Stefano Berloffa

A Naturalistic Exploratory Study of the Impact of Demographic, Phenotypic and Comorbid Features in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Background: Few studies have examined the impact of gender, age at onset, phenotype and comorbidity in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in children. In this naturalistic study we consider these characteristics of OCD in the framework of the 4 OCD phenotypes (contamination/cleaning, order/symmetry, obsessions/checking and hoarding) proposed by Leckman et al. Sampling and Methods: A consecutive series of 257 patients aged 13.6 ± 2.8 years, diagnosed using a DSM-IV-based clinical interview (Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Age Children – Present and Lifetime Version), were included. Results: Patients with OCD onset before 12 years of age presented a higher frequency of comorbid tic disorder and disruptive behavior disorders. The type of obsession varied with gender: order/symmetry was more frequent in males, contamination/cleaning in females. Order/symmetry had the highest comorbidity with tics, contamination/cleaning was the least severe according to the Clinical Global Impression Severity, and was associated with a high rate of comorbid anxiety and depression, similarly to sexual-religious obsessions. Hoarding was the severest according to the Clinical Global Impression Severity, and was associated with a high comorbidity with social phobia and bipolar disorder. Tic comorbidity was more prevalent in males, had an earlier onset, and a heavier comorbidity with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and other disruptive behavior disorders. A comorbid attention deficit hyperactivity disorder was associated with an earlier onset of OCD and a poorer response to treatments. Conclusions: OCD phenotypes and comorbidities may have marked clinical and prognostic implications. Tertiary care population results may not generalize to less impaired juvenile populations.

Aripiprazole augmentation in 39 adolescents with medication-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder.

The aim of this study was to assess efficacy of aripiprazole augmentation of serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRI) treatment in adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) who did not respond to 2 initial trials with SRI monotherapy. A consecutive series of 39 adolescents (28 males and 11 females; age range, 12 to 18 years; mean age, 14.6 ± 1.2 years), with OCD diagnosed based on a clinical interview and according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria, were included. The mean final aripiprazole dosage was 12.2 ± 3.4 mg/d. At the endpoint, 27 patients (59.0%) had a Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Improvement score 1 or 2 (very much or much improved) and a Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) score 3 or below and were thus considered responders. The CGI-S improved from 6.0 ± 0.9 at the baseline (severely to extremely severely ill) to 3.5 ± 1.0 (mild to moderately ill) at the end of the follow-up (P < 0.0001), whereas the Childrens Global Assessment Scale improved from 39.2 ± 5.8 to 49.8 ± 9.0 (P < 0.0001). Compared with nonresponders, responders were less impaired at the baseline in functional impairment (Childrens Global Assessment Scale; P = 0.004) but not in clinical severity (CGI-S). Subtypes of OCD comorbidity and absence of insight did not affect clinical response. Mild transitory agitation (10.3%), mild sedation (10.3%), and sleep disorders (7.7%) were reported, but any of the patients discontinued medication because of adverse effects. In these severely impaired adolescents, aripiprazole augmentation of SRIs was well tolerated and effective in more than half of the patients.

Pharmacotherapy in paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: a naturalistic, retrospective study.

AbstractBackground: Pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) can cause substantial impairment in academic, social and family functioning. Even though cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment, the pharmacological option has to be taken into consideration. Effectiveness of serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) has been supported by several double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. Objective: To report the response to pharmacotherapy in children and adolescents with OCD naturalistically followed up and treated with SRIs. Methods: From a consecutive series of 257 patients (174 males and 83 females; mean age 13.6 ± 2.7 years) diagnosed with OCD following a clinical interview according to DSM-IV criteria, 37 children improved significantly after psychotherapy and were excluded. The remaining 220 patients were included in the study. Results: Eighty-nine patients (40.5%) were managed with SRI monotherapy and 131 with an SRI in combination with another medication. Compared with those who needed polypharmacy, patients managed with SRI mono-therapy were younger at the time of the first consultation, had less severe symptoms at baseline, and more frequently presented with co-occurring anxiety and depressive disorders, while patients receiving polypharmacy presented with higher rates of bipolar disorder, tic disorder and disruptive behaviour disorders. 135 patients (61.4%) achieved a positive clinical response and were considered responders. When differences between responders and nonresponders at the end of follow-up were considered, irrespective of the pharmacological treatment (monotherapy or polypharmacy), responders had less severe disease at baseline, were younger at the time of the first consultation, more frequently presented with the contamination/cleaning phenotype and less frequently presented with the hoarding phenotype. Treatment refractoriness was associated with higher rates of conduct disorder and bipolar disorder, and lower rates of generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder. Forty-three children received therapy with an atypical anti-psychotic as an augmenting strategy, and 25 of these children (58.1%) became responders. Responders to augmentation were less severely impaired at baseline, while different subtypes of OCD were similar between responders and nonresponders, as were patterns of co-morbidity. Conclusion: Our study suggests that putative variables associated with response to pharmacological treatment of paediatric OCD can be defined, and can help improve treatment strategies.

Clinical and research implications of panic-bipolar comorbidity in children and adolescents.

A substantial portion of patients with juvenile bipolar disorder (BD) have a comorbid panic disorder (PD). The aim of our study was to analyze the cross-sectional and longitudinal implications of such comorbidity in children and adolescents with BD. The sample comprised 224 referred children and adolescents with BD, 140 males (62.5%) and 84 females (37.5%), mean age 13.8+/-2.8 years, diagnosed with a clinical interview (K-SADS-PL), and followed up naturalistically for 6 months. Fifty-one BD patients (22.8%) had a lifetime diagnosis of comorbid PD. Subjects with BD+PD and those without BD (BD-noPD) did not differ according to index age, age at onset of BD and bipolar phenotype (episodic vs. continuous course, irritable vs. elated mood). BD+PD was more frequent in females, was less severe at baseline according to the Clinical Global Impression severity score, and was more frequently associated with BD type 2. Moreover, BD+PD presented higher rates of comorbid anxiety disorders (namely separation anxiety disorder) and lower rates of externalizing disorders, namely attention deficit disorder (ADHD) than BD-noPD. However, this different pattern of externalizing comorbidity did not affect severity and improvement. Our findings suggest that PD is frequently comorbid in juvenile BD and can influence severity, pattern of comorbidity and course of BD. The data are compatible with the hypothesis that Panic-BD and ADHD-BD might represent distinct developmental pathways of bipolar disorder. Further research on this question may prove rewarding.

Pharmacological response in juvenile bipolar disorder subtypes: A naturalistic retrospective examination

This study reports on the naturalistic pharmacotherapy of 266 youths with bipolar disorder (BP), manic or hypomanic episode (158 males and 108 females, 13.8+/-2.8 years), first treated with monotherapy on valproic acid (VPA) (n=158, 59.4%), lithium (n=90, 33.8%) or atypical antipsychotics (n=18, 6.8%). Among the patients receiving mood stabilizers, 59.5% of those treated with VPA and 47.8% of those receiving lithium did not need other antimanic agents (mood stabilizers and/or atypical antipsychotics). Lower severity was associated with a greater persistence of both VPA and lithium monotherapy. Factors associated with greater persistence of VPA monotherapy were BP II and co-occurring generalized anxiety disorder, separation anxiety disorder and simple phobias. On the contrary, BP I and co-occurring psychotic symptoms and/or conduct disorder were associated with a lower persistence of VPA monotherapy. Factors associated with lower persistence of lithium monotherapy were younger age and the association with attention deficit hyper-activity disorder (ADHD). Type of BP and presence of psychotic symptoms and conduct disorder did not affect the lithium monotherapy. Overall, predictors of non-response (multiple stepwise logistic regression) in both VPA and lithium groups were baseline Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity score and comorbid conduct disorder; while psychotic symptoms and absence of comorbid generalized anxiety disorder were predictors of poorer treatment response only in the VPA group, and chronic course, comorbid ADHD and absence of comorbid panic disorder were predictors only in the lithium group. Such naturalistic data from an ordinary clinical setting have relevance to clinical practice.

Aripiprazole in Children with Tourette's Disorder and Co-morbid Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A 12-Week, Open-Label, Preliminary Study

Tourettes disorder (TD) in children and adolescents is frequently co-morbid with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Dopamine-blockers are the first line treatment for TD, whereas dopamine-agonists, such as stimulants, are the gold-standard in the treatment of ADHD. These contrasting effects supported concerns about the risk that stimulants for treating ADHD may trigger or worsen co-morbid tics. Aripiprazole, a partial dopamine agonist, acts as an antagonist at dopamine D2 receptors in hyperdopaminergic conditions and displays agonist properties under hypodopaminergic conditions. The present study describes the use of aripiprazole (10.0 ± 4.8 mg/day) in a consecutive group of 28 patients with a primary diagnosis of TD and co-morbid ADHD, combined subtype. The Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) and the ADHD-Rating Scale (ADHD-RS-IV) were used as primary outcome measures and both significantly improved (p<0.001) after the treatment. Global measures of severity (Clinical Global Impressions-Severity) and of functional impairment (Childrens Global Assessment Scale) also significantly improved during the treatment (p<0.001). At the YGTSS there was a reduction of 42.5%, in motor tics, of 47.9% in phonic tics (44.7% for the combined scores), and of 32.3% in tic impairment. Nineteen patients (67.9%) had a reduction of at least 50% of the YGTSS score (motor+phonic tics). The improvement at the ADHD-RS-IV score was 22.5%, 12 patients (42.8%) presented an improvement of 30%, but only 2 (7.1%) an improvement greater than 50%. Using a logistic regression model, a reduction of at least 30% in ADHD-RS-IV score was more likely to occur in the obsessive-compulsive disorder co-morbid group. Aripiprazole was well tolerated and none of the patients discontinued medication because of side effects. In summary, aripiprazole resulted in an effective treatment for TD, but it was only moderately effective on co-occurring ADHD symptomatology. Our preliminary data suggest that aripiprazole may represent a possible therapeutic option, among other possible monotherapies addressing both tics and ADHD.

Pediatric social anxiety disorder: Predictors of response to pharmacological treatment

OBJECTIVE Pediatric social anxiety disorder (SAD) is associated with an increased risk of comorbid mental disorders, with implications for prognosis and treatment strategy. The aim of this study is to explore predictors of treatment response, and the role of comorbidity in affecting refractoriness. METHODS One hundred and forty consecutive youths (81 males, 57.9%), ages 7-18 years (mean age 13.7 ± 2.5 years, mean age at onset of SAD 10.6 ± 2.7 years) met American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. (DSM-IV) criteria for SAD as primary diagnosis, according to a structured clinical interview (Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Aged Children-Present and Lifetime Version [K-SADS-PL]). All received a pharmacological treatment with serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) targeted to SAD, associated with additional medications for comorbidities (mood stabilizers in 27.1%, antipsychotics in 12.8%) and 57.9% received an additional psychotherapy. RESULTS Eighty-nine patients (63.6%) responded to treatments after 3 months, namely 72.8% with psychotherapy plus medication and 50.8% with medication only. Nonresponders had more severe symptoms at baseline in terms of both clinical severity and functional impairment, and had more comorbid disruptive behavior disorders. The backward logistic regression indicated that clinical severity and functional impairment at baseline, comorbid disruptive behavior disorders, and bipolar disorders were predictors of nonresponse. CONCLUSION Our data suggest that SSRIs can be effective in pediatric SAD, but that the more severe forms of the disorder and those with heavier comorbidity are associated with poorer prognosis.