Stephen M. Keyse

Protein phosphatases and the regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling.

The magnitude and duration of signalling through mitogen- and stress-activated kinases are critical determinants of biological effect. This reflects a balance between the activities of upstream activators and a complex regulatory network of protein phosphatases. These mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatases include both dual-specificity (threonine/tyrosine) and tyrosine-specific enzymes, and recent evidence suggests that a single mitogen-activated protein kinase isoform may be acted upon by both classes of protein phosphatase. In both cases, substrate selectivity is determined by specific protein-protein interactions mediated through noncatalytic amino-terminal mitogen-activated protein kinase binding domains. Future challenges include the determination of exactly how this network of protein phosphatases interacts selectively with mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling complexes to achieve precise regulation of these key pathways in mammalian cells.

Differential regulation of MAP kinase signalling by dual-specificity protein phosphatases

The regulated dephosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) plays a key role in determining the magnitude and duration of kinase activation and hence the physiological outcome of signalling. In mammalian cells, an important component of this control is mediated by the differential expression and activities of a family of 10 dual-specificity (Thr/Tyr) MAPK phosphatases (MKPs). These enzymes share a common structure in which MAPK substrate recognition is determined by sequences within an amino-terminal non-catalytic domain whereas MAPK binding often leads to a conformational change within the C-terminal catalytic domain resulting in increased enzyme activity. MKPs can either recognize and inactivate a single class of MAP kinase, as in the specific inactivation of extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) by the cytoplasmic phosphatase DUSP6/MKP-3 or can regulate more than one MAPK pathway as illustrated by the ability of DUSP1/MKP-1 to dephosphorylate ERK, c-Jun amino-terminal kinase and p38 in the cell nucleus. These properties, coupled with transcriptional regulation of MKP expression in response to stimuli that activate MAPK signalling, suggest a complex negative regulatory network in which individual MAPK activities can be subject to negative feedback control, but also raise the possibility that signalling through multiple MAPK pathways may be integrated at the level of regulation by MKPs.

Nuclear translocation of p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein kinase is required for growth factor-induced gene expression and cell cycle entry.

Mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) modules, composed of three protein kinases activated by successive phosphorylation, are involved in the signal transduction of a wide range of extracellular agents. In mammalian cells, mitogenic stimulation triggers the translocation of p42/p44MAPK from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, whereas the other protein kinases of the module remain cytosolic. Since MAPK has been shown to phosphorylate and activate nuclear targets, such as the transcription factor Elk1, it has been proposed, but not yet demonstrated, that MAPK nuclear translocation could represent a critical step in signal transduction. In this study, we sequestered p42/p44MAPK in the cytoplasm by the expression of a catalytically inactive form of cytoplasmic MAP kinase phosphatase (MKP‐3/Pyst‐1). Sequestering MAPK in the cytoplasm did not alter its activation or its ability to phosphorylate cytoplasmic substrates of MAPK (p90RSK1 or an engineered cytoplasmic form of Elk1). In contrast, prevention of MAPK nuclear translocation strongly inhibited Elk1‐dependent gene transcription and the ability of cells to reinitiate DNA replication in response to growth factors. Thus the relocalization of MAPK to the nucleus appears to be an important regulatory step for mitogen‐induced gene expression and cell cycle re‐entry.

Differential regulation of the MAP, SAP and RK/p38 kinases by Pyst1, a novel cytosolic dual-specificity phosphatase.

The Pyst1 and Pyst2 mRNAs encode closely related proteins, which are novel members of a family of dual‐specificity MAP kinase phosphatases typified by CL100/MKP‐1. Pyst1 is expressed constitutively in human skin fibroblasts and, in contrast to other members of this family of enzymes, its mRNA is not inducible by either stress or mitogens. Furthermore, unlike the nuclear CL100 protein, Pyst1 is localized in the cytoplasm of transfected Cos‐1 cells. Like CL100/ MKP‐1, Pyst1 dephosphorylates and inactivates MAP kinase in vitro and in vivo. In addition, Pyst1 is able to form a physical complex with endogenous MAP kinase in Cos‐1 cells. However, unlike CL100, Pyst1 displays very low activity towards the stress‐activated protein kinases (SAPKs) or RK/p38 in vitro, indicating that these kinases are not physiological substrates for Pyst1. This specificity is underlined by the inability of Pyst1 to block either the stress‐mediated activation of the JNK‐1 SAP kinase or RK/p38 in vivo, or to inhibit nuclear signalling events mediated by the SAP kinases in response to UV radiation. Our results provide the first evidence that the members of the MAP kinase family of enzymes are differentially regulated by dual‐specificity phosphatases and also indicate that the MAP kinases may be regulated by different members of this family of enzymes depending on their subcellular location.

Inactivation of p42 MAP kinase by protein phosphatase 2A and a protein tyrosine phosphatase, but not CL100, in various cell lines.

BACKGROUND Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase is central to a signal transduction pathway that triggers cell proliferation or differentiation. Activation of the p42mapk isoform requires its phosphorylation at two residues, Thr 183 and Tyr 185, and this phosphorylation is catalysed by MAP kinase kinase (MAPKK). Relatively little is known, however, about the enzymes that dephosphorylate these residues, thereby inactivating the pathway. Recently, the CL100 phosphatase has been shown to inactivate p42mapk in vitro by dephosphorylating Thr 183 and Tyr 185 at similar rates. CL100, the product of an immediate early gene, is synthesized within one hour of stimulating cells with growth factors or exposure to oxidative stress or heat shock. Incubation of NIH 3T3 fibroblasts with cycloheximide prevents both synthesis of CL100 and inactivation of p42mapk after stimulation with serum. RESULTS Depleting cells of CL100 and preventing its induction using cycloheximide stopped the inactivation of p42mapk in Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts following stimulation with epidermal growth factor (EGF), but had no effect on the rapid inactivation of p42mapk in response to EGF in adipose (3T3-L1) or chromaffin (PC12) cells or in response to platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) in endothelial (PAE) cells. Moreover, maximal induction of CL100 mRNA and a CL100-like activity did not trigger inactivation of p42mapk, which was sustained at a high level after stimulation of PC12 cells with nerve growth factor, PAE cells with serum, or Swiss 3T3 cells with PDGF. Dephosphorylation of Tyr 185 but not Thr 183 of p42mapk was suppressed by vanadate in EGF-stimulated PC12 cells; dephosphorylation of Thr 183, by contrast, was elicited by a vanadate-insensitive activity. Protein phosphatase-2A was the only vanadate-insensitive phosphatase acting on Thr 183 of p42mapk or on MAPKK to be detected in PC12 cell extracts. Phosphorylation of Thr 183 also inhibited the dephosphorylation of Tyr 185 in vitro by the major vanadate-sensitive Tyr 185-specific phosphatase, explaining why dephosphorylation of Thr 183 is rate-limiting for p42mapk inactivation in PC12 cells after stimulation with EGF. CONCLUSIONS The rapid inactivation of p42mapk initiated five minutes after stimulation of endothelial, adipose and chromaffin cells with growth factor is not catalysed by CL100, but rather by protein phosphatase 2A and by a protein tyrosine phosphatase distinct from CL100. Induction of CL100 is not accompanied by the inactivation of p42mapk in a number of situations.

Dual-specificity MAP kinase phosphatases (MKPs) and cancer

There are ten mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphatases (MKPs) that act as negative regulators of MAPK activity in mammalian cells and these can be subdivided into three groups. The first comprises DUSP1/MKP-1, DUSP2/PAC1, DUSP4/MKP-2 and DUSP5/hVH-3, which are inducible nuclear phosphatases. With the exception of DUSP5, these MKPs display a rather broad specificity for inactivation of the ERK, p38 and JNK MAP kinases. The second group contains three closely related ERK-specific and cytoplasmic MKPs encoded by DUSP6/MKP-3, DUSP7/MKP-X and DUSP9/MKP-4. The final group consists of three MKPs DUSP8/hVH-5, DUSP10/MKP-5 and DUSP16/MKP-7 all of which preferentially inactivate the stress-activated p38 and JNK MAP kinases. Abnormal MAPK signalling will have important consequences for processes critical to the development and progression of human cancer. In addition, MAPK signalling also plays a key role in determining the response of tumour cells to conventional cancer therapies. The emerging roles of the dual-specificity MKPs in the regulation of MAPK activities in normal tissues has highlighted the possible pathophysiological consequences of either loss (or gain) of function of these enzymes as part of the oncogenic process. This review summarises the current evidence implicating the dual-specificity MKPs in the initiation and development of cancer and also on the outcome of treatment.

Diverse physiological functions for dual-specificity MAP kinase phosphatases

A structurally distinct subfamily of ten dual-specificity (Thr/Tyr) protein phosphatases is responsible for the regulated dephosphorylation and inactivation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family members in mammals. These MAPK phosphatases (MKPs) interact specifically with their substrates through a modular kinase-interaction motif (KIM) located within the N-terminal non-catalytic domain of the protein. In addition, MAPK binding is often accompanied by enzymatic activation of the C-terminal catalytic domain, thus ensuring specificity of action. Despite our knowledge of the biochemical and structural basis for the catalytic mechanism of the MKPs, we know much less about their regulation and physiological functions in mammalian cells and tissues. However, recent studies employing a range of model systems have begun to reveal essential non-redundant roles for the MKPs in determining the outcome of MAPK signalling in a variety of physiological contexts. These include development, immune system function, metabolic homeostasis and the regulation of cellular stress responses. Interestingly, these functions may reflect both restricted subcellular MKP activity and changes in the levels of signalling through multiple MAPK pathways.

Dual-specificity MAP kinase phosphatases (MKPs) Shaping the outcome of MAP kinase signalling

Dual‐specificity MAP kinase phosphatases (MKPs) provide a complex negative regulatory network that acts to shape the duration, magnitude and spatiotemporal profile of MAP kinase activities in response to both physiological and pathological stimuli. Individual MKPs may exhibit either exquisite specificity towards a single mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) isoform or be able to regulate multiple MAPK pathways in a single cell or tissue. They can act as negative feedback regulators of MAPK activity, but can also provide mechanisms of crosstalk between distinct MAPK pathways and between MAPK signalling and other intracellular signalling modules. In this review, we explore the current state of knowledge with respect to the regulation of MKP expression levels and activities, the mechanisms by which individual MKPs recognize and interact with different MAPK isoforms and their role in the spatiotemporal regulation of MAPK signalling.

Oxidant stress leads to transcriptional activation of the human heme oxygenase gene in cultured skin fibroblasts

Treatment of cultured human skin fibroblasts with near-UV radiation, hydrogen peroxide, and sodium arsenite induces accumulation of heme oxygenase mRNA and protein. In this study, these treatments led to a dramatic increase in the rate of RNA transcription from the heme oxygenase gene but had no effect on mRNA stability. Transcriptional activation, therefore, appears to be the major mechanism of stimulation of expression of this gene by either oxidative stress or sulfydryl reagents.

Transcriptional induction of MKP-1 in response to stress is associated with histone H3 phosphorylation-acetylation.

ABSTRACT Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase phosphatase 1 (MKP-1) has been shown to play a critical role in mediating the feedback control of MAP kinase cascades in a variety of cellular processes, including proliferation and stress responsiveness. Although MKP-1expression is induced by a broad array of extracellular stimuli, the mechanisms mediating its induction remain poorly understood. Here we show that MKP-1 mRNA was potently induced by arsenite and ultraviolet light and modestly increased by heat shock and hydrogen peroxide. Interestingly, arsenite also dramatically induces phosphorylation-acetylation of histone H3 at a global level which precedes the induction of MKP-1 mRNA. The transcriptional induction of MKP-1, histone H3 modification, and elevation in MKP-1 mRNA in response to arsenite are all partially prevented by the p38 MAP kinase inhibitor SB203580, suggesting that the p38 pathway is involved in these processes. Finally, analysis of the DNA brought down by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) reveals that arsenite induces phosphorylation-acetylation of histone H3 associated with the MKP-1 gene and enhances binding of RNA polymerase II to MKP-1 chromatin. ChIP assays following exposure to other stress agents reveal various degrees of histone H3 modification at the MKP-1 chromatin. The differential contribution of p38 and ERK MAP kinases in mediating MKP-1 induction by different stress agents further illustrates the complexity and versatility of stress-induced MKP-1 expression. Our results strongly suggest that chromatin remodeling after stress contributes to the transcriptional induction of MKP-1.