Steve B. Jungst
Auburn University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Steve B. Jungst.
Livestock Production Science | 2002
L. I. Chiba; Daryl L. Kuhlers; L.T Frobish; Steve B. Jungst; E.J Huff-Lonergan; S.M Lonergan; K.A Cummins
Sixty-four pigs, 32 selected for lean growth efficiency and 32 controls selected randomly, were used to investigate the effect of genotype and realimentation diets on growth performance and carcass quality of pigs subjected to marginal dietary restrictions during the grower phase. When pigs weighed approximately 20 kg, 16 pens containing two gilts and 16 pens containing two castrated males were randomly assigned within genetic lines to grower diets and finisher diets in a 2×2×2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Grower diets contained 0.421 or 0.765 g lysine/MJ DE, whereas finisher diets contained 0.421 or 0.612 g lysine/MJ DE. Genotype had no effect on growth performance, but select line pigs had better carcass quality (P≤0.05) and seemed to utilize amino acids more efficiently for growth than control line pigs as indicated by lower blood urea nitrogen (P≤0.07). During the grower phase, pigs fed the high-amino acid grower diet grew faster and more efficiently (P<0.01) and had less ultrasound backfat (P<0.001) than those fed the low-amino acid diet. Although some grower×finisher diet interactions were observed, there was no indication that pigs subjected to early amino acid restrictions exhibited compensatory weight gain, or had different amino acid requirements in the subsequent phase. The rate of lean accretion was similar between pigs fed the low- and high-amino acid grower diets regardless of genotype, indicating that compensatory lean tissue growth may have occurred in pigs subjected to early amino acid restrictions. Furthermore, restricted pigs had better feed efficiency in the subsequent phase, which may have a positive impact on the environment by reducing the excretion of unutilized nutrients. Select line pigs fed the low-amino acid grower diet had lower overall weight gain compared with other groups (genotype×grower, P<0.001). The results imply that pigs selected for lean growth efficiency may be less tolerant of early amino acid restrictions, and offering a grower diet containing adequate amino acids might be important in optimizing overall growth performance.
Livestock Production Science | 1988
Steve B. Jungst; Daryl L. Kuhlers; Joe A. Little
Longevity and maternal productivity of 83 Duroc-Landrace (DL), 86 Hampshire-Landrace (HL) and 87 Yorkshire-Landrace (YL) sows were evaluated. Half of the sows of each cross were penned by cross in pasture lots during gestation. The remaining sows were confined in individual-sow gestation stalls. The 3 crosses of sows were bred in all possible combinations to 16 Duroc, 19 Hampshire and 19 Yorkshire boars. Litter sizes and weights at birth, 21 and 56 days were summed across 4 parities for each sow to form maternal productivity variables for each stage of production. The 256 sows farrowed 844 litters. A greater percentage of HL sows confined in gestation stalls completed 4 lactations than confined YL sows (88.0 vs 69.8%, P < 0.10). In the pasture gestation system, more total live pigs were produced at birth, 21 and 56 days in 4 parities by DL (40.0, 32.5, 30.9) and HL (38.2, 30.9, 30.2) sows, respectively, than by YL (31.1, 24.7, 24.3) sows (P < 0.10). In the pasture gestation system, DL (66.3, 168.9) and HL (56.5, 159.0) sows produced more kilograms of litter weight at birth (P < 0.10) and 21 days (P < 0.05), respectively, than YL (45.6, 124.8) sows. Confined HL (173.6) sows produced more kilograms of litter weight at 21 days in 4 parities than confined YL (143.1) sows (P < 0.10). Results from this study indicate that the breed of crossbred sows used in a production unit should be selected for the type of gestation system used on the farm.
Journal of Animal Science | 2001
Steven M. Lonergan; Elisabeth J. Huff-Lonergan; L. J. Rowe; Daryl L. Kuhlers; Steve B. Jungst
Journal of Animal Science | 1983
T. J. Prince; Steve B. Jungst; Daryl L. Kuhlers
Journal of Animal Science | 1981
Steve B. Jungst; Lauren L. Christian; Daryl L. Kuhlers
Journal of Animal Science | 1992
Daryl L. Kuhlers; Steve B. Jungst
Journal of Animal Science | 1985
Daryl L. Kuhlers; Steve B. Jungst; Dennis N. Marple; C. Hardin Rahe
Journal of Animal Science | 1983
Daryl L. Kuhlers; Steve B. Jungst
Journal of Animal Science | 1982
Daryl L. Kuhlers; Steve B. Jungst; Ronnie L. Edwards; Joe A. Little
Journal of Animal Science | 1981
Daryl L. Kuhlers; Steve B. Jungst; Ronnie L. Edwards; Joe A. Little