Stephen A. Obstbaum

National Outcomes of Cataract Extraction: Increased Risk of Retinal Complications Associated with Nd.-YAG Laser Capsulotomy

PURPOSE The authors studied 57,103 randomly selected Medicare beneficiaries who underwent extracapsular cataract extraction in 1986 or 1987 to determine the possible association between performance of neodymium (Nd):YAG laser capsulotomy and the risk of subsequent retinal break or detachment. METHODS Cases of cataract surgery were identified from Medicare claims submitted in 1986 and 1987 and were followed through the end of 1988. Episodes of cataract surgery, posterior capsulotomy, and retinal complications were ascertained based on procedure and diagnosis codes listed in physician bills and hospital discharge records. Lifetable and Coxs proportional hazards models were used to analyze the risk of retinal detachment or break in patients undergoing and not undergoing capsulotomy during the period of observation. RESULTS Of the 57,103 persons identified as having undergone extracapsular cataract extraction in 1986 or 1987, 13,709 subsequently underwent Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy between 1986 and 1988. A total of 337 persons had aphakic or pseudophakic retinal detachments between 1986 and 1988 and an additional 194 underwent repair of a retinal break. Proportional hazards modeling shows a 3.9-fold increase in the risk of retinal break or detachment among those who underwent capsulotomy (95% confidence interval: 2.89 to 5.25). Younger patient age, male sex, and white race also were associated with increased risk of retinal complications after extracapsular cataract extraction. CONCLUSION The authors conclude that there is a statistically significant increase in the risk of retinal detachment or break in those patients who undergo capsulotomy after cataract extraction. Therefore, capsulotomy should be deferred until the patients impairment caused by capsular opacification warrants the increased risk of retinal complications associated with performance of capsulotomy.

Results of the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) Study One Year After Surgery

The Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) study is a nine-center, self-controlled clinical trial of a standardized technique of radial keratotomy in 435 patients who had physiologic myopia with a preoperative refraction between -2.00 and -8.00 diopters. The surgical technique consisted of eight incisions using a diamond micrometer knife with blade length determined by intraoperative ultrasonic pachymetry and the diameter of central clear zone determined by preoperative refraction. At one year after surgery, myopia was reduced in all eyes; 60% were within +/- 1.00 diopter of emmetropia; 30% were undercorrected and 10% were overcorrected by more than 1.00 diopter (range of refraction, -4.25 to +3.38 D). Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 78% of eyes. The operation was most effective in eyes with a refraction between -2.00 and -4.25 diopters. Thirteen percent of patients lost one or two Snellen lines of best corrected visual acuity. However, all but three eyes could be corrected to 20/20. Ten percent of patients increased astigmatism more than 1.00 diopter. Disabling glare was not detected with a clinical glare tester, but three patients reduced their driving at night because of glare. Between six months and one year, the refraction changed by greater than 0.50 diopters in 19% of eyes.

Results of the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) Study Five Years after Surgery

In the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) Study, 793 eyes of 435 patients with 2 to 8 diopters (D) of myopia received a standardized surgery consisting of 8 incisions with a diamond-bladed knife set at 100% of the thinnest paracentral ultrasonic corneal thickness measurement and a diameter of the clear zone of 3.0 to 4.5 mm; 97 eyes (12%) received an additional 8 incisions. There were 757 eyes (95%) followed for 3 to 6.3 years. After surgery, uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 88% of eyes. The refractive error was within 1 D of emmetropia for 64% of eyes; 19% were myopic and 17% were hyperopic by more than 1 D. Between 6 months and 5 years after surgery, 22% of the eyes had a refractive change of 1 D or more in the hyperopic direction. For 25 eyes (3%) there was a loss of 2 or more lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity.

Three-year Results of the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) Study

The Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) study is a nine-center clinical trial of a standardized technique of radial keratotomy in 435 patients who had simple myopia with a preoperative refractive error between -2.00 and -8.00 diopters (D). We report results for one eye of each patient. The surgical technique consisted of eight incisions using a diamond micrometer knife with the blade length determined by intraoperative ultrasonic pachymetry and the diameter of the central clear zone determined by the preoperative refractive error. At three years after surgery, 58% of eyes had refractive error within one diopter of emmetropia; 26% were undercorrected, and 16% were overcorrected by more than one diopter. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 76% of eyes. The operation was more effective in eyes with a preoperative refractive error between -2.00 and -4.37 diopters. Between one and three years after surgery, the refractive error changed by 1.00 diopter or more in 12% of eyes, indicating a lack of stability in some eyes.

Standardized graphs and terms for refractive surgery results.

A critical element of peer-reviewed publication is clear communication to the reader and the ophthalmic and medical community. Refractive surgery has the luxury of multiple procedures with multiple outcome parameters that are relevant to clinicians, researchers, and, of course, patients. This diversity introduces complexity for the reader in evaluating and comparing various procedures as they are applied to various patient populations. For over a decade, the editors of the Journal of Refractive Surgery (JRS) and the Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS) have advocated a minimally acceptable level of standardization in reporting results of refractive surgical procedures.1,2 This has culminated in a set of criteria that include basic elements that must be reported in every manuscript. To further this goal of clear reporting, the editors of JCRS, JRS, and Cornea would like to announce their collaboration in standardizing two aspects of data reporting in refractive surgery.

Time analysis of corneal endothelial cell density after cataract extraction.

Serial endothelial photographs were taken preoperatively and postoperatively in 200 eyes; 111 eyes contained a Rayner iris clip lens, 54 eyes contained a Fyodorov Sputnik lens, and 35 eyes had no lens. Central endothelial cell density was changed in all instances, with counts in implanted eyes declining 25 to 30%, and in nonimplanted eyes 10 to 15%. In both instances, the decline essentially ceased at about three months. The cause of the greater decline in implanted eyes appeared to be mechanical and subsequent cell loss after the 90-day period was virtually equal for the two groups. Methods that may be used to alter the difference in cell density occurring with implantation are best analyzed by using the 90-day period data for comparison.

Endothelial Cell Loss from Intraocular Lens Insertion

ALTHOUGH intraocular implants for replacement of cataractous lenses were first used more than 25 years ago, they have begun to gain acceptance only recently in the United States, and still with considerable caution.1,2 One of the chief reasons for concern has been the high incidence of early and, in particular, late development of bullous keratopathy due to corneal endothelial decompensation arising in the early series of eyes with anterior chamber and angle-supported lenses. Barraquer inserted nearly 500 such lenses in the late 1950s but had removed half of them by 1970 many because of corneal edema, a complication which was nqt recognized until several

Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy: Photokeratoscope Corneal Topography

Preoperative and postoperative corneascope photographs of 368 myopic patients undergoing radial keratotomy in the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) study were optically scanned and digitized. A high-resolution scanning system was developed in order to quantify the preoperative and postoperative corneal shape accurately. Careful analysis of the 72 data points in the nine representative rings demonstrated that corneal topography is best represented by radius of curvature from the center to the periphery. The normal myopic cornea flattens approximately +0.28 mm from the center to the periphery, demonstrating the corneas aspheric nature. More highly myopic patients in the PERK population (-4.50 to -8.00 diopters [D]) demonstrated corneas that are 0.08 to 0.10 mm steeper than the less myopic population (-2.00 to -3.12 D). Optical zone, patient age, and gender are all correlated to changes in corneal topography after radial keratotomy. In more myopic populations, men have corneas which are flatter than those of women by 0.09 to 0.11 mm in all rings represented on corneoscopy. Highly myopic males also experience more corneal flattening after 3.0-mm optical zone radial keratotomy. Regardless of the optical zone used in radial keratotomy, the resulting corneal topography flattens in all rings. However, the ratio of millimeters of radius of curvature change to diopters of correction is consistent for each ring. The dioptric change observed after radial keratotomy corresponds closely with the millimeters of flattening at the respective rings being examined. The central rings flatten 0.166-mm radius of curvature per diopter of refractive alteration obtained. The largest degree of corneal flattening occurs centrally, 0.72 mm, in the more highly myopic patients who underwent 3-mm optical zone radial keratotomy. The use of smaller optical zones in radial keratotomy produces larger changes in the radius of curvature and, consequently, in the amount of refraction than when larger optical zones are used. When compared with younger patients, older patients with 3.0, 3.5, and 4.0 optical zone radial keratotomies experience more central and peripheral corneal flattening. This study of the corneal topography of the myopic population demonstrates that the refractive change resulting from radial keratotomy is related to alterations in corneal topography. The use of similar modifications of the corneal surface may be effective for newer refractive surgical procedures.

Stability of Refraction During Four Years After Radial Keratotomy in the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy Study

The Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy Study is a nine-center clinical trial of a standardized technique of radial keratotomy in 435 patients who had simple myopia with a preoperative refraction between -2.00 and -8.00 diopters. We studied the stability of the refractive error during four years after surgery for each of 341 eyes first operated on that had a single surgical procedure. Between baseline and two weeks after surgery, all eyes became less myopic; between two weeks and three months, 161 eyes (59%) lost 1.00 D or more of the initial effect; and between three and six months, 266 eyes (95%) had a stable refraction with less than 1.00 D change. The change from six months to four years was less than 1.00 D for 246 eyes (72%). There was 1.00 D or more decrease in surgical effect (increased minus power) for 13 eyes (4%), and 1.00 D or more increase in surgical effect (decreased minus power) for 82 eyes (24%). Eyes with larger amounts of preoperative myopia and smaller diameter of the clear zone were more likely to have an increasing effect of the surgery. The duration of this continued increasing effect of the surgery is unknown.

laser photomydriasis in pseudophakic pupillary block

Pupillary block glaucoma is a potential complication of implantation. Early recognition and prompt medical therapy will generally successfully treat the condition. In some instances surgical treatment is required if medical therapy is inadequate. Laser iridectomy and laser photomydriasis are other alternatives to surgical therapy. This case reports successful treatment of pseudophakic pupillary block glaucoma using laser photomydriasis.