with similar affinities. The structure of LDTI in complex with an inhibited proteinase could be used as a template for the development of low molecular weight tryptase inhibitors. RESULTS The crystal structure of the complex between trypsin and LDTI was solved at 2.0 A resolution and a model of the LDTI-tryptase complex was created, based on this X-ray structure. LDTI has a very similar fold to the third domain of the turkey ovomucoid inhibitor. LDTI interacts with trypsin almost exclusively through its binding loop (residues 3-10) and especially through the sidechain of the specificity residue Lys8. Our modeling studies indicate that these interactions are maintained in the LDTI-tryptase complex. CONCLUSIONS The insertion of nine residues after residue 174 in tryptase, relative to trypsin and chymotrypsin, prevents inhibition by other trypsin inhibitors and is certainly responsible for the higher specificity of tryptase relative to trypsin. In LDTI, the disulfide bond between residues 4 and 25 causes a sharp turn from the binding loop towards the N terminus, holding the N terminus away from the 174 loop of tryptase.