Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Stefania Ravazzi is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Stefania Ravazzi.


Critical Policy Studies | 2017

When a government attempts to institutionalize and regulate deliberative democracy: the how and why from a process-tracing perspective

Stefania Ravazzi

ABSTRACT Over the last few decades, public deliberation has spread in many countries, but this has occurred mostly through experiments and pilot projects. Recently, some countries have taken some steps forward by introducing participatory policies in order to institutionalize citizen involvement practices in the policy-making processes. Among these countries, France and Italy, and Tuscany in particular, have been recognized as clear examples of democratic governments that have initiated public programs to systematically apply deliberative processes to policy-making. These programs seem particularly challenging as far as the legitimacy of the democratic representative institutions and the role of politicians are concerned. Therefore, whatever leads a government to initiate such a policy deserves attention, and a theory on the particular model that can characterize the initiation of these policies is needed. The paper has the aim of proposing a hypothesis on the causal mechanism that can lead to the initiation of such a policy. A within-case study of the Tuscan case, which at present is recognized as the most advanced laboratory of deliberative democracy, is presented. The application of process tracing allows an analytical explanation to be made, which could be used as a theoretical base for further research on the topic.


Urban Affairs Review | 2016

Explaining “Power to” Incubation and Agenda Building in an Urban Regime

Stefania Ravazzi; Silvano Belligni

The urban regime theory has placed the decisional power of urban policy makers in the foreground. From this perspective, enduring governing coalitions can in fact manage to change the consolidated urban policy mix to foster great changes in the social and economic context. The urban regime theory labels this capacity “power to.” Although this higher capacity has frequently been affirmed, the literature has neglected to look at the framing mechanisms and the policy-making processes that allow a new agenda to emerge and be implemented. The present article has the aim of addressing this matter and in particular of trying to answer two main questions: (1) If an incubation phase lays the foundations for the emergence of a new policy agenda, how does this process take place? (2) Is the new agenda a by-product of sectorial policy negotiations or is it the output of a collective effort? The findings of an in-depth analysis of a case study are presented and discussed to address these questions.


Teoria politica. Fascicolo 1, 2008 | 2008

L'élite che governa Torino

Silvano Belligni; Stefania Ravazzi; Roberto Salerno

Turin’s Ruling Elite ABSTRACT: The transition of Turin from one-company town to a postindustrial city has been led by an urban ruling elite (ECG), whose members have been identified through a combination of positional and reputational methods. Network analysis and qualitative research on the members of the group allow to outline the elite relational structure and its social and political profile, that looks pluralistic and policentric. By selecting a core group inside the network and analysing its social and political attributes some hypotheses emerge on the urban regime and the capability of this ruling elite to act like a collective actor.


Partecipazione e Conflitto | 2012

Deliberazione e conflitto: evidenze da un’analisi comparata

Gianfranco Pomatto; Stefania Ravazzi

The article aims at analyzing the impact of deliberation on the dynamics of the conflicts in the policy making processes. We shall argue whether and how deliberation succeeds in stopping the typical escalation of the conflicts, lowering protests, generating more open-minded institutional decisions, reducing stereotypes and developing a new constructive approach in decision making. The analysis is based on the comparison of three recent cases of deliberative processes dealing with conflictual issues: a deliberative process on the hypothesis to write a bill regulating the use and power of the living will; a public debate on a new highway stretch in the city of Genova; a citizens’ jury on the building of a small plant to dispose of industrial waste in the small tuscan town of Castelfranco.


Journal of Public Deliberation | 2014

Flexibility, Argumentation and Confrontation. How Deliberative Minipublics Can Affect Policies on Controversial Issues

Stefania Ravazzi; Gianfranco Pomatto


Archive | 2012

La politica e la città. Regime urbano e classe dirigente a Torino

Silvano Belligni; Stefania Ravazzi


Polis | 2009

Urban Regime and the Government Coalition in Turin

Silvano Belligni; Stefania Ravazzi; Roberto Salerno


Partecipazione e Conflitto | 2018

Luigi Bobbio: A Mentor Between Fieldwork and Public Action

Stefania Ravazzi; Gianfranco Pomatto


Archive | 2015

Politiche pubbliche e argomenti nei giornali italiani

Stefania Ravazzi; Gianfranco Pomatto; Micol Maggiolini


Archive | 2013

Territoires, villes et métropoles en Italie. [en ligne]. [consulté le 24/06/2013]

Gilles Pinson; Deborah Galimberti; Christian Lefèvre; Ernesto d'Albergo; Giulio Moini; Silvano Belligni; Stefania Ravazzi; Massimo Allulli; Walter Tortorella; Paolo Perulli; Simone Tosi; Tommaso Vitale

Collaboration


Dive into the Stefania Ravazzi's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ernesto d'Albergo

Sapienza University of Rome

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Deborah Galimberti

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge