Stefano Kim

Cabazitaxel: a novel microtubule inhibitor.

The development of drug resistance is a major obstacle to effective cancer therapy. Several agents are in clinical development with the goal of overcoming resistance. Among them is cabazitaxel, a semisynthetic taxoid that is able to overcome a common mechanism of resistance that limits the efficacy of other chemotherapeutic agents, including the older taxanes. The promise of cabazitaxel as a second-line chemotherapy option for advanced prostate cancer has been confirmed clinically in the phase III TROPIC (Treatment of Hormone-Refractory Metastatic Prostate Cancer Previously Treated with a Taxotere-Containing Regimen) trial. This trial showed that cabazitaxel is the first chemotherapeutic agent to demonstrate a survival benefit in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) since the approval of docetaxel. On this basis, the US FDA and the European Medicines Agency approved cabazitaxel in June 2010 and January 2011, respectively, for the treatment of patients with mCRPC who have previously been treated with docetaxel. The most prevalent toxicity was neutropenia and the use of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor is recommended in high risk patients. This article presents the preliminary antitumour activity, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic data of cabazitaxel, and an overview of the current status of clinical development.

Impact of STAT3 phosphorylation on the clinical effectiveness of anti-EGFR-based therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

UNLABELLED Half of patients with KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer do not benefit from adding anti-epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) to standard chemotherapy regimens. This retrospective study was performed in 94 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated in the second line with cetuximab and chemotherapy. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) phosphorylation in tumor cells was correlated with decreased median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). These results highlight the potential role of STAT3 as a molecular target to optimize anti-EGFR therapies. BACKGROUND Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) is involved in epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling in a KRAS-independent manner. Phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3) expression in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with anti-EGFR-containing salvage chemotherapy has never been investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS : The first endpoint of this retrospective study was to evaluate the impact of pSTAT3 on the time to progression (TTP) in 94 patients with mCRC treated with anti-EGFR-based therapies in the second- or third-line setting between July 2004 and November 2009. The influence of pSTAT3 on objective response rate and overall survival (OS) was also reported. Nuclear expression of pSTAT3 status was evaluated by immunohistochemical tests on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor samples obtained before therapy. RESULTS Positive expression of pSTAT3 was observed in 24.5% of the tumor samples. The probability of achieving an objective response was 13% among patients with positive nuclear expression of pSTAT3 compared with 41% for patients displaying pSTAT3-negative tumors (P = .02). In a multivariate logistic regression model, high-grade skin rash, wild-type KRAS status, and negative pSTAT3 status significantly improved TTP and OS. CONCLUSION These results underscore an impact of pSTAT3 on the clinical efficacy of anti-EGFR-containing chemotherapy regimens and support the prospective assessment of this biomarker.

Cisplatin/gemcitabine or oxaliplatin/gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer: a systematic review

Cisplatin/gemcitabine association has been a standard of care for first‐line regimen in advanced biliary tract cancer nevertheless oxaliplatin/gemcitabine regimen is frequently preferred. Because comparative effectiveness in clinical outcomes of cisplatin‐ versus oxaliplatin‐containing chemotherapy is not available, a systematic review of studies assessing cisplatin/gemcitabine or oxaliplatin/gemcitabine chemotherapies in advanced biliary tract cancer was performed. Published studies evaluating cisplatin/gemcitabine or oxaliplatin/gemcitabine in advanced biliary tract cancer were included. Each study was weighted according to the number of patients included. The primary objective was to assess weighted median of medians overall survival (mOS) reported for both regimens. Secondary goals were to assess weighted median of medians progression‐free survival (mPFS) and toxic effects were pooled and compared within each arm. Thirty‐three studies involving 1470 patients were analyzed. In total, 771 and 699 patients were treated by cisplatin/gemcitabine and oxaliplatin/gemcitabine, respectively. Weighted median of mOS was 9.7 months in cisplatin group and 9.5 months in oxaliplatin group. Cisplatin‐based chemotherapy was significantly associated with more grade 3 and 4 asthenia, diarrhea, liver toxicity, and hematological toxicity. Sensitivity analysis including only the studies with the standard regimen of cisplatin (25–35 mg/m2 administered on days 1 and 8) showed that the weighted median of mOS increased from 9.7 to 11.7 months but Gem/CDDP regimen remained more toxic than Gemox regimen. These results suggest that the Gem/CDDP regimen with cisplatin (25–35 mg/m2) administered on days 1 and 8 is associated with survival advantage than Gemox regimen but with addition of toxicity.

Metronomic cyclophosphamide: An alternative treatment for hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma is a rare liver mesenchymatous tumor with an epithelial aspect developed from endothelial cells with a lack of validated therapeutic options at metastatic stage. Metronomic chemotherapy has been described as an anti-angiogenic therapy leading to the depletion of circulating endothelial progenitors. We report the results of two patients treated for metastatic hemangioendothelioma with metronomic cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. Following initiation of metronomic cyclophosphamide chemotherapy (50mg once a day continuously), the two patients exhibited significant clinical improvement and decrease in metastasis size without any clinically relevant side-effect. Metronomic cyclophosphamide could be proposed as a new therapeutic option to treat metastatic hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma.

Safety and Efficacy of Cabazitaxel in the Docetaxel-Treated Patients with Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer (PC) is one of the most common cancers and is a leading cause of death. Its initial growth is dependent on androgens; most patients show an initial response to hormonal therapy but will experience disease progression when PC becomes resistant to castration. In 2004, two key randomized controlled trials demonstrated a benefit for docetaxel-based regimens in the treatment of men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Cabazitaxel (XRP6258, TXD258, and RPR116258A), a tubulin-binding taxane drug as potent as docetaxel in cell lines, was the first treatment able to prolong survival for metastatic CRPC in the post-docetaxel setting. This review describes pharmacologic parameters of this agent followed by a review of clinical trials involving cabazitaxel. Other available treatments and the place of cabazitaxel in metastatic CRPC setting are discussed.

Evaluation of a 36 Gy elective node irradiation dose in anal cancer

PURPOSE To retrospectively analyze the efficacy of 36 Gy of elective node irradiation and report patterns of recurrence in patients with anal cancer treated by chemoradiation with the same radiotherapy (RT) treatment scheme. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between January 1996 and December 2013, 142 patients with anal squamous cell cancer were scheduled to receive a dose of 36 Gy of elective node irradiation (ENI) to the inguinal area and whole pelvis over 4 weeks followed after a 2-week gap by a boost dose of 23.4 Gy over 17 days to the macroscopic disease. Mitomycin C combined with fluorouracil, capecitabin or cisplatin was given at day 1 of each sequence of RT. RESULTS Disease stages were I: 3, II: 78, IIIA: 23, IIIB: 38. Compliance rates were 97.2% with RT and 87.9% with chemotherapy. After a median follow up of 48 months [3.6-192], estimated 5-year overall survival and colostomy-free survival were 75.4% and 85.3% respectively. Eleven patients (7.7%) never achieved a complete response, 15 had a local component of recurrence and 5 a regional one. One patient had failure in the common iliac node area outside the treatment fields. The inguinal control rate was 98.5%. The 5-year tumor and nodal control rates were 81.5% and 96.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION Chemoradiation with a dose of 36 Gy ENI achieved excellent nodal control. However, it is necessary to improve the 5-year control rate of the primary tumor. Omitting the gap and using additional doses per fraction or hyper-fractionation are to be explored.

Gemcitabine-Induced Pulmonary Toxicity: A Case Report of Pulmonary Veno-Occlusive Disease:

Introduction Gemcitabine is a chemotherapeutic agent frequently used by for the treatment of several malignancies both in the adjuvant and metastatic setting. Although myelosuppression is the most adverse event of this therapy, gemcitabine might induce severe pulmonary toxicities. We describe a case of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) related to gemcitabine. Case Presentation The patient was an 83-year-old man with a metastatic pancreatic cancer who was treated by gemcitabine as first-line therapy. He was in good health and received no other chemotherapy. A dose of 1000 mg/m2 of gemcitabine was administered over a 30-minute intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. After a period of 6 months, a complete response was observed. Nevertheless, the patient developed a severe dyspnea, with arterial hypoxemia and very low lung diffusion for carbon monoxide. A CT scan showed diffuse ground glass opacities with septal lines, bilateral pleural effusion, and lymph node enlargement. On echocardiography, there was a suspicion of pulmonary hypertension with elevated systolic pulmonary artery pressure and normal left ventricular pressures. Right heart catheterization confirmed pulmonary hypertension and normal pulmonary artery occlusion pressure. Diagnosis of PVOD was made, and a gemcitabine-induced toxicity was suspected. A symptomatic treatment was started. At last follow-up, patient was in functional class I with near-normal of CT scan, arterial blood gases, and echocardiography. A gemcitabine-induced PVOD is the more likely diagnosis.

Efficacy and Safety of Sequential Use of Everolimus in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Previously Treated With Bevacizumab With or Without Interferon Therapy: Results From the European AVATOR Study

BACKGROUND Everolimus is a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor. It gained approval based on the results of the RECORD-1 (Regulation of Coagulation in Orthopedic Surgery to Prevent Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism 1) trial, which included patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) whose disease progressed after receiving vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting angiogenesis that is approved in patients with mRCC. The sequence of everolimus second-line therapy after failure of bevacizumab ± interferon (IFN) first-line therapy has not yet been studied. METHODS AVAstin(®) followed by afiniTOR(®) (AVATOR) was a noninterventional retrospective multicenter European observational study of 42 unselected patients with mRCC who were previously or currently treated with everolimus after failure of bevacizumab ± IFN. The primary end point was everolimus progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were related to the overall survival (OS) of patients receiving the drug sequence and everolimus treatment and safety. RESULTS Exploring the duration of second-line everolimus treatment, 63.8% of patients received at least 3 months of everolimus and 28.8% received at least 8 months of treatment. At the time of data analysis, 15 patients (36%) were still receiving everolimus, 40% had stopped because of progressive disease, and 24% had discontinued treatment for other reasons. Patients receiving everolimus after bevacizumab experienced a median PFS of 17 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5 [not reached]). Median OS was not reached with everolimus second-line therapy. At 32 months after the start of first-line therapy, 53.3% of patients were still alive. All grades of common adverse events (AEs) were consistent with the known safety profile of everolimus. CONCLUSION The AVATOR-studied sequence displayed a longer than expected median PFS. Further prospective exploratory studies need to be performed to confirm these encouraging results in a larger cohort of patients.

Efficacy, Safety and Cost of Regorafenib in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in French Clinical Practice

Background Regorafenib is an orally administered multikinase inhibitor that has been approved for patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Even though regorafenib significantly improved survival in two international phase 3 trials (CORRECT and CONCUR), a high rate of treatment-related toxic effects and dose modifications were observed with a modest benefit. The aim of this study was to provide information concerning the efficacy, safety, and cost of regorafenib in patients with mCRC in clinical practice. Material and Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with regorafenib monotherapy for unresectable mCRC in five Franche-Comté cancer hospitals (France). The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points were safety and descriptive cost analyses of patients treated with regorafenib in clinical practice. Another aim of this study was to assess the impact of regorafenib prescription on the risk of hospitalization in real-life practice. Results From January 2014 to August 2014, 29 consecutive patients were enrolled. Patients were heavily pretreated and were refractory to standard chemotherapies. The primary tumor sites were the colon and the rectum for 55% and 45% of patients, respectively. Fifteen patients (51%) harbored an RAS mutation. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group - Performance Status (PS) was 0–1 for 86% of patients and 2 for 14% of patients. Nineteen patients (66%) initially received reduced doses of 120 or 80 mg/day. The median duration of treatment was 2.5 months (range, 0.13–11.4 months). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 86% of patients. The most frequent adverse events of any grade were fatigue (35%), diarrhea (20%), and hand-foot skin reaction (20%). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 10 patients (35%). Three patients (10%) were admitted to hospital due to drug-related severe adverse events. The mean cost of patient management with regorafenib for the duration of treatment was 9908 ± 8191€, and median cost was 7917€ (Interquartile range (IQR) 4469-13,042). The median overall survival was six months (95% confidence interval, five to eight months). Conclusions The safety and efficacy of regorafenib in heavily pretreated mCRC patients was comparable, in our study, to prospective and retrospective trials. Toxic effects were mostly manageable in an outpatient setting. Regorafenib itself represented the most important (93%) part of supported costs. Even though most side effects were manageable in an outpatient setting, severe adverse events occurred from hospitalization in 10% of patients. These data should be confirmed in a larger real-life-based cohort. Identification of predictive biomarkers is needed for mCRC patient selection for regorafenib treatment.

Docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy for metastatic or unresectable locally recurrent anal squamous cell carcinoma (Epitopes-HPV02): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND The incidence of anal squamous cell carcinoma has been increasing markedly in the past few decades. Currently, there is no validated treatment for advanced-stage anal squamous cell carcinoma. Therefore, we aimed to validate the clinical activity and safety of docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) chemotherapy in patients with metastatic or unresectable locally recurrent anal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS We did a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. We recruited patients from 25 academic hospitals, cancer research centres, and community hospitals in France who were aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed anal squamous cell carcinoma, with metastatic disease or with unresectable local recurrence; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1; and with at least one evaluable lesion according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1). Chemotherapy-naive patients received either six cycles of standard DCF (75 mg/m2 docetaxel and 75 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1 and 750 mg/m2 per day of fluorouracil for 5 days, every 3 weeks) or eight cycles of modified DCF (40 mg/m2 docetaxel and 40 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1 and 1200 mg/m2 per day of fluorouracil for 2 days, every 2 weeks), which were administered intravenously. The choice between the standard versus modified regimens was recommended based on, but not limited to, age (≤75 years vs >75 years) and ECOG performance status (0 vs 1). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival at 12 months from the first DCF cycle; for the primary endpoint to be met, at least 11 (17%) of 66 enrolled patients had to be alive without disease progression at 12 months. Efficacy and safety analyses were done in a modified intention-to-treat population, defined as all patients who were evaluable for progression at 12 months who received at least one cycle of DCF. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02402842, and the final results are presented here. FINDINGS Between Sept 17, 2014, and Dec 7, 2016, we enrolled 69 patients. Of these patients, three did not receive DCF. Of the 66 patients who received treatment, 36 received the standard DCF regimen and 30 received modified DCF. The primary endpoint was met: 31 (47%) of 66 patients were alive and progression free at 12 months. 22 (61%) of 36 patients who received the standard DCF regimen and 18 (60%) of 30 patients who received the modified DCF regimen had disease progression at data cutoff. 46 (70%) of 66 patients had at least one grade 3-4 adverse event (30 [83%] of 36 in the standard DCF regimen and 16 [53%] of 30 in the modified DCF regimen). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (15 [23%]; eight [22%] for standard DCF vs seven [23%] for modified DCF), diarrhoea (12 [18%]; nine [25%] vs three [10%]), asthenia (ten [15%]; eight [22%] vs two [7%]), anaemia (ten [15%]; six [17%] vs four [13%]), lymphopenia (eight [12%]; three [8%] vs five [17%]), mucositis (seven [11%]; seven [19%] vs none), and vomiting (seven [11%]; five [14%] vs two [7%]). No grade 4 non-haematological adverse events and febrile neutropenia were observed with modified DCF, whereas three (8%) grade 4 non-haematological adverse events and five (14%) cases of febrile neutropenia were reported with standard DCF. 97 serious adverse events were reported (69 in patients who received the standard DCF regimen [61 drug-related] and 28 in those given the modified DCF regimen [14 drug-related]). No treatment-related deaths were recorded. INTERPRETATION Compared with standard DCF, modified DCF provided long-lasting response with good tolerability in patients with metastatic or unresectable locally recurrent anal squamous cell carcinoma with ECOG performance status of 0-1 in the first-line setting, and therefore could be considered as a new standard of care for these patients. Regarding the elevated risk of high-grade and serious adverse events and febrile neutropenia, standard DCF cannot be recommended in this situation. FUNDING Besançon University Hospital and Ligue contre le cancer Grand-Est.