Stein Emil Vollset

Antibiotic prophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty

We have assessed the effect of different regimes of antibiotic prophylaxis on the survival of total hip implants, comparing antibiotics administered both systemically and in the bone cement, systemically only, in the bone cement only and with no antibiotics given. We studied 10 905 primary cemented total hip replacements, performed for osteoarthritis of the hip and reported to the Norwegian arthroplasty register between 1987 and 1995. Cox-estimated failure-rate ratios (FRR) are presented with adjustment for gender, age, the brand of cement, the prosthesis, the type of operating theatre and the operating time. For revisions performed for infection (39 operations), the lowest rate of revision was found among patients receiving antibiotic-containing cement plus systemic antibiotics (n = 5804). The revision rate for the 4586 patients receiving systemic antibiotics only was 4.3 times greater (95% CI 1.7 to 11.0, p = 0.001); in 239 with antibiotics in the bone cement only it was 6.3 times greater (CI 1.6 to 25.0, p = 0.003); and in the 276 who did not receive antibiotics it was by 11.5 times greater (CI 2.1 to 63.0, p = 0.002). Adjustment for the total amount of systemic antibiotic administered did not change the results. We also observed an increased revision rate for aseptic loosening (109 operations) comparing the systemic-only (FRR = 1.8, CI 1.1 to 2.9, p = 0.01) and the cement-only regimes (FRR = 2.6, CI 1.2 to 5.9, p = 0.02) with the combined dosage. Our findings show that systemic antibiotics combined with antibiotic-containing bone cement led to fewer revisions than the other methods.

The effect of the type of cement on early revision of Charnley total hip prostheses. A review of eight thousand five hundred and seventy-nine primary arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

We studied the survival of 8579 Charnley prostheses, in 7922 patients, according to the different types of cement that had been used. All of the patients had had a primary total hip replacement for primary coxarthrosis. The mean duration of follow-up was 3.2 years (range, zero to 6.4 years). The data were collected from the national Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. The duration of survival was defined as the time to revision due to aseptic loosening. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of survival at 5.5 years for the 1226 femoral components that had been implanted with low-viscosity cement was 94.1 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval, 92.1 to 96.2 per cent), compared with 98.1 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval, 97.5 to 98.6 per cent) for the 6589 components that had been implanted with high-viscosity cement (p < 0.0001). The remaining 764 femoral components had been implanted with Boneloc cement, which was classified as neither high nor low-viscosity, and these components were considered as a separate group in the analyses. The Boneloc cement had been used for only three years, and the two-year survival rate of these prostheses was 95.5 per cent (p < 0.0001). The cement contained an antibiotic in 2801 (42 per cent of the hips in which the femoral component had been implanted with high-viscosity cement, compared with only thirty (2 per cent) of those in which it had been implanted with low-viscosity cement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Early aseptic loosening of uncemented femoral components in primary total hip replacement. A review based on the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register

The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register recorded 24,408 primary total hip replacements from 1987 to 1993; 2907 of them (13%) were performed with uncemented femoral components. We have compared the results of eight different designs, each used in more than 100 patients. Survivorship of the components was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method using revision for aseptic loosening of the femoral component as the end-point. At 4.5 years, the estimated probability of revision for aseptic loosening for all implants was 4.5%, for the Bio-Fit stem 18.6% (n = 210) and for the Femora stem 13.6% (n = 173). The PM-Prosthesis and the Harris/Galante stem prostheses needed revision in 5.6% and 3.6%, respectively. The clockwise threaded stem of the Femora implant needed revision in 20% of right hips, but in only 4% of left hips. The short-term results of the four best uncemented femoral components (Corail, LMT, Profile and Zweimüller) were similar to those for cemented stems, with revision for loosening in less than 1% at 4.5 years. The importance of the control of innovative designs and the registration of early results is discussed.

Early postoperative mortality after 67,548 total hip replacements: Causes of death and thromboprophylaxis in 68 hospitals in Norway from 1987 to 1999

Patients in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register with a total hip replacement (THR) have a lower long-term mortality than the age- and gendermatched Norwegian population. We analyzed the early postoperative mortality after 67,548 THR operations in 68 hospitals reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register between 1987 and 1999. Data on deaths and causes of death were obtained from from Statistics Norway, and on thromboprophylaxis from a separate questionnaire sent to all hospitals. During the years 1987-2000 the 68 hospitals reported use of 6 thromboprophylaxis drugs and 24 different combinations of drugs and stockings. In 1988, only 3 of 29 hospitals reported use of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), but in 1999, 67 of the 68 hospitals used LMWH. In the first postoperative week, the daily mortality was about 2.5 deaths per 10,000 THR patients. By the 70th postoperative day, the daily mortality had declined to about 0.57 deaths per 10,000 patients. The daily mortality of the age- and gender-matched Norwegian population was 0.95 deaths per 10,000 individuals. Early postoperative mortality increased with age, was higher in men than women, and was usually due to vascular disease. We found only a slight reduction in the 60-day postoperative mortality during the period 1987-1999. All underlying diagnoses for a prosthesis operation had a higher 60-day postoperative mortality than primary osteoarthrosis.

Patient satisfaction and function after primary and revision total hip replacement.

This study assessed and compared satisfaction and function before and after total hip replacement as reported by 531 patients who had primary and revision surgery and 1087 patients who had primary surgery only. All operations were registered by the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register during the years 1987 to 1993, with time from last surgery to followup ranging from 0.6 to 6.4 years. Sixty-one percent of the patients who underwent revision surgery and 84% of the patients who did not undergo revision surgery rated their overall satisfaction with the hip implant as good or very good. With adjustment for primary diagnosis, gender, age, bilaterality, and time since the primary operation, a substantial benefit of total hip replacement was observed in both groups with regard to pain, walking ability, and need of help. However, improvement was less among patients who underwent revision total hip replacement than among those who did not undergo revision surgery. A deterioration was seen among patients who underwent revision surgery with regard to employment status and exercise habits.

Exeter and charnley arthroplasties with Boneloc or high viscosity cement. Comparison of 1,127 arthroplasties followed for 5 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

During the years 1991-1994, the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register recorded 1,324 primary hip arthroplasties implanted with the Boneloc cement. We have compared the survival until revision due to aseptic loosening for charnley (n 955) and Exeter (n 172) prostheses. The Boneloc cemented hips were also compared with high viscosity cemented hips implanted during the same period. In the Boneloc cemented group, the estimated probability of survival at 4.5 years of a Charnley femoral component was 74% and for an Exeter femoral component 97% (p < 0.0001). Using a Cox regression model with adjustment for age, gender, type of cement, systemic antibiotic and stratified for diagnosis, an 8 times higher risk of revision was found in Boneloc cemented Charnley femoral components than in Exeter femoral components (p < 0.0001). For the acetabular components, the difference between the Charnley and Exeter components with Boneloc cement was not statistically significant. In both the Charnley and the Exeter prostheses, the high viscosity cemented components had significantly better survival than the Boneloc cemented components. The Cox regression model showed that a Boneloc cemented Charnley femoral component had a 14 times higher risk of revision than a high viscosity cemented component (p < 0.0001), and for Exeter femoral components a 7 times higher revision risk was found in the Boneloc cemented components (p = 0.003). Our results confirm the previously reported inferior results of Charnley prostheses implanted with Boneloc cement and inferior results of Boneloc cemented Exeter prostheses as well, but less pronounced than for Charnley prostheses.