Steffen Wedel
Goethe University Frankfurt
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Steffen Wedel.
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine | 2009
Jon Jones; Eva Juengel; Ausra Mickuckyte; Lukasz Hudak; Steffen Wedel; Dietger Jonas; Roman A. Blaheta
Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors represent a promising class of antineoplastic agents which affect tumour growth, differentiation and invasion. The effects of the HDAC inhibitor valproic acid (VPA) were tested in vitro and in vivo on pre‐clinical renal cell carcinoma (RCC) models. Caki‐1, KTC‐26 or A498 cells were treated with various concentrations of VPA during in vitro cell proliferation 3‐(4,5‐dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)‐2,5‐diphenyltetrazolium bromide assays and to evaluate cell cycle manipulation. In vivo tumour growth was conducted in subcutaneous xenograft mouse models. The anti‐tumoural potential of VPA combined with low‐dosed interferon‐α (IFN‐α) was also investigated. VPA significantly and dose‐dependently up‐regulated histones H3 and H4 acetylation and caused growth arrest in RCC cells. VPA altered cell cycle regulating proteins, in particular CDK2, cyclin B, cyclin D3, p21 and Rb. In vivo, VPA significantly inhibited the growth of Caki‐1 in subcutaneous xenografts, accompanied by a strong accumulation of p21 and bax in tissue specimens of VPA‐treated animals. VPA–IFN‐α combination markedly enhanced the effects of VPA monotherapy on RCC proliferation in vitro, but did not further enhance the anti‐tumoural potential of VPA in vivo. VPA was found to have profound effects on RCC cell growth, lending support to the initiation of clinical testing of VPA for treating advanced RCC.
European Urology | 2014
Paweł Wiechno; Bradley G. Somer; Begoña Mellado; Piotr Chlosta; José Manuel Cervera Grau; Daniel Castellano; Christoph W. M. Reuter; M. Stöckle; Jörn Kamradt; Joanna Pikiel; Ignacio Duran; Steffen Wedel; Sophie Callies; Valérie André; Karla Hurt; Jacqueline Brown; Michael Lahn; Bernhard Heinrich
Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is partially characterised by overexpression of antiapoptotic proteins, such as survivin. In this phase 2 study, patients with metastatic CRPC (n=154) were randomly assigned (1:2 ratio) to receive standard first-line docetaxel/prednisone (control arm) or the combination of LY2181308 with docetaxel/prednisone (experimental arm). The primary objective was to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) for LY2181308 plus docetaxel. Secondary efficacy measures included overall survival (OS), several predefined prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-derived end points, and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) scores. The median PFS of treated patients for the experimental arm (n=98) was 8.64 mo (90% confidence interval [CI], 7.39-10.45) versus 9.00 mo (90% CI, 7.00-10.09) in the control arm (n=51; p=0.755). The median OS for the experimental arm was 27.04 mo (90% CI, 19.94-33.41) compared with 29.04 mo (90% CI, 20.11-39.26; p=0.838). The PSA responses (≥ 50% PSA reduction), BPI, and FACT-P scores were similar in both arms. In the experimental arm, patients had a numerically higher incidence of grades 3-4 neutropenia, anaemia, thrombocytopenia, and sensory neuropathy. In conclusion, this study failed to detect a difference in efficacy between the two treatment groups.
Carcinogenesis | 2011
Kai Doberstein; Anja Wieland; Sophia Boyoung Lee; Roman A. Blaheta; Steffen Wedel; Holger Moch; Peter Schraml; Josef Pfeilschifter; Glen Kristiansen; Paul Gutwein
Conflicting data exist about the expression of L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1-CAM) in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). To determine the clinical usefulness of L1-CAM as a therapeutic or prognostic marker molecule in renal cancer patients, we analyzed its expression on a cohort of 282 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. L1-CAM expression was found in 49.5% of 282 renal cancer tissues. Importantly, L1-CAM expression in patients with ccRCC was associated with significantly shorter patient survival time. We further present evidence that L1-CAM was involved in the resistance against therapeutic reagents like rapamycin, sunitinib and cisplatin. The downregulation of L1-CAM expression decreased renal cancer cell proliferation and reduced the expression of cyclin D1. In addition, we found out that Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) deficiency was accompanied by a downregulation of the transcription factor PAX8 and L1-CAM. In normal renal tissue, PAX8 and L1-CAM were co-expressed in collecting duct cells. Importantly, the downregulation of PAX8 by small interfering RNA increased the expression of L1-CAM and concomitantly induced the migration of renal cancer cells. Furthermore, we observed in 65.3% of 282 RCC patients a downregulation of PAX8 expression. With chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis, we additionally demonstrate that PAX8 can bind to the promoter of L1-CAM and we further observed that the downregulation of PAX8 was accompanied by increased L1-CAM expression in a high fraction of ccRCC patients. In summary, we show that VHL and PAX8 are involved in the regulation of L1-CAM in renal cancer and L1-CAM represents an important therapeutic and prognostic marker protein for the treatment of ccRCC.
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine | 2008
Steffen Wedel; A. Sparatore; P. D. Soldato; S.-E. Al-Batran; A. Atmaca; Eva Juengel; Lukasz Hudak; Dietger Jonas; Roman A. Blaheta
The anti‐epileptic drug valproic acid is also under trial as an anti‐cancer agent due to its histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitory properties. However, the effects of valproic acid (VPA) are limited and concentrations required for exerting anti‐neoplastic effects in vitro may not be reached in tumour patients. In this study, we tested in vitro and in vivo effects of two VPA‐derivatives (ACS2, ACS33) on pre‐clinical prostate cancer models. PC3 and DU‐145 prostate tumour cell lines were treated with various concentrations of ACS2 or ACS33 to perform in vitro cell proliferation 3‐(4,5‐dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)‐2,5‐diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assays and to evaluate tumour cell adhesion to endothelial cell monolayers. Analysis of acetylated histones H3 and H4 protein expression was performed by western blotting. In vivo tumour growth was conducted in subcutaneous xenograft mouse models. Tumour sections were assessed by immunohistochemistry for histone H3 acetylation and proliferation. ACS2 and ACS33 significantly up‐regulated histone H3 and H4 acetylation in prostate cancer cell lines. In micromolar concentrations both compounds exerted growth arrest in PC3 and DU‐145 cells and prevented tumour cell attachment to endothelium. In vivo, ACS33 inhibited the growth of PC3 in subcutaneous xenografts. Immunohistochemistry and western blotting confirmed increased histone H3 acetylation and reduced proliferation. ACS2 and ACS33 represent novel VPA derivatives with superior anti‐tumoural activities, compared to the mother compound. This investigation lends support to the clinical testing of ACS2 or ACS33 for the treatment of prostate cancer.
Life Sciences | 2011
Steffen Wedel; Lukasz Hudak; Jens-Michael Seibel; Eva Juengel; Igor Tsaur; Christoph Wiesner; Axel Haferkamp; Roman A. Blaheta
AIMS To analyze the combined impact of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor valproic acid (VPA) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor RAD001 on prostate cancer cell growth. MAIN METHODS PC-3, DU-145 and LNCaP cells were treated with RAD001, VPA or with an RAD001-VPA combination for 3 or 5 days. Tumor cell growth, cell cycle progression and cell cycle regulating proteins were then investigated by MTT assay, flow cytometry and Western blotting, respectively. Effects of drug treatment on cell signaling pathways were determined. KEY FINDINGS Separate application of RAD001 or VPA distinctly reduced tumor cell growth and impaired cell cycle progression. Significant additive effects were evoked when both drugs were used in concert. Particularly, the cell cycle regulating proteins cdk1, cdk2, cdk4 and cyclin B were reduced, whereas p21 and p27 were enhanced by the RAD001-VPA combination. Signaling analysis revealed deactivation of EGFr, ERK1/2 and p70S6k. Phosphorylation of Akt was diminished in DU-145 but elevated in PC-3 and LNCaP cells. SIGNIFICANCE The RAD001-VPA combination exerted profound antitumor properties on a panel of prostate cancer cell lines. Therefore, simultaneous blockage of HDAC and mTOR related pathways should be considered when designing novel therapeutic strategies for treating prostate carcinoma.
BMC Cancer | 2011
Steffen Wedel; Lukasz Hudak; Jens-Michael Seibel; Jasmina Makarević; Eva Juengel; Igor Tsaur; Ana Maria Waaga-Gasser; Axel Haferkamp; Roman A. Blaheta
BackgroundSingle drug use has not achieved satisfactory results in the treatment of prostate cancer, despite application of increasingly widespread targeted therapeutics. In the present study, the combined impact of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-inhibitor RAD001, the dual EGFr and VGEFr tyrosine kinase inhibitor AEE788 and the histone deacetylase (HDAC)-inhibitor valproic acid (VPA) on prostate cancer growth and adhesion in vitro was investigated.MethodsPC-3, DU-145 and LNCaP cells were treated with RAD001, AEE788 or VPA or with a RAD-AEE-VPA combination. Tumor cell growth, cell cycle progression and cell cycle regulating proteins were then investigated by MTT-assay, flow cytometry and western blotting, respectively. Furthermore, tumor cell adhesion to vascular endothelium or to immobilized extracellular matrix proteins as well as migratory properties of the cells was evaluated, and integrin α and β subtypes were analyzed. Finally, effects of drug treatment on cell signaling pathways were determined.ResultsAll drugs, separately applied, reduced tumor cell adhesion, migration and growth. A much stronger anti-cancer effect was evoked by the triple drug combination. Particularly, cdk1, 2 and 4 and cyclin B were reduced, whereas p27 was elevated. In addition, simultaneous application of RAD001, AEE788 and VPA altered the membranous, cytoplasmic and gene expression pattern of various integrin α and β subtypes, reduced integrin-linked kinase (ILK) and deactivated focal adhesion kinase (FAK). Signaling analysis revealed that EGFr and the downstream target Akt, as well as p70S6k was distinctly modified in the presence of the drug combination.ConclusionsSimultaneous targeting of several key proteins in prostate cancer cells provides an advantage over targeting a single pathway. Since strong anti-tumor properties became evident with respect to cell growth and adhesion dynamics, the triple drug combination might provide progress in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine | 2007
Jon Jones; Stefan Berkhoff; Eva Weich; Tobias Engl; Steffen Wedel; Borna Relja; Dietger Jonas; Roman A. Blaheta
Adhesion molecules of the integrin beta1 family are thought to be involved in the malignant progression renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Still, it is not clear how they contribute to this process. Since the hematogenous phase of tumour dissemination is the rate‐limiting step in the metastatic process, we explored beta1 integrin alterations on several RCC cell lines (A498, Caki1, KTC26) before and after contacting vascular endothelium in a tumour‐endothelium (HUVEC) co‐culture assay. Notably, alpha2, alpha3 and alpha5 integrins became down‐regulated immediately after the tumour cells attached to HUVEC, followed by re‐expression shortly thereafter. Integrin down‐regulation on RCC cells was caused by direct contact with endothelial cells, since the isolated endothelial membrane fragments but not the cell culture supernatant contributed to the observed effects. Integrin loss was accompanied by a reduced focal adhesion kinase (FAK) expression, FAK activity and diminished binding of tumour cells to matrix proteins. Furthermore, intracellular signalling proteins RCC cells were altered in the presence of HUVEC membrane fragments, in particular 14‐3‐3 epsilon, ERK2, PKCdelta, PKCepsilon and RACK1, which are involved in regulating tumour cell motility. We, therefore, speculate that contact of RCC cells with the vascular endothelium converts integrin‐dependent adhesion to integrin‐independent cell movement. The process of dynamic integrin regulation may be an important part in tumour cell migration strategy, switching the cells from being adhesive to becoming motile and invasive.
The Prostate | 2012
Lukasz Hudak; Patrick Tezeeh; Steffen Wedel; Jasmina Makarević; Eva Juengel; Igor Tsaur; Georg Bartsch; Christoph Wiesner; Axel Haferkamp; Roman A. Blaheta
We evaluated whether low‐dosed interferon alpha (IFNa) may augment the anti‐tumor potential of the histone deacetylase (HDAC)‐inhibitor valproic acid (VPA) on prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. PC‐3, DU‐145, or LNCaP prostate cancer cells were treated with VPA (1 mM), IFNa (200 U/ml), or with the VPA‐IFNa combination. Tumor cell growth, cell cycle progression, and cell cycle regulating proteins were then investigated by the MTT assay, flow cytometry, and western blotting. Tumor cell adhesion to endothelium or to immobilized extracellular matrix proteins, as well as migratory properties of the cells, were evaluated. Integrin α and β adhesion molecules and alterations of cell signaling pathways were analyzed. Finally, effects of the drug treatment on prostate cancer growth in vivo were determined in the NOD/SCID mouse model. VPA reduced tumor cell adhesion, migration, and growth in vitro. A much stronger anti‐cancer potential was evoked by the VPA‐IFNa combination, although IFNa in itself did not block growth or adhesion. The same effect was seen when tumor growth was evaluated in vivo. Molecular analysis revealed distinct elevation of histone H3 acetylation caused by VPA which was further up‐regulated by VPA‐IFNa, whereas IFNa alone did not alter H3 acetylation. The combinatorial benefit became obvious in Akt phosphorylation, p21 and p27 and integrin α1, α3, and β1 expression. Application of low‐dosed IFNa to a VPA based regimen profoundly boosts the anti‐tumor properties of VPA. The combined use of VPA and low‐dosed IFNa may therefore be an innovative option in treating advanced prostate cancer. Prostate 72:1719–1735, 2012.
Cancer Letters | 2011
Steffen Wedel; Lukasz Hudak; Jens-Michael Seibel; Eva Juengel; Igor Tsaur; Axel Haferkamp; Roman A. Blaheta
The impact of the mTOR inhibitor RAD001 combined with the EGFr/VEGFr tyrosine kinase inhibitor AEE788 on prostate tumor cell growth, adhesion and migration was analyzed in vitro. The RAD001-AEE788 combination profoundly reduced tumor-endothelium and tumor-matrix contacts, suppressing cell growth and cell cycle progression. The underlying molecular mode of action depended on the cell phenotype, since cell cycle proteins, integrin subtype expression and integrin dependent signaling were altered in a different manner in PC-3 and DU-145 versus LNCaP prostate cancer cells. Simultaneous targeting of mTOR and VEGFr/EGFr related pathways may offer a novel therapeutic strategy for prostate cancer treatment.
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine | 2009
Jon Jones; Eva Juengel; Ausra Mickuckyte; Lukasz Hudak; Steffen Wedel; Dietger Jonas; Gudrun Hintereder; Roman A. Blaheta
Treatment strategies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have been limited due to chemotherapy and radiotherapy resistance. The development of targeted drugs has now opened novel therapeutic options. In the present study, anti‐tumoral properties of the histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid (VPA) were tested in vitro and in vivo on pre‐clinical RCC models. RCC cell lines Caki‐1, KTC‐26 or A498 were treated with various concentrations of VPA to evaluate tumour cell adhesion to vascular endothelial cells or to immobilized extracellular matrix proteins. In vivo tumour growth was conducted in subcutaneous xenograft mouse models. VPA was also combined with low dosed interferon‐α (IFN‐α) and the efficacy of the combination therapy, as opposed to VPA monotherapy, was compared. VPA significantly and dose‐dependently prevented tumour cell attachment to endothelium or matrix proteins, accompanied by elevated histones H3 and H4 acetylation. VPA altered integrin‐α and ‐β subtype expression, in particular α3, α5 and β3, and blocked integrin‐dependent signalling. In vivo, VPA significantly inhibited the growth of Caki‐1 in subcutaneous xenografts with the 200 mg/kg being superior to the 400 mg/kg dosing schedule. VPA‐IFN‐α combination markedly enhanced the effects of VPA on RCC adhesion, and in vivo tumour growth was further reduced by the 400 mg/kg but not by the 200 mg/kg VPA dosing schedule. VPA profoundly blocked the interaction of RCC cells with endothelium and extracellular matrix and reduced tumour growth in vivo. Therefore, VPA should be considered an attractive candidate for clinical trials.