Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Stephen G. Oliver is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Stephen G. Oliver.


Science | 1996

Life with 6000 Genes

André Goffeau; Bart Barrell; Howard Bussey; Ronald W. Davis; Bernard Dujon; H. Feldmann; Francis Galibert; J D Hoheisel; Claude Jacq; Mark Johnston; Edward J. Louis; Hans-Werner Mewes; Yasufumi Murakami; Peter Philippsen; H Tettelin; Stephen G. Oliver

The genome of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been completely sequenced through a worldwide collaboration. The sequence of 12,068 kilobases defines 5885 potential protein-encoding genes, approximately 140 genes specifying ribosomal RNA, 40 genes for small nuclear RNA molecules, and 275 transfer RNA genes. In addition, the complete sequence provides information about the higher order organization of yeasts 16 chromosomes and allows some insight into their evolutionary history. The genome shows a considerable amount of apparent genetic redundancy, and one of the major problems to be tackled during the next stage of the yeast genome project is to elucidate the biological functions of all of these genes.


Nature | 2002

Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein–protein interactions

Christian von Mering; Roland Krause; Berend Snel; Michael Cornell; Stephen G. Oliver; Stanley Fields; Peer Bork

Comprehensive protein–protein interaction maps promise to reveal many aspects of the complex regulatory network underlying cellular function. Recently, large-scale approaches have predicted many new protein interactions in yeast. To measure their accuracy and potential as well as to identify biases, strengths and weaknesses, we compare the methods with each other and with a reference set of previously reported protein interactions.


Nature Biotechnology | 2007

Genome sequencing and analysis of the versatile cell factory Aspergillus niger CBS 513.88

Herman Jan Pel; Johannes H. de Winde; David B. Archer; Paul S. Dyer; Gerald Hofmann; Peter J. Schaap; Geoffrey Turner; Ronald P. de Vries; Richard Albang; Kaj Albermann; Mikael Rørdam Andersen; Jannick Dyrløv Bendtsen; Jacques A. E. Benen; Marco van den Berg; Stefaan Breestraat; Mark X. Caddick; Roland Contreras; Michael Cornell; Pedro M. Coutinho; Etienne Danchin; Alfons J. M. Debets; Peter Dekker; Piet W.M. van Dijck; Alard Van Dijk; Lubbert Dijkhuizen; Arnold J. M. Driessen; Christophe d'Enfert; Steven Geysens; Coenie Goosen; Gert S.P. Groot

The filamentous fungus Aspergillus niger is widely exploited by the fermentation industry for the production of enzymes and organic acids, particularly citric acid. We sequenced the 33.9-megabase genome of A. niger CBS 513.88, the ancestor of currently used enzyme production strains. A high level of synteny was observed with other aspergilli sequenced. Strong function predictions were made for 6,506 of the 14,165 open reading frames identified. A detailed description of the components of the protein secretion pathway was made and striking differences in the hydrolytic enzyme spectra of aspergilli were observed. A reconstructed metabolic network comprising 1,069 unique reactions illustrates the versatile metabolism of A. niger. Noteworthy is the large number of major facilitator superfamily transporters and fungal zinc binuclear cluster transcription factors, and the presence of putative gene clusters for fumonisin and ochratoxin A synthesis.


Nature Biotechnology | 2001

A functional genomics strategy that uses metabolome data to reveal the phenotype of silent mutations

Léonie M. Raamsdonk; Bas Teusink; David Broadhurst; Nianshu Zhang; Andrew Hayes; Michael C. Walsh; Jan A. Berden; Kevin M. Brindle; Douglas B. Kell; Jem J. Rowland; Hans V. Westerhoff; Karel van Dam; Stephen G. Oliver

A large proportion of the 6,000 genes present in the genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and of those sequenced in other organisms, encode proteins of unknown function. Many of these genes are “silent,” that is, they show no overt phenotype, in terms of growth rate or other fluxes, when they are deleted from the genome. We demonstrate how the intracellular concentrations of metabolites can reveal phenotypes for proteins active in metabolic regulation. Quantification of the change of several metabolite concentrations relative to the concentration change of one selected metabolite can reveal the site of action, in the metabolic network, of a silent gene. In the same way, comprehensive analyses of metabolite concentrations in mutants, providing “metabolic snapshots,” can reveal functions when snapshots from strains deleted for unstudied genes are compared to those deleted for known genes. This approach to functional analysis, using comparative metabolomics, we call FANCY—an abbreviation for functional analysis by co-responses in yeast.


Trends in Biotechnology | 1998

Systematic functional analysis of the yeast genome.

Stephen G. Oliver; Michael K. Winson; Douglas B. Kell; Frank Baganz

The genome sequence of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has provided the first complete inventory of the working parts of a eukaryotic cell. The challenge is now to discover what each of the gene products does and how they interact in a living yeast cell. Systematic and comprehensive approaches to the elucidation of yeast gene function are discussed and the prospects for the functional genomics of eukaryotic organisms evaluated.


Nature | 1997

Overview of the yeast genome.

Hans-Werner Mewes; Kaj Albermann; Manuel Bahr; Dmitrij Frishman; A. Gleissner; Jean Hani; Klaus Heumann; K. Kleine; Andreas Maierl; Stephen G. Oliver; F. Pfeiffer; Alfred Zollner

Nature 387 (Suppl.) 9 (1997) The display for chromosome 1 was incorrect as published owing to an error in the production process. The correct figure is shown here.


Nature | 2004

Functional genomic hypothesis generation and experimentation by a robot scientist

Ross D. King; Kenneth Edward Whelan; Ffion M. Jones; Philip G. K. Reiser; Christopher H. Bryant; Stephen Muggleton; Douglas B. Kell; Stephen G. Oliver

The question of whether it is possible to automate the scientific process is of both great theoretical interest and increasing practical importance because, in many scientific areas, data are being generated much faster than they can be effectively analysed. We describe a physically implemented robotic system that applies techniques from artificial intelligence to carry out cycles of scientific experimentation. The system automatically originates hypotheses to explain observations, devises experiments to test these hypotheses, physically runs the experiments using a laboratory robot, interprets the results to falsify hypotheses inconsistent with the data, and then repeats the cycle. Here we apply the system to the determination of gene function using deletion mutants of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and auxotrophic growth experiments. We built and tested a detailed logical model (involving genes, proteins and metabolites) of the aromatic amino acid synthesis pathway. In biological experiments that automatically reconstruct parts of this model, we show that an intelligent experiment selection strategy is competitive with human performance and significantly outperforms, with a cost decrease of 3-fold and 100-fold (respectively), both cheapest and random-experiment selection.


Molecular & Cellular Proteomics | 2002

Dynamics of Protein Turnover, a Missing Dimension in Proteomics

Julie M. Pratt; June Petty; Isabel Riba-Garcia; Duncan H. L. Robertson; Simon J. Gaskell; Stephen G. Oliver; Robert J. Beynon

Functional genomic experiments frequently involve a comparison of the levels of gene expression between two or more genetic, developmental, or physiological states. Such comparisons can be carried out at either the RNA (transcriptome) or protein (proteome) level, but there is often a lack of congruence between parallel analyses using these two approaches. To fully interpret protein abundance data from proteomic experiments, it is necessary to understand the contributions made by the opposing processes of synthesis and degradation to the transition between the states compared. Thus, there is a need for reliable methods to determine the rates of turnover of individual proteins at amounts comparable to those obtained in proteomic experiments. Here, we show that stable isotope-labeled amino acids can be used to define the rate of breakdown of individual proteins by inspection of mass shifts in tryptic fragments. The approach has been applied to an analysis of abundant proteins in glucose-limited yeast cells grown in aerobic chemostat culture at steady state. The average rate of degradation of 50 proteins was 2.2%/h, although some proteins were turned over at imperceptible rates, and others had degradation rates of almost 10%/h. This range of values suggests that protein turnover is a significant missing dimension in proteomic experiments and needs to be considered when assessing protein abundance data and comparing it to the relative abundance of cognate mRNA species.


Nature | 2000

Guilt-by-association goes global

Stephen G. Oliver

Clues to the function of a protein can be obtained by seeing whether it interacts with another protein of known function. This principle of guilt-by-association has now been applied to the entire protein complement of yeast.


Science | 2009

The Automation of Science

Ross D. King; Jeremy John Rowland; Stephen G. Oliver; Michael Young; Wayne Aubrey; Emma Louise Byrne; Maria Liakata; Magdalena Markham; Pınar Pir; Larisa N. Soldatova; Andrew Sparkes; Kenneth Edward Whelan; Amanda Clare

The basis of science is the hypothetico-deductive method and the recording of experiments in sufficient detail to enable reproducibility. We report the development of Robot Scientist “Adam,” which advances the automation of both. Adam has autonomously generated functional genomics hypotheses about the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and experimentally tested these hypotheses by using laboratory automation. We have confirmed Adams conclusions through manual experiments. To describe Adams research, we have developed an ontology and logical language. The resulting formalization involves over 10,000 different research units in a nested treelike structure, 10 levels deep, that relates the 6.6 million biomass measurements to their logical description. This formalization describes how a machine contributed to scientific knowledge.

Collaboration


Dive into the Stephen G. Oliver's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew Hayes

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pınar Pir

University of Cambridge

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nianshu Zhang

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge