Stephen Giguere
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Stephen Giguere.
international conference on user modeling adaptation and personalization | 2010
Ryan S. Baker; Albert T. Corbett; Sujith M. Gowda; Angela Z. Wagner; Benjamin A. MacLaren; Linda R. Kauffman; Aaron P. Mitchell; Stephen Giguere
Intelligent tutoring systems that utilize Bayesian Knowledge Tracing have achieved the ability to accurately predict student performance not only within the intelligent tutoring system, but on paper post-tests outside of the system Recent work has suggested that contextual estimation of student guessing and slipping leads to better prediction within the tutoring software (Baker, Corbett, & Aleven, 2008a, 2008b) However, it is not yet clear whether this new variant on knowledge tracing is effective at predicting the latent student knowledge that leads to successful post-test performance In this paper, we compare the Contextual-Guess-and-Slip variant on Bayesian Knowledge Tracing to classical four-parameter Bayesian Knowledge Tracing and the Individual Difference Weights variant of Bayesian Knowledge Tracing (Corbett & Anderson, 1995), investigating how well each model variant predicts post-test performance We also test other ways to utilize contextual estimation of slipping within the tutor in post-test prediction, and discuss hypotheses for why slipping during tutor use is a significant predictor of post-test performance, even after Bayesian Knowledge Tracing estimates are controlled for.
Applied Spectroscopy | 2017
Stephen Giguere; Thomas Boucher; Cj Carey; Sridhar Mahadevan; M. Darby Dyar
The task of proper baseline or continuum removal is common to nearly all types of spectroscopy. Its goal is to remove any portion of a signal that is irrelevant to features of interest while preserving any predictive information. Despite the importance of baseline removal, median or guessed default parameters are commonly employed, often using commercially available software supplied with instruments. Several published baseline removal algorithms have been shown to be useful for particular spectroscopic applications but their generalizability is ambiguous. The new Custom Baseline Removal (Custom BLR) method presented here generalizes the problem of baseline removal by combining operations from previously proposed methods to synthesize new correction algorithms. It creates novel methods for each technique, application, and training set, discovering new algorithms that maximize the predictive accuracy of the resulting spectroscopic models. In most cases, these learned methods either match or improve on the performance of the best alternative. Examples of these advantages are shown for three different scenarios: quantification of components in near-infrared spectra of corn and laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy data of rocks, and classification/matching of minerals using Raman spectroscopy. Software to implement this optimization is available from the authors. By removing subjectivity from this commonly encountered task, Custom BLR is a significant step toward completely automatic and general baseline removal in spectroscopic and other applications.
Applied Spectroscopy | 2017
Kate Lepore; Caleb I. Fassett; Elly A. Breves; Sarah Byrne; Stephen Giguere; Thomas Boucher; J. Michael Rhodes; M. J. Vollinger; Chloe H Anderson; Richard W. Murray; M. Darby Dyar
Obtaining quantitative chemical information using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy is challenging due to the variability in the bulk composition of geological materials. Chemical matrix effects caused by this variability produce changes in the peak area that are not proportional to the changes in minor element concentration. Therefore the use of univariate calibrations to predict trace element concentrations in geological samples is plagued by a high degree of uncertainty. This work evaluated the accuracy of univariate minor element predictions as a function of the composition of the major element matrices of the samples and examined the factors that limit the prediction accuracy of univariate calibrations. Five different sample matrices were doped with 10–85 000 ppm Cr, Mn, Ni, Zn, and Co and then independently measured in 175 mixtures by X-ray fluorescence, inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry, and laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy, the latter at three different laser energies (1.9, 2.8, and 3.7 mJ). Univariate prediction models for minor element concentrations were created using varying combinations of dopants, matrices, normalization/no normalization, and energy density; the model accuracies were evaluated using root mean square prediction errors and leave-one-out cross-validation. The results showed the superiority of using normalization for predictions of minor elements when the predicted sample and those in the training set had matrices with similar SiO2 contents. Normalization also mitigates differences in spectra arising from laser/sample coupling effects and the use of different energy densities. Prediction of minor elements in matrices that are dissimilar to those in the training set can increase the uncertainty of prediction by an order of magnitude. Overall, the quality of a univariate calibration is primarily determined by the availability of a persistent, measurable peak with a favorable transition probability that has little to no interference from neighboring peaks in the spectra of both the unknown and those used to train it.
intelligent tutoring systems | 2010
Stephen Giguere; Joseph E. Beck; Ryan S. Baker
This paper examines the problem of modeling when students are engaged in “gaming the system.” We propose and partially validate an approach that uses a hidden Markov model, as is used in knowledge tracing, to estimate whether the student is gaming on the basis of observable actions By doing so, we provide a common modeling approach that is applicable to gaming, or other constructs such as off task behavior We find that our initial approach gave promising results, with parameter estimates that are plausible, and also exposed some weaknesses in our initial attempt Specifically, that relying solely on response time is probably insufficient to construct a strong model of gaming.
UM | 2010
Ryan S. Baker; Albert T. Corbett; Sujith M. Gowda; Angela Z. Wagner; Benjamin A. MacLaren; Linda R. Kauffman; Aaron P. Mitchell; Stephen Giguere
user interface software and technology | 2013
Siddhartha Chaudhuri; Evangelos Kalogerakis; Stephen Giguere; Thomas A. Funkhouser
arXiv: Learning | 2014
Sridhar Mahadevan; Bo Liu; Philip S. Thomas; William Dabney; Stephen Giguere; Nicholas Jacek; Ian Gemp; Ji Liu
Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy | 2016
M. Darby Dyar; Caleb I. Fassett; Stephen Giguere; Kate Lepore; Sarah Byrne; Thomas Boucher; Cj Carey; Sridhar Mahadevan
Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy | 2016
M. Darby Dyar; Stephen Giguere; Cj Carey; Thomas Boucher
national conference on artificial intelligence | 2013
Sridhar Mahadevan; Stephen Giguere; Nicholas Jacek