Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Stephen O. Dean is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Stephen O. Dean.


Journal of Fusion Energy | 2002

A plan for the development of fusion energy

R.J. Goldston; Mohamed A. Abdou; Charles C. Baker; Michael Campbell; V.S. Chan; Stephen O. Dean; A. Hubbard; Robert Lotti Iotti; Thomas R. Jarboe; J. D. Lindl; B. Grant Logan; K.A. McCarthy; F. Najmabadi; C.L. Olson; Stewart C. Prager; Ned Sauthoff; J. D. Sethian; John Sheffield; S.J. Zinkle

This is the final report of a panel set up by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (FESAC) in response to a charge letter dated September 10, 2002 from Dr. Ray Orbach, Director of the DOEs Office of Science. In that letter, Dr. Orbach asked FESAC to develop a plan with the end goal of the start of operation of a demonstration power plant in approximately 35 years. This report, submitted March 5, 2003, presents such a plan, leading to commercial application of fusion energy by mid-century. The plan is derived from the necessary features of a demonstration fusion power plant and from the time scale defined by President Bush. It identifies critical milestones, key decision points, needed major facilities and required budgets. The report also responds to a request from DOE to FESAC to describe what new or upgraded fusion facilities will “best serve our purposes” over a time frame of the next twenty years.


Journal of Fusion Energy | 1998

Fusion Power by Magnetic Confinement Program Plan

Stephen O. Dean

This report has been available previously only as Volume I of a 5-volume U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Report ERDA-76/110 (1976). It was the first comprehensive U.S fusion development plan. It treats the technical, schedular and budgetary projections for the development of fusion power using magnetic confinement. It provided the basis for the U. S. fusion facility and funding commitments during the latter half of the 1970s and is published now to archive its historical significance.


Journal of Fusion Energy | 1998

Status and Objectives of Tokamak Systems for Fusion Research

Stephen O. Dean; James D. Callen; Harold P. Furth; J. F. Clarke; T. Ohkawa; P. H. Rutherford

This report had its beginnings at the Third International Symposium on Toroidal Plasma Confinement held in Garching/Munich, Federal Republic of Germany, March 26–30, 1973. The American scientists who attended this conference agreed to assist in preparing a summary of the status of the field. Since that time, the authors of this report have had the opportunity to incorporate progress reported at the VI European Conference on Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, held in Moscow, U.S.S.R., from July 29 to August 3, 1973. The report has been available previously only as U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Report WASH-1295 (1974). It was the first comprehensive survey of the status of the tokamak fusion research concept, which was to become the cornerstone of the world fusion effort for the next quarter century. It provided the basis for the rapid buildup of the U.S. tokamak program during the latter half of the 1970s and is published now to archive its historical significance.


Journal of Fusion Energy | 1991

An accelerated fusion power development plan

Stephen O. Dean; Charles C. Baker; Daniel R. Cohn; Susan D. Kinkead

Energy for electricity and transportation is a national issue with worldwide environmental and political implications. The world must have energy options for the next century that are not vulnerable to possible disruption for technical, environmental, public confidence, or other reasons. Growing concerns about the greenhouse effect and the safety of transporting oil may lead to reduced burning of coal and other fossil fuels, and the incidents at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl, as well as nuclear waste storage problems, have eroded public acceptance of nuclear fission. Meeting future world energy needs will require improvements in energy efficiency and conservation. However, the world will soon need new central station power plants and increasing amounts of fuel for the transportation sector. The use of fossil fuels, and possibly even fission power, will very likely be restricted because of environmental, safety, and, eventually, supply considerations. Time is running out for policymakers. New energy technologies cannot be brought to the marketplace overnight. Decades are required to bring a new energy production technology from conception to full market penetration. With the added urgency to mitigate deleterious environmental effects of energy use, policymakers must act decisively now to establish and support vigorous energy technology development programs. The U.S. has invested


Journal of Fusion Energy | 1995

Applications of plasma and fusion research

Stephen O. Dean

8 billion over the past 40 years in fusion research and development. If the U.S. fusion program proceeds according to its present strategy, an additional 40 years, and more money, will be expended before fusion will provide commercial electricity. Such an extended schedule is neither cost-effective nor technically necessary. It is time to launch a national venture to construct and operate a fusion power pilot plant. Such a plant could be operational within 15 years of a national commitment to proceed.


Journal of Fusion Energy | 1988

Commercial objectives, technology transfer, and systems analysis for fusion power development

Stephen O. Dean

Plasma and other technologies developed in part by fusion energy research programs are being used in a wide variety of commerical and other applications. Applications include efficient production of advanced semiconductor chips and integrated circuits; deposition of anticorrosion and other types of coating; improvements in materials for a wide variety of applications; new techniques for cleaning up and biological applications; improvements in a wide variety of related technologies, such as isotope separation, microwave sources, cryogenics and superconductivity, and optics; new technologies, such as light sources and digital radar; and contributions to many areas of basis science, such as space physics and supercomputing.


Journal of Fusion Energy | 1998

Lessons Drawn from ITER and Other Fusion International Collaborations

Stephen O. Dean

Fusion is an essentially inexhaustible source of energy that has the potential for economically attractive commercial applications with excellent safety and environmental characteristics. The primary focus for the fusion-energy development program is the generation of centralstation electricity. Fusion has the potential, however, for many other applications. The fact that a large fraction of the energy released in a DT fusion reaction is carried by high-energy neutrons suggests potentially unique applications. These include breeding of fissile fuels, production of hydrogen and other chemical products, transmutation or “burning” of various nuclear or chemical wastes, radiation processing of materials, production of radioisotopes, food preservation, medical diagnosis and medical treatment, and space power and space propulsion. In addition, fusion R&D will lead to new products and new markets.Each fusion application must meet certain standards of economic and safety and environmental attractiveness. For this reason, economics on the one hand, and safety and environment and licensing on the other hand, are the two primary criteria for setting long-range commercial fusion objectives. A major function of systems analysis is to evaluate the potential of fusion against these objectives and to help guide the fusion R&D program toward practical applications. The transfer of fusion technology and skills from the national laboratories and universities to industry is the key to achieving the long-range objective of commercial fusion applications.


Journal of Fusion Energy | 1992

Pilot plant: An affordable step toward fusion power

Stephen O. Dean; Charles C. Baker; Daniel R. Cohn; D. P. Dautovich; W. R. Ellis; W. G. Morison

The international character of fusion research and development is described, with special emphasis on the ITER (International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor) joint venture. The history of the ITER collaboration is traced. Lessons drawn that may prove useful for future ventures are presented.


Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences | 1975

Confinement of laser-produced plasma in resonant cavities by rf electromagnetic fields

Stephen O. Dean

Progress is reported on a study to define a “pilot plant” to demonstrate the production of high grade heat in a fusion power plant configuration at the lowest possible capital cost. We are considering several driven reactor tokamak designs with fusion power production levels in the 15–50 MWth range, using demountable copper coils. We conclude that it is acceptable for such facilities to be net consumers of electricity as a trade-off to achieve low capital cost, which we estimate to be in the


Journal of Fusion Energy | 1992

Report of panel 3: Concept improvement

Stephen O. Dean; B. H. Ripin; Don Batchelor; Klaus Berkner; William R. Ellis; K. W. Gentle; S.M. Kaye; B. Grant Logan; E. Marmar; Gerald A. Navratil; N. F. Ness; Tihiro Ohkawa; Richard E. Siemon; D. Steiner; Harold Weitzner

1 billion range. These designs are based on currently accepted physics models. Even lower cost designs may be possible, if we depart somewhat from the current physics database.

Collaboration


Dive into the Stephen O. Dean's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Sheffield

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charles C. Baker

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Harold Weitzner

Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

B. Grant Logan

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

B. H. Ripin

United States Naval Research Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

N. F. Ness

University of Delaware

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C.L. Olson

Sandia National Laboratories

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge