Stephen H. Y. Wei

Treatment response and long-term dentofacial adaptations to maxillary expansion and protraction

The purpose of this article is to summarize the short-term and long-term results of the authors clinical prospective study on the treatment of Class III malocclusion using the protraction facemask. An attempt is made to answer questions pertaining to this treatment modality. Twenty patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion were treated consecutively with maxillary expansion and a protraction facemask. A positive overjet was obtained in all cases after 6 to 9 months of treatment. These changes were contributed to by a forward movement of the maxilla, backward and downward rotation of the mandible, proclination of the maxillary incisors, and retroclination of the mandibular incisors. The molar relationship was overcorrected to Class I or Class II dental arch relationship. The overbite was reduced with a significant increase in lower facial height. The treatment was found to be stable 2 years after removal of the appliances. At the end of the 4-year observation period, 15 of the 20 patients maintained a positive overjet or an end-to-end incisal relationship. Patients who reverted back to a negative overjet were found to have excess horizontal mandibular growth that was not compensated by proclination of the maxillary incisors. A review of the literature showed that maxillary expansion in conjunction with protraction produced greater forward movement of the maxilla. Maxillary protraction with a 30 degrees forward and downward force applied at the canine region produced an acceptable clinical response. The reciprocal force from maxillary protraction transmitted to the temporomandibular joint did not increase masticatory muscle pain or activity. Significant soft tissue profile change can be expected with maxillary protraction including straightening of the facial profile and better lip competence and posture. However, one should anticipate individual variations in treatment response and subsequent growth changes. Treatment with the protraction facemask is most effective in Class III patients with a retrusive maxilla and a hypodivergent growth pattern. Treatment initiated at the time of initial eruption of the upper central incisors helps to maintain the anterior occlusion after treatment.

Soft tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with maxillary expansion and protraction headgear treatment

One of the goals of early treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and protraction headgear is to significantly improve the dentofacial profile. The objectives of the present study were to determine (1) the interrelationships of the soft tissue and dentoskeletal profiles after maxillary expansion and protraction headgear treatment and (2) which cephalometric variables could contribute to an accurate prediction of the protraction effect on the soft tissue profile. Lateral cephalometric radiographs of 20 consecutively treated Class III patients (10 males, 10 females) by protraction headgear were included in this study. Their ages at the start of protraction headgear treatment ranged from 6 to 11 years, with an average of 8.1 +/- 2.1 years. None of the patients had previous orthodontic treatment. For each patient, the first lateral cephalogram was taken 6 months before the initiation of headgear treatment (T0), and the second radiograph at the start of treatment (T1). Therefore (T1-T0) represented 6 months of growth with no treatment. A third radiograph was taken 6 months after start of treatment (T2). In this way, (T2-T1)-(T1-T0) represented the effect the result of appliance therapy alone and each subject served as his/her own control. A computerized cephalometric analysis was used including variables assessing sagittal and vertical relationships of skeletal and soft tissue profiles, incisal relationships, soft tissue thickness, and lip structure. Data were analyzed by means of paired t tests, Pearsons product-moment coefficient correlation, and multiple regression analyses. The results showed significant improvements in dentofacial profile after 6 months of maxillary protraction. The skeletal and soft tissue facial profiles were straightened and the posture of the lips was improved. The normal incisal relationship (overjet) that was achieved had a significant impact on the soft tissues overlying both upper and lower incisors resulting in better lip competence and posture. Significant correlations were found between changes in the sagittal relationships of skeletal and soft tissue profiles in both the maxilla and the mandible (p < 0.05). The forward movement of the maxilla was accompanied by a corresponding forward movement of the soft tissue profile at 50% to 79% of the hard tissue. In the mandible, the downward and backward movements of the soft tissues were equivalent to 71% to 81% of the corresponding hard tissues. The lack of high r square values in the multiple regression analyses reflected a low prediction value for the maxillary variables, but moderately high prediction value for the mandibular variables that could be used in preorthopedic treatment planning. This study showed that significant dentoskeletal changes and improvements in dentofacial profile resulted from 6 months of treatment with maxillary expansion and protraction.

TIMING FOR EFFECTIVE APPLICATION OF ANTERIORLY DIRECTED ORTHOPEDIC FORCE TO THE MAXILLA

Class III malocclusion with retrusive maxilla can be orthopedically corrected in the deciduous and mixed dentition, with reverse-pull headgear in combination with rapid palatal expansion. The literature recommends this procedure be carried out before the patient is 8 years old to obtain the optimal orthopedic result. This statement, however, has not been supported by scientific data. The current study examined the treatment effects of patients younger than 8 years old (5 to 8 years) and patients older than 8 years old (9 to 12 years). Thirty patients treated with maxillary protraction and expansion in the Department of Childrens Dentistry and Orthodontics, University of Hong Kong were included in this study. Cephalometric radiographs were taken 6 months before the initiation of treatment (T(0)), at the initiation of treatment (T1), and after 6 months of treatment (T2). In this way, (T(2)-T1) represented cephalometric changes during the treatment period and (T1-T0) represented 6 months of growth changes without treatment. Experimental subjects served as their own control in this study. A grid system consisting of maxillary occlusal plane (OL) and a line perpendicular to OL through sella (OLp) was used for linear measurements. A total of 15 linear and 3 angular cephalometric measurements were made. A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), which used age and treatment time as its factors, was used to determine effect of age and/or treatment on each cephalometric parameter. Results indicated strikingly similar therapeutic response between the younger and older age groups. These data suggest that similar skeletal response can be obtained when maxillary protraction was started either before age 8 (5 to 8 years) or after age 8 years (8 to 12 years).

Treatment response to maxillary expansion and protraction

A prospective clinical trial was conducted to determine the skeletal and dental contributions to the correction of overjet and overbite in Class III patients. Thirty patients (12 males and 18 females with a mean age of 8.4 +/- 1.7 years) were treated consecutively with protraction headgear and fixed maxillary expansion appliances. For each patient, a lateral cephalogram was taken 6 months before treatment (T0); immediately before treatment (T1); and 6 months after treatment (T2). The time period (T1-T0) represented changes due to 6 months of growth without treatment; (T2-T1) represented 6 months of growth and treatment. Each patient served as his/her own control. Cephalometric analysis described by Björk (1947) and Pancherz (1982a,b) was used. Sagittal and vertical measurements were made along the occlusal plane (OLs) and the occlusal plane perpendicular (OLp), and superimposed on the mid-sagittal cranial structure. The results revealed the following: with 6 months of treatment, all subjects were treated to Class I or overcorrected to Class I or Class II dental arch relationships. Overjet and sagittal molar relationships improved by an average of 6.2 and 4.5 mm, respectively. This was a result of 1.8 mm of forward maxillary growth, a 2.5-mm of backward movement of the mandible, a 1.7-mm of labial movement of maxillary incisors, a 0.2-mm of lingual movement of mandibular incisors, and a 0.2-mm of greater mesial movement of maxillary than mandibular molars. The mean overbite reduction was 2.6 mm. Maxillary and mandibular molars were erupted occlusally by 0.9 and 1.4 mm, respectively. The mandibular plane angle was increased by 1.5 degrees and the lower facial height by 2.9 mm. Individual variations in response to maxillary protraction was large for most of the parameters tested. Significant differences in treatment changes between male and female subjects were found only in the vertical eruption of mandibular incisors and maxillary and mandibular molars. These results demonstrate that significant overjet and overbite corrections can be obtained with 6 months of maxillary protraction in combination with a fixed expansion appliance.

Cephalometric A point changes during and after maxillary protraction and expansion

The purpose of this study was to analyze the treatment and posttreatment maxillary changes achieved with maxillary protraction therapy. The cephalometric records of 25 consecutively treated Chinese children with Class III malocclusions (mean age 8.4 years) were analyzed for cephalometric A point changes, which were then compared with an untreated, age and sex matched Class III control sample. A cephalometric maxillary superimposition technique was used to differentiate between the skeletal and the local contributions to the total A point change. Results showed that 6 months of maxillary protraction therapy produced a mean A point advancement of 2.4 mm compared with 0.2 mm in the control group. Of this advancement, 75% was found to be due to skeletal maxillary advancement and 25% was attributed to local remodeling. Significantly less downward movement of A point was found with treatment compared with the controls, which could be related to the direction of force application. No significant differences were found in the horizontal and the vertical movements of A point between the treatment and the control groups during the 12-month posttreatment period, indicating stability of early maxillary protraction in patients with Class III malocclusions.

A comparative study of southern Chinese and British Caucasian cephalometric standards.

A comprehensive cephalometric comparison between unselected Chinese and Caucasian 12-year-old male children in natural head posture finds the intracranial reference planes to slope down more caudally in the Chinese. By superimposing on true vertical, the degree of prognathism in the Chinese becomes apparent. Significant intergroup differences are highlighted for both selected dentoskeletal and soft tissue profile variables.

Recording and measuring malocclusion: A review of the literature

The methods of recording and measuring malocclusion can be broadly divided into two types: qualitative and quantitative. Among the qualitative methods of recording malocclusion, Angles method of classifying malocclusion with or without modifications is probably the most widely used. The WHO/FDI Basic Method for Recording of Malocclusion was published in 1979 to establish an assessment format to determine the prevalence of malocclusion and to estimate treatment needs of a population. Among the many occlusion indices developed by various research workers, the occlusal index developed by Summers appeared to have the least amount of bias, is best correlated with clinical standards and has the highest validity during time. More recently, methods have also been developed to enable assessment of treatment need according to grade index scales. However, experience in using these methods is still very limited.

Use of Onplants as Stable Anchorage for Facemask Treatment: A Case Report

A hexagonal onplant of 7.7 mm diameter was placed on the palatal bone of the maxilla in an 1-year five-month-old female patient with a Class III malocclusion and midface deficiency. Elastic traction (400 g per side) was applied from a facemask to the onplant at 30 degrees to the occlusal plane 12 hours per day for 12 months. The maxilla was found to have displaced forward and downward by 2.9 mm. The mandible was rotated downward and backward. There was a 3 degrees increase in mandibular plane angle and an increase in the lower face height. Clinically, there was a significant improvement in midface esthetics, noted by an increase in fullness of the infraorbital region and correction of the skeletal discrepancy between the maxillary and mandibular jaw relationship. Contrary to the reports that use teeth rather than onplants as anchorage, there was no forward movement of the maxillary molars and minimal extrusion of the maxillary molars. These results suggest that onplants can be used as an extremely stable anchorage for maxillary orthopedic facemask treatment.

Craniofacial width dimensions.

Abstract No Abstract Available. This paper is based on a portion of the M.D.S. thesis submitted to the University of Adelaide, South Australla.

The variability of roentgenographic cephalometric lines of reference.

Abstract No Abstract Available. *From the Department of Pedodontics, University of Iowa. This paper is based on a portion of a thesis submitted to the University of Adelaide, South Australia, for the partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Dental Surgery. The major cost of the project was financed by a Dental Board of South Australia Research Scholarship.