Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Stephen J. Ong is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Stephen J. Ong.


Journal of Banking and Finance | 2013

SAFE: An Early Warning System for Systemic Banking Risk

Mikhail V. Oet; Timothy Bianco; Dieter Gramlich; Stephen J. Ong

This paper builds on existing microprudential and macroprudential early warning systems (EWSs) to develop a new, hybrid class of models for systemic risk that incorporates the structural characteristics of the financial system and a feedback amplification mechanism. The models explain financial stress using both public and proprietary supervisory data from systemically important institutions, regressing institutional imbalances using an optimal lag method. The Systemic Assessment of Financial Environment (SAFE) EWS monitors microprudential information from the largest bank holding companies to anticipate the buildup of macroeconomic stresses in the financial markets. To mitigate inherent uncertainty, SAFE develops a set of medium-term forecasting specifications that gives policymakers enough time to take ex-ante policy action and a set of short-term forecasting specifications for verification and adjustment of supervisory actions. This paper highlights the application of these models to stress testing and policy.


Archive | 2012

Systemic Risk Early Warning System: A Micro-Macro Prudential Synthesis

Mikhail V. Oet; Ryan Eiben; Timothy Bianco; Dieter Gramlich; Stephen J. Ong; Jing Wang

From the financial supervisor’s point of view, an early warning system involves an ex ante approach to regulation, targeted to predict and prevent crises. An efficient EWS allows timely ex ante policy action and can reduce the need for ex post regulation. This chapter builds on existing microprudential and macroprudential early warning systems (EWSs) to propose a hybrid class of models for systemic risk, incorporating the structural characteristics of the financial system and a feedback amplification mechanism. The models explain financial stress using data from the five largest bank holding companies, regressing institutional imbalances using an optimal lag method. The z-scores of institutional data are justified as explanatory imbalances. The models utilize both public and proprietary supervisory data. The Systemic Assessment of Financial Environment (SAFE) EWS monitors microprudential information from systemically important institutions to anticipate the buildup of macroeconomic stresses in the financial markets at large. To the supervisor, SAFE offers a toolkit of possible institutional actions that can be used to diffuse the buildup of systemic stress in the financial markets. A hazard inherent in all ex ante models is that the model’s uncertainty may lead to wrong policy choices. To mitigate this risk, SAFE develops two modeling perspectives: a set of medium-term (six-quarter) forecasting specifications that gives policymakers enough time to take ex ante policy action, and a set of short-term (two-quarter) forecasting specifications for verification and adjustment of supervisory actions. Individual financial institutions may utilize the public version of SAFE EWS to enhance systemic risk stress testing and scenario analysis. This chapter shows the econometric results and robustness support for the SAFE set of models. The discussion of results addresses the usability and usefulness tests of supervisory data. In addition, the chapter investigates and suggests which action thresholds are appropriate for this EWS.


Economic commentary | 2012

The Cleveland Financial Stress Index

Timothy Bianco; Mikhail V. Oet; Stephen J. Ong

To promote stability in a dynamic fi nancial system, supervisors must monitor the system for risks at all times. The Cleveland Fed has developed an index of fi nancial stress, the CFSI, which is designed to track distress in the fi nancial system as it is building. The CFSI will help financial system supervisors monitor and understand the state of fi nancial markets on a real-time basis, and take appropriate regulatory or supervisory action as necessary.


Archive | 2013

Policy in Adaptive Financial Markets — The Use of Systemic Risk Early Warning Tools

Mikhail V. Oet; Stephen J. Ong; Dieter Gramlich

How can a systemic risk early warning system (EWS) facilitate the financial stability work of policymakers? In the context of evolving financial market dynamics and limitations of microprudential policy, this study examines new directions for financial macroprudential policy. A flexible macroprudential approach is anchored in strategic capacities of systemic risk EWSs. Tactically, macroprudential applications are founded on information about the level, structure, and institutional drivers of systemic financial stress and aim to manage the financial system risk and imbalances in two dimensions: across time and institutions. Time-related EWS policy applications are analyzed in pursuit of prevention and mitigation. EWS applications across institutions are considered via common exposures and interconnectedness. Care must be taken in the calibration of macroprudential applications, given their reliance on quality of the underlying systemic risk-modeling framework.


European Journal of Finance | 2017

The contributions to systemic stress of financial interactions between the US and Europe

Dieter Gramlich; Mikhail V. Oet; Stephen J. Ong

Understanding the connectivity of international financial markets is critical to understanding the origination and propagation of financial crises. This study investigates the contribution of US and European exchange rate interactions to overall stress in the US financial system from 1992 to 2013. The impacts of these interactions are assessed using a financial stress index that aggregates measures of national and international stresses. There are three main findings for the sample period. First, we find that European influences on US financial stress have increased. Second, observing several structural breaks with changing correlation and Granger causality patterns, we find that the euro and the British pound have contributed varying levels of stress. Third, we find that stress in US markets tends to spill over into European markets, while the reverse influences are of lesser importance. These findings have important implications for supervisors in international markets. Understanding the amplifying or attenuating feedback effects from international connectivity provides valuable insight into the development of macroprudential policies.


Risks | 2015

The Financial Stress Index: Identification of Systemic Risk Conditions

Mikhail V. Oet; Ryan Eiben; Timothy Bianco; Dieter Gramlich; Stephen J. Ong


Banks and Bank Systems | 2010

Early Warning Systems for Systemic Banking Risk: Critical Review and Modeling Implications

Dieter Gramlich; Gavin L. Miller; Mikhail V. Oet; Stephen J. Ong


Archive | 2013

Cryptography and the Economics of Supervisory Information: Balancing Transparency and Confidentiality

Mark D. Flood; Jonathan Katz; Stephen J. Ong; Adam D. Smith


Archive | 2012

Financial Stress Index: A Lens for Supervising the Financial System

Timothy Bianco; Dieter Gramlich; Mikhail V. Oet; Stephen J. Ong


Research in International Business and Finance | 2016

From Organization to Activity in the US Collateralized Interbank Market

Mikhail V. Oet; Stephen J. Ong

Collaboration


Dive into the Stephen J. Ong's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mikhail V. Oet

Case Western Reserve University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dieter Gramlich

Baden-Württemberg Cooperative State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Adam D. Smith

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jing Wang

Federal Reserve System

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter Sarlin

Hanken School of Economics

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge