Stefano Salciccia

Role of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging and Proton MR Spectroscopic Imaging in the Detection of Local Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer

OBJECTIVES To assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopic imaging (1H-MRSI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR (DCEMR) in the depiction of local prostate cancer recurrence in patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS 1H-MRSI and DCEMR were performed in 70 patients at high risk of local recurrence after RP. The population was divided on the basis of the clinical validation of MR results with the use of a transrectal ultrasound biopsy examination in a group of 50 patients (group A) and the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum level restitution after external beam radiotherapy, in a group of 20 patients (group B). RESULTS In group A, 1H-MRSI analysis alone showed a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 88%; the DCEMR analysis alone, a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 94%; combined 1HMRSI-DCEMR, a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 94%. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for 1HMRSI, DCEMR, and combined 1HMRSI /DCEMR were 0.942, 0.93,1 and 0.964, respectively. In group B, 1HMRSI alone showed a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 83%; DCEMR, a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 100%; combined 1HMRSI and DCEMR, a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 100%. Areas under the ROC curve for each of these groups were 0.81, 0.923, and 0.94, respectively. CONCLUSION Our results show that combined 1H-MRSI and DCMRE is an accurate method to identify local prostate cancer recurrence in patients with biochemical progression after RP.

Value of magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging for detecting prostate cancer foci in men with prior negative biopsy

Purpose: This study aimed to prospectively analyze the role of magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) and dynamic-contrast enhancement magnetic resonance (DCEMR) in the detection of prostate tumor foci in patients with persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen levels (in the range of ≥4 ng/mL to <10 ng/mL) and prior negative random trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy. Experimental Design: This was a prospective randomized single-center study. One hundred and eighty eligible cases were included in the study. Patients in group A were submitted to a second random prostate biopsy, whereas patients in group B were submitted to a 1H-MRSI-DCEMR examination and samples targeted on suspicious areas were associated to the random biopsy. Results: At the second biopsy, a prostate adenocarcinoma histologic diagnosis was found in 22 of 90 cases (24.4%) in group A and in 41 of 90 cases (45.5%) in group B (P = 0.01). On a patient-by-patient basis, MRSI had 92.3% sensitivity, 88.2% specificity, 85.7% positive predictive value (PPV), 93.7% negative predictive value (NPV), and 90% accuracy; DCEMR had 84.6 % sensitivity, 82.3% specificity, 78.5% PPV, 87.5% NPV, and 83.3% accuracy; and the association MRSI plus DCEMR had 92.6% sensitivity, 88.8% specificity, 88.7% PPV, 92.7% NPV, and 90.7% accuracy, for predicting prostate cancer detection. Conclusions: The combination of MRSI and DCEMR showed the potential to guide biopsy to cancer foci in patients with previously negative TRUS biopsy. To avoid a potential bias, represented from having taken more samples in group B (mean of cores, 12.17) than in group A (10 cores), in the future a MRSI/DCEMR directed biopsy could be prospectively compared with a saturation biopsy procedure. Clin Cancer Res; 16(6); 1875–83

Prostate growth and inflammation.

INTRODUCTION There is emerging evidence that prostatic inflammation may contribute to prostate growth either in terms of hyperplastic (BPH) or neoplastic (PC) changes. Inflammation is thought to incite carcinogenesis by causing cell and genome damage, promoting cellular turnover. METHODS We reviewed our personal experience and the international recent literature on the clinical data supporting a role of inflammation on BPH and PC growth and progression. RESULTS BPH: Among those patients with self-reported prostatitis, 57% had a history of BPH. MTOPS study showed that men with inflammation had a significantly higher risk of BPH progression and acute urinary retention. We showed that the use of a COX-2 inhibitor in combination with a 5 alpha reductase inhibitor could increase the apoptotic index in BPH tissue. Prostate cancer: A PCR-based analysis of bacterial colonization in PC specimens and normal prostate tissue showed highly suggestive correlation of bacterial colonization and chronic inflammation with a diagnosis of PC. Evidence from genetic studies support the hypothesis that prostate inflammation may be a cause of prostate cancer. De Marzo proposed that proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA) is a precursor to PIN and cancer. CONCLUSION The concept that inflammation can promote prostate growth either in terms of BPH and PC risk remains highly suggestive.

Early Recovery of Urinary Continence After Radical Prostatectomy Using Early Pelvic Floor Electrical Stimulation and Biofeedback Associated Treatment

PURPOSE We analyzed the benefit of the early combined use of functional pelvic floor electrical stimulation and biofeedback in terms of time to recovery and rate of continence after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 60 consecutive patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were included in the study. Patients were prospectively randomized to a treatment group (group 1) vs a control group (group 2). In group 1 a program of pelvic floor electrical stimulation plus biofeedback began 7 days after catheter removal, twice a week for 6 weeks. Each of the 12 treatment sessions was composed of biofeedback (15 minutes) followed by pelvic floor electrical stimulation (20 minutes). The evaluation of continence was performed at time 0, at 2 and 4 weeks, and at 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 months during followup. Evaluations were performed using the 24-hour pad test and the incontinence section of the International Continence Society questionnaire. RESULTS The mean leakage weight became significantly lower (p <0.05) in group 1 than in group 2 starting at 4 weeks until 6 months of followup. A significant difference (p <0.05) between groups 1 and 2 in terms of percentage of continent patients was achieved from 4 weeks (63.3% group 1 and 30.0% group 2) to 6 months (96.7% group 1 and 66.7% group 2). CONCLUSIONS Early, noninvasive physical treatment with biofeedback and pelvic floor electrical stimulation has a significant positive impact on the early recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy.

Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (1H-MRSI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (DCE-MRI): pattern changes from inflammation to prostate cancer.

PURPOSE To assess (1)H-magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging ((1)H-MRSI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (DCE-MRI) features in histologically confirmed prostatic chronic inflammation, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), low grade prostate cancer (LGPCa), and high grade prostate cancer (HGPCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS Ninety-six men were selected, who showed at histology a diagnosis of chronic inflammation (Group B), high grade (HG) PIN (Group C), or prostate cancer (LGPCa = Group D and HGPCa = Group E). RESULTS ANOVA analysis shows that inflammation (Group B) displays no significantly (p >.05) different choline and citrate levels when compared to HGPIN and LGPCa. CONCLUSION our results suggest the potential for these MR imaging techniques in the description of inflammatory and proliferative lesions inside the prostate gland.

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate can improve the predictive value of the urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 test in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and a previous negative biopsy.

Study Type – Clinical (prospective trial)

Comparative analysis of multiparametric magnetic resonance and PET-CT in the management of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE Our aim was to assess whether multiparametric magnetic resonance and PET-CT can have a role in detecting local recurrence in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. METHODS We reviewed the recent international literature by carrying out a PUBMED search. RESULTS We critically reviewed 11 recent original studies about the use of PET-CT and 5 recent studies about the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance. PET-CT has not shown significant results in terms of detection rate for local recurrence in patients with low level of PSA. Multiparametric magnetic resonance showed encouraging results to detect local recurrence in patients with low PSA and with small diameter lesions. CONCLUSIONS Currently, most important urological societies do not consider multiparametric magnetic resonance and PET-CT in the follow-up of patients with suspected local recurrence after radical prostatectomy. We can assert that multiparametric magnetic resonance seems to have excellent results in detecting local recurrence in patients submitted to radical prostatectomy and PSA<1.5 ng/ml.

Proton spectroscopic and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance: a modern approach in prostate cancer imaging.

At present, the evaluation of prostate cancer is more determined by the use of clinical nomograms including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) determination and by pathologic findings of the tumour at biopsy or after surgery. For a long time, a valid diagnostic imaging procedure has not been available for prostate cancer detection, staging, and follow-up during therapies. All three cross-sectional imaging modalities [computer tomography (CT), ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance (MR)] have been employed in patients with prostate cancer, and each have important limitations. In particular, reports on the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been contradictory [1]. Recently a large number of studies [2–5] have shown that the addition of proton 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (1H-MRSI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging to MR (DCEMR) could represent a powerful tool for the management of prostate cancer in most of its aspects: initial diagnosis, cancer localization and local staging, assessment of tumour aggressiveness, road-map for surgery and radiotherapy, and early detection of local recurrence.

Modern role of magnetic resonance and spectroscopy in the imaging of prostate cancer

Recently, a large number of studies have shown that the addition of proton 1H-spectroscopic imaging (1H-MRSI) and dynamic contrast enhanced imaging (DCEMR) to magnetic resonance (MR) could represent a powerful tool for the management of prostate cancer (CaP) in most of its aspects. This combination of MR techniques can substantially sustain the clinical management of patients with CaP at different levels: in particular, (1) in the initial assessment, reducing the need for more extensive biopsies and directing targeted biopsies; (2) in the definition of a biochemical progression after primary therapies, distinguishing between fibrotic reaction and local recurrence from CaP.

Distribution of high chromogranin A serum levels in patients with nonmetastatic and metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma.

Objectives: We analyzed the incidence of elevated serum levels of chromogranin A (CgA) (as marker of neuroendocrine activity) in nonmetastatic and metastatic prostate cancer populations. Material and Methods: 264 consecutive men with nonmetastatic prostate adenocarcinoma considered for radical prostatectomy (group 1) and 89 consecutive men with metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma (group 2) represented our population. In all 353 cases a blood sample for the determination of serum total PSA and CgA levels was obtained (RIA). Two different cut-off for elevated serum CgA levels were used: >60 and >90 ng/ml. Results: In group 1, 35.0% of cases presented CgA levels >60 ng/ml and 6.4% >90 ng/ml. In group 2, 100% of cases presented CgA levels >60 ng/ml and 69.7% >90 ng/ml. The OR for CgA level >60 and >90 ng/ml significantly increased from nonmetastatic to metastatic cases (p = 0.0001). In group 1 the percentage of cases with CgA >60 ng/ml was 29.6% in Gleason score ≤7 (3 + 4) and 46.4% in Gleason score ≥7 (4 + 3) (p = 0.0001). In group 2, the percentage of cases with CgA >90 ng/ml was 51.8% in Gleason score ≤7 (3 + 4) and 77.4% in Gleason score ≥7 (4 + 3) (p = 0.0028). Conclusions: We describe a significant incidence of elevated serum levels of CgA either in nonmetastatic (using 60 ng/ml as cut-off) or in metastatic (using 90 ng/ml as cut-off) prostate adenocarcinoma cases.