Stephen P. Miller

Expression of the yeast glycogen phosphorylase gene is regulated by stress-response elements and by the HOG MAP kinase pathway

Yeast glycogen metabolism responds to environmental stressors such as nutrient limitation and heat shock. This response is mediated, in part, by the regulation of the glycogen metabolic genes. Environmental stressors induce a number of glycogen metabolic genes, including GPH1, which encodes glycogen phosphorylase. Primer extension analysis detected two start sites for GPH1, one of which predominated. Sequences upstream of these sites included a possible TATA element. Mutation of this sequence reduced GPH1 expression by a factor of 10 but did not affect start site selection. This mutation also did not affect the relative induction of GPH1 upon entry into stationary phase. Three candidates for stress response elements (STREs) were found upstream of the TATA sequence. Mutation of the STREs showed that they were required for regulation of GPH1 expression in early stationary phase, and in response to osmotic shock and heat shock. These elements appeared to act synergistically, since the intact promoter exhibited 30‐fold more expression in stationary phase than the sum of that observed for each element acting independently. HOG1, which encodes a MAP kinase, has been implicated in control mediated by STREs. For GPH1, induction by osmotic shock depended on a functional HOG1 allele. In contrast, induction upon entry into stationary phase was only partially dependent on HOG1. Furthermore, the heat shock response, which can also be mediated by STREs, was independent of HOG1. These observations suggest that the GPH1 STREs respond to more than one pathway, only one of which requires HOG1. Copyright

The ribosomes of Aspergillus giganteus are sensitive to the cytotoxic action of α‐sarcin

Ribosomes in lysates prepared from the mycelia of Aspergillus giganteus MDH 18894, which are actively secreting α‐sarcin, do not contain the α‐sarcin lesion. However, the addition of exogenous α‐sarcin to these same lysates results in cleavage of the 26 S rRNA of the 60 S ribosomal subunit, characteristic of the cytotoxic action of α‐sarcin. We conclude that A. giganteus ribosomes are not inherently resistant to the action of α‐sarcin but are protected in vivo by producing α‐sarcin in an inactive form and/or by the efficient cotranslational secretion of the toxin.

Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Kinase/Phosphatase KINETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE WILD-TYPE AND TWO MUTANT PROTEINS

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) of Escherichia coli is regulated by a bifunctional protein, IDH kinase/phosphatase. In addition to the kinase and phosphatase activities, this protein catalyzes an intrinsic ATPase reaction. The initial velocity kinetics of these activities exhibited extensive similarities. IDH kinase and phosphatase both yielded intersecting double-reciprocal plots. In addition, we observed similar values for the kinetic constants describing interactions of the kinase and phosphatase with their protein substrates and the interactions of all three activities with ATP. In contrast, while the maximum velocities of IDH kinase and IDH phosphatase were nearly equal, they were 10-fold less than the maximum velocity of the ATPase. Although the IDH phosphatase reaction required either ATP or ADP, it was not supported by the nonhydrolyzable ATP analogue 5′-adenylyl imidodiphosphate. The kinetic properties of wild-type IDH kinase/phosphatase were compared with those of two mutant derivatives of this protein. The mutations in these proteins selectively inhibit IDH phosphatase activity. Inhibition of IDH phosphatase resulted from three factors: decreases in the maximum velocities, reduced affinities for phospho-IDH, and a loss of coupling between ATP and phospho-IDH. These mutations also affected the properties of IDH kinase, increasing the maximum velocities and decreasing the affinities for ATP and phospho-IDH. The intrinsic ATPase activities also exhibited reduced affinity for ATP. These results are discussed in the context of a model which proposes that all three activities occur at the same active site.

Locations of the Regulatory Sites for Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Kinase/Phosphatase

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1 ofEscherichia coli is regulated by a bifunctional protein, IDH kinase/phosphatase. In this paper, we demonstrate that the effectors controlling these activities belong to two distinct classes that differ in mechanism and in the locations of their binding sites. NADPH and isocitrate are representative members of one of these effector classes. NADPH inhibits both IDH kinase and IDH phosphatase, whereas isocitrate inhibits only IDH kinase. Isocitrate can “activate” IDH phosphatase by reversing product inhibition by dephospho-IDH. Mutations in icd, which encodes IDH, had parallel effects on the binding of these ligands to the IDH active site and on their effects on IDH kinase and phosphatase, indicating that these ligands regulate IDH kinase/phosphatase through the IDH active site. Kinetic analyses suggested that isocitrate and NADPH prevent formation of the complex between IDH kinase/phosphatase and its protein substrate. AMP, 3-phosphoglycerate, and pyruvate represent a class of regulatory ligands that is distinct from that which includes isocitrate and NADPH. These ligands bind directly to IDH kinase/phosphatase, a conclusion which is supported by the observation that they inhibit the IDH-independent ATPase activity of this enzyme. These effector classes can also be distinguished by the observation that mutant derivatives of IDH kinase/phosphatase expressed from aceK3 andaceK4 exhibited dramatic changes in their responses to AMP, 3-phosphoglycerate, and pyruvate but not to NADPH and isocitrate.

Evolution of a Transition State: Role of Lys100 in the Active Site of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase

An active site lysine essential to catalysis in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) is absent from related enzymes. As all family members catalyze the same oxidative β‐decarboxylation at the (2R)‐malate core common to their substrates, it seems odd that an amino acid essential to one is not found in all. Ordinarily, hydride transfer to a nicotinamide C4 neutralizes the positive charge at N1 directly. In IDH, the negatively charged C4‐carboxylate of isocitrate stabilizes the ground state positive charge on the adjacent nicotinamide N1, opposing hydride transfer. The critical lysine is poised to stabilize—and perhaps even protonate—an oxyanion formed on the nicotinamide 3‐carboxamide, thereby enabling the hydride to be transferred while the positive charge at N1 is maintained. IDH might catalyze the same overall reaction as other family members, but dehydrogenation proceeds through a distinct, though related, transition state. Partial activation of lysine mutants by K+ and NH4+ represents a throwback to the primordial state of the first promiscuous substrate family member.