Stephanie C. DeLuca
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Stephanie C. DeLuca.
Journal of Child Neurology | 2006
Stephanie C. DeLuca; Karen Echols; Charles R. Law; Sharon Landesman Ramey
A randomized crossover trial of a new form of pediatric rehabilitation was conducted with 18 children with hemiparesis. Half were randomly assigned to receive pediatric constraint-induced therapy involving constraint of the functional upper extremity and intensive therapy with the hemiparetic upper extremity. Controls received conventional physical and occupational therapy and then were crossed over to receive pediatric constraint-induced therapy. Pediatric constraint-induced therapy produced significantly greater gains than conventional rehabilitation services. (J Child Neurol 2006;21:931—938; DOI 10.2310/7010.2006.00201).
NeuroRehabilitation | 1997
David M. Morris; Jean E. Crago; Stephanie C. DeLuca; Rama Pidikiti; Edward Taub
A new therapeutic approach to rehabilitation of movement after stroke, termed Constraint-Induced (CI) Movement Therapy, has been derived from basic research with monkeys given somatosensory deafferentation. CI consists of a family of therapies; their common element is that they induce stroke patients to greatly increase the use of a more affected upper extremity for many hours a day over a 10-14 consecutive-day period. These therapies have significantly improved quality of movement and substantially increased amount of use of a more affected extremity in the activities of daily living in the life situation. The purpose of this paper is to describe the protocol used by the investigative team that developed the family of CI therapies and examined them as an effective rehabilitation approach.
Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine | 2012
Stephanie C. DeLuca; Jane Case-Smith; Richard D. Stevenson; Sharon Landesman Ramey
OBJECTIVE To compare effects of 2 dosage levels of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) for children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (CP). We hypothesized that high-dosage CIMT would produce larger benefits than moderate-dosage. METHODS Three sites enrolled a total of 18 children (6 children per site from 3-6 years) with unilateral CP. Children were randomly assigned to CIMT for 21 days for either 6 hours/day (high-dosage=126 hours) or 3 hours/day (moderate-dosage=63 hours); both groups wore a long-arm cast. Evaluators (blind to dosage) assessed children 1-week prior, then 1-week and 1-month after treatment with the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA), The Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST) Dissociated Movement and Grasp sections, the Shriners Hospital Upper Extremity Evaluation (SHUEE), and the Pediatric Motor Activity Log (PMAL). RESULTS All children responded well to casting and received the full intended dosage. Both groups showed statistically significant gains on the AHA, QUEST, SHUEE, and PMAL. Effect sizes ranged from 0.36-0.79. Overall, both groups showed comparable improvements at 1-week and 1-month post-treatment. CONCLUSIONS Pediatric CIMT at both moderate and high dosages produced positive effects across multiple reliable, valid outcome measures. The findings refuted the hypothesis of differential dosage benefits. Future research should address long-term effects, enroll larger and more diverse samples, and assess lower dosages to ascertain a minimal-efficacy threshold.
Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine | 2017
Stephanie C. DeLuca; Mary Rebekah Trucks; Dorian Ainsworth Wallace; Sharon Landesman Ramey
PURPOSE Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) is now designated a highly efficacious treatment for children with cerebral palsy, based on rigorous clinical trials. Yet virtually no evidence confirms that these moderate to large size effects can be replicated in clinical practice for a more heterogeneous clinical population. Thus there is a need to collect and report treatment outcome data based on actual clinical practice as a critical next step for implementation. METHODS This study presents results from a prospective study conducted on a clinical cohort of 88 children, 18 months to 12 years old (M = 55 months, SD = 5 months), who received high-intensity CIMT known as ACQUIREc. The children varied in severity and etiology of their hemiparesis and a subset was diagnosed with asymmetric quadriparesis. RESULTS Pre- to post-CIMT assessments confirmed highly significant and clinically meaningful changes based on both parental report (Pediatric Motor Activity Log, p< 0.0001) and standardized measures (The Assisting Hand Assessment, p= 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Clinical practice of high-intensity CIMT (120 hours in 4 weeks) with full-time casting of the less-impaired upper extremity produced benefits of comparable magnitude to those from rigorous randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Therapists were highly trained and actively monitored. Children across a wide range of etiologies and severity levels realized positive outcomes.
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology | 2012
Sharon Landesman Ramey; Stephanie C. DeLuca; Jane Case-Smith; Richard D. Stevenson
Sharon Landesman Ramey, Stephanie C Deluca, Jane Case-Smith, Richard Stevenson 1 Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA; 2 Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL; 3 Occupational Therapy Division, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; 4 Kluge Childrens Rehabilitation Center and Research Institute, Charlottesville, VA; USA. Correspondence to: [email protected]
Pediatrics | 2004
Edward Taub; Sharon Landesman Ramey; Stephanie C. DeLuca; Karen Echols
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior | 1994
Edward Taub; Jean E. Crago; Louis D. Burgio; Thomas E. Groomes; Edwin W. Cook; Stephanie C. DeLuca; Neal E. Miller
Physical Therapy | 2003
Stephanie C. DeLuca; Karen Echols; Sharon Landesman Ramey; Edward Taub
American Journal of Occupational Therapy | 2012
Jane Case-Smith; Stephanie C. DeLuca; Richard D. Stevenson; Sharon Landesman Ramey
Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science | 2018
Juniper J. Lee-Park; Harshawardhan U. Deshpande; Jonathan Lisinski; Stephen M. LaConte; Sharon Landesman Ramey; Stephanie C. DeLuca