Stephanie Cape

Recommendations on incurred sample stability (ISS) by GCC

The topic of incurred sample stability (ISS) has generated considerable discussion within the bioanalytical community in recent years. The subject was an integral part of the seventh annual Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (WRIB) held in Long Beach, CA, USA, in April 2013, and at the Global CRO Council for Bioanalysis (GCC) meeting preceding it. Discussion at both events focused on the use of incurred samples for ISS purposes in light of results from a recent GCC survey completed by member companies. This paper reports the consensus resulting from these discussions and serves as a useful reference for depicting ISS issues and concerns, summarizing the GCC survey results and providing helpful recommendations on ISS in the context of bioanalytical method development and application.

2016 White Paper on recent issues in bioanalysis: focus on biomarker assay validation (BAV) (Part 1 – small molecules, peptides and small molecule biomarkers by LCMS)

The 2016 10th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (10th WRIB) took place in Orlando, Florida with participation of close to 700 professionals from pharmaceutical/biopharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, contract research organizations, and regulatory agencies worldwide. WRIB was once again a 5-day, weeklong event - A Full Immersion Week of Bioanalysis including Biomarkers and Immunogenicity. As usual, it was specifically designed to facilitate sharing, reviewing, discussing and agreeing on approaches to address the most current issues of interest including both small and large molecule analysis involving LCMS, hybrid LBA/LCMS, and LBA approaches, with the focus on biomarkers and immunogenicity. This 2016 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop, and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. This white paper is published in 3 parts due to length. This part (Part 1) discusses the recommendations for small molecules, peptides and small molecule biomarkers by LCMS. Part 2 (Hybrid LBA/LCMS and regulatory inputs from major global health authorities) and Part 3 (large molecule bioanalysis using LBA, biomarkers and immunogenicity) will be published in the Bioanalysis journal, issue 23.

7th GCC Insights: incurred samples use; fit-for-purpose validation, solution stability, electronic laboratory notebook and hyperlipidemic matrix testing

The Global CRO Council for Bioanalysis (GCC), a global independent consortium bringing together many senior level CRO representatives, was created in 2010 in order to openly discuss and share opinions on scientific and regulatory issues specific to the bioanalytical field [1]. Since its formation, the GCC members have met on a regular basis to discuss various topics and challenges faced by bioanalytical CRO companies. Several conference reports of past GCC meetings were published to share the discussions held during these events [2–4]. In addition, the GCC also published several influential White Papers on topics of widespread interest in bioanalysis [5–9]. These White Papers provide unified GCC recommendations that are helpful to the global bioanalytical community. The 7th GCC Closed Forum for Bioanalysis took place in Long Beach, CA, USA on 8 April 2013, one day before the start of the 7th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (WRIB). In attendance were 46 senior-level participants from six countries, representing 37 bioanalytical CRO companies/sites. This event represented a good opportunity for bioanalytical experts from CROs to share and discuss these issues of concern for the outsourcing industry. The 7th GCC Closed Forum was chaired by Mario Rocci, who started the meeting by communicating the official admonition statement, as has been done in all previous editions [1]. Prior to initiating discussions, participants introduced themselves. As in previous GCC meetings, multiple topics of 7th GCC Insights: incurred samples use; fitfor-purpose validation, solution stability, electronic laboratory notebook and hyperlipidemic matrix testing

9th GCC closed forum: CAPA in regulated bioanalysis; method robustness, biosimilars, preclinical method validation, endogenous biomarkers, whole blood stability, regulatory audit experiences and electronic laboratory notebooks

The 9th GCCClosed Forum was held just prior to the 2015 Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (WRIB) in Miami, FL, USA on 13 April 2015. In attendance were 58 senior-level participants, from eight countries, representing 38 CRO companies offering bioanalytical services. The objective of this meeting was for CRO bioanalytical representatives to meet and discuss scientific and regulatory issues specific to bioanalysis. The issues selected at this years closed forum include CAPA, biosimilars, preclinical method validation, endogenous biomarkers, whole blood stability, and ELNs. A summary of the industrys best practices and the conclusions from the discussion of these topics is included in this meeting report.

Development of a multi-matrix LC–MS/MS method for urea quantitation and its application in human respiratory disease studies

HIGHLIGHTSSample volume normalization by urea concentration ratio in support of human respiratory disease studies.A simple and reliable multi‐matrix LC–MS/MS method for absolute quantitation of urea.Salting‐out assisted liquid‐liquid extraction of extremely polar small molecule. ABSTRACT In human respiratory disease studies, liquid samples such as nasal secretion (NS), lung epithelial lining fluid (ELF), or upper airway mucosal lining fluid (MLF) are frequently collected, but their volumes often remain unknown. The lack of volume information makes it hard to estimate the actual concentration of recovered active pharmaceutical ingredient or biomarkers. Urea has been proposed to serve as a sample volume marker because it can freely diffuse through most body compartments and is less affected by disease states. Here, we report an easy and reliable LC–MS/MS method for cross‐matrix measurement of urea in serum, plasma, universal transfer medium (UTM), synthetic absorptive matrix elution buffer 1 (SAMe1) and synthetic absorptive matrix elution buffer 2 (SAMe2) which are commonly sampled in human respiratory disease studies. The method uses two stable‐isotope‐labeled urea isotopologues, [15N2]‐urea and [13C,15N2]‐urea, as the surrogate analyte and the internal standard, respectively. This approach provides the best measurement consistency across different matrices. The analyte extraction was individually optimized in each matrix. Specifically in UTM, SAMe1 and SAMe2, the unique salting‐out assisted liquid‐liquid extraction (SALLE) not only dramatically reduces the matrix interferences but also improves the assay recovery. The use of an HILIC column largely increases the analyte retention. The typical run time is 3.6 min which allows for high throughput analysis.

The 10th GCC Closed Forum: rejected data, GCP in bioanalysis, extract stability, BAV, processed batch acceptance, matrix stability, critical reagents, ELN and data integrity and counteracting fraud

The 10th Global CRO Council (GCC) Closed Forum was held in Orlando, FL, USA on 18 April 2016. In attendance were decision makers from international CRO member companies offering bioanalytical services. The objective of this meeting was for GCC members to meet and discuss scientific and regulatory issues specific to bioanalysis. The issues discussed at this closed forum included reporting data from failed method validation runs, GCP for clinical sample bioanalysis, extracted sample stability, biomarker assay validation, processed batch acceptance criteria, electronic laboratory notebooks and data integrity, Health Canadas Notice regarding replicates in matrix stability evaluations, critical reagents and regulatory approaches to counteract fraud. In order to obtain the pharma perspectives on some of these topics, the first joint CRO-Pharma Scientific Interchange Meeting was held on 12 November 2016, in Denver, Colorado, USA. The five topics discussed at this Interchange meeting were reporting data from failed method validation runs, GCP for clinical sample bioanalysis, extracted sample stability, processed batch acceptance criteria and electronic laboratory notebooks and data integrity. The conclusions from the discussions of these topics at both meetings are included in this report.

AstraZeneca and Covance Laboratories Clinical Bioanalysis Alliance: an evolutionary outsourcing model

The AstraZeneca and Covance Laboratories Clinical Bioanalysis Alliance (CBioA) was launched in 2011 after a period of global economic recession. In this challenging environment, AstraZeneca elected to move to a full and centralized outsourcing model that could optimize the number of people supporting bioanalytical work and reduce the analytical cost. This paper describes the key aspects of CBioA, the innovative operational model implemented, and our ways of ensuring this was much more than simply a cost reduction exercise. As we have recently passed the first 5-year cycle, this paper also summarizes some of the concluding benefits, wins and lessons learned, and how we now plan to extend and develop the relationship even further moving into a new clinical laboratory partnership.

Incurred sample reanalysis in AstraZeneca small molecule portfolio – what have we learned and where do we go next?

In this paper, experiences and learnings are shared from the 10-year application of incurred sample reanalysis (ISR) in support of the AstraZeneca small molecule portfolio. The conclusions from including ISR in every clinical bioanalysis study for a period of 5 years, generating ISR data from 550 studies, are shared. Our preclinical ISR approach is described and data generated using capillary microsampling demonstrate confidence in its routine application. The data demonstrate that ISR failures are very rare and the assessment can and should therefore be limited. Dialogue between the bioanalytical teams internally, as well as with the partner contract research organizations, is however critical for a successful bioanalytical method validation and to avoid any ISR failures.

Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Assays in the Regulated Bioanalytical Laboratory

Data derived from robust and reproducible bioanalytical assays form the foundation of all pharmaceutical marketing approval submissions to regulatory agencies. In this chapter, bioanalytical method development, validation, and sample analysis for small molecules are discussed with emphasis on high performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) assays. Considerations for assay development include selection of analyte extraction, chromatography, and mass spectrometry parameters. Relevant aspects of validation testing and documentation are covered. Sample analysis for both good laboratory practice (animal, nonclinical) and good clinical practice (human, clinical) studies is discussed. Regulatory compliance issues are addressed for assay development, validation, and sample analysis.