Stella L. Ng

Reclaiming a theoretical orientation to reflection in medical education research: a critical narrative review.

Reflection and reflective practice have become popular topics of scholarly dialogue in medical education. This popularity has given rise to checklists, portfolios and other tools to inspire and document reflection. We argue that some of the common ways in which reflection has been applied are influenced by broader discourses of assessment and evidence, and divorced from original theories of reflection and reflective practice.

Adaptation of the BKB-SIN test for use as a pediatric aided outcome measure.

BACKGROUND There is a need for objective pediatric hearing aid outcome measurement and thus a need for the evaluation of outcome measures. We explored a commercially available pediatric sentence-in-noise measure adapted for use as an aided outcome measure. PURPOSE The purposes of the current study were (1) to administer an adapted BKB-SIN (Bamford-Kowal-Bench Speech-in-Noise test) to adults and children who have normal hearing and children who use hearing aids and (2) to evaluate the utility of this adapted BKB-SIN as an aided, within-subjects outcome measure for amplification strategies. RESEARCH DESIGN We used a mixed within and between groups design to evaluate speech recognition in noise for the three groups of participants. The children who use hearing aids were tested under the omnidirectional, directional, and digital noise reduction (DNR) conditions. Results from each group were compared to each other, and we compared results of each aided condition for the children who use hearing aids to evaluate the test utility as an aided outcome measure. STUDY SAMPLE The study sample consisted of 14 adults with normal hearing (aged 22-28 yr) and 15 children with normal hearing (aged 6-18 yr), recruited through word of mouth, and 14 children who use hearing aids (aged 9-16 yr) recruited from local audiology clinics. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS List pairs of the BKB-SIN test were presented at 50 dB HL as follows: four list pairs to each participant with normal hearing, four list pairs in the omnidirectional condition, and two list pairs in the directional and DNR conditions. Children who use hearing aids were fitted bilaterally with laboratory devices and completed the BKB-SIN test aided. Data were plotted as mean percent of key words correct at each signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Further, we conducted an analysis of variance for group differences and within-groups for the three aided conditions. RESULTS Adult participants outperformed children with normal hearing, who outperformed the children who use hearing aids. SNR-50 (signal-to-noise ratio at which listener can obtain a speech recognition score of 50% correct) scores demonstrated reliability of the adapted test implementation. The BKB-SIN test measured significant differences in performance for omnidirectional versus directional microphone conditions but not between omnidirectional and DNR conditions. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that the adapted implementation of the BKB-SIN test can be administered reliably and feasibly. Further study is warranted to develop norms for the adapted implementation as well as to determine if an adapted implementation can be sensitive to age effects. Until such norms are developed, clinicians should refrain from comparing results from the adapted test to the test manual norms and should instead use the adapted implementation as a within-subject measure.

Blurring the boundaries: using institutional ethnography to inquire into health professions education and practice

Qualitative, social science approaches to research have surged in popularity within health professions education (HPE) over the past decade. Institutional ethnography (IE) offers the field another sociological approach to inquiry. Although widely used in nursing and health care research, IE remains relatively uncommon in the HPE research community. This article provides a brief introduction to IE and suggests why HPE researchers may wish to consider it for future studies.

A Case Review: Reframing School-Based Practices Using a Critical Perspective

ABSTRACT It is well established in the literature that school-based practice is fraught with challenges such as acquisition of appropriate and sufficient resources, communication barriers among professionals, parental burden, and redundancies and gaps in services. The purpose of this perspective paper is to reframe potentially problematic school-based practices using a critical social science perspective, suggesting a vision and strategies for therapists working in the context of school-based practice. We illustrate our approach with a case example. To reframe school-based practices, we begin with Jills case, exploring it through a critical lens to identify potential issues and opportunities for change. We then trace these findings to our larger dataset from an ongoing program of research to ensure relevance to the broader context of school-based practice. Reframing of three school-based practice issues is discussed from: (a) advocacy by proxy to collaborative dialogue, (b) governing texts to guiding texts, and (c) playing the “right” part to having a voice. Although this is a perspective paper based on a case exemplar, we posit how we may reframe and rethink school-based practices in pediatric rehabilitation. We suggest that only with a genuine shift in our professional values will we see the enactment of collaborative practice in school-based settings.

Theory and Research in Audiology Education: Understanding and Representing Complexity through Informed Methodological Decisions

BACKGROUND The discipline of audiology has the opportunity to embark on research in education from an informed perspective, learning from professions that began this journey decades ago. The goal of this article is to position our discipline as a new member in the academic field of health professional education (HPE), with much to learn and contribute. PURPOSE In this article, I discuss the need for theory in informing HPE research. I also stress the importance of balancing our research goals by selecting appropriate methodologies for relevant research questions, to ensure that we respect the complexity of social processes inherent in HPE. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Examples of relevant research questions are used to illustrate the need to consider alternative methodologies and to rethink the traditional hierarchy of evidence. I also provide an example of the thought processes and decisions that informed the design of an educational research study using a constructivist grounded theory methodology. CONCLUSIONS As audiology enters the scholarly field of HPE, we need to arm ourselves with some of the knowledge and perspective that informs the field. Thus, we need to broaden our conceptions of what we consider to be appropriate styles of academic writing, relevant research questions, and valid evidence. Also, if we are to embark on qualitative inquiry into audiology education (or other audiology topics), we need to ensure that we conduct this research with an adequate understanding of the theories and methodologies informing such approaches. We must strive to conduct high quality, rigorous qualitative research more often than uninformed, generic qualitative research. These goals are imperative to the advancement of the theoretical landscape of audiology education and evolving the place of audiology in the field of HPE.

When I say… praxis

At first glance, our research foci are worlds apart. SN studies what health professionals do in complex practice contexts, informed by critical theories of practice, and SW studies the ways in which power relations and deeply embedded traditions might limit medical school policies and practices. Yet on one fundamental point our work is united: we share an underlying commitment to praxis. When we say praxis, we are speaking of the embodiment and enactment of theory in practice, driven by a commitment to improving that practice. Both of our journeys to education science arose from practical experience in fields we were inspired to help improve. And now, as education scientists in applied settings, we are often found offering theoretical and methodological guidance to practitioners who have ideas and goals for change. For these reasons, we wonder if praxis might unite the work of many health professions educators and scientists, and we explore the concept here for your consideration.

Multiple boundaries: professional and institutional identities of clinician-scientists

1 Eva KW, Regehr G. Exploring the divergence between self-assessment and self-monitoring. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2011;16 (3): 311–29. 2 de Bruin ABH, Dunlosky J, Cavalcanti RB. Monitoring and regulation of learning in medical education: the need for predictive cues. Med Educ 2017;51 (6):575–84. 3 Koriat A. Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: a cueutilisation approach to judgements of learning. J Exp Psych Gen 1997;126 (4):349–70. 4 McLaughlin JE, Roth MT, Glatt DM et al. The flipped classroom: a course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Acad Med 2014;89 (2):236–43. 5 Brydges R, Nair P, Ma I, Shanks D, Hatala R. Directed self-regulated learning versus instructor-regulated learning in simulation training. Med Educ 2012;46 (7):648–56. 6 Ilgen JS, Eva KW, Regehr G. What’s in a label? Is diagnosis the start or the end of clinical reasoning? J Gen Intern Med 2016;31 (4):435–7. 7 Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V et al. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med 2007;147 (7):478–91. 8 American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation. Choosing wisely: an initiative of the ABIM Foundation. http://www.c hoosingwisely.org/about-us/. [Accessed 1 February 2017.] 9 Mead N, Bower P. Patientcentredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med 2000;51 (7):1087–110. 10 Eva KW, Regehr G. Knowing when to look it up: a new conception of self-assessment ability. Acad Med 2007;82 (10 Suppl):81–4. 11 Zilbert NR, Murnaghan ML, Gallinger S, Regehr G, Moulton CA. Taking a chance or playing it safe: reframing risk assessment within the surgeon’s comfort zone. Ann Surg 2015;262 (2):253–9. 12 Jin CJ, Martimianakis MA, Kitto S, Moulton CA. Pressures to ‘measure up’ in surgery: managing your image and managing your patient. Ann Surg 2012;256 (6):989–93.

A Qualitative Case Study of Smartphone-Connected Hearing Aids: Influences on Patients, Clinicians, and Patient‐Clinician Interactions

Background: Innovations in hearing aid technology influence clinicians and individuals who use hearing aids. Little research, to date, explains the innovation adoption experiences and perspectives of clinicians and patients, which matter to a field like audiology, wherein technology innovation is constant. By understanding clinician and patient experiences with such innovations, the field of audiology may develop technologies and ways of practicing in a manner more responsive to patients’ needs, and attentive to societys influence. Purpose: The authors aimed to understand how new innovations influence clinician and patient experiences, through a study focusing on connected hearing aids. “Connected” refers to the wireless functional connection of hearing aids with everyday technologies like mobile phones and tablets. Research Design: The authors used a qualitative collective case study methodology, borrowing from constructivist grounded theory for data collection and analysis methods. Specifically, the authors designed a collective case study of a connected hearing aid and smartphone application, composed of two cases of experience with the innovation: the case of clinician experiences, and the case of patient experiences. Study Sample: The qualitative sampling methods employed were case sampling, purposive within‐case sampling, and theoretical sampling, and culminated in a total collective case n = 19 (clinician case n = 8; patient case n = 11). These data were triangulated with a supplementary sample of ten documents: relevant news and popular media collected during the study time frame. Data Collection and Analysis: The authors conducted interviews with the patients and clinicians, and analyzed the interview and document data using the constant comparative method. The authors compared their two cases by looking at trends within, between, and across cases. Results: The clinician case highlighted clinicians’ heuristic‐based candidacy judgments in response to the adoption of the connected hearing aids into their practice. The patient case revealed patients’ perceptions of themselves as technologically competent or incompetent, and descriptions of how they learned to use the new technology. Between cases, the study found a difference in the response to how the connected hearing aid changed the clinician‐patient relationship. While clinicians valued the increased time they spent “getting to know” their patients, patients experienced some frustration specific to the additional troubleshooting related to Bluetooth connectivity. Across cases, there was a resounding theme of “normalization” of hearing aids via their integration with a “normal” technology (mobile phones) and general lack of concern about privacy in relation to the smartphone application and its tracking and geotagging features. Both audiologists and patients credited the connected hearing aids with increased opportunities to participate more fully in everyday life. Conclusions: The introduction of smartphone‐connected hearing aids influenced the identities and candidate profiles of hearing aid users, and the nature of time spent in clinical interactions, in important and interesting ways. The influence of connected hearing aids on patient experience and audiology practice calls for continued research and clinical consideration, with implications for clinical decision‐making regarding hearing aid candidacy. Further study should look critically at normalization and possible unintended stigmatizing effects of making hearing aids increasingly discreet.

An evaluation of flipped e-learning experiences

Abstract Aim: The “flipped” classroom is an educational strategy gaining popularity for its growing evidence base that suggests it may successfully improve learning outcomes. Also known as reverse instruction, this approach has been typically implemented and studied in in-person post-secondary settings. The utilization of a flipped approach in the healthcare education literature has been examined in a wide range of contexts, but little has been written regarding continuing professional development (CPD). Therefore, with success in other contexts there is potential for the flipped classroom approach to enhance student satisfaction, learner engagement, and learning outcomes in the context of online education for CPD. Methods: In this paper, we describe the structure and format of such a course using a qualitative case study framework. Results: This study contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of effective ways of overcoming distributed learning challenges in online CPD using a flipped approach.

Navigating difficult conversations: the role of self‐monitoring and reflection‐in‐action

Clinicians draw upon experiential knowledge to manoeuvre difficult conversations, using tacit knowledge that is difficult to explicitly teach. Instead, learners are taught to communicate through role‐play and checklists, both of which are approaches that may fail during moments of clinical complexity. We know that difficult conversations may provoke anxiety in learners, but we know little about how they learn to navigate them. Without a deeper understanding, we may fail to equip learners with the skills to manoeuvre these conversations in practice.