Stephen A. Cook

The complexity of theorem-proving procedures

It is shown that any recognition problem solved by a polynomial time-bounded nondeterministic Turing machine can be “reduced” to the problem of determining whether a given propositional formula is a tautology. Here “reduced” means, roughly speaking, that the first problem can be solved deterministically in polynomial time provided an oracle is available for solving the second. From this notion of reducible, polynomial degrees of difficulty are defined, and it is shown that the problem of determining tautologyhood has the same polynomial degree as the problem of determining whether the first of two given graphs is isomorphic to a subgraph of the second. Other examples are discussed. A method of measuring the complexity of proof procedures for the predicate calculus is introduced and discussed.

THE RELATIVE EFFICIENCY OF PROPOSITIONAL PROOF SYSTEMS

We are interested in studying the length of the shortest proof of a propositional tautology in various proof systems as a function of the length of the tautology. The smallest upper bound known for this function is exponential, no matter what the proof system. A question we would like to answer (but have not been able to) is whether this function has a polynomial bound for some proof system. (This question is motivated below.) Our results here are relative results.In §§2 and 3 we indicate that all standard Hilbert type systems (or Frege systems, as we call them) and natural deduction systems are equivalent, up to application of a polynomial, as far as minimum proof length goes. In §4 we introduce extended Frege systems, which allow introduction of abbreviations for formulas. Since these abbreviations can be iterated, they eliminate the need for a possible exponential growth in formula length in a proof, as is illustrated by an example (the pigeonhole principle). In fact, Theorem 4.6 (which is a variation of a theorem of Statman) states that with a penalty of at most a linear increase in the number of lines of a proof in an extended Frege system, no line in the proof need be more than a constant times the length of the formula proved.

A taxonomy of problems with fast parallel algorithms

The class NC consists of problems solvable very fast (in time polynomial in log n ) in parallel with a feasible (polynomial) number of processors. Many natural problems in NC are known; in this paper an attempt is made to identify important subclasses of NC and give interesting examples in each subclass. The notion of NC 1 -reducibility is introduced and used throughout (problem R is NC 1 -reducible to problem S if R can be solved with uniform log-depth circuits using oracles for S ). Problems complete with respect to this reducibility are given for many of the subclasses of NC . A general technique, the “parallel greedy algorithm,” is identified and used to show that finding a minimum spanning forest of a graph is reducible to the graph accessibility problem and hence is in NC 2 (solvable by uniform Boolean circuits of depth O (log 2 n ) and polynomial size). The class LOGCFL is given a new characterization in terms of circuit families. The class DET of problems reducible to integer determinants is defined and many examples given. A new problem complete for deterministic polynomial time is given, namely, finding the lexicographically first maximal clique in a graph. This paper is a revised version of S. A. Cook, (1983, in “Proceedings 1983 Intl. Found. Comut. Sci. Conf.,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 158, pp. 78–93, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/New York).

Soundness and Completeness of an Axiom System for Program Verification

A simple ALGOL-like language is defined which includes conditional, while, and procedure call statements as well as blocks. A formal interpretive semantics and a Hoare style axiom system are given for the language. The axiom system is proved to be sound, and in a certain sense complete, relative to the interpretive semantics. The main new results are the completeness theorem, and a careful treatment of the procedure call rules for procedures with global variables in their declarations.

Characterizations of Pushdown Machines in Terms of Time-Bounded Computers

A class of machines called auxiliary pushdown machines is introduced. Several types of pushdown automata, including stack automata, are characterized in terms of these machines. The computing power of each class of machines in question is characterized in terms of time-bounded Turing machines, and corollaries are derived which answer some open questions in the field. ~

A new recursion-theoretic characterization of the polytime functions

We give a recursion-theoretic characterization of FP which describes polynomial time computation independently of any externally imposed resource bounds. In particular, this syntactic characterization avoids the explicit size bounds on recursion (and the initial function 2|x|·|y|) of Cobham.

Upper and lower time bounds for parallel random access machines without simultaneous writes

One of the frequently used models for a synchronous parallel computer is that of a parallel random access machine, where each processor can read from and write into a common random access memory. Different processors may read the same memory location at the same time, but simultaneous writing is disallowed. We show that even if we allow nonuniform algorithms, an arbitrary number of processors, and arbitrary instruction sets,

Log depth circuits for division and related problems

\Omega (\log n)

Problems complete for deterministic logarithmic space

is a lower bound on the time required to compute various simple functions, including sorting n keys and finding the logical “or” of n bits. We also prove a surprising time upper bound of

Parallel computation for well-endowed rings and space-bounded probabilistic machines

.72\log _2 n