Stefania Salpietro

Raltegravir, maraviroc, etravirine: an effective protease inhibitor and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-sparing regimen for salvage therapy in HIV-infected patients with triple-class experience.

We prospectively evaluated 28 triple-class experienced HIV-1-infected patients harbouring R5 virus, who received maraviroc, raltegravir and etravirine. By on-treatment analysis, 26 (92%) had less than 50 copies HIV-RNA/ml at week 48. The median (interquartile range) 48-week increase in CD4+ cell counts was 267 (136–355) cells/μl. Three serious adverse events occurred: one recurrence of mycobacterial spondylodiscitis, one anal cancer, one Hodgkin lymphoma. Although long-term safety needs further study, this protease inhibitor and nucleoside analogue-sparing regimen showed sustained efficacy.

Residual viraemia does not influence 1 year virological rebound in HIV-infected patients with HIV RNA persistently below 50 copies/mL

OBJECTIVES It is currently debated whether patients with residual viraemia are at higher risk of virological failure than those attaining <1 HIV RNA copy/mL. We therefore investigated the effect of residual viraemia on virological rebound. METHODS We used a prospective, non-interventional, single-centre, study. This analysis was based on HIV-infected patients with two consecutive HIV RNA viral loads (VLs) of <50 copies/mL as tested by Versant bDNA, followed by two HIV RNA VLs of <50 copies/mL as tested using the Versant kinetic PCR molecular system (kPCR; limit of quantification = 1 copy/mL). Virological rebound was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA values of >50 copies/mL after baseline, and the time to virological rebound was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS There were 739 eligible patients; 446 (60.4%) had HIV RNA <1 copy/mL (group A) and 293 (39.6%) had residual viraemia (1-49 HIV RNA copies/mL; group B). After a follow-up (median 48.9 weeks), virological rebound occurred in four patients in group A (0.9%) and six patients in group B (2%); the time to virological rebound was similar in the two groups (log-rank test P = 0.231). CD4+ cell recovery (slope) was significantly less in the patients with residual viraemia; +14.3 (-7.7, 43.9) cells/mm(3) per year versus +21.2 (-2.5, 53.2) cells/mm(3) per year; P = 0.036. CONCLUSIONS Residual viraemia assessed by kPCR was not associated with virological rebound during 1 year of follow-up. However, the patients attaining <1 HIV RNA copy/mL showed a small but statistically significant improvement in CD4+ cell recovery.

Number of daily pills, dosing schedule, self‐reported adherence and health status in 2010: a large cross‐sectional study of HIV‐infected patients on antiretroviral therapy

The aim of the study was to assess whether pill burden is associated with self‐reported adherence to current combination antiretroviral regimens and health status in a large sample of unselected and chronically treated HIV‐infected patients.

Ten-year survival among HIV-1-infected subjects with AIDS or non-AIDS-defining malignancies.

Few data are available regarding the 10‐year survival among subjects with HIV and cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 10‐year survival of HIV‐infected subjects with AIDS‐defining malignancies (ADM) or non‐AIDS‐defining malignancies (NADM). This was a single center, retrospective, observational study of subjects with HIV infection and a subsequent cancer diagnosis; the data were collected from January 1991 to April 2010. Malignancies were divided into ADM or NADM on the basis of the Centre of Diseases Control‐1993 classification. Survival curves were estimated using Kaplan–Meyer method and compared by the log‐rank test. Six hundred and fifteen (9.5%) of the 6,495 subjects recorded in the San Raffaele Infectious Diseases Database developed a malignancy: 431 (70%) an ADM and 184 (30%) a NADM. In the case of ADM, survival was more favorable when cancer was diagnosed during post‐highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) era (10‐year survival: 43.2% ± 4.4%) than when diagnosed during the pre‐HAART era (10‐year survival: 16.4% ± 2.7%; log‐rank test: p < 0.001). The same was true in the case of NADM (10‐year survival: 44.7% ± 5.5% vs. 33.3 ± 9.6%; log‐rank test: p = 0.03). An evaluation of survival probability by cancer type showed higher survival rates during the post‐HAART era in the case of non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (10‐year survival: 42.1% ± 5.3% vs. 11.4% ± 3.3%; log‐rank test: p = <0.001), Kaposis sarcoma (10‐year survival: 44.0% ± 8.4% vs. 23.5% ± 3.9%; log‐rank test: p < 0.001) and Hodgkins disease (10‐year survival: 49.5% ± 14.5% vs. 40.0% ± 12.7%; log‐rank test: p = 0.005). Despite the better cancer prognosis during the post‐HAART era, the 10‐year survival of HIV‐infected subjects with an ADM or NADM is poor.

Use of statins and risk of AIDS-defining and non-AIDS-defining malignancies among HIV-1 infected patients on antiretroviral therapy

Objective:Previous studies have shown that statins use is associated with a lower mortality risk or occurrence of non-Hodgkins lymphoma or non-AIDS-defining malignancies (NADMs) in HIV-positive patients. We evaluated the effect of statin therapy on the occurrence of all AIDS-defining malignancy (ADM) and NADM among HIV-positive patients. Design:A chart study on HIV-1 infected patients attending the Infectious Diseases Department of the San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Italy. Methods:Incident malignancies diagnosed since antiretroviral treatment (ART) initiation until October 2012 among treated patients not taking statins at ART initiation. Statin therapy had to precede cancer diagnosis, if it occurred. Malignancies that occurred before ART or statin initiation were excluded. Follow-up was calculated since ART initiation until the first cancer diagnosis or loss to follow-up or death or last available visit, whichever occurred first. Results are described as median (interquartile range, IQR). Results:Five thousand, three hundred and fifty-seven HIV-1 treated patients were included. During 52 663 person-years, 740 (14%) patients had a history of statin use; 375 malignancies occurred: 12 (1.6%) malignancies (0 ADM; 12 NADM, crude incidence rate, 1.3/1000 person-years) among statin users and 363 (7.9%) malignancies (194 ADM; 169 NADM, crude incidence rate, 8.4/1000 person-years) among non-statin users. By multivariate Fine-Gray regression, statin use was associated with a lower risk of cancer [adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for ever use: 0.45 (0.17–0.71)]. Conclusion:Among HIV-1 treated patients, statin use was associated with a lower risk of cancer; the benefit was mainly related to AIDS-defining malignancies. Confirmatory studies are needed to consider the residual confounding likely present in this study.

Detecting impaired glucose tolerance or type 2 diabetes mellitus by means of an oral glucose tolerance test in HIV-infected patients.

As a proactive diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM) may prevent the onset of severe complications, we used an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to check for impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and DM in patients with long‐standing HIV infection and long durations of exposure to antiretroviral drugs with normal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels.

Long-term glucose tolerance in highly experienced HIV-infected patients receiving nucleoside analogue-sparing regimens.

Thirty-nine HIV-1-infected patients treated for 156 weeks with a new nucleoside analogue-sparing regimen [raltegravir, etravirine and maraviroc (REM) or raltegravir, etravirine and darunavir/ritonavir (RED)] showed a uniform increase in fasting glucose levels and a uniform decrease in insulin secretory capacity. Diabetes mellitus occurred in one RED-treated and four REM-treated patients. A worsening glucose tolerance was observed in highly treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients receiving effective antiretroviral therapy after virological failure.

Impact of a treatment including tenofovir plus didanosine on the selection of the 65R mutation in highly drug-experienced HIV-infected patients.

Data from 20 highly drug-experienced HIV-infected patients receiving tenofovir plus didanosine as part of a salvage regimen were analysed. At baseline, all but one patient harboured a virus bearing at least one nucleoside excision mutation (NEM); in 13 cases (65%) three or more NEM were detectable. After a median of 26 weeks of treatment, two patients (10%) selected the 65R mutation. These results support the hypothesis that NEM hinder the selection of this mutation.

Cost analysis of initial highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens for managing human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients according to clinical practice in a hospital setting

Objective In the study reported here, single-tablet regimen (STR) versus (vs) multi-tablet regimen (MTR) strategies were evaluated through a cost analysis in a large cohort of patients starting their first highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Adult human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 1-naïve patients, followed at the San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy, starting their first-line regimen from June 2008 to April 2012 were included in the analysis. Methods The most frequently used first-line HAART regimens (>10%) were grouped into two classes: 1) STR of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) + emtricitabine (FTC) + efavirenz (EFV) and 2) MTR including TDF + FTC + EFV, TDF + FTC + atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r), TDF + FTC + darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r), and TDF + FTC + lopinavir/ritoavir (LPV/r). Data were analyzed from the point of view of the Lombardy Regional Health Service. HAART, hospitalizations, visits, medical examinations, and other concomitant non-HAART drug costs were evaluated and price variations included. Descriptive statistics were calculated for baseline demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics; associations between categorical variables and type of antiretroviral strategy (STR vs MTR) were examined using chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests. At multivariate analysis, the generalized linear model was used to identify the predictive factors of the overall costs of the first-line HAART regimens. Results A total of 474 naïve patients (90% male, mean age 42.2 years, mean baseline HIV-RNA 4.50 log 10 copies/mL, and cluster of differentiation 4 [CD4+] count of 310 cells/μL, with a mean follow-up of 28 months) were included. Patients starting an STR treatment were less frequently antibody-hepatitis C virus positive (4% vs 11%, P=0.040), and had higher mean CD4+ values (351 vs 297 cells/μL, P=0.004) than MTR patients. The mean annual cost per patient in the STR group was €9,213.00 (range: €6,574.71–€33,570.00) and €14,277.00 (range: €5,908.89–€82,310.30) among MTR patients. At multivariate analysis, after adjustment for age, sex, antibody-hepatitis C virus status, HIV risk factors, baseline CD4+, and HIV-RNA, the cost analysis was significantly lower among patients starting an STR treatment than those starting an MTR (adjusted mean: €12,096.00 vs €16,106.00, P=0.0001). Conclusion STR was associated with a lower annual cost per patient than MTR, thus can be considered a cost-saving strategy in the treatment of HIV patients. This analysis is an important tool for policy makers and health care professionals to make short- and long-term cost projections and thus assess the impact of these on available budgets.

Virological rebound in human immunodeficiency virus‐infected patients with or without residual viraemia: results from an extended follow‐up

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) -infected patients with HIV RNA loads of < 50 copies/mL were followed-up for a median (interquartile range) of 30.8 (11.7-32.9) months to study the effect of residual viraemia (RV) on virological rebound (VR). At baseline, 446 (60.3%) patients had undetectable HIV RNA (group A) and 293 (39.7%) had RV (1-49 HIV RNA copies/mL, group B) by kinetic PCR. VR occurred in 4 (0.9%) patients in group A and in 12 (4.1%) patients in group B (p 0.007). Time to VR was shorter among patients of group B (Log-rank test: p 0.003). However, the proportion of VR was extremely low also among patients with RV.