Stefanie Fuhrman
Ames Research Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Stefanie Fuhrman.
pacific symposium on biocomputing | 1998
Patrik D'haeseleer; Xiling Wen; Stefanie Fuhrman; Roland Somogyi
Large-scale gene expression data sets are revolutionizing the field of functional genomics. However, few data analysis techniques fully exploit this entirely new class of data. We present a linear modeling approach that allows one to infer interactions between all the genes included in the data set. The resulting model can be used to generate interesting hypotheses to direct further experiments.
IPCAT '97 Proceedings of the second international workshop on Information processing in cell and tissues | 1998
Patrik D'haeseleer; Xiling Wen; Stefanie Fuhrman; Roland Somogyi
In order to infer the logical principles underlying biological development and phenotypic change, it is necessary to determine large-scale temporal gene expression patters. To quote Eric Lander, “The mRNA levels sensitively reflect the state of the cell, perhaps uniquely defining cell types, stages, and responses. To decipher the logic of gene regulation, we should aim to be able to monitor the expression level of all genes simultaneously…” (Lander, 1996). One method for accomplishing this involves the use of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to assay the expression levels of large numbers of genes in a tissue at different time points during development, with a standard protocol. The relative amounts of mRNA produced at these time points provide a gene expression time series for each gene.
Nonlinear Analysis-theory Methods & Applications | 1997
Roland Somogyi; Stefanie Fuhrman; Manor Askenazi; Andrew Wuensche
Understanding of complex biological processes requires knowledge of the component molecularelements, as well as the principles that govern the interactions between them in forming higherordered structures. We are founding our laboratory studies of CNS development and celldifferentiation on the integrative concept of a genetic network, based on the tenets of geneticinformation flow. But first it is important to establish the intellectually challenging principles bywhich complex networks of functionally cross-linked elements lead to predictable, higher-orderedbehaviors. To this end we are studying Boolean network models, which exhibit dynamicproperties similar to those of living systems, such as self-organization and cycling. In this model,genes are conceptualized as binary (on/off) elements interacting within a freely cross-wirednetwork. The on/off pattern, or state, of the entire network of genes updates itself as the genesinteract, until the system reaches a final state, the attractor. This process of updating representsthe pattern, or trajectory, of gene expression which results in the mature organism ordifferentiated cell type, representing analogies of the attractor.Since trajectories and attractors are specific expressions of the architecture of a particularsystem, any experimental strategy must gain access to the states of the biological network. In thatcontext, PCR (polymerase chain reaction) is being used to measure the expression of a largevariety genes at different time points in a tissue or experimental cell system in order to gainaccess to data on trajectories. While many alternative trajectories may be obtainedexperimentally during cell and tissue differentiation or responses to perturbation, it is equallyimportant to development the computational tools to infer genetic network architectures fromsuch data sets. Here we discuss a heuristic approach to this problem using examples fromBoolean networks as illustrations. Finally, analysis of experimental data is expected to providetestable hypotheses concerning further interconnections, some of which might not otherwise bepredicted by strict molecular/mechanistic approaches. Especially within light of the massivegenetic tool set generated by the genome projects, one may anticipate that a strategy of large scalegene expression mapping and genetic signaling network inference may become essential to thestudy of complex medical problems such as cancer or tissue regeneration.
Neurochemical Research | 2002
Max Kotlyar; Stefanie Fuhrman; Alan Ableson; Roland Somogyi
An important problem in the analysis of large-scale gene expression data is the validation of gene expression clusters. By examining the temporal expression patterns of 74 genes expressed in rat spinal cord under three different experimental conditions, we have found evidence that some genes cluster together under multiple conditions. Using RT-PCR data from spinal cord development and two sets of microarray data from spinal injury, we applied Spearman correlation to identify clusters and to assign P values to pairs of genes with highly similar temporal expression patterns. We found that 15% of genes occurred in statistically significant pairs in all three experimental conditions, providing both statistical and experimental support for the idea that genes that cluster together are co-regulated. In addition, we demonstrated that DNA microarray and RT-PCR data are comparable, and can be combined to confirm gene expression relationships.
IPCAT '97 Proceedings of the second international workshop on Information processing in cell and tissues | 1998
Roland Somogyi; Stefanie Fuhrman
Molecular life sciences are rapidly uncovering the elementary building blocks underlying complex biological functions. A common feature encountered at all levels is the organization of basic constituents into distributed, high-dimensional networks. A major challenge lies in understanding the abstract principles that govern the logic of these networks, enabling them to execute complex functions while retaining stability and adaptability (Somogyi and Sniegoski, 1996). Boolean networks provide a model framework that captures these features, serving as a testing ground for establishing novel techniques in computational network analysis.
pacific symposium on biocomputing | 1998
Shoudan Liang; Stefanie Fuhrman; Roland Somogyi
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 1998
Xiling Wen; Stefanie Fuhrman; George S. Michaels; Daniel B. Carr; Susan Smith; Jeffery L. Barker; Roland Somogyi
pacific symposium on biocomputing | 1998
George S. Michaels; Daniel B. Carr; Manor Askenazi; Stefanie Fuhrman; Xiling Wen; Roland Somogyi
ieee international conference on complex systems | 2000
Stefanie Fuhrman; Xiling Wen; George S. Michaels; Roland Somogyi
Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience | 2001
Bernard Chang; Roland Somogyi; Stefanie Fuhrman