Stein Bergan

Bilateral Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Cyclosporine A and Atorvastatin in Renal Transplant Recipients

Atorvastatin is increasingly used as a cholesterol‐lowering agent in solid organ transplant recipients receiving cyclosporine A (CsA). However, the potential bilateral pharmacokinetic interaction between atorvastatin and CsA in renal transplant recipients has not previously been examined.

Monitored high-dose azathioprine treatment reduces acute rejection episodes after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND Azathioprine (AZA) is widely used in organ transplantation. Common practice is to adjust dose according to body weight only, despite documented pharmacokinetic variability. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether high-dose AZA treatment monitored by 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) levels reduces the incidence of rejection episodes in renal transplantation without a corresponding increase in myelotoxicity. METHODS Patients receiving cyclosporine, steroids, and AZA were randomized into either the low-dose AZA group (3 mg/kg on day 0, then 2 mg/kg/day the first week and 1 mg/kg/day thereafter) or the high-dose AZA group. In the latter, AZA was started at 5 mg/kg/day and then adjusted to keep 6-TGN concentrations (measured twice weekly) between 100 and 200 pmol/8 x 10(8) RBCs. RESULTS A total of 360 transplant recipients were included in the final analysis. The cumulative incidence of first rejection episodes was reduced by 21%, from 62.8% in the low-dose group to 49.4% in the high-dose group (difference: 13.3%; 95% confidence interval: 3.2-23.5). Similar results were found in subgroups according to HLA-DR match. The 6-TGN concentration was significantly higher in the high-dose AZA group during the first month, and the reduction in rejection episodes was achieved in the same period. A larger proportion of patients in the high-dose group had nadir white blood cell count below 2.0 x 10(9) leukocytes/L (13.3% vs. 4.4%; difference: 8.9%; confidence interval: 3.1-14.7). CONCLUSIONS High-dose AZA therapy in a triple-drug regimen, monitored by 6-TGN, will keep myelotoxicity within acceptable limits with the benefit of a reduction in acute rejection episodes.

Calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in renal allograft recipients with thrombotic microangiopathy/hemolytic uremic syndrome

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) represent serious threats to kidney allograft recipients.

C2 monitoring in maintenance renal transplant recipients: Is it worthwhile?

Presently, there is little knowledge regarding cyclosporine (CsA) concentration at 2 hr post-dose (C2) monitoring in maintenance patients. This study evaluates the actual C2 range in stable renal transplant recipients (who underwent transplantation >12 months ago). In addition, we investigated whether underexposure or overexposure to CsA (assessed by C2) affects graft function (as measured by serum [S]-creatinine). All renal transplant recipients in Norway receiving CsA were asked to participate; 1,447 fulfilled the criteria. Valid C2 and CsA trough concentration (C0) measurements were performed in 1,032 renal transplant recipients (71%) monitored by C0. Target C0 level was 75 to 125 &mgr;mol/L. CsA levels were measured using a Cloned Enzyme Donor Immunoassay method, and all analyses were performed in the same laboratory (overall mean [±standard deviation] CsA C0=112±31 &mgr;g/L, CsA C2=697±211 &mgr;g/L [range 81–1,580 &mgr;g/L], CsA dose [mg/day]=208±61, CsA dose [mg/kg/day]=2.8±1.1, and S-creatinine=141±58 &mgr;mol/L). A univariate analysis of variance showed that patients with C2 levels between 700 and 800 &mgr;g/L (n=203, S-creatinine=136±49 &mgr;mol/L) had significantly lower S-creatinine levels compared with patients with C2 levels greater than 950 &mgr;g/L (n=94, S-creatinine=152±56 &mgr;mol/L) (P <0.02). The same was true for patients with C2 levels less than 450 &mgr;g/L (n=95, S-creatinine 141±72 &mgr;mol/L) (P <0.05) when compared with patients with C2 levels greater than 950 &mgr;g/L. There was no significant difference in S-creatinine between patients in the low and intermediate C2 group; 666 patients had C0 levels in the therapeutic range (75–125 &mgr;mol/L). A linear regression showed a significant relation between S-creatinine and C2 for these patients (P =0.03). The corresponding relation between S-creatinine and C0 was nonsignificant (P =0.3). Monitoring of C2 in maintenance patients is a valuable tool to detect overexposure to CsA. Until results from prospective studies are available, we recommend C0 in the therapeutic range and reduction in CsA in overexposed patients, aiming at a C2 value between 700 and 800 &mgr;g/L.

Reduced elimination of cyclosporine A in elderly (>65 years) kidney transplant recipients.

Background. Physiologic functions that may affect pharmacokinetics of drugs are altered in elderly patients. The current study was performed to elucidate the effect of age on cyclosporine A (CsA) pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients. Method. Twenty-five renal transplant recipients on CsA treatment were included in the study. CsA doses were adjusted by C2 monitoring. The patients were divided into two groups based on age; elderly: more than 65 years (n=11, mean 73 years) and younger: 18 to 64 years (n=14, mean 43 years). A full 12-hr pharmacokinetic profile was performed during stable phase. CsA whole blood and intracellular T-lymphocytes concentrations (first 6 hr) were measured. Genotyping of the CYP3A5*1/*3 and ABCB1 (C1236T, G2677T, C3435T) polymorphisms and quantification of whole blood mRNA ABCB1 expression were performed in all patients. Results. Elderly patients achieved target C2 levels with lower CsA doses than the younger patients (4.3±0.8 vs. 6.1±2.1 mg/day/kg, P=0.025) because of lower clearance of CsA (22.7±5.1 vs. 30.5±11.1 L/hr, P=0.031). Elderly patients also showed 44% higher intracellular-to-whole blood CsA ratio than younger patients (P=0.02). Neither the CYP3A5*1, the ABCB1 genotypes nor mRNA ABCB1 expression revealed any significant influence on CsA pharmacokinetics. Conclusion. The clearance of CsA decreased with increasing age. In addition, elderly patients had a significant larger proportion of the whole blood CsA concentration located at the site of action (within T lymphocytes). This indicates that in elderly recipients it might be safe to aim for an even lower whole blood target levels than current guidelines propose.

Pharmacokinetics of diltiazem and its metabolites in relation to CYP2D6 genotype

Recently, it was shown in vitro that the polymorphic enzyme cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 mediates O‐demethylation of diltiazem. The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of diltiazem and its major metabolites in healthy human volunteers representing different CYP2D6 genotypes.

Patterns of Azathioprine Metabolites in Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Reticulocytes, and Erythrocytes: Relevance to Toxicity and Monitoring in Recipients of Renal Allografts

Monitoring of azathioprine (AZA) therapy by the measurement of 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) concentrations in red blood cells (RBC) may improve safety and ensure optimal immunosuppressive effects of AZA in organ transplantation. The authors explored the rationale for such monitoring by measuring thiopurine metabolites in peripheral blood cell types that are more relevant to the effects and kinetics of AZA and its active metabolites. Neutrophil granulocytes were isolated by density gradient centrifugation, and CD4+ lymphocytes and reticulocytes by using specific immunomagnetic beads. In neutrophils, 6-TGN concentrations had median measurements 31 times higher than in RBCs. In contrast to the high methylated mercaptopurine (me-MP) concentrations in RBCs, these metabolites were not detected in the neutrophils. Thiopurine metabolite levels were lower than the analytic limit of detection in all the CD4+ samples. The concentrations of 6-TGN and me-MPs were lower in reticulocytes than in RBCs in general, indicating that thiopurine metabolites are taken up by RBCs in the circulation. This studys findings, that 6-TGN concentrations are very high in neutrophils, whereas me-MPs are undetectable, many explain the specific neutropenic adverse effect of AZA. The results also add support to monitoring AZA through measurements of 6-TGN and me-MPs in RBCs.

Automated determination of free mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide in plasma from renal allograft recipients.

Mycophenolic acid, the active moiety of mycophenolate mofetil, inhibits the enzyme inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase. The main metabolite, mycophenolic acid glucuronide, has no immunosuppressive effect. Reported protein bindings are 97% for mycophenolic acid and 82% for mycophenolic acid glucuronide. Considerable intraindividual and interindividual variability in mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics has been observed. Data on the variability of mycophenolic acid free fraction in plasma are sparse but may be relevant when discussing whether therapeutic drug monitoring of this drug is warranted. The authors describe a fully automated method for the determination of free concentrations by dialysis across a membrane followed by concentration of the dialysate on a trace enrichment column and liquid chromatography. Total concentrations are measured by protein precipitation and direct injection on the trace enrichment column. Plasma concentrations as low as 6 ng/mL free mycophenolic acid and 1 &mgr;g/mL free mycophenolic acid glucuronide can be measured with between-day coefficient of variation less than 15% and 6%, respectively. Stability testing confirmed that plasma samples could be stored for 14 days at 4°C or −20°C and at room temperature for approximately 12 hours without significant changes in free concentrations. Predose total and free concentrations of mycophenolic acid and mycophenolic acid glucuronide were determined in 27 samples from stable renal allograft recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporin, and steroids. Total concentrations ranged from 0.57 to 16.2 &mgr;g/mL mycophenolic acid and 36 to 199 &mgr;g/mL mycophenolic acid glucuronide. Free concentrations ranged from 13 to 210 ng/mL mycophenolic acid and 8 to 58 &mgr;g/mL mycophenolic acid glucuronide. The method presented here has been successfully applied to measure free mycophenolic acid and free mycophenolic acid glucuronide in clinical samples. Further investigations may provide important data to support the identification of principles and target ranges for the monitoring of mycophenolic acid in the immunosuppressive therapy of organ transplant recipients.

Barcelona Consensus on Biomarker-Based Immunosuppressive Drugs Management in Solid Organ Transplantation.

Abstract: With current treatment regimens, a relatively high proportion of transplant recipients experience underimmunosuppression or overimmunosuppression. Recently, several promising biomarkers have been identified for determining patient alloreactivity, which help in assessing the risk of rejection and personal response to the drug; others correlate with graft dysfunction and clinical outcome, offering a realistic opportunity for personalized immunosuppression. This consensus document aims to help tailor immunosuppression to the needs of the individual patient. It examines current knowledge on biomarkers associated with patient risk stratification and immunosuppression requirements that have been generally accepted as promising. It is based on a comprehensive review of the literature and the expert opinion of the Biomarker Working Group of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology. The quality of evidence was systematically weighted, and the strength of recommendations was rated according to the GRADE system. Three types of biomarkers are discussed: (1) those associated with the risk of rejection (alloreactivity/tolerance), (2) those reflecting individual response to immunosuppressants, and (3) those associated with graft dysfunction. Analytical aspects of biomarker measurement and novel pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic models accessible to the transplant community are also addressed. Conventional pharmacokinetic biomarkers may be used in combination with those discussed in this article to achieve better outcomes and improve long-term graft survival. Our group of experts has made recommendations for the most appropriate analysis of a proposed panel of preliminary biomarkers, most of which are currently under clinical evaluation in ongoing multicentre clinical trials. A section of Next Steps was also included, in which the Expert Committee is committed to sharing this knowledge with the Transplant Community in the form of triennial updates.

Improved tacrolimus target concentration achievement using computerized dosing in renal transplant recipients – a prospective, randomized study

Background Early after renal transplantation, it is often challenging to achieve and maintain tacrolimus concentrations within the target range. Computerized dose individualization using population pharmacokinetic models may be helpful. The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the target concentration achievement of tacrolimus using computerized dosing compared with conventional dosing performed by experienced transplant physicians. Methods A single-center, prospective study was conducted. Renal transplant recipients were randomized to receive either computerized or conventional tacrolimus dosing during the first 8 weeks after transplantation. The median proportion of tacrolimus trough concentrations within the target range was compared between the groups. Standard risk (target, 3-7 &mgr;g/L) and high-risk (8-12 &mgr;g/L) recipients were analyzed separately. Results Eighty renal transplant recipients were randomized, and 78 were included in the analysis (computerized dosing (n = 39): 32 standard risk/7 high-risk, conventional dosing (n = 39): 35 standard risk/4 high-risk). A total of 1711 tacrolimus whole blood concentrations were evaluated. The proportion of concentrations per patient within the target range was significantly higher with computerized dosing than with conventional dosing, both in standard risk patients (medians, 90% [95% confidence interval {95% CI}, 84-95%] vs 78% [95% CI, 76-82%], respectively, P < 0.001) and in high-risk patients (medians, 77% [95% CI, 71-80%] vs 59% [95% CI, 40-74%], respectively, P = 0.04). Conclusions Computerized dose individualization improves target concentration achievement of tacrolimus after renal transplantation. The computer software is applicable as a clinical dosing tool to optimize tacrolimus exposure and may potentially improve long-term outcome.