Steve Angyalfi

Implanted brachytherapy seed movement reflecting transrectal ultrasound probe-induced prostate deformation

PURPOSE Compression of the prostate during transrectal ultrasound-guided permanent prostate brachytherapy is not accounted for during treatment planning. Dosimetry effects are expected to be small but have not been reported. The study aims to characterize the seed movement and prostate deformation due to probe pressure and to estimate the effects on dosimetry. METHODS AND MATERIALS C-arm fluoroscopy imaging was performed to reconstruct the implanted seed distributions (compressed and relaxed prostate) for 10 patients immediately after implantation. The compressed prostate was delineated on ultrasound and registered to the fluoroscopy-derived seed distribution via manual seed localization. Thin-plate spline mapping, generated with implanted seeds as control points, was used to characterize the deformation field and to infer the prostate contour in the absence of probe compression. Differences in TG-43 dosimetry for the compressed prostate and that on probe removal were calculated. RESULTS Systematic seed movement patterns were observed on probe removal. Elastic decompression was characterized by expansion in the anterior-posterior direction and contraction in the superior-inferior and lateral directions up to 4 mm. Bilateral shearing in the anterior direction was up to 6 mm, resulting in contraction of the 145 Gy prescription isodose line by 2 mm with potential consequences for the posterior-lateral margin. The average whole prostate D90 increased by 2% of prescription dose (6% max; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The current investigation presents a novel study on ultrasound probe-induced deformation. Seed movements were characterized, and the associated dosimetry effects were nonnegligible, contrary to common expectation.

Is tissue harmonic ultrasound imaging (THI) of the prostatic urethra and rectum superior to brightness (B) mode imaging? An observer study.

Quality ultrasound images are an essential part of prostate brachytherapy procedure. The authors have previously reported that tissue harmonic ultrasound images (THI) are superior to brightness (B) mode for the prostate. The objective of the current study was to compare both imaging modes for visualization of the prostatic urethra and rectum. B and THI mode transrectal ultrasound images were acquired for ten patients. The prostatic urethra and rectal wall were contoured by a radiation oncologist (RO) and five observers on randomly presented images. The contours on one patient were repeated four additional times by four observers. All the images were qualitatively scored using a five-level Likert scale. The values of the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients showed that the observers were in close agreement with the RO. Two sample paired student t-test showed that the rectum volumes with THI were significantly smaller than B-mode, but no significant difference for urethra. Two-factor analysis of variances showed significant observer variability in defining the rectum and urethra in both imaging modes. Observer consistency of the rectum volumes, estimated by standard deviations as percentages of means was significantly improved for THI. The Likert scale based qualitative assessment supported quantitative observations. The significant improvement in image quality of the prostate (reported previously) and rectum with THI may offer better-quality treatment plans for prostate brachytherapy and potential improvement in local control.

Parameters predicting for prostate specific antigen response rates at one year post low-dose-rate intraoperative prostate brachytherapy

Purpose To develop a model for prostate specific antigen (PSA) values at one year among patients treated with intraoperatively planned 125I prostate brachytherapy (IOPB). Material and methods Four hundred and deven patients treated with IOPB for prostate adenocarcinoma were divided into four groups: those with PSA values ≥ 3 ng/ml; < 3 and ≥ 2; < 2 and ≥ 1 or PSA < 1 between 10.5 and 14.5 months post implantation (1yPSA). Ordinal regression analysis was then performed between patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. 1yPSA values were also compared with toxicity outcomes. Results Median 1yPSA was 0.77 (0.04-17.36). Thirty-two patients (8%) had a PSA ≥ 3; 35 (9%) had PSA < 3, ≥ 2; 87 (21%) had PSA < 2, ≥ 1, and most patients 254 (62%) had PSA < 1. PSA response was independent of gland volume, Gleason score, clinical stage, seed activity, V90, V200, D90, or number of needles and seeds used. Older patients had significantly lower 1yPSA; median ages 65.1 (46.5-81.0), 62.1 (50.4-79.5), 60.5 (47.1-80.3), and 58.1 (45.1-74.2) years for each of the 1yPSA groups respectively (p < 0.001). Also, both implant V150 (p < 0.001) and initial PSA values (p = 0.04) were predictive of 1yPSA values. There was no correlation between 1yPSA values and toxicity encountered. Conclusions PSA response at 1 year post IOPB appears to be dependent on patient age, initial PSA, and implant V150. Our results provide reassurance that parameters other than biochemical failure influence 1yPSA values.

WE-A-17A-11: Implanted Brachytherapy Seed Movement Due to Transrectal Ultrasound Probe-Induced Prostate Deformation

PURPOSE To characterize the movement of implanted brachytherapy seeds due to transrectal ultrasound probe-induced prostate deformation and to estimate the effects on prostate dosimetry. METHODS Implanted probe-in and probe-removed seed distributions were reconstructed for 10 patients using C-arm fluoroscopy imaging. The prostate was delineated on ultrasound and registered to the fluoroscopy seeds using a visible subset of seeds and residual needle tracks. A linear tensor and shearing model correlated the seed movement with position. The seed movement model was used to infer the underlying prostate deformation and to simulate the prostate contour without probe compression. Changes in prostate and surrogate urethra dosimetry were calculated. RESULTS Seed movement patterns reflecting elastic decompression, lateral shearing, and rectal bending were observed. Elastic decompression was characterized by anterior-posterior expansion and superior-inferior and lateral contractions. For lateral shearing, anterior movement up to 6 mm was observed for extraprostatic seeds in the lateral peripheral region. The average intra-prostatic seed movement was 1.3 mm, and the residual after linear modeling was 0.6 mm. Prostate D90 increased by 4 Gy on average (8 Gy max) and was correlated with elastic decompression. For selected patients, lateral shearing resulted in differential change in D90 of 7 Gy between anterior and posterior quadrants, and increase in whole prostate D90 of 4 Gy. Urethra D10 increased by 4 Gy. CONCLUSION Seed movement upon probe removal was characterized. The proposed model captured the linear correlation between seed movement and position. Whole prostate dose coverage increased slightly, due to the small but systematic seed movement associated with elastic decompression. Lateral shearing movement increased dose coverage in the anterior-lateral region, at the expense of the posterior-lateral region. The effect on whole prostate D90 was smaller due to the subset of peripheral seeds involved, but lateral shearing movement can have greater consequences for local dose coverage.

Poster — Thur Eve — 12: Dosimetric manifestation of harmonic mode imaging for seed implant brachytherapy

PURPOSE To demonstrate the dosimetric effects of observer variability in defining the prostate and critical organs, using Tissue Harmonic (H) ultrasound imaging mode for permanent seed implant brachytherapy. METHODS Images were acquired using a B -K medical 8848 probe with Brightness (B) and H mode for ten prostate brachytherapy patients. The prostate, rectum and urethra were contoured independently by five observers. The clinically used treatment plans based on B mode imaging fulfilling the dosimetric criteria were applied on these contours. Dosimetric parameters (prostate: D90, V100 and V200; rectum: V100; urethra: V140, V150 and V160) were computed using SPOT PRO™ planning system. Interobserver variability in dosimetric parameters was tested using standard deviations as percentages of means. RESULTS Two-factor analysis of variances showed significant (p<0.05) interobserver variability in all dosimetric parameters for both modes. Interobserver agreement in dosimetric parameters improves in H mode due to improved interobserver consistency in contouring these organs on H mode images compared to B mode. There is no significant difference observed (paired student t test, p>0.05) in the mean values of dosimetric parameters in H and B mode for prostate and critical organs. CONCLUSIONS H mode due to its better image quality helped to improve the interobserver agreement in contouring the prostate and critical organs and hence better interobserver consistency in all dosimetric parameter. Because the difference in the mean value of dosimetric parameters between two imaging modes is not statistically significant, H mode does not appear to offer any clinical advantages in terms of improving the dosimetric outcome.

SU‐E‐U‐06: Is Tissue Harmonic Ultrasound Imaging of the Prostate and Critical Organs Superior to B Mode Imaging? An Observer Study

Purpose: The objective of the current work is to assess the relative quality of tissue harmonic (H) transrectal ultrasoundimages of the prostate and neighbouring critical organs by comparing it with brightness (B) mode, using quantitative and qualitative statistical tools. Methods: Image sets containing prostate and critical organs were acquired using the B and H mode capable transrectal probe B‐K medical 8848, for ten patients undergoing radioactive seed implants at our centre. The prostate, urethra and rectum were contoured by a radiation oncologist (RO) and five similarly trained observers for all image sets. These observers also qualitatively scored randomly presented images using a five‐level Likert scale. The prostate, rectum and urethra volumes and qualitative scores of images were used for inter imaging mode comparison and observer group versus RO and among the observers (interobserver) studies. Results: Pearson correlation coefficients showed that all volumes outlined by observers were in close agreement with that of the RO. Two sample paired student t‐tests showed that the prostate (p=0.008) and rectum (p=0.009) volumes with H mode were significantly smaller than B mode. However there was no significant difference (p=0.29) in urethral volumes between the two modes. Interobserver consistency was estimated based on standard deviations as percentages of means. Two‐factor analysis of variances (ANOVA) showed significant interobserver variability (p<0.003) in defining the prostate and critical organs, in both imaging modes. Interobserver consistency for small prostates and rectum improved in H mode, but there is no significant improvement for the urethra. Qualitative assessment of image clarity agreed well with these quantitative observations. Conclusions: Except for the urethra, the volumes of prostates and critical organs defined with H mode are significantly smaller compared to B mode. H mode improves interobserver consistency in defining the prostate and rectum as a result of superior image clarity.