Stephanie Lustgarten

A Phase 2 Trial of Ponatinib in Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive Leukemias

BACKGROUND Ponatinib is a potent oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of unmutated and mutated BCR-ABL, including BCR-ABL with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor-refractory threonine-to-isoleucine mutation at position 315 (T315I). We conducted a phase 2 trial of ponatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph-positive ALL). METHODS We enrolled 449 heavily pretreated patients who had CML or Ph-positive ALL with resistance to or unacceptable side effects from dasatinib or nilotinib or who had the BCR-ABL T315I mutation. Ponatinib was administered at an initial dose of 45 mg once daily. The median follow-up was 15 months. RESULTS Among 267 patients with chronic-phase CML, 56% had a major cytogenetic response (51% of patients with resistance to or unacceptable side effects from dasatinib or nilotinib and 70% of patients with the T315I mutation), 46% had a complete cytogenetic response (40% and 66% in the two subgroups, respectively), and 34% had a major molecular response (27% and 56% in the two subgroups, respectively). Responses were observed regardless of the baseline BCR-ABL kinase domain mutation status and were durable; the estimated rate of a sustained major cytogenetic response of at least 12 months was 91%. No single BCR-ABL mutation conferring resistance to ponatinib was detected. Among 83 patients with accelerated-phase CML, 55% had a major hematologic response and 39% had a major cytogenetic response. Among 62 patients with blast-phase CML, 31% had a major hematologic response and 23% had a major cytogenetic response. Among 32 patients with Ph-positive ALL, 41% had a major hematologic response and 47% had a major cytogenetic response. Common adverse events were thrombocytopenia (in 37% of patients), rash (in 34%), dry skin (in 32%), and abdominal pain (in 22%). Serious arterial thrombotic events were observed in 9% of patients; these events were considered to be treatment-related in 3%. A total of 12% of patients discontinued treatment because of an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS Ponatinib had significant antileukemic activity across categories of disease stage and mutation status. (Funded by Ariad Pharmaceuticals and others; PACE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01207440 .).

Ponatinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukaemia: an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND Ponatinib has shown potent activity against chronic myeloid leukaemia that is resistant to available treatment, although it is associated with arterial occlusion. We investigated whether this activity and safety profile would result in superior outcomes compared with imatinib in previously untreated patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. METHODS The Evaluation of Ponatinib versus Imatinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (EPIC) study was a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial designed to assess the efficacy and safety of ponatinib, compared with imatinib, in newly diagnosed patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia. Patients from 106 centres in 21 countries were randomly assigned (1:1, with stratification by Sokal score at diagnosis) using an interactive voice and web response system to receive oral ponatinib (45 mg) or imatinib (400 mg) once daily until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other criteria for withdrawal were met. Eligible patients were at least 18 years of age, within 6 months of diagnosis, and Philadelphia chromosome-positive by cytogenetic assessment, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and had not previously been treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The primary endpoint was major molecular response at 12 months. Patients who remained on study and had molecular assessments at specified timepoints were studied at those timepoints. Safety analyses included all treated patients, as per study protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01650805. FINDINGS Between Aug 14, 2012, and Oct 9, 2013, 307 patients were randomly assigned to receive ponatinib (n=155) or imatinib (n=152). The trial was terminated early, on Oct 17, 2013, following concerns about vascular adverse events observed in patients given ponatinib in other trials. Trial termination limited assessment of the primary endpoint of major molecular response at 12 months, as only 13 patients in the imatinib group and ten patients in the ponatinib group could be assessed at this timepoint; the proportion of patients achieving a major molecular response at 12 months did not differ significantly between the two groups (eight [80%] of ten patients given ponatinib and five [38%] of 13 patients given imatinib; p=0·074). 11 (7%) of 154 patients given ponatinib and three (2%) of 152 patients given imatinib had arterial occlusive events (p=0·052); arterial occlusive events were designated serious in ten (6%) of 154 patients given ponatinib and in one (1%) of 152 patients given imatinib (p=0·010). The data monitoring committee criterion for risk assessment (significant difference in serious grade 3 or 4 ischaemic events between groups) was not met (five [3%] of 154 vs one [1%] of 152; p=0·21). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events observed in more than 5% of patients in the ponatinib group were increased lipase (22 [14%] of 154 vs three [2%] of 152 with imatinib), thrombocytopenia (19 [12%] of 154 vs ten [7%] of 152 with imatinib), rash (ten [6%] of 154 vs two [1%] of 152 with imatinib). In the imatinib group, grade 3 or 4 adverse events observed in more than 5% of patients were neutropenia (12 [8%] of 152 vs five [3%] of 154 with ponatinib) and thrombocytopenia (ten [7%] of 152 vs 19 [12%] of 154 with ponatinib). Serious adverse events that occurred in three or more patients given ponatinib were pancreatitis (n=5), atrial fibrillation (n=3), and thrombocytopenia (n=3). No serious adverse event occurred in three or more patients given imatinib. INTERPRETATION The efficacy of ponatinib treatment of newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia compared with imatinib could not be assessed due to trial termination, but preliminary data suggest there might be benefit, although with more arterial occlusive events than with imatinib at the doses studied. Because the EPIC trial was terminated early, efficacy of ponatinib in this setting remains to be established. FUNDING ARIAD Pharmaceuticals.

Ponatinib in patients with refractory acute myeloid leukaemia: Findings from a phase 1 study

Activating mutations in the FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3), a tyrosine kinase receptor important in haematopoiesis, are among the most common molecular aberrations in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), occurring in 30% of adult patients (Levis & Small 2003). Common FLT3-activating mutations include FLT3 internal tandem duplications (FLT3-ITDs), detected in about 23% of AML patients, and point mutations within the tyrosine kinase domain, found in about 8% (Levis & Small 2003). These mutations result in a constitutively active FLT3 receptor, leading to growth factor–independent proliferation and survival of leukaemic cells and conferring poor prognosis (Levis & Small 2003). Clinical studies of single-agent first-generation FLT3 inhibitors have demonstrated clinical activity, with responses that are typically short-lived and mostly partial or complete responses with incomplete haematopoietic recovery. This may be due to suboptimal potency and/or pharmacokinetics, leading to insufficient or transient target inhibition, or concomitant c-kit inhibition (Knapper 2011). Recently, high potency second-generation FLT3 inhibitors (eg, quizartinib) have shown substantial efficacy as monotherapy, suggesting a potency threshold for clinical benefit (Knapper 2011). The validation of FLT3-ITD as a therapeutic target has rekindled interest in developing and testing new potent FLT3 inhibitors in AML patients with FLT3-ITD mutations (Smith et al, 2012). Ponatinib is a novel, orally administered tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and a potent pan–BCR-ABL1 inhibitor (O’Hare et al, 2009). Based on results in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (Ph+ ALL) in phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials (Cortes et al 2012a, Cortes et al (2012b), ponatinib (45 mg once daily) has been approved in the United States for the treatment of patients with CML and Ph+ ALL that is resistant or intolerant to prior TKI therapy. Preclinical studies revealed that ponatinib also potently inhibits FLT3, leading to apoptosis of leukaemic cell lines carrying the FLT3-ITD mutation and tumour regression in xenograft models, suggesting the potential for activity in patients with AML (Gozgit et al, 2011). Additionally, ponatinib appears to retain activity against the clinically-relevant quizartinib-resistant mutant FLT3-ITD F691L (Smith et al, 2013). Here we report the first clinical experience with ponatinib in 12 AML patients included in the phase 1 study. Methods are described in the on-line supporting information. The median age of these patients was 49 (30-72) years. The median time from diagnosis to treatment was 1 year. Patients received a median of 3 (1-7) prior therapies; 58% had received 3 or more prior therapies (Table I and Table S1). Mutational analysis in a central laboratory confirmed the presence of FLT3-ITD in 7 patients (58%). Three additional patients did not have an adequate DNA sample at study entry; however, they had a history of FLT3-ITD mutation—as reported by the investigator—and they are included in the FLT3-ITD mutation– positive group for these analyses. Three patients (all FLT3-ITD mutation positive) were previously treated with one or more FLT3 inhibitors (sorafenib, quizartinib, and/or IMC-EB10); one patient progressed on IMC-EB10 and had a partial response to sorafenib, one patient had a complete response to sorafenib and a partial response to quizartinib, and one patient had a partial response to quizartinib. Seven patients (70%) with FLT3-ITD mutation were FLT3 inhibitor– naive (Table I). The median treatment duration was 52 (10-173) days. At the time of analysis, all patients had discontinued ponatinib: 5 (42%) due to death (all unrelated to ponatinib), 3 (25%) due to adverse events (AEs: unrelated central nervous system [CNS] haemorrhage, possibly related acute pancreatitis, unrelated graft vs host disease), 2 (17%) due to progressive disease (PD), and 2 (17%) due to investigator decision (Table I). Table 1 Selected baseline characteristics, treatment duration, response, and reasons for discontinuation by individual patients with AML Nine patients experienced at least one treatment-related AE. The most common treatment-related AEs occurring in 2 or more patients were pancreatitis (n=3) and petechiae (n=2). Three patients experienced a treatment-related serious AE (SAE) of pancreatitis (all grade 2), which was a dose-limiting toxicity in this trial (Cortes et al, 2012a). Pancreatitis resolved in 2 patients after dose interruption, lasting 3 days in one patient and 8 days in the other. These 2 patients continued therapy at a reduced dose (30 mg) and were subsequently re-escalated to 45 mg without recurrence. The third patient discontinued therapy per investigator decision. Additional details regarding treatment-emergent AEs and SAEs can be found in Table S2. Seven patients died during the study for reasons not related to ponatinib: disease progression (n=3), multiorgan failure (n=2), pneumonia and sepsis (n=1), and CNS haemorrhage (n=1) (Table I). Ponatinib had an acceptable safety profile in this small group of patients with refractory AML, similar to that observed in patients with CML and Ph+ ALL. Few treatment-related AEs were reported; the most common was pancreatitis, which was manageable, and re-challenge with ponatinib was possible in most cases. The geometric mean maximal concentration and area under the curve of single-dose ponatinib at day 1, cycle 1 in AML patients were 97 nM and 1441 nM*h, respectively, similar to findings across all 31 patients receiving 45 mg ponatinib (98.8 nM and 1360.1 nM*h). The overall response rate (RR, partial remission or better) was 3/12 (25%): 2 patients achieved complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery and one patient experienced partial remission (Table I, Fig 1). These 3 responders carried FLT3-ITD mutations and were all FLT3 inhibitor–naive; the duration of ponatinib treatment in these patients was 3 to 6 months. Among 10 patients with FLT3-ITD mutations, RR was 3/10 (30%). Among 7 patients with FLT3-ITD mutations who were FLT3 inhibitor–naive, RR was 3/7 (43%). Three patients (2 FLT3-ITD negative) had stable disease, as they did not meet criteria for complete/partial remission or PD; however, peripheral blood blasts in 2 of these patients decreased considerably (~60-90%) during the first treatment cycle. The RR reported with quizartinib in phase 1 testing was 30% (Cortes et al, 2009) and 10% with sorafenib (Borthakur et al, 2011). Although the sample size reported here is small, these results suggest that ponatinib has clinical activity in AML patients with FLT3-ITD, requiring confirmation in a larger cohort of patients and with additional focus on optimization of response (eg, combination therapy) and response durability. Figure 1 Course of the disease in 3 responders during ponatinib treatment

The impact of multiple low-level BCR-ABL1 mutations on response to ponatinib

The third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) ponatinib shows activity against all common BCR-ABL1 single mutants, including the highly resistant BCR-ABL1-T315I mutant, improving outcome for patients with refractory chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, responses are variable, and causal baseline factors have not been well-studied. The type and number of low-level BCR-ABL1 mutations present after imatinib resistance has prognostic significance for subsequent treatment with nilotinib or dasatinib as second-line therapy. We therefore investigated the impact of low-level mutations detected by sensitive mass-spectrometry before ponatinib initiation (baseline) on treatment response in 363 TKI-resistant patients enrolled in the PONATINIB for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Evaluation and Ph(+)Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia trial, including 231 patients in chronic phase (CP-CML). Low-level mutations were detected in 53 patients (15%, including low-level T315I in 14 patients); most, however, did not undergo clonal expansion during ponatinib treatment and, moreover, no specific individual mutations were associated with inferior outcome. We demonstrate however, that the number of mutations detectable by mass spectrometry after TKI resistance is associated with response to ponatinib treatment and could be used to refine the therapeutic approach. Although CP-CML patients with T315I (63/231, 27%) had superior responses overall, those with multiple mutations detectable by mass spectrometry (20, 32%) had substantially inferior responses compared with those with T315I as the sole mutation detected (43, 68%). In contrast, for CP-CML patients without T315I, the inferior responses previously observed with nilotinib/dasatinib therapy for imatinib-resistant patients with multiple mutations were not seen with ponatinib treatment, suggesting that ponatinib may prove to be particularly advantageous for patients with multiple mutations detectable by mass spectrometry after TKI resistance.

Comparative efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments in the third-line setting, for chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia after failure of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors

We compared the efficacy of ponatinib and second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (2G-TKIs: bosutinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib) in chronic phase CML resistant/intolerant to ≥1 prior 2G-TKI. Estimated probabilities of CCyR with 2G-TKI ranged from 22% to 26%, compared with 60% (95% CrI 52-68%) with ponatinib. The estimated probability of ponatinib providing higher response rate than all other included treatments was 99% (CCyR) and 97% (MCyR). Use of further 2G-TKI may provide limited benefit in CP-CML patients resistant/intolerant to prior 2G-TKI treatment. Compared with 2G-TKIs, ponatinib is estimated to provide substantially higher probability of achieving CCyR and MCyR; safety was not compared.

Ponatinib efficacy and safety in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia: final 5-year results of the phase 2 PACE trial

Ponatinib has potent activity against native and mutant BCR-ABL1, including BCR-ABL1T315I The pivotal phase 2 Ponatinib Ph+ ALL and CML Evaluation (PACE) trial evaluated efficacy and safety of ponatinib at a starting dose of 45 mg once daily in 449 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) resistant/intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib, or with BCR-ABL1T315I This analysis focuses on chronic-phase CML (CP-CML) patients (n = 270) with 56.8-month median follow-up. Among 267 evaluable patients, 60%, 40%, and 24% achieved major cytogenetic response (MCyR), major molecular response (MMR), and 4.5-log molecular response, respectively. The probability of maintaining MCyR for 5 years was 82% among responders. Dose reductions were implemented in October 2013 to decrease the risk of arterial occlusive events (AOEs); ≥90% of CP-CML patients who had achieved MCyR or MMR maintained response 40 months after elective dose reductions. Estimated 5-year overall survival was 73%. In CP-CML patients, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were rash (47%), abdominal pain (46%), thrombocytopenia (46%), headache (43%), dry skin (42%), and constipation (41%). The cumulative incidence of AOEs in CP-CML patients increased over time to 31%, while the exposure-adjusted incidence of new AOEs (15.8 and 4.9 per 100 patient-years in years 1 and 5, respectively) did not increase over time. These final PACE results demonstrate ponatinib provides durable and clinically meaningful responses, irrespective of dose reductions, in this population of heavily pretreated CP-CML patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01207440.

Benefits and risks of ponatinib versus bosutinib following treatment failure of two prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison

Abstract Objective: Comparing the benefit–risk profiles of ponatinib vs. bosutinib in third-line (3L) treatment of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) is challenging because their pivotal trials lacked comparator arms. To characterize the overall benefit–risk profile in 3L CP-CML patients treated with bosutinib vs. ponatinib, a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was performed to compare efficacy outcomes and treatment duration after adjusting for trial subjects’ baseline characteristics, and tolerability was assessed with an unadjusted comparison of study-drug discontinuation. Methods: The MAIC was performed using published data from the pivotal bosutinib trial and the most recent individual-patient-level data on file from the pivotal ponatinib trial. Results: Responses were more frequent and durable with ponatinib (n = 70 MAIC-adjusted) than with bosutinib (n = 119) – complete cytogenetic response (CCyR): 61% vs. 26%; Kaplan–Meier estimate of maintaining CCyR at 4 years: 89% vs. 54%. Median treatment duration was longer with ponatinib than with bosutinib: 38.4 vs. 8.6 months. Only 9% of ponatinib patients (n = 97 unadjusted) vs. 42% of bosutinib patients discontinued due to death, disease progression or unsatisfactory response; 19% vs. 24% discontinued due to adverse events. Conclusions: Based on these surrogate measures of patient benefit–risk profiles, ponatinib appears to provide a net overall benefit vs. bosutinib in 3L CP-CML.