Stefanie Roberfroid
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Stefanie Roberfroid.
Biofouling | 2014
Stijn Robijns; Stefanie Roberfroid; S. Van Puyvelde; B. De Pauw; E. Uceda Santamaría; A De Weerdt; D. De Coster; Kim Hermans; S.C.J. De Keersmaecker; Jozef Vanderleyden; Hans Steenackers
Salmonella, an important foodborne pathogen, forms biofilms in many different environments. The composition of these biofilms differs depending on the growth conditions, and their development is highly coordinated in time. To develop efficient treatments, it is therefore essential that biofilm formation and its inhibition be understood in different environments and in a time-dependent manner. Many currently used techniques, such as transcriptomics or proteomics, are still expensive and thus limited in their application. Therefore, a GFP-promoter fusion library with 79 important Salmonella biofilm genes was developed (covering among other things matrix production, fimbriae and flagella synthesis, and c-di-GMP regulation). This library is a fast, inexpensive, and easy-to-use tool, and can therefore be conducted in different experimental setups in a time-dependent manner. In this paper, four possible applications are highlighted to illustrate and validate the use of this reporter fusion library.
Journal of Microbiological Methods | 2011
Kim Hermans; T.L. Anh Nguyen; Stefanie Roberfroid; Geert Schoofs; Tine Verhoeven; David De Coster; Jos Vanderleyden; Sigrid De Keersmaecker
Bacterial biofilm formation is an important cause of environmental persistence of food-borne pathogens, such as Salmonella Typhimurium. As the ensemble of bacterial cells within a biofilm represents different physiological states, even for monospecies biofilms, gene expression patterns in these multicellular assemblages show a high degree of heterogeneity. This heterogeneity might mask differential gene expression that occurs only in subpopulations of the entire biofilm population when using methods that average expression output. In an attempt to address this problem and to refine expression analysis in biofilm studies, we used the Differential Fluorescence Induction (DFI) technique to gain more insight in S. Typhimurium biofilm gene expression. Using this single cell approach, we were able to identify 26 genetic loci showing biofilm specific increased expression. For a selected number of identified genes, we confirmed the DFI results by the construction of defined promoter fusions, measurement of relative gene expression levels and construction of mutants. Overall, we have shown for the first time that the DFI technique can be used in biofilm research. The fact that this analysis revealed genes that have not been linked with Salmonella biofilm formation in previous studies using different approaches illustrates that no single technique, in casu biofilm formation, is able to identify all genes related to a given phenotype.
Critical Reviews in Microbiology | 2016
Stefanie Roberfroid; Jos Vanderleyden; Hans Steenackers
Abstract During the last decade it has been shown that among cell variation in gene expression plays an important role within clonal populations. Here, we provide an overview of the different mechanisms contributing to gene expression variability in clonal populations. These are ranging from inherent variations in the biochemical process of gene expression itself, such as intrinsic noise, extrinsic noise and bistability to individual responses to variations in the local micro-environment, a phenomenon called phenotypic plasticity. Also genotypic variations caused by clonal evolution and phase variation can contribute to gene expression variability. Consequently, gene expression studies need to take these fluctuations in expression into account. However, frequently used techniques for expression quantification, such as microarrays, RNA sequencing, quantitative PCR and gene reporter fusions classically determine the population average of gene expression. Here, we discuss how these techniques can be adapted towards single cell analysis by integration with single cell isolation, RNA amplification and microscopy. Alternatively more qualitative selection-based techniques, such as mutant screenings, in vivo expression technology (IVET) and recombination-based IVET (RIVET) can be applied for detection of genes expressed only within a subpopulation. Finally, differential fluorescence induction (DFI), a protocol specially designed for single cell expression is discussed.
BMC Genomics | 2016
Kim Hermans; Stefanie Roberfroid; Inge Thijs; Gwendoline Kint; David De Coster; Kathleen Marchal; Jos Vanderleyden; Sigrid De Keersmaecker; Hans Steenackers
BackgroundBiofilm formation is an important survival strategy of Salmonella in all environments. By mutant screening, we showed a knock-out mutant of fabR, encoding a repressor of unsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis (UFA), to have impaired biofilm formation. In order to unravel how this regulator impinges on Salmonella biofilm formation, we aimed at elucidating the S. Typhimurium FabR regulon. Hereto, we applied a combinatorial high-throughput approach, combining ChIP-chip with transcriptomics.ResultsAll the previously identified E. coli FabR transcriptional target genes (fabA, fabB and yqfA) were shown to be direct S. Typhimurium FabR targets as well. As we found a fabB overexpressing strain to partly mimic the biofilm defect of the fabR mutant, the effect of FabR on biofilms can be attributed at least partly to FabB, which plays a key role in UFA biosynthesis. Additionally, ChIP-chip identified a number of novel direct FabR targets (the intergenic regions between hpaR/hpaG and ddg/ydfZ) and yet putative direct targets (i.a. genes involved in tRNA metabolism, ribosome synthesis and translation). Next to UFA biosynthesis, a number of these direct targets and other indirect targets identified by transcriptomics (e.g. ribosomal genes, ompA, ompC, ompX, osmB, osmC, sseI), could possibly contribute to the effect of FabR on biofilm formation.ConclusionOverall, our results point at the importance of FabR and UFA biosynthesis in Salmonella biofilm formation and their role as potential targets for biofilm inhibitory strategies.
Communications in agricultural and applied biological sciences | 2012
Stefanie Roberfroid; Kim Hermans; Stijn Robijns; Hans Steenackers; Jos Vanderleyden; Sigrid De Keersmaecker
Archive | 2017
Stefanie Roberfroid; Bram Lories; Kevin R. Foster; Hans Steenackers
Archive | 2016
Kim Hermans; Stefanie Roberfroid; Inge Thijs; Gwendoline Kint; David De Coster; Kathleen Marchal; Jos Vanderleyden; Sigrid De Keersmaecker; Hans Steenackers
Archive | 2015
Stefanie Roberfroid; Lise Dieltjens; Ilse Parijs; Jos Vanderleyden; Hans Steenackers
Archive | 2012
Stijn Robijns; Stefanie Roberfroid; B. De Pauw; E. Uceda Santamaría; Arnaud Marchand; Patrick Chaltin; Bart De Keersmaecker; Jos Vanderleyden; Hans Steenackers
Archive | 2012
Stijn Robijns; Stefanie Roberfroid; Kim Hermans; Ami De Weerdt; Jos Vanderleyden; Sigrid De Keersmaecker; Hans Steenackers