Stephen L. Fielding

Low-dose mifepristone followed by vaginal misoprostol at 48 hours for abortion up to 63 days

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness, side effects, and acceptability of one-third the standard dose of mifepristone, i.e., 200 mg, and vaginal misoprostol 800 microg to induce abortion in subjects < or =56 days pregnant with subjects 57-63 days pregnant. A prospective multicenter trial enrolled healthy women > or =18 years, < or =63 days pregnant, and wanting an abortion. Women received mifepristone 200 mg orally, followed by misoprostol 800 microg vaginally, and returned 1-4 days later for ultrasound evaluation. A second dose of misoprostol was administered, if necessary. Surgical intervention was indicated for continuing pregnancy, excessive bleeding, or persistent products of conception 5 weeks later. Of 1137 subjects, 829 were in the < or =56 days pregnant group and 308 in the 57-63 days pregnant group. In all, 34 subjects had surgical intervention and 16 were lost to follow-up. Complete medical abortions occurred in 97% of subjects < or =56 days pregnant and 96% in the 57-63 days pregnant group. In all, 88% of subjects in the < or =56 days pregnant and 92% in the 57-63 days pregnant group bled within 4 h of using vaginal misoprostol. Comparing subjects < or =56 days pregnant with 57-63 days pregnant, there was less diarrhea (20% vs 29%, p = 0.002) and vomiting (33% vs 44%, p = 0.001), although side effects were acceptable to 82% of subjects in both groups. One subject in the < or =56 day group required a transfusion for delayed excessive bleeding. Although bleeding (p = 0.01) and pain (p = 0.02) were less acceptable in the 57-63 day group, 91% of subjects in both groups reported that the overall procedure was acceptable. In summary, low-dose mifepristone 200 mg and home administration of vaginal misoprostol 800 microg at 48 h were highly effective and acceptable to women < or =63 days pregnant, thereby expanding the number of women who can access a medical abortion.

Randomized trial of oral versus vaginal misoprostol at one day after mifepristone for early medical abortion

Mifepristone was recently approved in the United States. Regimens with shorter intervals may be more acceptable. The objective of this study was to determine whether the oral route of misoprostol was as effective as the vaginal route of misoprostol 1 day after mifepristone. A prospective, open-labeled, randomized trial of healthy adult women up to 63 days pregnant and wanting a medical abortion were randomized to use either two doses of oral misoprostol 400 microg taken 2 h apart or misoprostol 800 microg vaginally. Women self-administered misoprostol 1 day after taking one-third of the standard dose of mifepristone (200 mg) orally. Women then returned to the clinic up to 5 days later for a repeat sonogram evaluation. A dose of vaginal misoprostol was administered to women with a continuing pregnancy who then returned 1 day later to Day 15. The primary outcome measures were a complete medical abortion by the first or by the second follow-up visits. Surgical intervention was indicated for continuing pregnancy at the second follow-up visit, excessive bleeding, or persistent products of conception 5 weeks later. One thousand one hundred sixty-eight women were enrolled. Of the 1144 (98%) women who complied with their random assignment, two oral doses of misoprostol (800 microg total) were 90% effective at inducing an abortion by the first follow-up visit, compared with one dose of misoprostol by vagina of 97% (chi(2) = 23.95, p = 0.001). By the second follow-up visit, the complete abortion rate was 95% for oral misoprostol and 99% for vaginal misoprostol (chi(2) = 21.76, p = 0.001). There were minimal differences in side effects. Women preferred the oral route. The trial demonstrated that although two doses of oral misoprostol were effective, the vaginal misoprostol was more effective at inducing an early medical abortion at 1 day after low-dose mifepristone, and the regimen could be extended to 63 days gestation.

The psychosocial work environment: Work organization, democratization and health: edited by Jeffrey V. Johnson and Gunn Johansson

Will reading habit influence your life? Many say yes. Reading psychosocial work environment work organization democratization and health is a good habit; you can develop this habit to be such interesting way. Yeah, reading habit will not only make you have any favourite activity. It will be one of guidance of your life. When reading has become a habit, you will not make it as disturbing activities or as boring activity. You can gain many benefits and importances of reading.

Randomized trial of oral versus vaginal misoprostol 2 days after mifepristone 200 mg for abortion up to 63 days of pregnancy

This prospective, open-label, randomized trial of healthy adult women up to 9 weeks pregnant compared mifepristone 200 mg followed 2 days later with misoprostol 400 microg orally versus misoprostol 800 microg vaginally. The study was interrupted after the oral misoprostol group experienced a higher than expected failure rate. This treatment was discontinued and another substituted consisting of oral misoprostol 800 microg divided into two doses two hours apart. Women returned for a follow-up visit from Day 4 to 8. All women with a continuing pregnancy received a repeat dose of misoprostol vaginally and returned before Day 15. The primary outcome measure was a complete medical abortion without surgical intervention at the first visit. Of the 1045 women enrolled, 1011 had complete data: Group 1 (220) used oral misoprostol 400 microg, Group 2 (269) used oral misoprostol 800 microg, and Group 3 (522) used vaginal misoprostol 800 microg. At first follow-up visit, the primary outcome, that is, a complete abortion, was 84% for Group 1, 92% for Group 2, and 96% for Group 3, p < 0.001. After a second dose of vaginal misoprostol in women with on-going pregnancies at their first follow-up visit, the complete abortion rates were 91%, 95%, and 98%, respectively, p < 0.001. There were minimal differences in side effects, onset of bleeding and overall acceptability in the three groups. Mifepristone 200 mg followed by vaginal misoprostol 2 days later was more effective at inducing an abortion up to 9 weeks of pregnancy than the same dose of mifepristone followed by oral misoprostol.

Having an Abortion Using Mifepristone And Home Misoprostol: A Qualitative Analysis Of Women's Experiences

CONTEXT Women choose medical over surgical abortion because it is more natural, more private and less painful. Whether their perceptions change during the medical abortion process has not been explored. METHODS A nonprobabilitysample of 43 participants in a clinical trial of abortion using mifepristone completed two open-ended questionnaires about this method, one before taking mifepristone and the second during their follow-up clinic visit 4-8 days after taking misoprostol. Thirty women participated in in-depth interviews 1-6 weeks following their abortion. Researchers analyzed transcripts to identify common themes. RESULTS On the first visit to the clinic, women expressed anxiety and uncertainty about the effectiveness of medical abortion, guilt or ambivalence, and a desire to avoid surgery. For most women, emotional distress decreased after their abortion. Control was the overarching theme women expressed regarding the meaning of the procedure: Women stressed the importance of being able to select the type of abortion procedure, to maintain control over their future and to preserve their familys quality of life, given the constraints of time, finances and emotional resources. In in-depth interviews, eight women remained concerned about long-term health effects; 18 said that having an abortion at home was a comfortable experience. CONCLUSIONS Learning whether women are concerned about personal control may help clinicians identify appropriate candidates for medical abortion. In addition, clinicians could help allay womens anxiety at their first abortion visit by explaining that the uncertainties posed by any medical procedure create similar feelings. Clinicians also should reemphasize at the follow-up visit that there are no long-term health effects related to abortion.

Curettage after mifepristone-induced abortion: frequency, timing, and indications

Abstract OBJECTIVE: To characterize women who underwent curettage after medical abortion with mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol, to describe when curettage occurred and the reasons for the intervention, and to categorize the indications for curettage according to a simple classification schema. Methods: These analyses used data from two multisite, randomized controlled trials sponsored by Abortion Rights Mobilization. In the first study, women pregnant less than 63 days received 200 mg of mifepristone and 800 μg of vaginal misoprostol to use 48 hours after taking mifepristone. In the second study, women pregnant less than 56 days were randomly assigned to insert vaginal misoprostol at 1, 2, or 3 days after mifepristone administration. Case report forms and clinical case notes of all women who underwent curettage were examined. Results: Of the 4393 women enrolled in both studies, 116 (2.6%, 95% confidence interval 2.1%, 3.1%) curettages were identified. The gestational age and a history of prior elective abortion were associated with the rate of curettage. The distribution of indications for curettage included bleeding, 61 (53%); continuing pregnancy, 17 (15%); patient request, 36 (31%); and indeterminate, 2 (1.7%). The timing of curettage differed by the indication and scheduled interval between study visits. The distribution of the timing was bimodal. One subset of women, 44 (38%), underwent curettage in the first study week and another subset, 43 (37%), during weeks 3–5. Conclusion: Curettage after medical abortion with mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol is rare. At least one half of the curettages were performed for persistent bleeding several weeks after treatment. Both acute heavy bleeding and continuing pregnancy are extremely rare.

Mifepristone and misoprostol for early abortion when no gestational sac is present

The study was conducted to determine whether the administration of mifepristone followed by vaginal misoprostol can induce an abortion in early pregnancy when no gestational sac is present on sonogram. This report presents a prospective, pilot study of 30 healthy adult women, pregnant and seeking an abortion, and with no gestational sac on sonogram. All women had a baseline serum chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) level measured prior to using mifepristone 200 mg orally followed by misoprostol 800 mcg vaginally 48 h later, and then returned up to 4 days later for a repeat sonogram and serum hCG level. Women with initial hCG levels > 2000 IU/L were evaluated for ectopic pregnancy. At the first follow-up visit, if the hCG decreased by >50%, the women were followed with home pregnancy (25 IU/L) tests weekly until negative. If the levels did not decrease by 50%, a second dose of misoprostol was given. Surgical intervention was indicated for persistent hCG levels or excessive bleeding. Of the 30 women enrolled, the mean number of days of amenorrhea was 40 (SD 9) days. Two women had surgical intervention for continuing pregnancy, 2 had ectopic pregnancies, and 1 was lost to follow-up. Complete medical abortions occurred in 25/30 (88%) women, but when recalculated, in 25/27 (93%) women who completed the protocol and who did not have an ectopic pregnancy. There was 1 adverse event in a woman with an ongoing pregnancy who then received methotrexate. She was hospitalized a day later with a complicated pelvic infection and likely methotrexate-induced pneumonitis. Twenty-three women had a decrease in hCG at first follow-up visit of >50%. All 27 women who completed the protocol found the overall regimen acceptable. Mifepristone followed at 48 h by vaginal misoprostol were effective and acceptable in inducing an abortion in very early pregnancy. There may be a higher incidence of failure in very early pregnancies. Documentation of a complete abortion by hCG level is necessary to ensure the pregnancy is neither ongoing nor ectopic.

Social Context and the Experience of a Sample of U.S. Women Taking RU-486 (Mifepristone) for Early Abortion

Of 50 women seeking an abortion in Rochester, New York, between November 1999 and January 2001, 35 went on to complete an in-depth interview from 1 to 6 weeks after their followup clinical visit. Ahigher proportion of women who defined their pregnancy as a baby indicated emotional distress during their in-depth interview compared to those who saw their pregnancy as only having the potential to become a baby. The authors conclude that abortion might be made less difficult through public education about the different views of pregnancy and abortion throughout U.S. history. It might be important for abortion counselors to first ask a woman how she defines her pregnancy. A larger study is warranted.

Service Pathways for Children and Youth Meeting Criteria for Serious Emotional Disturbance

Few studies offer guidance on best practice for social workers in assessment and recommendation of treatment services for specialty mental health services within a system of care (SOC). This study examined factors associated with service assignment among a population of children and youth (N = 1,270) entering a federally funded system of care program referred to specialty mental health services. Logistic regression was used to examine the likelihood of children and youth determined in need of varying levels of care coordination services based on child factors and referral source. Older youth, youth with internalizing problems, and those referred from mental health compared to juvenile justice and schools were significantly more likely determined in need of more intensive care coordination services. Race was not significantly associated with level of care determination. Findings suggest that differences exist in level of care determination for children entering system of care referred by the juvenile justice system and related services and schools. Social workers and providers need to be aware of these differences in order to properly screen children for internalizing problems when referred by sources other than mental health.

Anxieties and Attitudes Towards Abortion in Women Presenting for Medical and Surgical Abortions

OBJECTIVE To examine the differences in anxiety levels and attitudes towards abortion between women having an early medical abortion and women having a surgical (manual vacuum aspiration) abortion. METHODS Women who presented for an early medical abortion or a surgical abortion at an urban, free-standing abortion clinic were invited to participate in this study. Fifty-nine women having a medical abortion and 43 women having a surgical abortion answered questionnaires before their scheduled abortion, and again 2 to 4 weeks after the abortion. Thirty women were interviewed about their answers. RESULTS Anxiety levels were similar in both groups before the abortion procedure. Anti-choice views about abortion were seen in 60.5% of women having a medical abortion and in 37.3% of women having a surgical abortion (P = .027). Women who were pro-choice had a mean anxiety score of 5.0 (range, 0-10) before and 2.7 after the abortion, whereas women who were anti-choice had a mean anxiety score of 5.2 before and 4.4 after the abortion (P = .005). CONCLUSION It is important for providers of abortion care to understand that women undergoing a medical abortion may be more ambivalent about abortion than women undergoing a surgical abortion, and women who are anti-choice but having an abortion may have unresolved anxiety after the procedure.