Stephanie Petillo
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Stephanie Petillo.
international conference on robotics and automation | 2010
David R. Thompson; Steve Chien; Yi Chao; Peggy P. Li; Bronwyn Cahill; Julia Levin; Oscar Schofield; Arjuna Balasuriya; Stephanie Petillo; Matt Arrott; Michael Meisinger
This work addresses mission planning for autonomous underwater gliders based on predictions of an uncertain, time-varying current field. Glider submersibles are highly sensitive to prevailing currents so mission planners must account for ocean tides and eddies. Previous work in variable-current path planning assumes that current predictions are perfect, but in practice these forecasts may be inaccurate. Here we evaluate plan fragility using empirical tests on historical ocean forecasts for which followup data is available. We present methods for glider path planning and control in a time-varying current field. A case study scenario in the Southern California Bight uses current predictions drawn from the Regional Ocean Monitoring System (ROMS).
OCEANS'10 IEEE SYDNEY | 2010
Stephanie Petillo; Arjuna Balasuriya; Henrik Schmidt
In the underwater environment, spatiotemporally dynamic environmental conditions pose challenges to the detection and tracking of hydrographic features. A useful tool in combating these challenge is Autonomous Adaptive Environmental Assessment (AAEA) employed on board Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs). AAEA is a process by which an AUV autonomously assesses the hydrographic environment it is swimming through in real-time, effectively detecting hydro-graphic features in the area. This feature detection process leads naturally to the subsequent active/adaptive tracking of a selected feature. Due to certain restrictions in operating AUVs this detection-tracking feedback loop setup with AAEA can only rely on having an AUVs self-collected hydrographic data (e.g., temperature, conductivity, and/or pressure readings) available. With a basic quantitative definition of an underwater feature of interest, an algorithm can be developed (with which a data set is evaluated) to detect said feature. One example of feature tracking with AAEA explored in this paper is tracking the marine thermocline. The AAEA process for thermocline tracking is outlined here from quantitatively defining the thermocline region and calculating thermal gradients, all the way through simulation and implementation of the process on AUVs. Adaptation to varying feature properties, scales, and other challenges in bringing the concept of feature tracking with AAEA into implementation in field experiments is addressed, and results from two recent field experiments are presented.
International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks | 2012
Stephanie Petillo; Henrik Schmidt; Arjuna Balasuriya
In recent years, there has been significant concern about the impacts of offshore oil spill plumes and harmful algal blooms on the coastal ocean environment and biology, as well as on the human populations adjacent to these coastal regions. Thus, it has become increasingly important to determine the 3D extent of these ocean features (“plumes”) and how they evolve over time. The ocean environment is largely inaccessible to sensing directly by humans, motivating the need for robots to intelligently sense the ocean for us. In this paper, we propose the use of an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) network to track and predict plume shape and motion, discussing solutions to the challenges of spatiotemporal data aliasing (coverage versus resolution), underwater communication, AUV autonomy, data fusion, and coordination of multiple AUVs. A plume simulation is also developed here as the first step toward implementing behaviors for autonomous, adaptive plume tracking with AUVs, modeling a plume as a sum of Fourier orders and examining the resulting errors. This is then extended to include plume forecasting based on time variations, and future improvements and implementation are discussed.
OCEANS'10 IEEE SYDNEY | 2010
Arjuna Balasuriya; Stephanie Petillo; Henrik Schmidt; Michael R. Benjamin
This paper discusses the autonomy framework proposed for the mobile instruments such as Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) and gliders. Paper focuses on the challenges faced by these clusters of mobile platform in executive tasks such as adaptive sampling in the hostile underwater environment. Collaborations between these mobile instruments are essential to capture the environmental changes and track them for time-series analysis. This paper looks into the challenges imposed by the underwater communication infrastructure and presents the nested autonomy architecture as a solution to overcome these challenges. The autonomy architecture is separated from the low-level control architecture of these instruments, which is called the ‘backseat driver’. The back-seat driver paradigm is implemented on the Mission Oriented Object Suite (MOOS) developed at MIT. The autonomy is achieved by generating multiple behaviors (multiple objective functions) linked to the internal state of the platform as well as the environment. Optimization engine called the MOOS-IvP is used to pick the best action for the given instance based on the mission at hand. At sea operational scenarios and results are presented to demonstrate the proposed autonomy architecture for Ocean Observatory Initiative (OOI).
oceans conference | 2015
Stephanie Petillo; Henrik Schmidt; Pierre F. J. Lermusiaux; Dana R. Yoerger; Arjuna Balasuriya
Oceanic fronts, similar to atmospheric fronts, occur at the interface of two fluid (water) masses of varying characteristics. In regions such as these where there are quantifiable physical, chemical, or biological changes in the ocean environment, it is possible - with the proper instrumentation - to track, or map, the front boundary. In this paper, the front is approximated as an isotherm that is tracked autonomously and adaptively in 2D (horizontal) and 3D space by an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) running MOOS-IvP autonomy. The basic, 2D (constant depth) front tracking method developed in this work has three phases: detection, classification, and tracking, and results in the AUV tracing a zigzag path along and across the front. The 3D AUV front tracking method presented here results in a helical motion around a central axis that is aligned along the front in the horizontal plane, tracing a 3D path that resembles a slinky stretched out along the front. To test and evaluate these front tracking methods (implemented as autonomy behaviors), virtual experiments were conducted with simulated AUVs in a spatiotemporally dynamic MIT MSEAS ocean model environment of the Mid-Atlantic Bight region, where a distinct temperature front is present along the shelfbreak. A number of performance metrics were developed to evaluate the performance of the AUVs running these front tracking behaviors, and the results are presented herein.
IFAC Proceedings Volumes | 2012
Stephanie Petillo; Henrik Schmidt
Abstract An autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) equipped with environmental sensors and an on-board autonomy system can greatly increase the efficiency of environmental data collection and the synopticity of the data set collected simply by autonomously adapting its motion to changes it senses in its local environment. One application of this is tracking ocean features in an unknown ocean environment. This can be accomplished with one or multiple AUVs collaborating in near-real-time using acoustic communications. To further explore one example of this application, this paper focuses on using multiple AUVs to track underwater plumes. We evaluate various types of plumes (e.g., hydrothermal vent plumes, algal blooms, oil leaks), how each plume type may be detected and its spatial extent determined, what types of sensors can be used, and how AUVs can be employed to autonomously and adaptively track these dynamic plumes. Since AUVs vary significantly in design, mobility, deployment duration, on-board processing power, etc., it is also necessary to consider the best choice of AUV (or combination of AUVs) to track a plume. Thus, an operator/scientists choice of AUV type(s) will likely depend the type of plume to be tracked, or vice versa. Since most underwater plumes are highly spatiotemporally dynamic, employing environmentally adaptive autonomy to track them with a fleet of AUVs is one of the most efficient ways to do so, given todays technology.
oceans conference | 2015
Toby Schneider; Stephanie Petillo; Henrik Schmidt; Chris Murphy
Other repository | 2014
Stephanie Petillo; Henrik Schmidt
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2014
Erin M. Fischell; Stephanie Petillo; Thomas Howe; Henrik Schmidt