Stephan Baumueller

Low-dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and-shoot mode

Objective To compare the diagnostic accuracy and radiation doses of two low-dose protocols for coronary artery imaging with second-generation, dual-source CT in comparison with catheter angiography (CA). Design, setting and patients Prospective, single-centre study conducted in a referral centre enrolling 100 patients with low-to-intermediate risk and suspicion of coronary artery disease. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography and CA. Patients were randomly assigned to two different low-dose CT protocols (each 100 kV/320 mA): in group A (n=50), CT was performed using the prospectively electrocardiography (ECG)-gated step-and-shoot (SAS) mode; in group B (n=50), CT was performed using the prospectively ECG-gated high-pitch mode (pitch 3.4). The image quality and presence or absence of significant coronary stenosis in all coronary segments were evaluated by two blinded and independent observers. CA served as the standard of reference. Results Sixty-one significant stenoses were found in group A, and 69 in group B. There was no significant difference in age (group A, 62±8yrs; group B, 63±8yrs; p=0.72), body mass index (group A, 26.4±3.1kg/m2; group B, 25.9±2.8kg/m2; p=0.41) and heart rate (HR) (group A, 58±8bpm; group B, 56±10bpm; p=0.66) between the groups. Diagnostic image quality was obtained in 98.6% (651/660) of segments in group A and in 98.9% (642/649) in group B, with no significant differences between groups. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were 94%, 91%, 85% and 97% per-patient in group A, and 93%, 94%, 89% and 97% per-patient in group B (no significant differences). The effective radiation dose in group B (0.9±0.1 mSv) was significantly (p<0.01) lower than that in group A (1.4±0.4 mSv). Conclusions Both the high-pitch and the SAS mode for low-dose CT coronary angiography provide high accuracy for the assessment of significant coronary stenoses, while the high-pitch mode further significantly lowers the radiation dose.

Automated attenuation-based tube potential selection for thoracoabdominal computed tomography angiography: improved dose effectiveness.

Purpose:To introduce a novel algorithm of automated attenuation-based tube potential selection and to assess its impact on image quality and radiation dose of body computed tomography angiography (CTA). Materials and Methods:In all, 40 patients (mean age 71 ± 11.8 years, body mass index (BMI) 25.7 ± 3.8 kg/m2, range 18.8–33.8 kg/m2) underwent 64-slice thoracoabdominal CTA (contrast material: 80 mL, 5 mL/s) using an automated tube potential selection algorithm (CAREkV), which optimizes tube-potential (70–140 kV) and tube-current (138.8 ± 18.6 effective mAs, range 106–177 mAs) based on the attenuation profile of the topogram and on the diagnostic task. Image quality was semiquantitatively assessed by 2 blinded and independent readers (scores 1: excellent to 5: nondiagnostic). Attenuation and noise were measured by another 2 blinded and independent readers. Contrast-to-noise ratio was calculated. The CT dose index (CTDIvol) was recorded and compared with the estimated CTDIvol of a standard 120 kV protocol without using the algorithm in each patient. Selected tube potentials were correlated with BMI and attenuation of the topogram. Results:Diagnostic image quality was obtained in all patients (excellent: 14; good: 21; moderate: 5; interreader agreement: &kgr; = 0.78). Mean attenuation, noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio were 260.8 ± 63.5 Hounsfield units, 15.5 ± 3.3 Hounsfield units, and 14 ± 4.2, respectively, with good to excellent agreement between readers (r = 0.50–0.99, P < 0.01 each). Automated attenuation-based tube potential selection resulted in a kV-reduction from 120 to 100 kV in 23 patients and to 80 kV in 1 patient, whereas tube potential increased to 140 kV in 1 patient. Automatically selected tube potential showed a significant correlation with both BMI (r = 0.427, P < 0.05) and attenuation of the topogram (r = 0.831, P < 0.001). CTDIvol (7.95 ± 2.6 mGy) was significantly lower when using the algorithm compared with the standard 120 kV protocol (10.59 ± 1.8 mGy, P < 0.001), corresponding to an overall dose reduction of 25.1%. Conclusion:Automated attenuation-based tube potential selection based on the attenuation profile of the topogram is feasible, provides a diagnostic image quality of body CTA, and reduces overall radiation dose by 25% as compared with a standard protocol with 120 kV.

Ultralow-dose chest computed tomography for pulmonary nodule detection: first performance evaluation of single energy scanning with spectral shaping.

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality and sensitivity of ultralow radiation dose single-energy computed tomography (CT) with tin filtration for spectral shaping and iterative reconstructions for the detection of pulmonary nodules in a phantom setting. MethodsSingle-energy CT was performed using third-generation dual-source CT (SOMATOM Force; 2 × 192 slices) at 70 kVp, 100 kVp with tin filtration (100Sn kVp), and 150Sn kV with tube current-time product adjustments resulting in standard dose (CT volume dose index, 3.1 mGy/effective dose, 1.3 mSv at a scan length of 30 cm), 1/10th dose level (0.3 mGy/0.13 mSv), and 1/20th dose level (0.15 mGy/0.06 mSv). An anthropomorphic chest phantom simulating an intermediate-sized adult with randomly distributed solid pulmonary nodules of various sizes (2–10 mm; attenuation, 75 HU at 120 kVp) was used. Images were reconstructed with advanced model-based iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE; strength levels 3 and 5) and were compared with those acquired with second-generation dual-source CT at 120 kVp (reconstructed with filtered back projection) and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (strength level 3) at the lowest possible dose at 120 kVp (CT volume dose index, 0.28 mGy). One blinded reader measured image noise, and 2 blinded, independent readers determined overall image quality on a 5-grade scale (1 = nondiagnostic to 5 = excellent) and marked nodule localization with confidence rates on a 5-grade scale (1 = unsure to 5 = high confidence). The constructional drawing of the phantom served as reference standard for calculation of sensitivity. Two patients were included, for proof of concept, who were scanned with the 100Sn kVp protocol at the 1/10th and 1/20th dose level. ResultsImage noise was highest in the images acquired with second-generation dual-source CT and reconstructed with filtered back projection. At both the 1/10th and 1/20th dose levels, image noise at a tube voltage of 100Sn kVp was significantly lower than in the 70 kVp and 150Sn kV data sets (ADMIRE 3, P < 0.01; ADMIRE 5, P < 0.05). Sensitivity of nodule detection was lowest in images acquired with second-generation dual-source CT at 120 kVp and the lowest possible dose. Protocols at 100Sn kVp and ADMIRE 5 showed highest sensitivity at the 1/10th and 1/20th dose levels. Highest numbers of false-positives occurred in second-generation dual-source CT images (range, 12–15), whereas lowest numbers occurred in the 1/10th and 1/20th dose data sets acquired with third-generation dual-source CT at 100Sn kVp and reconstructed with ADMIRE strength levels 3 and 5 (total of 1 and 0 false-positives, respectively). Diagnostic confidence at 100Sn kVp was significantly higher than at 70 kVp or 150Sn kV (ADMIRE 3, P < 0.05; ADMIRE 5, P < 0.01) at both the 1/10th and 1/20th dose levels. Images of the 2 patients scanned with 100Sn kVp at the 1/10th and 1/20th dose levels were of diagnostic quality. ConclusionsOur study suggests that chest CT for the detection of pulmonary nodules can be performed with third-generation dual-source CT producing high image quality, sensitivity, and diagnostic confidence at a very low effective radiation dose of 0.06 mSv when using a single-energy protocol at 100 kVp with spectral shaping and when using advanced iterative reconstruction techniques.

Atrial Myxomas and Thrombi: Comparison of Imaging Features on CT

OBJECTIVE The purpose of our study was to compare the imaging features of atrial myxomas and thrombi using CT and to assess the accuracy of CT for determining the origin of myxomas in comparison with surgical findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS From July 2006 until June 2008, 23 patients (15 women, eight men; mean age, 63 +/- 14 years) with atrial myxomas (n = 13) and thrombi (n = 11) who underwent dual-source CT coronary angiography were included in this retrospective study. Two independent and blinded readers evaluated quantitative (CT attenuation and size) and qualitative (location, origin, shape, mobility, prolapse, and calcifications) parameters at CT. The shape and origin of myxomas were compared with the findings at surgery. RESULTS No significant differences regarding the CT attenuation of myxomas in comparison with thrombi were found (43 +/- 14 HU vs 57 +/- 30 HU; p = 0.23). Myxomas were significantly larger than thrombi (33 +/- 16 mm vs 21 +/- 7 mm; p < 0.05). The lesions were found equally in the left and right atria (p = 0.11). The origin (p < 0.001), shape (p < 0.05), mobility (p < 0.01), and occurrence of prolapse (p < 0.01) differed significantly between the lesions. Calcifications did not differ between the lesions (p = 0.2). In comparison with surgery, the origin of myxomas was correctly evaluated by CT in 11 of 13 patients (fossa ovalis, n = 5; interatrial septum, n = 4; and lateral atrial wall, n = 2), whereas CT misclassified the origin of two myxomas (posterior and lateral wall left atria at CT vs fossa ovalis at surgery). CONCLUSION Atrial myxomas and thrombi can be differentiated by their distinguishing features of size, origin, shape, mobility, and prolapse. CT is accurate in determining the origin of myxomas but may fail in some cases.

Prospective and retrospective ECG-gating for CT coronary angiography perform similarly accurate at low heart rates

OBJECTIVE To compare, in patients with suspicion of coronary artery disease (CAD) and low heart rates, image quality, diagnostic performance, and radiation dose values of prospectively and retrospectively electrocardiography (ECG)-gated dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for the diagnosis of significant coronary stenoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two-hundred consecutive patients with heart rates ≤70 bpm were retrospectively enrolled; 100 patients undergoing prospectively ECG-gated CTCA (group 1) and 100 patients undergoing retrospectively-gated CTCA (group 2). Coronary artery segments were assessed for image quality and significant luminal diameter narrowing. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV), and accuracy of both CTCA groups were determined using conventional catheter angiography (CCA) as reference standard. Radiation dose values were calculated. RESULTS Both groups were comparable regarding gender, body weight, cardiovascular risk profile, severity of CAD, mean heart rate, heart rate variability, and Agatston score (all p>0.05). There was no significant difference in the rate of non-assessable coronary segments between group 1 (1.6%, 24/1404) and group 2 (1.4%, 19/1385; p=0.77); non-diagnostic image quality was significantly (p<0.001) more often attributed to stair step artifacts in group 1. Segment-based sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were 98%, 98%, 88%, 100%, and 100% among group 1; 96%, 99%, 90%, 100%, and 98% among group 2, respectively. Parameters of diagnostic performance were similar (all p>0.05). Mean effective radiation dose of prospectively ECG-gated CTCA (2.2±0.4 mSv) was significantly (p<0.0001) smaller than that of retrospectively ECG-gated CTCA (8.1±0.6 mSv). CONCLUSION Prospectively ECG-gated CTCA yields similar image quality, performs as accurately as retrospectively ECG-gated CTCA in patients having heart rates ≤70 bpm while being associated with a lower mean effective radiation dose.

Cardiac CT for the Differentiation of Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves: Comparison With Echocardiography and Surgery

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CT, compared with that of echocardiography and surgery, for differentiating between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-seven patients with bicuspid valve and 47 patients with tricuspid aortic valve underwent retrospectively ECG-gated dual-source CT and echocardiography. Thirty-four (72%) of the 47 patients with bicuspid aortic valve underwent valve surgery. Two independent blinded observers assessed the CT image quality of the aortic valve during diastole and systole on a 4-point scale, determined which phase allowed the differentiation of valve type, distinguished between tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves, and assessed for the presence of a raphe. Diagnostic performance of CT was determined using echocardiography and surgery as the reference standard. RESULTS According to echocardiography and surgery, seven (15%) of the 47 bicuspid aortic valves had no raphe, and 40 (85%) had a raphe. CT image quality was diagnostic (i.e., scores of 1-3) in all 94 patients in both diastole and systole. Among patients with bicuspid aortic valve and no raphe, differentiation between tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves could be performed in diastole in 100% (7/7) of cases. Among patients with bicuspid aortic valve and raphe, differentiation was possible only in systole in 5% (2/40) of cases and when combining diastole and systole in 95% (38/40) of cases. In three bicuspid aortic valves with raphe, the valve was misclassified by CT as tricuspid aortic valve. Overall sensitivity and specificity of CT for the diagnosis of bicuspid aortic valve were 94% and 100%. CONCLUSION CT is highly accurate for differentiation between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves. For bicuspid aortic valves without raphe, diastolic reconstructions are sufficient, whereas in those with a raphe, additional reconstructions in systole are required.

Scan Length Adjustment of CT Coronary Angiography Using the Calcium Scoring Scan: Effect on Radiation Dose

OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to prospectively investigate the effect of adjusting the scan length of CT coronary angiography using the calcium scoring images instead of the scout view with regard to radiation dose. SUBJECTS AND METHODS One hundred twenty-five consecutive patients (mean age +/- SD, 62 +/- 10 years) undergoing both calcium scoring and CT coronary angiography were included in our study. The scan length of calcium scoring was planned on the scout view; the scan length of CT coronary angiography was planned on the axial images of the calcium scoring by identifying the origin of the left main artery and cardiac apex and adding 1 cm cranially and caudally. Effective radiation doses were calculated for CT coronary angiography using both scout view-derived and calcium scoring-derived scan lengths. RESULTS The scout view-derived scan length (mean +/- SD, 139 +/- 13 mm) was significantly greater than the calcium scoring-derived scan length (117 +/- 9 mm; p < 0.01). The average radiation dose was 0.8 +/- 0.3 mSv (range, 0.6-1.5 mSv) for calcium scoring and 9.0 +/- 0.6 mSv (range, 6.5-10.2 mSv) for CT coronary angiography. Using the scout view-derived scan length would have been associated with an effective radiation dose of 10.7 +/- 1.2 mSv (mean +/- SD) for CT coronary angiography, which is significantly higher than that using the calcium scoring-derived scan length (p < 0.05). The average difference between CT coronary angiography using a calcium scoring-derived scan length and that using a scout view-derived scan length was 1.7 +/- 0.9 mSv, corresponding to a radiation dose reduction of 16%. The average dose reduction when using a calcium scoring-derived instead of a scout view-derived scan length for CT coronary angiography-including the radiation dose of the calcium scoring scan-was 1.2 +/- 0.8 mSv (range, 0.1-2.7 mSv) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Adjustment of the scan length of CT coronary angiography using the images from calcium scoring instead of the scout view is feasible and is associated with a 16% reduction in radiation dose of dual-source CT coronary angiography.

Automated Attenuation-Based Kilovoltage Selection: Preliminary Observations in Patients After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair of the Abdominal Aorta

OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to assess prospectively the impact of automated attenuation-based kilovoltage selection on image quality and radiation dose in patients undergoing body CT angiography (CTA) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of the abdominal aorta. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Thirty-five patients (five women, 30 men; mean age ± SD, 69 ± 13 years; mean body mass index ± SD, 27.3 ± 4.5 kg/m(2)) underwent 64-MDCT angiography of the thoracoabdominal aorta using a fixed 120-kVp protocol (scan A: 120 mAs [reference]; rotation time, 0.33 second; pitch, 1.2) and, within a median time interval of 224 days, using a protocol with automated kilovoltage selection (scan B: tube voltage, 80-140 kVp). Subjective image quality (5-point scale: 1 [excellent] to 5 [nondiagnostic]) and objective image quality (aortic attenuation at four locations of the aortoiliac system, noise, contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) were assessed independently by two blinded radiologists. The volume CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) was compared between scans A and B. RESULTS The subjective image quality of scans A and B was similar (median score for both, 1; range, 1-4; p = 0.74), with all datasets being of diagnostic quality. Automated attenuation-based kilovoltage selection led to a reduction to 80 kVp in one patient (2.9%) and 100 kVp in 18 patients (51.4%). Fifteen of 35 patients (42.9%) were scanned at 120 kVp, whereas in one patient (2.9%) the kilovoltage setting increased to 140 kVp. Image noise (scan A vs scan B: mean ± SD, 12.8 ± 2.3 vs 13.7 ± 2.9 HU, respectively) was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in scan B than in scan A, whereas CNR was similar among scans (A vs B: mean ± SD, 15.7 ± 7.0 vs 16.9 ± 9.7; p = 0.43). The CTDI(vol) was significantly lower in scan B (mean ± SD, 8.9 ± 2.9 mGy; scan A, 10.6 ± 1.5 mGy; average reduction, 16%; p = 0.002) despite a higher tube current-exposure time product (B vs A: mean ± SD, 152 ± 27 vs 141 ± 29 mAs; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION In patients undergoing follow-up after EVAR of the abdominal aorta, body CTA using automated attenuation-based kilovoltage selection yields similar subjective image quality and CNR at a significantly reduced dose compared with a protocol that uses 120 kVp.

Computed tomography of the lung in the high-pitch mode: Is breath holding still required?

Objectives:To prospectively investigate whether the high-pitch mode (HPM) for computed tomography (CT) enables the diagnostic visualization of the lung parenchyma without suspended respiration. Materials and Methods:A total of 40 consecutive patients (age, 67 ± 11 years) underwent 128-slice dual-source CT of the chest including nonenhanced, arterial, and venous phase of contrast. CT was performed in the HPM with a pitch of 3.2 during continuous breathing (group A) and during breath-hold (group B), and at standard pitch of 1 during deep-inspiratory breath-hold (group C). The 3 protocols were scanned in a random order in each patient. Two blinded readers independently assessed the image quality of 5 regions in both the lungs using a semiquantitative 3-point score. Image noise was measured as the standard deviation of attenuation. Presence and size of pulmonary nodules were noted and measured on each CT dataset. Lung volume was measured using dedicated semi-automated segmentation software. Results:Interobserver agreement for image quality ratings was excellent (&kgr; = 0.91). There were no significant differences in the number of lung regions having an image quality other than excellent between group A (2.5%) and B (1.5%, P = 0.48), whereas significantly less regions had impaired image quality in group B compared with group C (5.5%, P < 0.01). Image quality impairment in group C was because of breathing in 36% and cardiac pulsation in 64%. Image noise in group C (9 ± 2 HU) was significantly lower than that in group B (30 ± 2 HU, P < 0.001) whereas no significant difference was found between group A and B (P = 0.52). There were no significant differences for the depiction (P = 1.0) and size (P = 0.94) of lung nodules among the 3 modes. Average lung volume in group A was 75% ± 15% of that in deep inspiration (group B/C) being significantly smaller (P < 0.05). Estimated effective radiation doses in group C and group B were 5.8 ± 0.5 mSv and 1.6 ± 0.1 mSv, respectively. Conclusions:CT of the lung can be accomplished using the HPM at a low radiation dose with a diagnostic image quality even without suspended respiration.

Dual Source CT Coronary Angiography in Severely Obese Patients: Trading Off Temporal Resolution and Image Noise

Objective:To assess in severely obese patients the subjective and objective image quality parameters and to estimate the radiation dose of dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA), using 3 different protocols. Materials and Methods:Dual-source CTCA was performed in 60 patients (30 women; mean age 58 ± 7 years) suffering from obesity class II or higher (body mass index [BMI] >35 kg/sq m). Twenty patients were examined with a standard CTCA protocol at 120 kV/350 mAs (protocol A), 20 patients with a CTCA protocol at 140 kV/350 mAs (protocol B), and 20 patients at 140 kV/350 mAs with a dedicated obesity protocol (protocol C), that allows the additional data sampling by expanding the data acquisition for each tube from a quarter to a half rotation, permitting to trade off temporal resolution and image noise. Two blinded observers independently assessed the image quality of each coronary segment, using a 4-point scale (1: excellent–4: nondiagnostic) and measured the different image parameters (image noise, signal-to-noise ratio [SNR], and contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]). Radiation dose estimates were calculated. Results:The average BMI was 46.3 ± 8.3 kg/sq m (range, 36.8–69.6 kg/sq m). Subjective image quality (1.55 ± 0.73) was significantly better in protocol C when compared with protocol A (2.46 ± 0.76; P < 0.01) and protocol B (2.12 ± 0.87; P < 0.017). There was a significantly lower rate of coronary artery segments with nondiagnostic image quality when using the obesity protocol C (1.5%; 4/262) compared with that obtained when using protocol A (7.8%; 22/280; P < 0.01) and protocol B (4.4%; 12/275; P < 0.017). Image noise was significantly lower in protocol C (31.8 ± 5.0 HU) when compared with group A (43.5 ± 4.7 HU; P < 0.001) and B (36.8 ± 5.5 HU; P < 0.01). SNR and CNR were significantly higher in group C (13.8 ± 2.4 and 23.1 ± 2.8) compared with group A (10.6 ± 1.7 and 15.1 ± 3.2; each P < 0.001) and group B (12.0 ± 2.0 and 18.8 ± 3.1; each P < 0.01). The estimated effective radiation dose of the obesity protocol C (15.6 ± 0.9 mSv) was significantly higher when compared with that in protocol A (10.1 ± 0.8 mSv; P < 0.01), but not significantly different from that in protocol B (13.3 ± 0.8 mSv; P = 0.022). Conclusions:Use of an obesity protocol in dual-source CTCA in severely obese patients significantly improves image quality, but goes along with a higher radiation dose.