Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Stephen E. Robertson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Stephen E. Robertson.


Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology | 1976

Relevance weighting of search terms

Stephen E. Robertson; K. Sparck Jones

This paper examines statistical techniques for exploiting relevance information to weight search terms. These techniques are presented as a natural extension of weighting methods using information about the distribution of index terms in documents in general. A series of relevance weighting functions is derived and is justified by theoretical considerations. In particular, it is shown that specific weighted search methods are implied by a general probabilistic theory of retrieval. Different applications of relevance weighting are illustrated by experimental results for test collections.


international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval | 1994

Some simple effective approximations to the 2-Poisson model for probabilistic weighted retrieval

Stephen E. Robertson; Steve Walker

The 2-Poisson model for term frequencies is used to suggest ways of incorporating certain variables in probabilistic models for information retrieval. The variables concerned are within-document term frequency, document length, and within-query term frequency. Simple weighting functions are developed, and tested on the TREC test collection. Considerable performance improvements (over simple inverse collection frequency weighting) are demonstrated.


Information Processing and Management | 2000

A probabilistic model of information retrieval: development and comparative experiments

K. Sparck Jones; Steve Walker; Stephen E. Robertson

The paper combines a comprehensive account of the probabilistic model of retrieval with new systematic experiments on TREC Programme material. It presents the model from its foundations through its logical development to cover more aspects of retrieval data and a wider range of system functions. Each step in the argument is matched by comparative retrieval tests, to provide a single coherent account of a major line of research. The experiments demonstrate, for a large test collection, that the probabilistic model is eAective and robust, and that it responds appropriately, with major improvements in performance, to key features of retrieval situations. Part 1 covers the foundations and the model development for document collection and relevance data, along with the test apparatus. Part 2 covers the further development and elaboration of the model, with extensive testing, and briefly considers other environment conditions and tasks, model training, concluding with comparisons with other approaches and an overall assessment. Data and results tables for both parts are given in Part 1. Key results are summarised in Part 2. 7 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.


Journal of Documentation | 2004

Understanding inverse document frequency: on theoretical arguments for IDF

Stephen E. Robertson

The term‐weighting function known as IDF was proposed in 1972, and has since been extremely widely used, usually as part of a TF*IDF function. It is often described as a heuristic, and many papers have been written (some based on Shannons Information Theory) seeking to establish some theoretical basis for it. Some of these attempts are reviewed, and it is shown that the Information Theory approaches are problematic, but that there are good theoretical justifications of both IDF and TF*IDF in the traditional probabilistic model of information retrieval.


Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval | 2009

The Probabilistic Relevance Framework: BM25 and Beyond

Stephen E. Robertson; Hugo Zaragoza

The Probabilistic Relevance Framework (PRF) is a formal framework for document retrieval, grounded in work done in the 1970—1980s, which led to the development of one of the most successful text-retrieval algorithms, BM25. In recent years, research in the PRF has yielded new retrieval models capable of taking into account document meta-data (especially structure and link-graph information). Again, this has led to one of the most successful Web-search and corporate-search algorithms, BM25F. This work presents the PRF from a conceptual point of view, describing the probabilistic modelling assumptions behind the framework and the different ranking algorithms that result from its application: the binary independence model, relevance feedback models, BM25 and BM25F. It also discusses the relation between the PRF and other statistical models for IR, and covers some related topics, such as the use of non-textual features, and parameter optimisation for models with free parameters.


conference on information and knowledge management | 2004

Simple BM25 extension to multiple weighted fields

Stephen E. Robertson; Hugo Zaragoza; Michael J. Taylor

This paper describes a simple way of adapting the BM25 ranking formula to deal with structured documents. In the past it has been common to compute scores for the individual fields (e.g. title and body) independently and then combine these scores (typically linearly) to arrive at a final score for the document. We highlight how this approach can lead to poor performance by breaking the carefully constructed non-linear saturation of term frequency in the BM25 function. We propose a much more intuitive alternative which weights term frequencies <i>before</i> the non-linear term frequency saturation function is applied. In this scheme, a structured document with a title weight of two is mapped to an unstructured document with the title content repeated twice. This more verbose unstructured document is then ranked in the usual way. We demonstrate the advantages of this method with experiments on Reuters Vol1 and the TREC dotGov collection.


international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval | 2008

Selecting good expansion terms for pseudo-relevance feedback

Guihong Cao; Jian-Yun Nie; Jianfeng Gao; Stephen E. Robertson

Pseudo-relevance feedback assumes that most frequent terms in the pseudo-feedback documents are useful for the retrieval. In this study, we re-examine this assumption and show that it does not hold in reality - many expansion terms identified in traditional approaches are indeed unrelated to the query and harmful to the retrieval. We also show that good expansion terms cannot be distinguished from bad ones merely on their distributions in the feedback documents and in the whole collection. We then propose to integrate a term classification process to predict the usefulness of expansion terms. Multiple additional features can be integrated in this process. Our experiments on three TREC collections show that retrieval effectiveness can be much improved when term classification is used. In addition, we also demonstrate that good terms should be identified directly according to their possible impact on the retrieval effectiveness, i.e. using supervised learning, instead of unsupervised learning.


international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval | 2001

Effective site finding using link anchor information

Nick Craswell; David Hawking; Stephen E. Robertson

Link-based ranking methods have been described in the literature and applied in commercial Web search engines. However, according to recent TREC experiments, they are no better than traditional content-based methods. We conduct a different type of experiment, in which the task is to find the main entry point of a specific Web site. In our experiments, ranking based on link anchor text is twice as effective as ranking based on document content, even though both methods used the same BM25 formula. We obtained these results using two sets of 100 queries on a 18.5 million document set and another set of 100 on a 0.4 million document set. This site finding effectiveness begins to explain why many search engines have adopted link methods. It also opens a rich new area for effectiveness improvement, where traditional methods fail.


text retrieval conference | 2000

Experimentation as a way of life: Okapi at TREC

Stephen E. Robertson; Steve Walker; Micheline Beaulieu

The Okapi system has been used in a series of experiments on the TREC collections, investigating probabilistic models, relevance feedback and query expansion, and interaction issues. The TREC-6 ad hoc task was used to test an application of a new relevance weighting formula, which takes account of documents judged nonrelevant. The application was to a form of blind feedback (using the top-ranked documents from an initial search to improve the query formulation for a subsequent search, without actual relevance feedback, on the assumption that these top-ranked documents are likely to be relevant). In the routing task, the problem is one of query optimization based on a training set with known relevant documents; investigations for TREC-6 included using a form of simulated annealing for this purpose. A significant feature of this work is the need to avoid overfitting of the training sample. In the interactive track, methodology remains the major problem: we do not yet know how to conduct controlled laboratory experiments which provide good information about information retrieval interaction. The Okapi team has been particularly interested in the relation between the functionalities associated with relevance feedback and the ability of searchers to make use of these functionalities. TREC provides an excellent environment and set of tools for investigating automatic systems; its value for interactive systems is not yet proven.


international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval | 2003

Challenges in information retrieval and language modeling: report of a workshop held at the center for intelligent information retrieval, University of Massachusetts Amherst, September 2002

James Allan; Jay Aslam; Nicholas J. Belkin; Chris Buckley; James P. Callan; W. Bruce Croft; Susan T. Dumais; Norbert Fuhr; Donna Harman; David J. Harper; Djoerd Hiemstra; Thomas Hofmann; Eduard H. Hovy; Wessel Kraaij; John D. Lafferty; Victor Lavrenko; David Lewis; Liz Liddy; R. Manmatha; Andrew McCallum; Jay M. Ponte; John M. Prager; Dragomir R. Radev; Philip Resnik; Stephen E. Robertson; Ron G. Rosenfeld; Salim Roukos; Mark Sanderson; Richard M. Schwartz; Amit Singhal

Information retrieval (IR) research has reached a point where it is appropriate to assess progress and to define a research agenda for the next five to ten years. This report summarizes a discussion of IR research challenges that took place at a recent workshop. The attendees of the workshop considered information retrieval research in a range of areas chosen to give broad coverage of topic areas that engage information retrieval researchers. Those areas are retrieval models, cross-lingual retrieval, Web search, user modeling, filtering, topic detection and tracking, classification, summarization, question answering, metasearch, distributed retrieval, multimedia retrieval, information extraction, as well as testbed requirements for future work. The potential use of language modeling techniques in these areas was also discussed. The workshop identified major challenges within each of those areas. The following are recurring themes that ran throughout: • User and context sensitive retrieval • Multi-lingual and multi-media issues • Better target tasks • Improved objective evaluations • Substantially more labeled data • Greater variety of data sources • Improved formal models Contextual retrieval and global information access were identified as particularly important long-term challenges.

Collaboration


Dive into the Stephen E. Robertson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Emine Yilmaz

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jun Wang

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Susan Jones

City University London

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge