Stephen A. Strickland

Vosaroxin plus cytarabine versus placebo plus cytarabine in patients with first relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (VALOR): a randomised, controlled, double-blind, multinational, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND Safe and effective treatments are urgently needed for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia. We investigated the efficacy and safety of vosaroxin, a first-in-class anticancer quinolone derivative, plus cytarabine in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia. METHODS This phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was undertaken at 101 international sites. Eligible patients with acute myeloid leukaemia were aged 18 years of age or older and had refractory disease or were in first relapse after one or two cycles of previous induction chemotherapy, including at least one cycle of anthracycline (or anthracenedione) plus cytarabine. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to vosaroxin (90 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 4 in a first cycle; 70 mg/m(2) in subsequent cycles) plus cytarabine (1 g/m(2) intravenously on days 1-5) or placebo plus cytarabine through a central interactive voice system with a permuted block procedure stratified by disease status, age, and geographical location. All participants were masked to treatment assignment. The primary efficacy endpoint was overall survival and the primary safety endpoint was 30-day and 60-day all-cause mortality. Efficacy analyses were done by intention to treat; safety analyses included all treated patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01191801. FINDINGS Between Dec 17, 2010, and Sept 25, 2013, 711 patients were randomly assigned to vosaroxin plus cytarabine (n=356) or placebo plus cytarabine (n=355). At the final analysis, median overall survival was 7·5 months (95% CI 6·4-8·5) in the vosaroxin plus cytarabine group and 6·1 months (5·2-7·1) in the placebo plus cytarabine group (hazard ratio 0·87, 95% CI 0·73-1·02; unstratified log-rank p=0·061; stratified p=0·024). A higher proportion of patients achieved complete remission in the vosaroxin plus cytarabine group than in the placebo plus cytarabine group (107 [30%] of 356 patients vs 58 [16%] of 355 patients, p<0·0001). Early mortality was similar between treatment groups (30-day: 28 [8%] of 355 patients in the vosaroxin plus cytarabine group vs 23 [7%] of 350 in the placebo plus cytarabine group; 60-day: 70 [20%] vs 68 [19%]). Treatment-related deaths occurred at any time in 20 (6%) of 355 patients given vosaroxin plus cytarabine and in eight (2%) of 350 patients given placebo plus cytarabine. Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 116 (33%) and 58 (17%) patients in each group, respectively. Grade 3 or worse adverse events that were more frequent in the vosaroxin plus cytarabine group than in the placebo plus cytarabine group included febrile neutropenia (167 [47%] vs 117 [33%]), neutropenia (66 [19%] vs 49 [14%]), stomatitis (54 [15%] vs 10 [3%]), hypokalaemia (52 [15%] vs 21 [6%]), bacteraemia (43 [12%] vs 16 [5%]), sepsis (42 [12%] vs 18 [5%]), and pneumonia (39 [11%] vs 26 [7%]). INTERPRETATION Although there was no significant difference in the primary endpoint between groups, the prespecified secondary analysis stratified by randomisation factors suggests that the addition of vosaroxin to cytarabine might be of clinical benefit to some patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia. FUNDING Sunesis Pharmaceuticals.

Allo-SCT for high-risk AML-CR1 in the molecular era: impact of FLT3/ITD outweighs the conventional markers

Seventy-nine patients with AML in CR1 received allo-SCT between May 2006 and May 2011, and the prognostic impact of FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3/internal tandem duplication (FLT3/ITD) mutation was evaluated in the context of other clinical prognostic factors. Patients with FLT3/ITD+ AML had significantly inferior DFS (2-year DFS: 19% vs 64%, P=0.0027), increased risk of relapse (1-year: 59% vs 19%, P=0.01), and a trend towards decreased OS (P=0.08) compared with patients without FLT3/ITD. Multivariate analysis confirmed FLT3/ITD+ independently predicted a shorter DFS (HR, 3.0; 95% CI), 1.4–6.5; P=0.01) and increased risk of relapse (HR, 4.9; 95% CI, 2.0–12.3, P=0.01). Time to relapse in patients with FLT3/ITD+ was short with 100-day cumulative risk of 45% (95% CI, 33–57). Our data suggest that the poor prognostic implication of FLT3/ITD positivity remains even after early allo-SCT in patients with FLT3/ITD+ AML, and patients remain at high risk of early relapse. FLT3/ITD positivity also outweighs other conventional prognostic markers in predicting relapse.

Selective inhibition of FLT3 by gilteritinib in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia: a multicentre, first-in-human, open-label, phase 1–2 study

Background Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutations are common in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and are associated with rapid relapse and short survival. In relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML, the clinical benefit of FLT3 inhibitors has been limited by rapid generation of resistance mutations, especially FLT3-D835. Gilteritinib is a potent, highly selective oral FLT3/AXL inhibitor with preclinical activity against FLT3-ITD and FLT3-D835 mutations. The aim of this Phase 1/2 study was to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic (PK) effects of gilteritinib in FLT3 mutation-positive (FLT3mut+) R/R AML. Methods This ongoing pharmacodynamic-driven Phase 1/2 trial (NCT02014558) enrolled subjects from October 2013 to August 2015 who were aged ≥18 years and were either refractory to induction therapy or had relapsed after achieving remission with prior therapy. Subjects were enrolled in one of seven dose-escalation or dose-expansion cohorts that were assigned to receive once-daily doses of oral gilteritinib (20, 40, 80, 120, 200, 300, or 450 mg). Cohort expansion was based on safety/tolerability, FLT3 inhibition in correlative assays, and antileukemic activity; the 120 and 200 mg dose cohorts were further expanded to include FLT3mut+ patients only. Safety and tolerability, and PK effects were the primary endpoints; antileukemic response was the main secondary endpoint. Safety and tolerability were assessed by monitoring dose-limiting toxicities and treatment-emergent adverse events, and safety assessments (eg, clinical laboratory evaluations, electrocardiograms) in the Safety Analysis Set. Findings A total of 252 adults with R/R AML, including 58 with wild-type FLT3 and 194 with FLT3 mutations (FLT3-ITD, n=162; FLT3-D835, n=16; FLT3-ITD and -D835, n=13; other, n=3), received oral gilteritinib (20–450 mg) once daily in one of seven dose-escalation (n=23) or dose-expansion (n=229) cohorts. Gilteritinib was well tolerated in this heavily pretreated population; Grade 3 diarrhea and hepatic transaminase elevation limited dosing above 300 mg/d. The most common Grade 3/4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (39%; n=97/252), anemia (24%; n=61/252), thromobocytopenia (13%; n=33/252), sepsis (11%; n=28/252), and pneumonia (11%; n=27/252). Serious adverse events in ≥5% of patients were febrile neutropenia (31%; n=78/252), progressive disease (17%; n=43/252), sepsis (14%; n=36/252), pneumonia (11%; n=27/252), and acute renal failure (10%; n=25/252), pyrexia (8%; n=21/252), bacteremia (6%; n=14/252), and respiratory failure (6%; n=14/252). Gilteritinib demonstrated consistent, potent inhibition of FLT3 phosphorylation at doses ≥80 mg/d in correlative assays. While responses were observed across all dose levels regardless of FLT3 mutation status (overall response rate [ORR]=40%), response rate was improved in FLT3mut+ patients at doses ≥80 mg/d (ORR=52%). Among patients with FLT3-ITD, the additional presence of FLT3-D835 did not alter response rate; patients with only FLT3-D835 responded less frequently. Interpretation Gilteritinib had a favorable safety profile and generated potent FLT3 inhibition leading to high rates of antileukemic responses in patients with FLT3mut+ R/R AML. These findings confirm that FLT3 is a high-value target in R/R AML and that long-term success of therapeutic FLT3 inhibition in AML is optimized by agents with potent, selective, and sustained activity against FLT3-ITD mutations and FLT3 tyrosine kinase domain mutations. Funding This study was funded by Astellas Pharma, Inc., by a National Cancer Institute Leukemia Specialized Program of Research Excellence grant (CA100632) awarded to Drs Mark Levis and Jorge Cortes, and by Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro awarded to Professor Giovanni Martinelli.

Oral sapacitabine for the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia in elderly patients: a randomised phase 2 study

BACKGROUND Available treatments for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) have limited durable activity and unsatisfactory safety profiles in most elderly patients. We assessed the efficacy and toxicity of sapacitabine, a novel oral cytosine nucleoside analogue, in elderly patients with AML. METHODS In this randomised, phase 2 study, we recruited patients with AML who were either treatment naive or at first relapse and who were aged 70 years or older from 12 centres in the USA. We used a computer-generated randomisation sequence to randomly allocate eligible patients to receive one of three schedules of oral sapacitabine (1:1:1; stratified by a history of AML treatment): 200 mg twice a day for 7 days (group A); 300 mg twice a day for 7 days (group B); and 400 mg twice a day for 3 days each week for 2 weeks (group C). All schedules were given in 28 day cycles. To confirm the safety and tolerability of dosing schedules, after 20 patients had been treated in a group we enrolled an expanded cohort of 20-25 patients to that group if at least four patients had achieved complete remission or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery, and if the 30 day death rate was 20% or less. Our primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival, analysed by intention-to-treat (ie, patients who have received at least one dose of sapacitabine) in those patients who had been randomly allocated to treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00590187. RESULTS Between Dec 27, 2007, and April 21, 2009, we enrolled 105 patients: 86 patients were previously untreated and 19 were at first relapse. Of the 60 patients randomly allocated to treatment, 1-year overall survival was 35% (95% CI 16-59) in group A, 10% (2-33) in group B, and 30% (13-54) in group C. 14 (13%) of 105 patients died within 30 days and 27 (26%) died within 60 days. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were anaemia (eight of 40 patients in group A, 12 of 20 patients in group B, and 15 of 45 patients in group C), neutropenia (14 in group A, 10 in group B, 11 in group C), thrombocytopenia (24 in group A, 12 in group B, and 22 in group C), febrile neutropenia (16 in group A, nine in group B, and 22 in group C), and pneumonia (seven in group A, five in group B, and 10 in group C). The most common grade 5 events were pneumonia (two in group A, one in group B, and three in group C) and sepsis (six in group A, three in group B, and one in group C). Seven deaths were thought to be probably or possibly related to sapacitabine treatment. INTERPRETATION Sapacitabine seems active and tolerable in elderly patients with AML. The 400 mg dose schedule had the best efficacy profile. Future investigations should aim to combine sapacitabine with other low-intensity therapies in elderly patients with AML. FUNDING Cyclacel Limited.

Extramedullary relapses after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.

Allogeneic stem cell transplant is a potentially curative treatment for patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. In this issue of the journal, Craddock et al. [1][1] report the largest reported series of T-cell depleted reduced intensity stem cell transplant for acute

Acute myeloid leukemia, version 3.2017: Clinical practice guidelines in oncology

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common form of acute leukemia among adults and accounts for the largest number of annual deaths due to leukemias in the United States. This portion of the NCCN Guidelines for AML focuses on management and provides recommendations on the workup, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment options for younger (age <60 years) and older (age ≥60 years) adult patients.

Randomized multicenter phase II study of flavopiridol (alvocidib), cytarabine, and mitoxantrone (FLAM) versus cytarabine/daunorubicin (7+3) in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia

Serial studies have demonstrated that induction therapy with FLAM [flavopiridol (alvocidib) 50 mg/m2 days 1–3, cytarabine 667 mg/m2/day continuous infusion days 6–8, and mitoxantrone (FLAM) 40 mg/m2 day 9] yields complete remission rates of nearly 70% in newly diagnosed poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia. Between May 2011–July 2013, 165 newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients (age 18–70 years) with intermediate/adverse-risk cytogenetics were randomized 2:1 to receive FLAM or 7+3 (cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day continuous infusion days 1–7 and daunorubicin 90 mg/m2 days 1–3), across 10 institutions. Some patients on 7+3 with residual leukemia on day 14 received 5+2 (cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day continuous infusion days 1–5 and daunorubicin 45 mg/m2 days 1–2), whereas patients on FLAM were not re-treated based on day 14 bone marrow findings. The primary objective was to compare complete remission rates between one cycle of FLAM and one cycle of 7+3. Secondary end points included safety, overall survival and event-free survival. FLAM led to higher complete remission rates than 7+3 alone (70% vs. 46%; P=0.003) without an increase in toxicity, and this improvement persisted after 7+3+/−5+2 (70% vs. 57%; P=0.08). There were no significant differences in overall survival and event-free survival in both arms but post-induction strategies were not standardized. These results substantiate the efficacy of FLAM induction in newly diagnosed AML. A phase III study is currently in development. This study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 01349972.

REVEAL-1, a phase 2 dose regimen optimization study of vosaroxin in older poor-risk patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukaemia.

This phase 2 study (N = 116) evaluated single‐agent vosaroxin, a first‐in‐class anticancer quinolone derivative, in patients ≥60 years of age with previously untreated unfavourable prognosis acute myeloid leukaemia. Dose regimen optimization was explored in sequential cohorts (A: 72 mg/m2 d 1, 8, 15; B: 72 mg/m2 d 1, 8; C: 72 mg/m2 or 90 mg/m2 d 1, 4). The primary endpoint was combined complete remission rate (complete remission [CR] plus CR with incomplete platelet recovery [CRp]). Common (>20%) grade ≥3 adverse events were thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, anaemia, neutropenia, sepsis, pneumonia, stomatitis and hypokalaemia. Overall CR and CR/CRp rates were 29% and 32%; median overall survival (OS) was 7·0 months; 1‐year OS was 34%. Schedule C (72 mg/m2) had the most favourable safety and efficacy profile, with faster haematological recovery (median 27 d) and lowest incidence of aggregate sepsis (24%) and 30‐d (7%) and 60‐d (17%) all‐cause mortality; at this dose and schedule, CR and CR/CRp rates were 31% and 35%, median OS was 7·7 months and 1‐year OS was 38%. Overall, vosaroxin resulted in low early mortality and an encouraging response rate; vosaroxin 72 mg/m2 d 1, 4 is recommended for further study in this population. Registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov: #NCT00607997.

Expression of putative targets of immunotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia and healthy tissues

The ability to target myeloid malignancies using immunotherapy through means other than allogeneic transplantation depends on the capability to target leukemic clones while sparing normal tissues. It is now possible to generate clinical grade ex-vivo expanded T cells specific for leukemia-associated antigens (LAAs) for use in adoptive cell therapy.1 Although a variety of putative LAAs in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have been identified for use as potential targets for immunotherapy2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and consensus panels have attempted to prioritize generic cancer antigens,9 a comprehensive evidence-based list of AML antigen targets has not yet been established. As a first step toward this goal, we therefore analyzed, using quantitative real-time PCR, the gene expression of 65 potential LAAs (Supplementary Table S1) in de-identified, clinically annotated samples from 48 newly diagnosed untreated AML patients that were collected under institutional review board-approved protocols from three NCCN cancer centers.

Optimizing Personalized Bone Marrow Testing Using an Evidence-Based, Interdisciplinary Team Approach

OBJECTIVES To address the overuse of testing that complicates patient care, diminishes quality, and increases costs by implementing the diagnostic management team, a multidisciplinary system for the development and deployment of diagnostic testing guidelines for hematologic malignancies. METHODS The team created evidence-based standard ordering protocols (SOPs) for cytogenetic and molecular testing that were applied by pathologists to bone marrow biopsy specimens on adult patients. Testing on 780 biopsy specimens performed during the six months before SOP implementation was compared with 1,806 biopsy specimens performed during the subsequent 12 months. RESULTS After implementation, there were significant decreases in tests discordant with SOPs, omitted tests, and the estimated cost of testing to payers. The fraction of positive tests increased. Clinicians reported acceptance of the new procedures and perceived time savings. CONCLUSIONS This process is a model for optimizing complex and personalized diagnostic testing.