Stefano Turi

Esmolol reduces perioperative ischemia in noncardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

OBJECTIVE Literature increasingly has suggested how beta-blockers could be associated with reductions of mortality and morbidity in noncardiac surgery. Recently, the POISE trial showed that beta-blockers could be harmful in the perioperative period. The authors performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical effects of esmolol in noncardiac surgery. DESIGN Meta-analysis. SETTING Hospitals. PARTICIPANTS A total of 1765 patients from 32 randomized trials. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Three investigators independently searched BioMedCentral and PubMed. Inclusion criteria were random allocation to treatment and comparison of esmolol versus placebo, other drugs, or standard of care in noncardiac surgery. Exclusion criteria were duplicate publications, nonhuman experimental studies, and no data on clinical outcomes. The use of esmolol was associated with a significant reduction of myocardial ischemia episodes (5/283 [1.76%] in the esmolol group v 16/265 [6.03%] in the control arm, odds ratio [OR] = 0.16 [0.05-0.54], p = 0.003). The authors did not observe significant differences regarding episodes of arrhythmias (8/236 [3.38%] v 22/309 [7.11%], OR = 0.52 [0.23-1.18], p = 0.12) and in the incidence of myocardial infarction (0/148 [0%] v 1/169 [0.59%], OR = 0.23 [0.01-6.09], p = 0.38). Esmolol-treated patients did not experience more episodes of hypotension (17/384 [4.42%] v 38/439 [8.65%], OR = 0.41 [0.22-0.79], p = 0.17) and bradycardia (25/342 [7.30%] v 17/406 [4.18%], OR = 1.42 [0.74-2.74], p = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS Esmolol seemed to reduce the incidence of myocardial ischemia in noncardiac surgery without increasing the episodes of hypotension and bradycardia. Large randomized trials are necessary to confirm these promising results.

Spinal Analgesia in Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE Controversial results exist on the effects of spinal analgesia in cardiac surgery. The authors conducted a review of randomized studies to show whether there are any advantages in clinically relevant outcomes using spinal analgesia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. DESIGN Meta-analysis. SETTING Multiple hospitals. PARTICIPANTS A total of 1,106 patients from 25 randomized trials. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULT PubMed, BioMedCentral, CENTRAL, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and conference proceedings were searched (updated January 2009) for randomized trials that compared general anesthesia with an anesthetic plan including spinal analgesia in cardiac surgery. Four independent reviewers performed data extraction, with divergences resolved by consensus. A total of 1,106 patients from 25 randomized studies were included in the analysis. Overall analysis showed that there were no differences in terms of mortality (2/562 [0.4%] in the spinal group v 2/514 [0.4%] in the control arm [risk difference (RD) = 0.00 [-0.02, +0.02], p = 1.0), perioperative myocardial infarction (9/421 [2.1%] in the spinal group v 11/407 [2.7%] in the control arm [RD = 0.00, -(0.03, +0.02), p = 0.77), and the length of hospital stay (WMD = -0.28 days [-0.68, -0.13], p = 0.18, with 419 included patients). CONCLUSIONS This analysis indicated that spinal analgesia does not improve clinically relevant outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, discouraging further randomized controlled trials on this topic even if changes in techniques, devices, and drugs could modify the outlook of the comparison between spinal and standard anesthesia in this setting.

Noninvasive Ventilation Outside the Intensive Care Unit From the Patient Point of View: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is increasingly utilized outside the ICU for patients with acute respiratory failure. However, success and failure risk factors and patient safety aspects have been poorly explored in this setting. So far, no study has evaluated the perspective of the patient, despite the known high relevance of patient participation for NIV success. METHODS: We prospectively interviewed (following a standard questionnaire) the patients successfully treated with NIV for acute respiratory failure outside the ICU. Subjects were interviewed 24–48 hours after NIV suspension. Exclusion criteria: NIV failure, patient not competent, patient unwilling to participate in the study, patient transferred to the ICU. RESULTS: Forty-five consecutive patients were included in the study. Only 20% participated in the initial setting of NIV parameters. More than 40% reported they never had the possibility to discuss the NIV treatment. Eighty percent reported they were never asked to try another interface. All subjects knew how to call for help, but only one fourth had been trained to remove the mask, and 22% reported not being able at all to remove the mask if needed. One half of the subjects reported having received help immediately when needed, but 15% waited more than 3 min. All subjects reported complications, and 18% reported respiratory worsening while on NIV. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects reported a low level of involvement in the initial setting of NIV treatment, low satisfaction about communication with the caring staff, and a suboptimal safety level in case of emergency.

Continuous infusion versus bolus injection of furosemide in pediatric patients after cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized studies

Introduction. Acute renal failure and fluid retention are common problems in pediatric patients after cardiac surgery. Furosemide, a loop diuretic drug, is frequently administered to increase urinary output. The aim of the present study was to compare efficacy and complications of continuous infusion of furosemide vs bolus injection among pediatric patients after cardiac surgery. Methods. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in compliance with The Cochrane Collaboration and the Quality of Reporting of Meta-Analysis (QUORUM) guidelines. The following inclusion criteria were employed for potentially relevant studies: a) random treatment allocation, b) comparison of furosemide bolus vs continuous infusion, c) surgical or intensive care pediatric patients. Non-parallel design randomized trials (e.g. cross-over), duplicate publications and non-human experimental studies were excluded. Results. Up to August 2008, only three studies were found, with 92 patients randomized (50 to continuous infusion and 42 to bolus treatment). Overall analysis showed that continuous infusion and bolus administration were equally effective in achieving the predefined urinary output, and were associated with a similar amount of administered furosemide (WMD=- 1.71 mg/kg/day (-5.20; +1.78), p for effect=0.34, p for heterogeneity<0.001, I2=99.0). However, in the continuous infu- sion group, patients had a significantly reduced urinary output (WMD=-0.48 ml/kg/day (-0.88; -0.08), p for effect=0.02, p for heterogeneity <0.70, I2=0%). Conclusions. Existing data comparing furosemide bolus injection with a continuous infusion are insufficient to confidently assess the best way to administer furosemide to pediatric patients after cardiac surgery. Larger studies are needed before any recommendations can be made.

Intrathecal lactate concentration and spinal cord injury in thoracoabdominal aortic surgery.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of lactate as an early predictor of spinal cord injury during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. DESIGN Observational study. SETTING University hospital. PARTICIPANTS Sixteen consecutive patients (10 men and 6 women) scheduled to undergo thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair were enrolled in the study. All patients were affected by atherosclerotic aneurysmal pathology. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS During surgery, the authors simultaneously withdrew samples of cerebrospinal fluid and arterial blood to evaluate pO(2), pCO(2), pH, and lactate concentration. Samples were collected at 5 fixed times during and after surgery: T1 (before aortic cross-clamping), T2 (15 minutes after clamping), T3 (just before unclamping), T4 (end of surgery), and T5 (4 hours after the end of surgery). Lactate levels in cerebrospinal fluid rose consistently during aortic cross-clamping (T1 = 1.89 mmol/L, T2 = 2.21 mmol/L, T3 = 2.88 mmol/L, T4 = 3.655 mmol/L, and T5 = 3.16 mmol/L). Lactate concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid were significantly higher in the 4 patients who developed neurologic injury, even at T1 (before surgery), than in those who did not end in spinal cord injury with the 4 highest values belonging to the 4 patients who later developed spinal cord injury. CONCLUSIONS This study has the potential to elucidate the time course of early lactate level elevation during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair and its clinical use in predicting the development of postoperative spinal cord injury.

Organ protection by volatile anesthetics in non-coronary artery bypass grafting surgery

The cardioprotective properties of volatile anesthetics have been widely demonstrated by numerous randomized studies and meta-analyses in the setting of cardiac surgery, above of all during coronary artery bypass grafting procedures. Recently, conflicting results have been presented in cardiac non-coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Unfortunately, despite the existence of a great number of studies comparing a total intravenous anesthetic regimen with an inhalational regimen, at present there are no randomized studies presenting data regarding mortality and important outcomes, such as myocardial infarction, in non-cardiac surgery. In this review we analyze and present the results of the most recent and important studies regarding anesthetic preconditioning in cardiac and in noncardiac surgery. Furthermore, we focus on the emerging data from animal experiments, discussing in particular the molecular mechanisms underlying anesthetic preconditioning.