Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Stephen E. Jones is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Stephen E. Jones.


The Lancet | 2007

Survival and safety of exemestane versus tamoxifen after 2-3 years' tamoxifen treatment (Intergroup Exemestane Study): a randomised controlled trial

R. C. Coombes; Lucy Kilburn; Claire Snowdon; Robert Paridaens; Robert E. Coleman; Stephen E. Jones; Jacek Jassem; Cjh van de Velde; T Delozier; Isabel Alvarez; L. Del Mastro; O. Ortmann; K Diedrich; Alan S. Coates; Emilio Bajetta; Stig Holmberg; David Dodwell; Elizabeth Mickiewicz; J Andersen; Per Eystein Lønning; Giorgio Cocconi; John F Forbes; M. Castiglione; N Stuart; Alan Stewart; Lesley Fallowfield; Gianfilippo Bertelli; Emma Hall; Richard G Bogle; M Carpentieri

BACKGROUND Early improvements in disease-free survival have been noted when an aromatase inhibitor is given either instead of or sequentially after tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with oestrogen-receptor-positive early breast cancer. However, little information exists on the long-term effects of aromatase inhibitors after treatment, and whether these early improvements lead to real gains in survival. METHODS 4724 postmenopausal patients with unilateral invasive, oestrogen-receptor-positive or oestrogen-receptor-unknown breast cancer who were disease-free on 2-3 years of tamoxifen, were randomly assigned to switch to exemestane (n=2352) or to continue tamoxifen (n=2372) for the remainder of a 5-year endocrine treatment period. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival; overall survival was a secondary endpoint. Efficacy analyses were intention-to-treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN11883920. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 55.7 months (range 0-89.7), 809 events contributing to the analysis of disease-free survival had been reported (354 exemestane, 455 tamoxifen); unadjusted hazard ratio 0.76 (95% CI 0.66-0.88, p=0.0001) in favour of exemestane, absolute benefit 3.3% (95% CI 1.6-4.9) by end of treatment (ie, 2.5 years after randomisation). 222 deaths occurred in the exemestane group compared with 261 deaths in the tamoxifen group; unadjusted hazard ratio 0.85 (95% CI 0.71-1.02, p=0.08), 0.83 (0.69-1.00, p=0.05) when 122 patients with oestrogen-receptor-negative disease were excluded. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that early improvements in disease-free survival noted in patients who switch to exemestane after 2-3 years on tamoxifen persist after treatment, and translate into a modest improvement in overall survival.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2000

Exemestane Is Superior to Megestrol Acetate After Tamoxifen Failure in Postmenopausal Women With Advanced Breast Cancer: Results of a Phase III Randomized Double-Blind Trial

Manfred Kaufmann; Emilio Bajetta; Luc Dirix; Luis Fein; Stephen E. Jones; Nicoletta Zilembo; Jean Louis Dugardyn; Cristina Nasurdi; Robert G. Mennel; Jozica Cervek; Camilla Fowst; Anna Polli; Enrico Di Salle; Alexei Arkhipov; Gabriella Piscitelli; Langdon L. Miller; Giorgio Massimini

PURPOSE This phase III, double-blind, randomized, multicenter study evaluated the efficacy, pharmacodynamics, and safety of the oral aromatase inactivator exemestane (EXE) versus megestrol acetate (MA) in postmenopausal women with progressive advanced breast cancer who experienced failure of tamoxifen. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 769 patients were randomized to EXE 25 mg/d (n = 366) or MA (n = 403) 40 mg four times daily. Tumor response, duration of tumor control, tumor-related signs and symptoms (TRSS), quality of life (QOL), survival, and tolerability were evaluated. RESULTS Overall objective response (OR) rates were higher in patients treated with EXE than in those treated with MA (15.0% v 12.4%); a similar trend was noted in patients with visceral metastases (13.5% v 10.5%). Median survival time was significantly longer with EXE (median not reached) than with MA (123.4 weeks; P =.039), as were the median duration of overall success (OR or stable disease > or = 24 weeks; 60.1 v 49.1 weeks; P =.025), time to tumor progression (20.3 v 16.6 weeks; P =.037), and time to treatment failure (16.3 v 15.7 weeks; P =.042). Compared with MA, there were similar or greater improvements in pain, TRSS, and QOL with EXE. Both drugs were well tolerated. Grade 3 or 4 weight changes were more common with MA (17.1% v 7.6%; P =.001). CONCLUSION EXE prolongs survival time, time to tumor progression, and time to treatment failure compared with MA and offers a well-tolerated treatment option for postmenopausal women with progressive advanced breast cancer who experienced failure of tamoxifen.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2006

Phase III Trial Comparing Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide With Docetaxel Plus Cyclophosphamide As Adjuvant Therapy for Operable Breast Cancer

Stephen E. Jones; Michael Savin; Frankie A. Holmes; Joyce O'Shaughnessy; Joanne L. Blum; Svetislava J. Vukelja; Kristi McIntyre; John E. Pippen; James H. Bordelon; Robert Kirby; John Sandbach; William Hyman; Pankaj Khandelwal; Angel G. Negron; Donald A. Richards; Stephen P. Anthony; Robert G. Mennel; Kristi A. Boehm; Walter G. Meyer; Lina Asmar

PURPOSE The combination of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) is a standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimen. Studies of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) showed promise in MBC. In 1997, we initiated a randomized adjuvant trial of TC compared with standard-dose AC with a primary end point of disease-free survival (DFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were eligible if they had stage I to III operable invasive breast cancer with complete surgical excision of the primary tumor. Between June 1997 and December 1999, 1,016 patients were randomly assigned to four cycles of either standard-dose AC (60 and 600 mg/m2, respectively; n = 510) or TC (75 and 600 mg/m2, respectively; n = 506), administered intravenously every 3 weeks as adjuvant chemotherapy. Radiation therapy (as indicated) and tamoxifen, for patients with hormone receptor-positive disease, were administered after completion of chemotherapy. RESULTS Both treatment groups (TC and AC) were well balanced with respect to major prognostic factors. Patients were observed through 2005 for a median of 5.5 years. At 5 years, DFS rate was significantly superior for TC compared with AC (86% v 80%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.94; P = .015). Overall survival rates for TC and AC were 90% and 87%, respectively (HR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.1; P = .13). More myalgia, arthralgia, edema, and febrile neutropenia occurred on the TC arm; more nausea and vomiting occurred on the AC arm as well as one incident of congestive heart failure. CONCLUSION At 5 years, TC was associated with a superior DFS and a different toxicity profile compared with AC.


The Lancet | 2011

Adjuvant tamoxifen and exemestane in early breast cancer (TEAM): a randomised phase 3 trial

Cornelis J. H. van de Velde; Daniel Rea; Caroline Seynaeve; Hein Putter; Annette Hasenburg; J.M. Vannetzel; Robert Paridaens; Christos Markopoulos; Yasuo Hozumi; Elysee T M Hille; Dirk G. Kieback; L. Asmar; J. Smeets; Johan W. R. Nortier; Peyman Hadji; John M.S. Bartlett; Stephen E. Jones

BACKGROUND Aromatase inhibitors improved disease-free survival compared with tamoxifen when given as an initial adjuvant treatment or after 2-3 years of tamoxifen to postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. We therefore compared the long-term effects of exemestane monotherapy with sequential treatment (tamoxifen followed by exemestane). METHODS The Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) phase 3 trial was conducted in hospitals in nine countries. Postmenopausal women (median age 64 years, range 35-96) with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to open-label exemestane (25 mg once a day, orally) alone or following tamoxifen (20 mg once a day, orally) for 5 years. Randomisation was by use of a computer-generated random permuted block method. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years. Main analyses were by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00279448, NCT00032136, and NCT00036270; NTR 267; Ethics Commission Trial27/2001; and UMIN, C000000057. FINDINGS 9779 patients were assigned to sequential treatment (n=4875) or exemestane alone (n=4904), and 4868 and 4898 were analysed by intention to treat, respectively. 4154 (85%) patients in the sequential group and 4186 (86%) in the exemestane alone group were disease free at 5 years (hazard ratio 0·97, 95% CI 0·88-1·08; p=0·60). In the safety analysis, sequential treatment was associated with a higher incidence of gynaecological symptoms (942 [20%] of 4814 vs 523 [11%] of 4852), venous thrombosis (99 [2%] vs 47 [1%]), and endometrial abnormalities (191 [4%] vs 19 [<1%]) than was exemestane alone. Musculoskeletal adverse events (2448 [50%] vs 2133 [44%]), hypertension (303 [6%] vs 219 [5%]), and hyperlipidaemia (230 [5%] vs 136 [3%]) were reported more frequently with exemestane alone. INTERPRETATION Treatment regimens of exemestane alone or after tamoxifen might be judged to be appropriate options for postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer. FUNDING Pfizer.


The Lancet | 2008

Association between the SERPING1 gene and age-related macular degeneration: a two-stage case–control study

Sarah Ennis; Catherine Jomary; Robert F. Mullins; Angela J. Cree; Xiaoli Chen; Alex MacLeod; Stephen E. Jones; Andrew Collins; Edwin M. Stone; Andrew J. Lotery

BACKGROUND Age-related macular degeneration is the most prevalent form of visual impairment and blindness in developed countries. Genetic studies have made advancements in establishing the molecular cause of this disease, identifying mutations in the complement factor H (CFH) gene and a locus on chromosome 10 encompassing the HTRA1/LOC387715/ARMS2 genes. Variants in complement 3 (C3) and an HLA locus containing both factor B and C2 genes have also been implicated. We aimed to identify further genetic risk factors for this disease. METHODS We used a case-control study design in a UK sample of patients with age-related macular degeneration (n=479) and controls (n=479) and undertook a low-density screen of 32 genes using 93 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Genes were selected as candidates on the basis of potential functional relevance to age-related macular degeneration. Significant initial findings were confirmed by replication in an independent US cohort of 248 unrelated patients with disease and 252 controls, and by high-density genotyping around association signals. FINDINGS The SNP variant rs2511989, located within intron six of the SERPING1 gene, showed highly significant genotypic association with age-related macular degeneration (uncorrected p=4.0x10(-5), corrected p=0.00372). We detected no evidence for association between disease and the other 31 candidate genes. The odds ratio for age-related macular degeneration in rs2511989 G/A heterozygotes compared with wild type G/G homozygotes was 0.63 (95% CI 0.47-0.84). A similar comparison of the A/A homozygotes with the wild type yielded an odds ratio of 0.44 (0.31-0.64). We replicated the observed genotypic association in a US cohort (p=0.008). Furthermore, a secondary high-density genotyping study across the SERPING1 gene region identified five additional SNP variants similarly associated with age-related macular degeneration (rs2244169, rs2511990, rs2509897, rs1005510, and rs2511988). INTERPRETATION Genetic variation in SERPING1 significantly alters susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration. SERPING1 encodes the C1 inhibitor, which has a crucial role in inhibition of complement component 1 (C1) and might implicate the classic pathway of complement activation in this disease.


Gene Therapy | 1997

Rescue of photoreceptor function by AAV-mediated gene transfer in a mouse model of inherited retinal degeneration

Catherine Jomary; Ka Vincent; John Grist; Michael J. Neal; Stephen E. Jones

Knowledge of the mutations leading to inherited retinal degenerations provides a foundation for the development of somatic gene therapy in which potentially corrective genes are transferred to the target photoreceptor cells. Towards this end, we have evaluated the efficacy of a recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector to deliver and express the correct form of the cGMP phosphodiesterase-β (PDE-β) gene in the retinas of rd mice, which suffer rapid retinal degeneration due to recessive mutation in the endogenous gene. A truncated murine opsin promoter was used to drive expression of the PDE-β cDNA. Following intraocular injection of AAV.PDE-β, increased retinal expression of immunoreactive PDE protein was observed, including within photoreceptor cell bodies. Compared with age-matched controls, treated eyes showed increased numbers of photoreceptors and a two-fold increase in sensitivity to light as measured by in vitro electroretinography. These findings provide evidence that rescue of functional photoreceptor neurons can be achieved by somatic gene therapy.


JAMA | 2012

Association Between Age at Diagnosis and Disease-Specific Mortality Among Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer

Willemien van de Water; Christos Markopoulos; Cornelis J. H. van de Velde; Caroline Seynaeve; Annette Hasenburg; Daniel Rea; Hein Putter; Johan W.R. Nortier; Anton J. M. de Craen; Elysée T.M. Hille; E. Bastiaannet; Peyman Hadji; Rudi G. J. Westendorp; Gerrit-Jan Liefers; Stephen E. Jones

CONTEXT In addition to classic tumor-related prognostic factors, patient characteristics may be associated with breast cancer outcome. OBJECTIVE To assess the association between age at diagnosis and breast cancer outcome in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS Study analysis of 9766 patients enrolled in the TEAM (Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational) randomized clinical trial between January 2001 and January 2006. Age at diagnosis was categorized as younger than 65 years (n=5349), 65 to 74 years (n=3060), and 75 years or older (n=1357). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary end point was disease-specific mortality; secondary end points were other-cause mortality and breast cancer relapse. RESULTS During median follow-up of approximately 5.1 years, there were a total of 1043 deaths. Disease-specific mortality, as a proportion of all-cause mortality, decreased with categorical age group (78% [<65 years], 56% [65-74 years], and 36% [≥75 years]; P < .001). In multivariable analyses, compared with patients younger than 65 years, disease-specific mortality increased with age for patients aged 65 to 74 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01-1.54); and patients aged 75 years or older (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.23-2.16) (P < .001). Similarly, breast cancer relapse increased with age for patients aged 65-74 years (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.91-1.25 and patients aged 75 years or older (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.05-1.60) (P = .06). Other-cause mortality increased with age in patients aged 65 to 74 years (HR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.96-3.63) and patients aged 75 years or older (HR, 7.30; 95% CI, 5.29-10.07) (P < .001). CONCLUSION Among postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, increasing age was associated with a higher disease-specific mortality.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2012

Disease-Related Outcomes With Long-Term Follow-Up: An Updated Analysis of the Intergroup Exemestane Study

Judith M. Bliss; Lucy Kilburn; Robert E. Coleman; John Forbes; Alan S. Coates; Stephen E. Jones; Jacek Jassem; T Delozier; Jørn Andersen; Robert Paridaens; Cornelis J. H. van de Velde; Per Eystein Lønning; James Morden; Laura Cisar; Thomas Menschik; R. Charles Coombes

PURPOSE Intergroup Exemestane Study (IES), an investigator-led study in 4,724 postmenopausal patients with early-stage breast cancer has demonstrated clinically important benefits from switching adjuvant endocrine therapy after 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen to exemestane. Now, with longer follow-up, a large number of non-breast cancer-related events have been reported. Exploratory analyses describe breast cancer-free survival (BCFS) and explore incidence and patterns of the different competing events. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients who were disease-free after 2 to 3 years of adjuvant tamoxifen were randomly assigned to continue tamoxifen or switch to exemestane to complete 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy. At this planned analysis, the median follow-up was 91 months. Principal analysis focuses on 4,052 patients with estrogen receptor (ER) -positive and 547 with ER-unknown tumors. RESULTS In all, 930 BCFS events have been reported (exemestane, 423; tamoxifen, 507), giving an unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.92; P = .001) in favor of exemestane in the ER-positive/ER unknown group. Analysis partitioned at 2.5 years after random assignment showed that the on-treatment benefit of switching to exemestane (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.75; P < .001) was not lost post-treatment, but that there was no additional gain once treatment had ceased (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.10; P = .60). Improvement in overall survival was demonstrated, with 352 deaths in the exemestane group versus 405 deaths in the tamoxifen group (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.99; P = .04). Of these, 222 were reported as intercurrent deaths (exemestane, 107; tamoxifen, 115). CONCLUSION The protective effect of switching to exemestane compared with continuing on tamoxifen on risk of relapse or death was maintained for at least 5 years post-treatment and was associated with a continuing beneficial impact on overall survival.


Cancer Research | 2009

Results of the first planned analysis of the TEAM (tamoxifen exemestane adjuvant multinational) prospective randomized phase III trial in hormone sensitive postmenopausal early breast cancer.

Stephen E. Jones; C. Seynaeve; Annette Hasenburg; D Rae; J.M. Vannetzel; Robert Paridaens; Christos Markopoulos; Yasuo Hozumi; Hein Putter; Elysée T.M. Hille; Dg Kieback; L. Asmar; J. Smeets; R. Urbanski; Jms Bartlett; C.J.H. van de Velde

CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2008 Abstracts Abstract #15 Background : Exemestane (E) is a steroidal aromatase inactivator, which has been demonstrated to be more effective than tamoxifen (T) in metastatic breast cancer (BC). The role of E in adjuvant therapy has been established after 2 to 3 years of T compared to 5 years of T in the Intergroup Exemestane Study (Lancet 2007; 369: 599-70). One objective of the TEAM study was to evaluate E compared to T as initial adjuvant endocrine therapy. Methods : Using common criteria, eligible postmenopausal patients in 9 countries with invasive ER+ and/or PR+ early BC, were prospectively randomized to either open-label E 25 mg/day or T 20 mg/day. All patients had completed primary therapy of surgery and chemotherapy if indicated. All data were collected and analyzed by the Central Data Center in Leiden, The Netherlands. The trial was initiated in 2001 with a primary endpoint of DFS between T and E. In 2004, based on results of the IES, TEAM was modified such that all patients on T were switched to E at 2.5-3 years. The modified design includes 2 primary endpoints: DFS of T versus E followed up to 2.75 years, and DFS of E for 5 years versus T switched to E treated for a total of 5 years. The present analysis focuses on the first primary endpoint: DFS for T compared to E at 2.75 years with censoring of events after 2.75 years. Log rank test with a 2-sided significance level of 2.98% stratified by country and factors nested in protocols will be utilized. Results : Between January 2001 and January 2006, 9775 women were randomized to T or E of which 9300 will be followed for 2.75 years by October 2008: 99% were ER and/or /PgR+, 50% were node negative, 44% underwent mastectomy, 68% received radiotherapy, and 36% chemotherapy. There have been 693 DFS events (locoregional or distant recurrence, second breast cancers, or death without recurrence) by April 2008 within 2.75 years of randomization. In accordance with the statistical analysis plan, the first planned analysis will be based on 723 events or 9300 patients with at least 2.75 years follow-up. We will present a detailed analysis of the first primary endpoint of DFS between T and E at 2.75 years at the 2008 SABCS. The TEAM study represents the largest of the 3 major trials to compare efficacy of an aromatase inhibitor/inactivator versus tamoxifen as initial endocrine therapy. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 15.


Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience | 2001

Characterization of Cell Death Pathways in Murine Retinal Neurodegeneration Implicates Cytochrome c Release, Caspase Activation, and Bid Cleavage

Catherine Jomary; Michael J. Neal; Stephen E. Jones

Apoptosis is considered to be the final common pathway of photoreceptor cell death in different inherited retinal diseases. However, apoptosis encompasses diverse pathways of molecular interactions culminating in cellular demise. To begin dissecting these interactions, we have investigated key participants in the rd (retinal degeneration) model of retinal neurodegeneration. By Western blot analysis and immunocytochemistry, we found that cytochrome c release occurs in rd retinas concurrently with the activation of the proapoptotic protein Bid. Active forms of caspase-8 and the mitogen-activated protein kinase p38, both of which are capable of cleaving Bid, were detected in rd retinas at the peak time of photoreceptor death. In addition, the activated form of the cell death effector caspase-3 was detectable particularly at the photoreceptors in parallel with this peak degenerative phase. These data suggest that activation of both major apoptotic pathways occurs during photoreceptor degeneration in the rd mouse model of inherited blindness.

Collaboration


Dive into the Stephen E. Jones's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. Seynaeve

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C.J.H. van de Velde

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hein Putter

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Rea

University of Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge