Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Stephen T. Schram is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Stephen T. Schram.


Journal of Great Lakes Research | 1995

Lake Trout (Salvelinus namaycush) Populations in Lake Superior and Their Restoration in 1959–1993

Michael J. Hansen; James W. Peck; Richard G. Schorfhaar; James H. Selgeby; Donald R. Schreiner; Stephen T. Schram; Bruce L. Swanson; Wayne R. MacCallum; Mary K. Burnham-Curtis; Gary L. Curtis; John W. Heinrich; Robert J. Young

Naturally-reproducing populations of lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) have been reestablished in most of Lake Superior, but have not been restored to 1929-1943 average abundance. Progress toward lake trout restoration in Lake Superior is described, management actions are reviewed, and the effectiveness of those actions is evaluated; especially stocking lake trout as a tool for building spawning stocks, and subsequently, populations of wild recruits. Widespread destruction of lake trout stocks in the 1950s due to an intense fishery and sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) predation resulted in lower overall phenotypic diversity than was previously present. Stocking of yearling lake trout, begun in the 1950s, produced high densities of spawners that reproduced wherever inshore spawning habitat was widespread. Sea lampreys were greatly reduced, beginning in 1961, using selective chemical toxicants and barrier dams, but continue to exert substantial mortality. Fishery regulation was least effective in Wisconsin, where excessive gillnet effort caused high by-catch of lake trout until 1991, and in eastern Michigan, where lake trout restoration was deferred in favor of a tribal fishery for lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) in 1985. Restoration of stocks was quicker in offshore areas where remnant wild lake trout survived and fishing intensity was low, and was slower in inshore areas where stocked lake trout reproduced successfully and fishing intensity was high. Inshore stocks of wild lake trout are currently about 61 % of historic abundance in Michigan and 53% in Wisconsin. Direct comparison of modern and historic abundances of inshore lake trout stocks in Minnesota and Ontario is impossible due to lack of historic stock assessment data. Stocks in Minnesota are less abundant at present than in Michigan or Wisconsin, and stocks in Ontario are similar to those in Michigan. Further progress in stock recovery can only be achieved if sea lampreys are depressed and if fisheries are constrained further than at present.


Journal of Great Lakes Research | 1995

Population Recovery and Natural Recruitment of Lake Trout at Gull Island Shoal, Lake Superior, 1964–1992

Stephen T. Schram; James H. Selgeby; Charles R. Bronte; Bruce L. Swanson

We documented an increase in the abundance of wild lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) at Gull Island Shoal in western Lake Superior and examined the relationship between parental-stock size and recruitment of age-0 fish in 1964–1992. Abundance of adult wild female lake trout and densities of age-0 fish both increased during the 28-year period. A significant positive, linear relationship (P = 0.0002) was found between the abundance of wild females on the spawning reef in the fall and density of age-0 lake trout on adjacent nursery grounds in August and September of the following year. The abundance of hatchery-origin females did not explain significant amounts (P = 0.107) of variation in recruitment. We concluded that most recruitment in 1965–1992 was the result of natural reproduction of wild females. After 28 years of recovery the Gull Island Shoal lake trout population appears to have additional capacity to increase because the stock-recruitment relationship is still linear. Therefore, restoration periods on the order of 30 years may be needed for other lake trout populations in the Great Lakes. We recommend that the refuge established to protect this population be maintained to allow further study of the relationship between parental stock and recruitment, and to provide a major source of recruitment to the lake trout population in the surrounding waters.


North American Journal of Fisheries Management | 1999

Reintroduction of Lake Sturgeon in the St. Louis River, Western Lake Superior

Stephen T. Schram; John Lindgren; Lori M. Evrard

Abstract Lake sturgeon Acipenser fulvescens declined in abundance in Lake Superiors St. Louis River during the late 1800s and were eliminated from the river during the early 1900s because of the combined effects of exploitation, pollution, and habitat alteration. Since then, exploitation in the river and in Lake Superior has been reduced. Furthermore, water quality in the St. Louis River has improved, and its upper-estuary spawning habitat has remained relatively unchanged and adequate. Lake sturgeon have been stocked annually in the St. Louis River since 1983; from 1983 to 1994 stockings included 736,000 fry, 128,000 fingerlings, and 500 yearlings of the Lake Winnebago strain. Relative abundance, distribution, and growth were determined by sampling marked fish in the St. Louis River estuary and western Lake Superior with graded-mesh gill nets and bottom trawls. During 1983–1998, 644 lake sturgeon were caught in 15,486 m of gill net, and 196 were caught in 1,200 trawl tows. Lake sturgeon were sampled mos...


Journal of Great Lakes Research | 2007

Diet and Prey Selection by Lake Superior Lake Trout during Spring, 1986–2001

Bradley A. Ray; Thomas R. Hrabik; Mark P. Ebener; Owen T. Gorman; Donald R. Schreiner; Stephen T. Schram; William P. Mattes; Charles R. Bronte

ABSTRACT We describe the diet and prey selectivity of lean (Salvelinus namaycush namaycush) and siscowet lake trout (S. n. siscowet) collected during spring (April–June) from Lake Superior during 1986–2001. We estimated prey selectivity by comparing prey numerical abundance estimates from spring bottom trawl surveys and lake trout diet information in similar areas from spring gill net surveys conducted annually in Lake Superior. Rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax) was the most common prey and was positively selected by both lean and siscowet lake trout throughout the study. Selection by lean lake trout for coregonine (Coregonus spp.) prey increased after 1991 and corresponded with a slight decrease in selection for rainbow smelt. Siscowet positively selected for rainbow smelt after 1998, a change that was coincident with the decrease in selection for this prey item by lean lake trout. However, diet overlap between lean and siscowet lake trout was not strong and did not change significantly over the study period. Rainbow smelt remains an important prey species for lake trout in Lake Superior despite declines in abundance.


North American Journal of Fisheries Management | 2009

A Synthesis of Cisco Recovery in Lake Superior: Implications for Native Fish Rehabilitation in the Laurentian Great Lakes

Jason D. Stockwell; Mark P. Ebener; Jeff A. Black; Owen T. Gorman; Thomas R. Hrabik; Ronald E. Kinnunen; William P. Mattes; Jason K. Oyadomari; Stephen T. Schram; Donald R. Schreiner; Michael J. Seider; Shawn P. Sitar; Daniel L. Yule

Abstract Populations of cisco Coregonus artedi in the Laurentian Great Lakes supported large-scale commercial fisheries and were the primary forage of piscivores during the first half of the 20th century. However, by 1970 populations had collapsed in all of the lakes. Since then, ciscoes have staged a recovery in Lake Superior. In this synthesis, we describe the status of ciscoes in Lake Superior during 1970–2006 and provide a comprehensive review of their ecology. Better understanding of age estimation techniques, application of hydroacoustic and midwater trawl sampling, and compilation of long-term data sets have advanced our understanding of the species. Management agencies contemplating rehabilitation of cisco populations should recognize that (1) knowledge of cisco ecology and population dynamics is increasing; (2) ciscoes are long-lived; (3) Great Lakes populations are probably composed of both shallow-water and deepwater spawning forms; (4) large year-classes can be produced from small adult stocks...


Transactions of The American Fisheries Society | 2003

Trophic relationships among lean and Siscowet Lake trout in Lake Superior

Chris J. Harvey; Stephen T. Schram; James F. Kitchell

Abstract Lake trout Salvelinus namaycush occur in several different morphotypes in Lake Superior, including nearshore “leans” and deepwater “siscowets.” Siscowets, which are highly abundant and commercially undesirable, have been hypothesized to constrain populations of the more desirable lean lake trout through competition for prey. The stable isotope ratios (δ13C and δ15N) of leans and siscowets differed in several regions of U.S. waters, implying differences in both production base and trophic level. Spatial differences were partly a result of large-scale variation in food web structure, as stable isotope analysis of fishes in the genus Coregonus revealed different site-to-site patterns. In western Lake Superior, δ13C was similar among small leans and siscowets (implying a common production base) but diverged as the fish grew larger. The value of δ15N was greater for siscowets than for leans at all sizes, further implying that siscowets feed on a different prey assemblage than leans and are preying on ...


Journal of Great Lakes Research | 2005

Hydroacoustic estimates of abundance and spatial distribution of pelagic prey fishes in Western Lake Superior

Doran M. Mason; Timothy B. Johnson; Chris J. Harvey; James F. Kitchell; Stephen T. Schram; Charles R. Bronte; Michael H. Hoff; Stephen J. Lozano; Anett S. Trebitz; Donald R. Schreiner; E. Conrad Lamon; Thomas R. Hrabik

Lake herring (Coregonus artedi) and rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax) are a valuable prey resource for the recovering lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) in Lake Superior. However, prey biomass may be insufficient to support the current predator demand. In August 1997, we assessed the abundance and spatial distribution of pelagic coregonines and rainbow smelt in western Lake Superior by combining a 120 kHz split beam acoustics system with midwater trawls. Coregonines comprised the majority of the midwater trawl catches and the length distributions for trawl caught fish coincided with estimated sizes of acoustic targets. Overall mean pelagic prey fish biomass was 15.56 kg ha−1 with the greatest fish biomass occurring in the Apostle Islands region (27.98 kg ha−1), followed by the Duluth Minnesota region (20.22 kg ha−1), and with the lowest biomass occurring in the open waters of western Lake Superior (9.46 kg ha−1). Biomass estimates from hydroacoustics were typically 2–134 times greater than estimates derived from spring bottom trawl surveys. Prey fish biomass for Lake Superior is about order of magnitude less than acoustic estimates for Lakes Michigan and Ontario. Discrepancies observed between bioenergetics-based estimates of predator consumption of coregonines and earlier coregonine biomass estimates may be accounted for by our hydroacoustic estimates.


Journal of Great Lakes Research | 2004

Reconstructing Habitat Use and Wetland Nursery Origin of Yellow Perch from Lake Superior using Otolith Elemental Analysis

John C. Brazner; Steven E. Campana; Danny K. Tanner; Stephen T. Schram

Abstract The use of otolith elemental composition as a natural tag has emerged as a powerful tool for managing and understanding the ecology of marine fish populations. The approach remains relatively untested in fresh waters, so we examined its utility for reconstructing habitat use and wetland nursery origin in Lake Superior. We analyzed the otolith margin of adult yellow perch, Perca flavescens , as an indicator of recently occupied habitat, and the juvenile region of the otolith core as an indicator of nursery area. To characterize elemental fingerprints, all otolith samples were analyzed for Ca and 13 minor and trace elements using mass spectrometry. We found differences in the otolith concentrations of several elements between yellow perch inhabiting coastal wetlands and those inhabiting the adjacent nearshore waters of Chequamegon Bay. The most striking difference was the high concentration of Sr in the sagittal margins of wetland-caught fish relative to those captured in the bay. Based on differences in otolith Sr concentrations alone, fish from bay and wetland habitats could be distinguished with 100% accuracy. We also found that elemental fingerprints derived from otolith cores of adult yellow perch were similar among fish captured from wetlands adjacent to Chequamegon Bay but quite distinct for one site outside of the bay, suggesting these fish came from a separate population from those in Chequamegon Bay. Overall, these results encourage us that elemental fingerprinting techniques will be useful for estimating the relative importance of different coastal wetland habitats to wetland-dependent species in the Great Lakes.


Transactions of The American Fisheries Society | 1996

Causes of Declining Survival of Lake Trout Stocked in U.S. Waters of Lake Superior in 1963-1986

Michael J. Hansen; Mark P. Ebener; Richard G. Schorfhaar; Stephen T. Schram; Donald R. Schreiner; James H. Selgeby; William W. Taylor

Abstract Survival of the 1963–1982 year-classes of stocked yearling lake trout Salvelinus namaycush declined significantly over time in Lake Superior. To investigate possible causes of this decline, a Ricker model of stock–recruitment was used to describe the catch per effort (CPE) of age-7 stocked lake trout in the Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin waters of Lake Superior as functions of the numbers of yearlings stocked 6 years earlier (an index of density dependence), the density (CPE) of wild adult lake trout (an index of predation), and large-mesh (≥114-mm stretch-measure) gill-net fishing effort (an index of fishing mortality). Declining CPE of stocked lake trout in Michigan and Wisconsin was significantly associated with increasing large-mesh gill-net fishing effort. Declining CPE of stocked lake trout in Minnesota was significantly associated with increasing density of wild lake trout. Declining survival of stocked lake trout may therefore have been caused by increased mortality in large-mesh gill...


Transactions of The American Fisheries Society | 1996

Comparison of Three Nonlinear Models to Describe Long-Term Tag Shedding by Lake Trout

Mary C. Fabrizio; Bruce L. Swanson; Stephen T. Schram; Michael H. Hoff

Abstract We estimated long-term tag-shedding rates for lake trout Salvelinus namaycush using two existing models and a model we developed to account for the observed permanence of some tags. Because tag design changed over the course of the study, we examined tag-shedding rates for three types of numbered anchor tags (Floy tags FD-67, FD-67C, and FD-68BC) and an unprinted anchor tag (FD-67F). Lake trout from the Gull Island Shoal region, Lake Superior, were double-tagged, and subsequent recaptures were monitored in annual surveys conducted from 1974 to 1992. We modeled tag-shedding rates, using time at liberty and probabilities of tag shedding estimated from fish released in 1974 and 1978–1983 and later recaptured. Long-term shedding of numbered anchor tags in lake trout was best described by a nonlinear model with two parameters: an instantaneous tag-shedding rate and a constant representing the proportion of tags that were never shed. Although our estimates of annual shedding rates varied with tag type ...

Collaboration


Dive into the Stephen T. Schram's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Donald R. Schreiner

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bruce L. Swanson

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James F. Kitchell

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark P. Ebener

University of Wisconsin–Stevens Point

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charles R. Bronte

Great Lakes Science Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Doran M. Mason

Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mary C. Fabrizio

Great Lakes Science Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard G. Schorfhaar

Michigan Department of Natural Resources

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge