Steffen Oppel

Invasive mammal eradication on islands results in substantial conservation gains.

Significance Global conservation actions to prevent or slow extinctions and protect biodiversity are costly. However, few conservation actions have been evaluated for their efficacy globally, hampering the prioritization of conservation actions. Islands are key areas for biodiversity conservation because they are home to more than 15% of terrestrial species and more than one-third of critically endangered species; nearly two-thirds of recent extinctions were of island species. This research quantifies the benefits to native island fauna of removing invasive mammals from islands. Our results highlight the importance of this conservation measure for protecting the worlds most threatened species. More than US

Timing and Distance of King Eider Migration and Winter Movements

21 billion is spent annually on biodiversity conservation. Despite their importance for preventing or slowing extinctions and preserving biodiversity, conservation interventions are rarely assessed systematically for their global impact. Islands house a disproportionately higher amount of biodiversity compared with mainlands, much of which is highly threatened with extinction. Indeed, island species make up nearly two-thirds of recent extinctions. Islands therefore are critical targets of conservation. We used an extensive literature and database review paired with expert interviews to estimate the global benefits of an increasingly used conservation action to stem biodiversity loss: eradication of invasive mammals on islands. We found 236 native terrestrial insular faunal species (596 populations) that benefitted through positive demographic and/or distributional responses from 251 eradications of invasive mammals on 181 islands. Seven native species (eight populations) were negatively impacted by invasive mammal eradication. Four threatened species had their International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List extinction-risk categories reduced as a direct result of invasive mammal eradication, and no species moved to a higher extinction-risk category. We predict that 107 highly threatened birds, mammals, and reptiles on the IUCN Red List—6% of all these highly threatened species—likely have benefitted from invasive mammal eradications on islands. Because monitoring of eradication outcomes is sporadic and limited, the impacts of global eradications are likely greater than we report here. Our results highlight the importance of invasive mammal eradication on islands for protecting the worlds most imperiled fauna.

Prioritizing Islands for the Eradication of Invasive Vertebrates in the United Kingdom Overseas Territories

Abstract Understanding the patterns, extent, and phenology of migration is important for estimating potential influences of habitat or climate changes on populations of migratory birds. We used satellite telemetry of >100 individual King Eiders (Somateria spectabilis) tagged in northwestern North America in 2002–2006 to describe the timing and extent of their migration and winter movements in the Bering Sea. We found high variability in timing of migration events and distances flown. Arrival on breeding grounds and onset of molt migration were the least variable events in duration. Fall migration was extremely variable, ranging from less than a week to several months. More than a third of King Eiders did not migrate after wing molt and wintered on or near wing-molting areas. We found diffuse migratory connectivity between breeding and wintering areas, and low intrayear fidelity to 25 km radius wintering sites. More than half of the King Eiders used several wintering sites in a given year, and their winter ranges were considerably larger than those of other sea duck species. We identified three distinct wintering regions in the Bering Sea that were several hundred km apart, among which no movements occurred from late December until April. The onset of spring migration was earlier for birds wintering farther south, but arrival time on breeding grounds was not correlated with wintering latitude. We conclude that high phenotypic plasticity in migratory traits may render King Eiders more likely to respond to environmental shifts than sea duck species that show stronger migratory connectivity.

Effects of Lipid Extraction on Stable Isotope Ratios in Avian Egg Yolk: Is Arithmetic Correction a Reliable Alternative?

Invasive alien species are one of the primary threats to native biodiversity on islands worldwide. Consequently, eradicating invasive species from islands has become a mainstream conservation practice. Deciding which islands have the highest priority for eradication is of strategic importance to allocate limited resources to achieve maximum conservation benefit. Previous island prioritizations focused either on a narrow set of native species or on a small geographic area. We devised a prioritization approach that incorporates all threatened native terrestrial vertebrates and all invasive terrestrial vertebrates occurring on 11 U.K. overseas territories, which comprise over 2000 islands ranging from the sub-Antarctic to the tropics. Our approach includes eradication feasibility and distinguishes between the potential and realistic conservation value of an eradication, which reflects the benefit that would accrue following eradication of either all invasive species or only those species for which eradication techniques currently exist. We identified the top 25 priority islands for invasive species eradication that together would benefit extant populations of 155 native species including 45 globally threatened species. The 5 most valuable islands included the 2 World Heritage islands Gough (South Atlantic) and Henderson (South Pacific) that feature unique seabird colonies, and Anegada, Little Cayman, and Guana Island in the Caribbean that feature a unique reptile fauna. This prioritization can be rapidly repeated if new information or techniques become available, and the approach could be replicated elsewhere in the world.

Using an algorithmic model to reveal individually variable movement decisions in a wintering sea duck

ABSTRACT. Many studies of nutrient allocation to egg production in birds use stable isotope ratios of egg yolk to identify the origin of nutrients. Dry egg yolk contains >50% lipids, which are known to be depleted in 13C. Currently, researchers remove lipids from egg yolk using a chemical lipid-extraction procedure before analyzing the isotopic composition of protein in egg yolk. We examined the effects of chemical lipid extraction on &dgr;13C, &dgr;15N, and &dgr;34S of avian egg yolk and explored the utility of an arithmetic lipid correction model to adjust whole yolk &dgr;13C for lipid content. We analyzed the dried yolk of 15 captive Spectacled Eider (Somateria fischeri) and 20 wild King Eider (S. spectabilis) eggs, both as whole yolk and after lipid extraction with a 2:1 chloroform:methanol solution. We found that chemical lipid extraction leads to an increase of (mean ± SD) 3.3 ± 1.1‰ in &dgr;13C, 1.1 ± 0.5‰ in &dgr;15N, and 2.3 ± 1.1‰ in &dgr;34S. Arithmetic lipid correction provided accurate values for lipid-extracted &dgr;13C in captive Spectacled Eiders fed on a homogeneous high-quality diet. However, arithmetic lipid correction was unreliable for wild King Eiders, likely because of their differential incorporation of macronutrients from isotopically distinct environments during migration. For that reason, we caution against applying arithmetic lipid correction to the whole yolk &dgr;13C of migratory birds, because these methods assume that all egg macronutrients are derived from the same dietary sources.

Using eggshell membranes as a non-invasive tool to investigate the source of nutrients in avian eggs

1. Many migratory birds are assumed to remain fairly stationary during winter. However, recent research indicates that mid-winter movements are evident in a variety of bird species, and the factors causing individuals to move are poorly understood. 2. We examined the winter movements of 95 individual king eiders (Somateria spectabilis, L.) tracked with satellite transmitters in the Bering Sea between 2002 and 2006 to explore whether environmental factors such as day length, location, sea ice, and habitat quality could explain the occurrence of winter movements longer than 50 km. 3. We used a novel algorithmic random forest model to assess the importance of variables predicting whether a bird remained or departed from a wintering site. 4. We found extremely high individual variability in winter movement decisions by king eiders, and the individual bird was the most important variable followed by location, date, and sea ice concentration. 5. We conclude that individual strategies exist that interact with environmental conditions to form multiple movement patterns. 6. While a minor proportion of winter movements may be forced by environmental conditions, we propose that many winter movements may be of an exploratory nature where individuals aim to acquire information about alternative wintering sites that may enhance their survival probability at some point in time when environmental fluctuation renders their preferred wintering site unsuitable.

Assessing population viability while accounting for demographic and environmental uncertainty.

Development of minimally invasive techniques to collect nutritional information from free-living birds is desirable for both ethical and conservation reasons. Here, we explore the utility of waterfowl eggshell membranes to determine the nutrient source of egg formation by using stable isotope ratios. We compared δ13C and δ15N of membranes from complete king eider (Somateria spectabilis) eggs to membranes of hatched or depredated eggs of the same clutch remaining after incubation. Despite large variation among membranes (δ13C: −26 to −14‰) we found a highly predictable relationship between δ13C of complete egg membranes and remaining (hatched or depredated) membranes from the same clutch. We did not find a consistent change in either δ13C or δ15N of eggshell membranes during incubation. We suggest that isotope ratios of membranes can be used to determine the source of exogenous nutrients for egg production in income breeders, and that membranes may offer a clutch-specific reference point for dietary nutrients (‘income endpoint’) in isotopic mixing models quantifying nutrient allocation in capital or mixed-strategy breeders.

Using a Random Forest Model and Public Data to Predict the Distribution of Prey for Marine Wildlife Management

Predicting the future trend and viability of populations is an essential task in ecology. Because many populations respond to changing environments, uncertainty surrounding environmental responses must be incorporated into population assessments. However, understanding the effects of environmental variation on population dynamics requires information on several important demographic parameters that are often difficult to estimate. Integrated population models facilitate the integration of time series data on population size and all existing demographic information from a species, allowing the estimation of demographic parameters for which limited or no empirical data exist. Although these models are ideal for assessments of population viability, they have so far not included environmental uncertainty. We incorporated environmental variation in an integrated population model to account for both demographic and environmental uncertainty in an assessment of population viability. In addition, we used this model to estimate true juvenile survival, an important demographic parameter for population dynamics that is difficult to estimate empirically. We applied this model to assess the past and future population trend of a rare island endemic songbird, the Montserrat Oriole Icterus oberi, which is threatened by volcanic activity. Montserrat Orioles experienced lower survival in years with volcanic ashfall, causing periodic population declines that were compensated by higher seasonal fecundity in years with high pre-breeding season rainfall. Due to the inclusion of both demographic and environmental uncertainty in the model, the estimated population growth rate in the immediate future was highly imprecise (95% credible interval 0.844-1.105), and the probability of extinction after three generations (in the year 2028) was low (2.1%). This projection demonstrates that accounting for both demographic and environmental sources of uncertainty provides a more realistic assessment of the viability of populations under unknown future environmental conditions.

Importance of lethal control of invasive predators for island conservation

Modern wildlife management relies on studies investigating the distribution patterns and habitat selection of wildlife at appropriately large scales for decision-making. One important aspect to consider in the assessment of habitat suitability and the underlying mechanism of animal distribution is the spatial distribution of their food resources. In marine areas, where many mammal and bird species occur over large spatial scales, the analysis of habitat use and distribution patterns requires information on the distribution of food resources at appropriately large scales (Huettmann and Diamond 2006). An important food resource for several species of marine birds and mammals are invertebrate organisms that live on the bottom of the sea and are collectively described as the benthos, a community that is especially productive and diverse at high latitudes (Carey 1991; Piepenburg 2005; Starmans et al. 1999). The distribution and productivity of benthic foragers such as ice seals, walrus (Odobenus rosmarus), sea ducks (Somateria spp., Melanitta spp.), and gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus) is influenced by the distribution of accessible benthic prey resources (Kaiser et al. 2006; Lovvorn et al. 2003; Moore et al. 2003). Benthic invertebrates thus form a key component in the trophic structure of marine ecosystems, and the distribution of marine benthic invertebrates is of major interest to wildlife managers (Solan et al. 2004). Most of the species mentioned above are of management concern, and either are (Spectacled Eider, Somateria fischeri; Stellers Eider, Polysticta stelleri) or have been proposed (walrus, ice seals) to be listed as ‘threatened’. Therefore, the identification and delineation of critical habitat providing sufficient food resources for these species will become extremely important in the near future.

Cowbird parasitism of Pale-headed Brush-finch Atlapetes pallidiceps : implications for conservation and management

James C. Russell,∗† Holly P. Jones,‡ Doug P. Armstrong,§ Franck Courchamp,∗∗ Peter J. Kappes,†† Philip J. Seddon,‡‡ Steffen Oppel,§§ Mark J. Rauzon,∗∗∗ Phil E. Cowan,††† Gerard Rocamora,† Piero Genovesi,‡‡‡ Elsa Bonnaud,∗∗ Bradford S. Keitt,§§§ Nick D. Holmes,§§§ and Bernie R. Tershy∗∗∗∗ ∗School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand, email j.russell@auckland.ac.nz †Island Biodiversity & Conservation Center, University of Seychelles, P.O. Box 1348, Anse Royale, Republic of Seychelles ‡Department of Biological Sciences and Institute for the Study of the Environment, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115, U.S.A. §Wildlife Ecology Group, Institute of Natural Resources, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand ∗∗Ecologie Systematique Evolution, Universite Paris-Sud, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Universite Paris-Saclay, 91400 Orsay, France ††Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, U.S.A. ‡‡Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand §§RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire SG19 2DL, United Kingdom ∗∗∗Geography Department, Laney College, Oakland, CA 94607, U.S.A. †††Landcare Research, P.O. Box 69040, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand ‡‡‡Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, Via V. Brancati 48, Rome I-00144, Italy §§§Island Conservation, 2161 Delaware Avenue Suite A, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, U.S.A. ∗∗∗∗University of California Santa Cruz, 100 Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, U.S.A.