Steve Griffin

Hyperbaric oxygen preconditioning improves myocardial function, reduces length of intensive care stay, and limits complications post coronary artery bypass graft surgery ☆,☆☆,★

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine whether preconditioning coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with HBO(2) prior to first-time elective on-pump cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) leads to improved myocardial left ventricular stroke work (LVSW) post CABG. The primary end point of this study was to demonstrate that preconditioning CAD patients with HBO(2) prior to on-pump CPB CABG leads to a statistically significant (P<.05) improvement in myocardial LVSW 24 h post CABG. METHODS This randomised control study consisted of 81 (control group=40; HBO(2) group=41) patients who had CABG using CPB. Only the HBO(2) group received HBO(2) preconditioning for two 30-min intervals separated 5 min apart. HBO(2) treatment consisted of 100% oxygen at 2.4 ATA. Pulmonary artery catheters were used to obtain perioperative hemodynamic measurements. All routine perioperative clinical outcomes were recorded. Venous blood was taken pre HBO(2), post HBO(2) (HBO(2) group only), and during the perioperative period for analysis of troponin T. RESULTS Prior to CPB, the HBO(2) group had significantly lower pulmonary vascular resistance (P=.03). Post CPB, the HBO(2) group had increased stroke volume (P=.01) and LVSW (P=.005). Following CABG, there was a smaller rise in troponin T in HBO(2) group suggesting that HBO(2) preconditioning prior to CABG leads to less postoperative myocardial injury. Post CABG, patients in the HBO(2) group had an 18% (P=.05) reduction in length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Intraoperatively, the HBO(2) group had a 57% reduction in intraoperative blood loss (P=.02). Postoperatively, the HBO(2) group had a reduction in blood loss (11.6%), blood transfusion (34%), low cardiac output syndrome (10.4%), inotrope use (8%), atrial fibrillation (11%), pulmonary complications (12.7%), and wound infections (7.6%). Patients in the HBO(2) group saved US

Sevoflurane versus isoflurane in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A hemodynamic and recovery study☆

116.49 per ICU hour. CONCLUSION This study met its primary end point and demonstrated that preconditioning CAD patients with HBO(2) prior to on-pump CPB CABG was capable of improving LVSW. Additionally, this study also showed that HBO(2) preconditioning prior to CABG reduced myocardial injury, intraoperative blood loss, ICU length of stay, postoperative complications, and saved on cost, post CABG.

Hyperbaric oxygen: A novel technology for modulating myocardial ischemia-reperfusion via a single drug

OBJECTIVE To determine if sevoflurane provides comparable hemodynamics and recovery characteristics to isoflurane in cardiac anesthesia. DESIGN A prospective, crossover, dose-response study using sevoflurane and isoflurane before the start of surgery, followed by randomization to sevoflurane or isoflurane for surgery with blinded assessment for recovery. SETTING Tertiary referral cardiac clinic and intensive care. PARTICIPANTS Sixteen elective patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting. INTERVENTIONS A pulmonary artery catheter was used to obtain a complete hemodynamic profile during the dose response study before surgery. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and an electrocardiogram (ECG) were used to assess myocardial ischemia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Both agents showed similar hemodynamic effects at 0.5 and 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC). There was a tendency toward decreases in heart rate, blood pressure, vascular resistance, and cardiac output with a rise in central pressures. Ischemic changes were not detected by TEE or ECG. Times to eye opening and extubation were similar for both agents. CONCLUSION At MAC equivalent doses, sevoflurane showed comparable hemodynamics to isoflurane. Both agents when used as the primary anesthetic showed similar recovery characteristics, with no statistical difference between them at any stage of the study.

Can hyperbaric oxygen be used as adjunctive heart failure therapy through the induction of endogenous heat shock proteins

Over the years, the anecdotal medical use of oxygen has demonstrated, in a non-evidence-based manner, that it may have wide-ranging clinical consequences. Although oxygen is a critical substrate in the alleviation of hypoxia, anoxia, and ischemia, paradoxically, it also functions as a deleterious metabolite during the reperfusion of previously ischemic tissues. In adding to this controversy, a spate of new pioneering work has identified hyperoxygenation (hyperoxia) and its metabolites as solely and purposefully demonstrating cellular and clinical benefit, particularly in the field of ischemic reperfusion injury (IRI). Furthermore, the beneficial effects of oxygen have been technologically augmented by administration at doses above atmospheric pressure and at higher concentrations. The novel technology that involves oxygen treatment at supra-atmospheric pressures in high concentrations is known as hyperbaric oxygen (HBO). Although the concept of hyperbaric oxygen has been around since the mid 20th century, it is only during the past decade or so that its therapeutic potential as a new technology-based drug has been exploited for the purposes of cellular tolerance and protection. HBO has recently been shown to be a useful adjunct in several models of IRI, including myocardial infarction. How it does this remains to be elucidated. This article attempts to bring into the spotlight some pertinent developments regarding HBO and myocardial IRI, while simultaneously stimulating intellect, thought, and discussion as to whether this novel technology—HBO—which consists of only a singular drug—oxygen—is a therapy that warrants further laboratory and clinical investigation as a therapeutic modality that may be safe and cost-effective, without producing significant adverse effects.

Angiotensin in cardiac surgery: efficacy in patients on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.

Heart failure (HF) is a chronic condition that is expected to increase in incidence along with increased life expectancy and an aging population. As the incidence of HF increases, the cost to national healthcare budgets is expected to run into the billions. The costs of lost productivity and increased social reliance on state support must also be considered. Recently, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has come to be seen as the major contributing factor to HF. Although thrombolysis may restore coronary perfusion after an AMI, it may also introduce ischemic reperfusion injury (IRI). In an attempt to ameliorate sustained protein damage caused by IRI, endogenous chaperone proteins known as heat shock proteins (HSPs) are induced as a consequence of the stress of IRI. Recently, hyperbaric oxygen has been shown to induce the production of HSPs in noncardiac tissue, with a resultant protective effect. This current opinion review article suggests a possible role for hyperbaric oxygen, as a technologically modern drug, in augmenting the induction of endogenous HSPs to repair and improve the function of failing hearts that have been damaged by AMI and IRI. In addition, this simple, safe, noninvasive drug may prove useful in easing the economic burden of HF on already overextended health resources.

Hyperbaric oxygen: a new drug in myocardial revascularization and protection?

Patients presenting for cardiac surgery are often treated with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), either for heart failure or hypertension. Control of systemic vascular resistance (SVR) during surgery can be difficult in such patients. Angiotensin II has been available as an unlicensed vasoconstrictor, but there is concern about renal damage and its use.