Steve Kalb
University of Florida
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Steve Kalb.
Journal of Economic Entomology | 2015
Rafael Caballero; David J. Schuster; Natalia A. Peres; Jozer Mangandi; Tomas Hasing; Fred Trexler; Steve Kalb; Hector Eduardo Portillo; Paula C. Marçon; Issac Billy Annan
ABSTRACT Cyantraniliprole is the second xylem-systemic active ingredient in the new anthranilic diamide class. Greenhouse (2006), growth chamber (2007), and field studies (2009–2010) were conducted to determine the efficacy of cyantraniliprole for managing Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) biotype B and in interfering with transmission of tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) by this whitefly. Cyantraniliprole applied as soil treatments (200 SC) or foliar sprays (100 OD) provided excellent adult whitefly control, TYLCV suppression, and reduced oviposition and nymph survival, comparable to current standards. The positive results observed in these greenhouse experiments with a high level of insect pressure (l0× the field threshold of one adult per plant) and disease pressure (five adults per plant, with a high level of confidence that TYLCV virulent adults were used), indicate a great potential for cyantraniliprole to be used in a whitefly management program. Field evaluations of soil drench treatments confirmed the suppression of TYLCV transmission demonstrated in the greenhouse studies. Field studies in 2009 and 2010 showed that cyantraniliprole (200 SC) provided TYLCV suppression for 2 wk after a drench application, when using a susceptible (2009) or imidacloprid-tolerant (2010) whitefly population. Cyantraniliprole was demonstrated to be a promising tool for management of TYLCV in tomato production, which is very difficult and expensive, and which has limited options. The integration of cyantraniliprole into a resistance management program will help to ensure the continued sustainability of this and current insecticides used for the management of insect vectors, including whiteflies and the TYLCV they spreads.
Arthropod Management Tests | 2009
David J. Schuster; Aaron Shurtleff; Steve Kalb
On 28 Feb, transplants were set 18 inches apart on raised beds of EauGallie fine sand soil covered with white on black low density polyethylene mulch. Plots were three, 21-ft-long rows on 10-ft aisles and 5-ft centers and were irrigated by a seepage sub-irrigation system. Treatments were replicated four times in a RCB design. Admire, Platinum and V-10112 were applied on 28 Feb to each plant in 4 oz of water. Activol, Aza-Direct and Hexacide were applied weekly. The remaining products were to have been applied at the pre-determined density of five whitefly sessile nymphs and/or pupae/10 leaflets (Table 1); however, on 9 May only treatments with Oberon were applied before uncontrollable circumstances stopped spraying. All treatments were applied on 26 May. Foliar applications were made with a high clearance, self-propelled sprayer operated at 200 psi and 3.4 mph. It was fitted with eight Albuz orange nozzles per row and delivered 90 (six nozzles open) or 120 (eight nozzles open) gpa. Because of a heavy population of southern armyworm larvae, Javelin (2 lb/acre), XenTari (2 lb/acre), Confirm 2F(16 oz/acre) or Avaunt 30WG (3.5oz/acre) were applied weekly. The number of plants in each plot with definite visual symptoms of whitefly-vectored geminivirus, primarily tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV), were recorded weekly beginning 19 Mar. The numbers of sessile nymphs (2nd and 3rd instars) and pupae (4th instar or red eye nymphs) of the silverleaf whitefly were counted on the terminal leaflet from the 7th to 8th leaf counting from the top of each of ten plants in the center row of each plot about weekly beginning on 31 Mar. Fruit were harvested on 4 Jun from the middle 10 plants of the middle row of check plots and plots treated only with either Admire or Platinum. Fruit with zippering, cat-facing or large blossom-end scars were culled as defective and counted and weighed. The remaining fruit were graded for size by machine where extra large fruit were > 2.75 inches in diam, large were 2.51 to 2.75 inches in diam, medium were 2.26 to 2.5 inches in diam and small were ≤ 2.25 inches in diam. All size categories were counted and weighed. Small fruit are considered too small for marketing and are culled.
Arthropod Management Tests | 2009
David J. Schuster; Aaron Shurtleff; Steve Kalb
Arthropod Management Tests | 2009
David J. Schuster; Steve Kalb; Aaron Shurtleff
Arthropod Management Tests | 2012
Hugh A. Smith; David J. Schuster; Steve Kalb; Curtis A. Nagle
Arthropod Management Tests | 2009
David J. Schuster; Steve Kalb; Aaron Shurtleff
Arthropod Management Tests | 2009
David J. Schuster; Steve Kalb; Aaron Shurtleff
Arthropod Management Tests | 2009
David J. Schuster; Steve Kalb; Aaron Shurtleff
Arthropod Management Tests | 2009
David J. Schuster; Aaron Shurtleff; Steve Kalb
Arthropod Management Tests | 2009
David J. Schuster; Steve Kalb; Aaron Shurtleff