Stephen C. Massey

Transmitter circuits in the vertebrate retina

Con~n~

Chapter 11 Cell types using glutamate as a neurotransmitter in the vertebrate retina

The goal of this review is to summarize the evidence for glutamate as the neurotransmitter of 6 major retinal cell types; rods, cones, ON bipolar cells, OFF bipolar cells, rod bipolar cells and ganglion cells

Rod pathways in the mammalian retina use connexin 36.

Many neurons in the mammalian retina are coupled by means of gap junctions. Here, we show that, in rabbit retina, an antibody to connexin 36 heavily labels processes of AII amacrine cells, a critical interneuron in the rod pathway. Image analysis indicates that Cx36 is primarily located at dendritic crossings between overlapping AII amacrine cells. This finding suggests that Cx36 participates in homotypic gap junctions between pairs of AII amacrine cells. Cx36 was also found at AII/cone bipolar contacts, previously shown to be gap junction sites. This finding suggests that Cx36 participates at gap junctions that may be heterotypic. These results place an identified neuronal connexin in the context of a well‐defined retinal circuit. The absence of Cx36 in many other neurons known to be coupled suggests the presence of additional unidentified connexins in mammalian neurons. Conversely, Cx36 labeling in other regions of the retina is not associated with AII amacrine cells, indicating some other cell types use Cx36. J. Comp. Neurol. 436:336–350, 2001.

Dopamine-stimulated dephosphorylation of connexin 36 mediates AII amacrine cell uncoupling.

Gap junction proteins form the substrate for electrical coupling between neurons. These electrical synapses are widespread in the CNS and serve a variety of important functions. In the retina, connexin 36 (Cx36) gap junctions couple AII amacrine cells and are a requisite component of the high-sensitivity rod photoreceptor pathway. AII amacrine cell coupling strength is dynamically regulated by background light intensity, and uncoupling is thought to be mediated by dopamine signaling via D1-like receptors. One proposed mechanism for this uncoupling involves dopamine-stimulated phosphorylation of Cx36 at regulatory sites, mediated by protein kinase A. Here we provide evidence against this hypothesis and demonstrate a direct relationship between Cx36 phosphorylation and AII amacrine cell coupling strength. Dopamine receptor-driven uncoupling of the AII network results from protein kinase A activation of protein phosphatase 2A and subsequent dephosphorylation of Cx36. Protein phosphatase 1 activity negatively regulates this pathway. We also find that Cx36 gap junctions can exist in widely different phosphorylation states within a single neuron, implying that coupling is controlled at the level of individual gap junctions by locally assembled signaling complexes. This kind of synapse-by-synapse plasticity allows for precise control of neuronal coupling, as well as cell-type-specific responses dependent on the identity of the signaling complexes assembled.

The effects of 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid (APB) on the ERG and ganglion cell discharge of rabbit retina

Perfusion of 100 microM 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid (APB) into the in vivo rabbit eye-cup selectively and reversibly blocked the b-wave of the ERG and all On responses from retinal ganglion cells. In contrast, Off responses were occasionally enhanced, sometimes dramatically. The antagonistic surround inputs to Off ganglion cells, identified by their latency to light stimulation and magnesium sensitivity, were unchanged by APB. These observations suggest that APB selectively blocks depolarizing bipolar cells in rabbit retina in close agreement with the results of Slaughter and Miller (1981) from mudpuppy retina. We conclude that APB may be useful as a pharmacological tool to differentiate On and Off pathways in the rabbit visual system.

A calbindin-immunoreactive cone bipolar cell type in the rabbit retina

We have studied the distribution of the calcium‐binding protein calbindin in the adult rabbit retina by using a commercially available antibody and immunocytochemical methods. The most heavily labeled cells are A‐type horizontal cells, but B‐type horizontal cells are also lightly labeled by this antibody. Among the horizontal cells, there is a mosaic of small, well‐labeled somata, which we have identified as a subset of ON cone bipolar cells. In addition, some wide‐field amacrine cells and a few large ganglion cells are also labeled for calbindin. The calbindin bipolar cells form a regular mosaic with a peak density of approximately 1,700 cells/mm2, falling to 550 cells/mm2 in the periphery. They account for about one‐twelfth of cone bipolar cells, and they are narrowly stratified deep in sublamina 4 of the inner plexiform layer immediately above the rod bipolar terminals. Double‐label experiments using an antibody to protein kinase C (PKC) indicate that the calbindin bipolar cells are completely distinct from the population of rod bipolar cells. Rod bipolar cells outnumber the calbindin cone bipolar cells by a factor of four to five. Further double‐label experiments show that the calbindin bipolar cells are also labeled for recovering. The calbindin bipolar cells are well coupled to AII amacrine cells, and they account for roughly 23% of the AII coupled bipolar cells. This suggests that there are three to four additional ON cone bipolar cell types that are coupled to AII amacrine cells. The calbindin cone bipolar cell described in this paper shares many characteristics with a reconstructed cone bipolar cell that forms the most gap junctions with AII amacrine cells (Strettoi et al. [1994] J. Comp. Neurol. 347:139–149). We conclude that these different methodologies provide complementary descriptions of the same cone bipolar cell type. The calbindin antibody defines a subset of cone bipolar cells in the rabbit retina. The cells in this subset are almost certainly the deepest of the cone bipolar cells. The tight stratification of the calbindin cone bipolar cell suggests that the inner plexiform layer is stratified according to depth, with narrow functional divisions within the broad partition of sublamina b, where ON signals are processed. The strength of coupling between the calbindin cone bipolar cells and AII amacrine cells suggests this pathway plays a major role under scotopic conditions.

ON Inputs to the OFF Layer: Bipolar Cells That Break the Stratification Rules of the Retina

The vertebrate retina is a distinctly laminar structure. Functionally, the inner plexiform layer, in which bipolar cells synapse onto amacrine and ganglion cells, is subdivided into two sublaminae. Cells that depolarize at light offset ramify in sublamina a; those that depolarize at light onset ramify in sublamina b. The separation of ON and OFF pathways appears to be a fundamental principle of retinal organization that is reflected throughout the entire visual system. We show three clear exceptions to this rule, in which the axons of calbindin-positive ON cone bipolar cells make ribbon synapses as they pass through the OFF layers with three separate cell types: (1) dopaminergic amacrine cells, (2) intrinsically photosensitive ganglion cells, and (3) bistratified diving ganglion cells. The postsynaptic location of the AMPA receptor GluR4 at these sites suggests that ON bipolar cells can make functional synapses as their axons pass through the OFF layers of the inner plexiform layer. These findings resolve a long-standing question regarding the anomalous ON inputs to dopaminergic amacrine cells and suggest that certain ON bipolar cell axons can break the stratification rules of the inner plexiform layer by providing significant synaptic output before their terminal specializations. These outputs are not only to dopaminergic amacrine cells but also to at least two ON ganglion cell types that have dendrites that arborize in sublamina a.

Screening of gap junction antagonists on dye coupling in the rabbit retina

Many cell types in the retina are coupled via gap junctions and so there is a pressing need for a potent and reversible gap junction antagonist. We screened a series of potential gap junction antagonists by evaluating their effects on dye coupling in the network of A-type horizontal cells. We evaluated the following compounds: meclofenamic acid (MFA), mefloquine, 2-aminoethyldiphenyl borate (2-APB), 18-alpha-glycyrrhetinic acid, 18-beta-glycyrrhetinic acid (18-beta-GA), retinoic acid, flufenamic acid, niflumic acid, and carbenoxolone. The efficacy of each drug was determined by measuring the diffusion coefficient for Neurobiotin (Mills & Massey, 1998). MFA, 18-beta-GA, 2-APB and mefloquine were the most effective antagonists, completely eliminating A-type horizontal cell coupling at a concentration of 200 muM. Niflumic acid, flufenamic acid, and carbenoxolone were less potent. Additionally, carbenoxolone was difficult to wash out and also may be harmful, as the retina became opaque and swollen. MFA, 18-beta-GA, 2-APB and mefloquine also blocked coupling in B-type horizontal cells and AII amacrine cells. Because these cell types express different connexins, this suggests that the antagonists were relatively non-selective across several different types of gap junction. It should be emphasized that MFA was water-soluble and its effects on dye coupling were easily reversible. In contrast, the other gap junction antagonists, except carbenoxolone, required DMSO to make stock solutions and were difficult to wash out of the preparation at the doses required to block coupling in A-type HCs. The combination of potency, water solubility and reversibility suggest that MFA may be a useful compound to manipulate gap junction coupling.

Antibody to calretinin stains AII amacrine cells in the rabbit retina: Double‐label and confocal analyses

The AII or rod amacrine cell is a critical interneuron in the rod pathway of mammalian retinae. In this report, it is shown that commercially available antibodies to the calcium binding protein calretinin may be used to label the population of AII amacrine cells selectively. Calretinin‐positive amacrine cells had the morphological attributes of AII amacrine cells. Double‐labeling procedures showed that calretinin‐positive somata were surrounded by dopaminergic varicosities and that calretinin‐positive dendrites enclosed rod bipolar terminals, both as previously described for AII amacrine cells. By analyzing the surrounding kernel for each labeled pixel in the rod bipolar image, it is shown here that AII processes are adjacent to rod bipolar terminals at a level that far exceeds the random overlap present in images in which one label was rotated out of phase. Such a spatial relationship is indicative of synaptic connections, as well described for rod bipolar input to AII amacrine cells. AII amacrine cells also were double‐labeled for calretinin and parvalbumin; however, a scattergram analysis of red versus green intensity showed that the parvalbumin antibody stained additional unidentified amacrine cells. In conclusion, at the appropriate dilution, calretinin antibodies are a useful marker for AII amacrine cells in the rabbit retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 411:3–18, 1999.

AII Amacrine Cells Limit Scotopic Acuity in Central Macaque Retina: A Confocal Analysis of Calretinin Labeling

We have used calretinin antibodies to label selectively the mosaic of AII amacrine cells in the macaque retina. Confocal analysis of double‐labeled material indicated that AII dendrites spiral down around descending rod bipolar axons before enveloping the synaptic terminals. Processes from a previously observed dopaminergic plexus in the inner nuclear layer were observed to contact the somata of calretinin‐positive AII somata. Intracellular neurobiotin injection revealed that AII amacrine cells are tracer coupled to other AII amacrine cells and to some unidentified cone bipolar cells. An analysis of the retinal distribution of macaque AII amacrine cells, including an area in and around the fovea, showed a peak density of approximately 5,000 cells/mm2 at an eccentricity of 1.5 mm. Staining of AII amacrine cells in central retina with antibodies to calretinin was confirmed by confocal microscopy. These results indicate that calretinin antibodies can be used to label the AII amacrine cell population selectively and that primate AII amacrine cells share many of the features of previously described mammalian AII amacrine cells. The peak AII cell density closely matched the peak sampling rate of scotopic visual acuity. Calculations suggest that, in central macaque retina, where midget ganglion cells are more numerous, AII amacrine cells form the limit of scotopic visual acuity (Wässle et al. [1995] J. Comp. Neurol. 361:537–551). As the ganglion cell density falls rapidly away from the fovea, there is a cross‐over point at around 15° eccentricity that matches the inflection point in a psychophysically derived plot of scotopic visual acuity versus eccentricity (Lennie and Fairchild [1994] Vision Res. 34:477–482). The correspondence between the anatomic and psychophysical data supports our interpretation that the anatomic sampling rate of AII amacrine cells limits central scotopic acuity. J. Comp. Neurol. 411:19–34, 1999.