Steve Beck

Toxicological Assessment of the International Space Station Atmosphere with Emphasis on Metox Canister Regeneration

Space-faring crews must have safe breathing air throughout their missions to ensure adequate performance and good health. Toxicological assessment of air quality depends on the standards that define acceptable air quality, measurements of pollutant levels during the flight, and reports from the crew on their in-flight perceptions of air quality. Air samples returned from ISS on flights 8A, UF2, 9A, and 11A were analyzed for trace pollutants. On average, the air during this period of operations was safe for human respiration. However, about 3 hours into the regeneration of 2 Metox canisters in the U.S. airlock on 20 February 2002 the crew reported an intolerable odor that caused them to stop the regeneration, take refuge in the Russian segment, and scrub air in the U.S. segment for 30 hours. Analytical data from grab samples taken during the incident showed that the pollutants released were characteristic of nominal air pollutants, but were present in much higher concentrations. The odors reported by the crew were due to relatively high concentrations of n-butanol, and possibly other pollutants in the mixture. Later data taken during regeneration of Metox canisters that had not been subject to long-term flows showed minimal effects on air quality. Long-term trending data suggest that a disruption in atmospheric mixing between the Service Module and the U.S. Laboratory has occurred and that formaldehyde concentrations are gradually increasing in the U.S. Laboratory. Trending data also show that the releases of octafluoropropane (OFP) have subsided.

Toxicological Assessment of the International Space Station Atmosphere from Mission 5A to 8A

There are many sources of air pollution that can threaten air quality during space missions. The International Space Station (ISS) is an extremely complex platform that depends on a multi-tiered strategy to control the risk of excessive air pollution. During the seven missions surveyed by th is report, the ISS atmosphere was in a safe, steady-state condition; however, there were minor loads added as new modules were attached. There was a series of leaks of octafluoropropane, which is not directly toxic to humans, but did cause changes in air purification operations that disrupted the steady state condition . In addition, off-nominal regeneration of metal oxide canisters used during extravehicular activity caused a serious pollution incident.

International Space Station Air Quality Assessed According to Toxicologically-Grouped Compounds

Scores of compounds are found in the International Space Station (ISS) atmospheric samples that are returned to the Johnson Space Center Toxicology Laboratory for analysis. Spacecraft Maximum Allowable Concentrations (SMACs) are set with the view that each compound is present as if there were no other compounds present. In order to apply SMACs to the interpretation of the analytical data, the toxicologist must employ some method of combining the potential effects of the aggregate of compounds found in the atmospheric samples. The simplest approach is to assume that each quantifiable compound has the potential for some effect in proportion to the applicable SMAC, and then add all the proportions. This simple paradigm disregards the fact that most compounds have potential to adversely affect only a few physiological systems, and their effects would be independent rather than additive. An improved approach to dealing with exposure to mixtures is to add the proportions only for compounds that adversely affect the same physiological system. For example, toxicants that cause respiratory irritation are separated from those that cause neurotoxicity or cardio-toxicity. Herein we analyze ISS air quality data according to toxicological groups with a view that this could be used for understanding any crew symptoms occurring at the time of the sample acquisition. In addition, this approach could be useful in post-flight longitudinal surveys where the flight surgeon may need to identify post-flight, follow-up medical studies because of on-orbit exposures that target specific physiological systems.

Development and Performance of the Oxygen Sensor in the CSA-CP Aboard the International Space Station

A combustion products analyzer (CPA) was built for use on Shuttle in response to several thermodegradation incidents that had occurred during early flights. The CPA contained sensors that measured carbon monoxide, hydrogen chloride, hydrogen cyanide, and hydrogen fluoride. These marker compounds, monitored by the CPA, were selected based upon the likely products to be released in a spacecraft fire. When the Toxicology Laboratory group at Johnson Space Center (JSC) began to assess the air quality monitoring needs for the International Space Station (ISS), the CPA was the starting point for design of an instrument to monitor the atmosphere following a thermodegradation event. The final product was significantly different from the CPA and was named the compound specific analyzer-combustion products (CSA-CP). The major change from the CPA that will be the focus of this paper was the replacement of an unreliable hydrogen fluoride (HF) sensor with an oxygen sensor. A reliable HF sensor was not commercially available, but as the toxicology group reviewed the overall monitoring strategy for ISS, it appeared that a portable oxygen sensor to backup the major constituent analyzer was needed. Therefore, an oxygen sensor replaced the HF sensor in the new instrument. This paper will describe the development, deployment, and performance of the CSA-CP oxygen sensor on both Shuttle and ISS. Also, data for CSA-CP oxygen sensor accuracy at nominal and reduced pressures will be presented.

Study of Long-Term Compound Stability in Dual Sorbent Tubes

The primary means to assess spacecraft air quality during a mission, for crew health purposes, has been archival air samplers that are returned to the ground for analysis. One such sampler is the Dual Sorbent Tube (DST) developed in late 2003 by the Toxicology group at the Johnson Space Center. The DSTs provided a low mass, low-volume sampler that was compatible with the constraints of the Soyuz return vehicle. The first set of DSTs, including positive control tubes, flew to the International Space Station (ISS) aboard Soyuz in January 2004 and they were returned in May 2004. The analytical recovery of compounds from the positive controls provides an indication of the stability of contaminants in the sampler. Analysis of the first returned set of positive controls revealed poor recoveries for several of the compounds. The low recoveries from the positive controls led to a study of compound stability on DSTs for long storage periods. This paper will provide the results of this study for a few key compounds.

Flight Data Update on Long-Term Compound Stability in Dual Sorbent Tubes

Dual Sorbent Tubes (DSTs) are currently the primary method for collecting volatile organic compounds in the cabin air of the International Space Station (ISS). Data from groundbased analysis of these archival air samplers provide a major component of the assessment of ISS air quality by the NASA toxicologist. At the 2005 ICES conference data from the positive control DSTs, returned on Soyuz 7S and 8S, were presented. Positive control tubes are dosed, preflight, with known concentrations of representative contaminant compounds and they are launched to ISS in the DST kit as trip controls. Upon return of the DST kit to the ground, results from analysis of the trip (positive) and laboratory control tubes are used to determine the recoveries: concentration of dosed compounds retained in the tube. Results from positive controls, returned on 7S and 8S showed substantial losses of some compounds dosed into the tubes 156 to 240 days prior to the analysis. Low recoveries are expected for spacecraft air contaminants with similar properties to the poorly recovered dosed compounds. It was shown that compound losses in the control tubes were consistent, which led to the generation of acceptable correction factors for spacecraft air contaminants. Correction factors decrease the accuracy of derived compound concentrations and substantial error could arise under some conditions. An investigation into the mechanism for compound loss is necessary before design modifications can be implemented to improve the DST performance. This paper will update results from the DSTs returned on Soyuz 9S and 10S missions during the latter part of 2005. The data acquired from these returned DSTs will be compared to the 7S and 8S data presented last year. Discussion will focus on the reliability of correction factors and identify any trends in the data. This paper will describe the experimental design and plans to identify the compound loss mechanism.