Stephen E.M. Langley
Royal Surrey County Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Stephen E.M. Langley.
BJUI | 2012
Peter D. Grimm; Ignace Billiet; David Bostwick; Adam P. Dicker; Steven J. Frank; Jos Immerzeel; Mira Keyes; Patrick A. Kupelian; W. Robert Lee; Stefan Machtens; Jyoti Mayadev; Brian J. Moran; Gregory S. Merrick; Jeremy Millar; Mack Roach; Richard G. Stock; Katsuto Shinohara; Mark Scholz; Ed Weber; Anthony L. Zietman; Michael J. Zelefsky; Jason Wong; Stacy Wentworth; Robyn Vera; Stephen E.M. Langley
Whats known on the subject? and What does the study add?
BJUI | 2012
Stephen E.M. Langley; Hashim U. Ahmed; Bashar Al-Qaisieh; David Bostwick; Louise Dickinson; Francisco Gomez Veiga; Peter D. Grimm; Stefan Machtens; Ferran Guedea; Mark Emberton
Whats known on the subject? and What does the study add?
Clinical Cancer Research | 2011
Richard Morgan; Angela Boxall; Aagna Bhatt; Michael Bailey; Richard Hindley; Stephen E.M. Langley; Hayley C. Whitaker; David E. Neal; M Ismail; Hamish Whitaker; Nicola E. Annels; Agnieszka Michael; Hardev Pandha
Purpose: Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most common cause of cancer related death in men. A number of key limitations with prostate specific antigen (PSA), currently the standard detection test, has justified evaluation of new biomarkers. We have assessed the diagnostic potential of Engrailed-2 (EN2) protein, a homeodomain-containing transcription factor expressed in PC cell lines and secreted into the urine by PC in men. Experimental Design: EN2 expression in PC cell lines and prostate cancer tissue was determined by semi-quantative RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. First pass urine [without prior digital rectal examination (DRE)] was collected from men presenting with urinary symptoms (referred to exclude/confirm the presence of prostate cancer) and from controls. EN2 protein was measured by ELISA in urine from men with PC (n = 82) and controls (n = 102). Results: EN2 was expressed and secreted by PC cell lines and PC tissue but not by normal prostate tissue or stroma. The presence of EN2 in urine was highly predictive of PC, with a sensitivity of 66% and a specificity of 88.2%, without requirement for DRE. There was no correlation with PSA levels. These results were confirmed independently by a second academic center. Conclusions: Urinary EN2 is a highly specific and sensitive candidate biomarker of prostate cancer. A larger multicenter study to further evaluate the diagnostic potential of EN2 is justified. Clin Cancer Res; 17(5); 1090–8. ©2011 AACR.
BJUI | 2012
Benjamin Ayres; Bruce Montgomery; Neil J. Barber; Nicola Pereira; Stephen E.M. Langley; Philippa Denham; Simon Bott
Study Type – Diagnostic (exploratory cohort)
BJUI | 2012
Hardev Pandha; Karen D. Sorensen; Thorsten F. Orntoft; Stephen E.M. Langley; Søren Høyer; Michael Borre; Richard Morgan
Whats known on the subject? and What does the study add?
Clinical Oncology | 2003
A. Henderson; Stephen E.M. Langley; Robert Laing
INTRODUCTION We compare the cytoreductive efficacy of bicalutamide or goserelin with no hormonal manipulation in prostate cancer before brachytherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Transrectal ultrasound volume estimations were performed in clinic and during the brachytherapy-planning scan. Between volume estimations, patients received no hormonal treatment, bicalutamide 150 mg once daily or goserelin 3.6 mg every 28 days. RESULTS Patients receiving no hormonal manipulation had a volume increase of 8% compared with an 8% volume reduction in the bicalutamide group and a 26% reduction in the goserelin group. As initial prostate volume was not equivalent in the three groups, a subgroup analysis was performed on patients who received active treatment for more than 3 months who had initial prostate volume less than 55 cm3. In this subgroup, a mean fall in prostate volume of 7%, occurred in the bicalutamide group compared with 21% in the goserelin group. In both the original and subgroup analysis, the cytoreductive efficacy of goserelin was significantly greater than bicalutamide (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION In the absence of data from randomised trials, comparing the efficacy of these agents, luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogues remain the gold standard for cytoreduction before prostate brachytherapy. If the neoadjuvant efficacy of hormonal manipulation in external beam radiotherapy is dependent on prostate volume reduction, then LHRH analogues may also prove more effective in this neoadjuvant role.
BJUI | 2002
Jyoti Shah; B. Montgomery; Stephen E.M. Langley; Ara Darzi
Objective To examine the instructional effectiveness of a course for nurses wishing to learn flexible cystoscopy, using a virtual reality flexible cystoscopy simulator to measure the outcome.
BJUI | 2014
Saqib Javed; E. Chadwick; Albert A. Edwards; Sabeena Beveridge; Robert Laing; Simon Bott; Christopher Eden; Stephen E.M. Langley
To evaluate the ability of prostate HistoScanning™ (PHS; Advanced Medical Diagnostics, Waterloo, Belgium) to detect, characterize and locally stage prostate cancer, by comparing it with transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)‐guided prostate biopsies, transperineal template prostate biopsies (TTBs) and whole‐mount radical prostatectomy specimens.
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2012
James Earley; Ather M. Abdelbaky; Melanie J. Cunningham; E. Chadwick; Stephen E.M. Langley; Robert Laing
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Radiation dose to the bulbomembranous urethra has been shown to correlate with urethral stricture formation. This retrospective case-control study was designed to explore the relationship between dose to the apical/peri-apical regions of the urethra and development of brachytherapy (BXT)-related urethral stricture. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cases were patients who developed urethral stricture after treatment with BXT as monotherapy and who had urethral dosimetry post-implant. Each case was matched with a control that had not developed urethral stricture. Dosimetry was compared between cases and controls. RESULTS Twenty-three cases were pair matched with 23 controls. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, presenting Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) or Gleason score. The dose delivered to the peri-apical and apical urethra was significantly higher for cases when compared with controls (peri-apical urethra: mean V(150) 1.1 Vs 0.8 cc [p=0.02]; apical urethra: mean dose 200 Vs 174 Gy [p=0.01]). The distance from the prostate apex to isodose lines was also found to be significant in predicting stricture formation. CONCLUSION There was evidence to suggest that the development of BXT-related stricture was associated with radiation dose at the apical and peri-apical urethra. Attention to the dose delivered to those areas may minimise the risk of developing such morbidity.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2014
Bashar Al-Qaisieh; Josh Mason; P. Bownes; Ann M. Henry; Louise Dickinson; Hashim U. Ahmed; Mark Emberton; Stephen E.M. Langley
PURPOSE Focal brachytherapy targeted to an individual lesion(s) within the prostate may reduce side effects experienced with whole-gland brachytherapy. The outcomes of a consensus meeting on focal prostate brachytherapy were used to investigate optimal dosimetry of focal low-dose-rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy targeted using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) and transperineal template prostate mapping (TPM) biopsy, including the effects of random and systematic seed displacements and interseed attenuation (ISA). METHODS AND MATERIALS Nine patients were selected according to clinical characteristics and concordance of TPM and mp-MRI. Retrospectively, 3 treatment plans were analyzed for each case: whole-gland (WG), hemi-gland (hemi), and ultra-focal (UF) plans, with 145-Gy prescription dose and identical dose constraints for each plan. Plan robustness to seed displacement and ISA were assessed using Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS WG plans used a mean 28 needles and 81 seeds, hemi plans used 17 needles and 56 seeds, and UF plans used 12 needles and 25 seeds. Mean D90 (minimum dose received by 90% of the target) and V100 (percentage of the target that receives 100% dose) values were 181.3 Gy and 99.8% for the prostate in WG plans, 195.7 Gy and 97.8% for the hemi-prostate in hemi plans, and 218.3 Gy and 99.8% for the focal target in UF plans. Mean urethra D10 was 205.9 Gy, 191.4 Gy, and 92.4 Gy in WG, hemi, and UF plans, respectively. Mean rectum D2 cm(3) was 107.5 Gy, 77.0 Gy, and 42.7 Gy in WG, hemi, and UF plans, respectively. Focal plans were more sensitive to seed displacement errors: random shifts with a standard deviation of 4 mm reduced mean target D90 by 14.0%, 20.5%, and 32.0% for WG, hemi, and UF plans, respectively. ISA has a similar impact on dose-volume histogram parameters for all plan types. CONCLUSIONS Treatment planning for focal LDR brachytherapy is feasible. Dose constraints are easily met with a notable reduction to organs at risk. Treating smaller targets makes seed positioning more critical.