Steven A. Marshall

Nosocomial enterococcal blood stream infections in the SCOPE program: Antimicrobial resistance, species occurrence, molecular testing results, and laboratory testing accuracy☆

Characteristics of nosocomial enterococcal blood stream infection (NEBSI) isolates obtained from patients at 41 U.S. hospitals participating in the SCOPE Program were studied. Isolates from 480 episodes of NEBSI were characterized according to species and antimicrobial susceptibility profile. Selected isolates were also identified to species and vancomycin resistance genotype using polymerase chain reaction based methods. Polymerase chain reaction genotyping and ribotyping were used as genetic markers for molecular epidemiologic typing. Enterococci were the third most common cause of nosocomial blood stream infection in this study, accounting for 11.7% of all isolates reported. Enterococcus faecalis was the most common species (59.6%), followed by E. faecium (19.4%). Species identification errors involving E. faecium, E. durans, E. avium, and E. raffinosus were observed. Vancomycin resistance was observed in 36.4% of all participating medical centers and varied from 11.1% of medical centers in the Northwest to 60.9% of medical centers in the Southwest. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci accounted for 20.6% of NEBSI in the Northeast, 11.4% in the Southeast, 11.1% in the Southwest, and 9.5% in the Northwest regions. VanA genotypes predominated in the Northeast and Southwest, whereas vanA and vanB genotypes were equally prevalent in the Northwest and Southeast. Molecular typing studies identified strains that were unique to individual hospitals as well as strains that were prevalent in several different hospitals. NEBSI with vancomycin-resistant enterococci continues to escalate among hospitalized patients in all geographic areas of the USA.

Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci from Blood Stream Infections: Frequency of Occurrence, Antimicrobial Susceptibility, and Molecular (mecA) Characterization of Oxacillin Resistance in the SCOPE Program

Staphylococci are major causes of nosocomial blood stream infection. The recently completed SCOPE Surveillance Program found that coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and Staphylococcus aureus were the first and second most common etiologic agents, respectively, causing nosocomial blood stream infection in the USA. The frequency of oxacillin resistance was 68% among 1553 strains of CoNS and 26% among 787 strains of S. aureus in this study. Extended susceptibility profiles were generated for a subset of 150 S. aureus and 300 CoNS against 16 antimicrobial agents. Oxacillin-susceptible strains of both CoNS and S. aureus were uniformly susceptible to beta-lactam agents with the exception of ampicillin and penicillin. Oxacillin-susceptible S. aureus were also highly susceptible to the fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. The oxacillin-susceptible CoNS were less susceptible to these agents, and only glycopeptides were reliably active against oxacillin-resistant strains. PCR detection of the mecA gene was used to scrutinize current NCCLS interpretive breakpoint MICs for determining susceptibility or resistance to oxacillin. We found complete concordance between the presence or absence of mecA and the NCCLS oxacillin interpretive breakpoint categories for S. aureus. In contrast, the NCCLS breakpoints for oxacillin significantly underestimate the degree of true oxacillin resistance among CoNS. Using the presence of mecA as the reference standard, we detected 15.7% false susceptibility to oxacillin using a MIC susceptible breakpoint concentration of < or = 2 micrograms/mL. Lowering the oxacillin MIC breakpoint to < or = 0.25 microgram/mL for CoNS would greatly improve the accuracy of the MIC test performance. We found that both the current oxacillin disk test and the 30-microgram ceftizoxime disk test functioned quite well in predicting those strains of CoNS that contain mecA. These studies have demonstrated both a high level of antimicrobial resistance among nosocomial blood stream isolates of staphylococci as well as significant problems with the current NCCLS breakpoints for oxacillin when testing CoNS.

Inducible Amp C β-lactamase producing gram-negative bacilli from blood stream infections : Frequency, antimicrobial susceptibility, and molecular epidemiology in a national surveillance program (SCOPE)

A surveillance study of nosocomial blood stream infections [Surveillance and Control of Pathogens of Epidemiologic Importance (SCOPE)] was conducted during a 14-month period in 1995 to 1996 in approximately 50 American medical centers. Among the 4725 blood stream infections, the etiologic agent was Enterobacter spp. in 230, Citrobacter freundii in 24, and Serratia marcescens in 65. The vast majority of these isolates (89%) had been sent to the University of Iowa including 198 Enterobacter spp. (46 Enterobacter aerogenes, 141 Enterobacter cloacae, 11 other Enterobacter spp.), 23 C. freundii, and 62 S. marcescens. Because these species are capable of producing Amp C beta-lactamase, we examined their susceptibility to 12 broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents. The frequency of resistance to ceftazidime and the molecular epidemiology of ceftazidime-resistant strains was also examined. Among the Enterobacter spp. and C. freundii isolates, resistance to third generation cephalosporins (ceftazidime, ceftriaxone) and broad-spectrum semisynthetic penicillins (piperacillin), with or without an enzyme inhibitor (piperacillin/tazobactam), was high, e.g., 35 to 50%. The S. marcescens isolates were quite susceptible to all agents tested. Both imipenem and cefepime were active against virtually all isolates tested including 84 stably derepressed Amp C-producing ceftazidime-resistant strains of Enterobacter spp. and C. freundii. The overall rank order of activity for the six best agents against these Amp C-producing strains was: imipenem (100% susceptible) > amikacin = cefepime (98.6%) > ciprofloxacin = gentamicin = ofloxacin (93.6 to 94.0%). Molecular typing studies of ceftazidime-resistant E. cloacae using an automated ribotyping system, as well as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, indicated that although clonal spread of a single strain occurred in some of the medical centers, most of the episodes of bacteremia were caused by patient-unique strains. Control of these resistant organisms will require attention to microbiologic recognition of phenotypes, to infection control practices, and to limiting the overuse of certain extended spectrum beta-lactams.

Comparison of the Vitek Gram-Positive Susceptibility 106 Card and the MRSA-Screen Latex Agglutination Test for Determining Oxacillin Resistance in Clinical Bloodstream Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus

ABSTRACT The Vitek automated susceptibility testing system with a modified Gram-Positive Susceptibility (GPS) 106 Card (bioMerieux Vitek, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.) and a rapid slide latex agglutination test (MRSA-Screen; Denka Seiken Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) were evaluated for their ability to detect oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. The oxacillin-salt agar screen (OS) test, the reference broth microdilution method, and the detection of the mecAgene by PCR were compared with the commercial products. A total of 200 contemporary (1999) bloodstream infection isolates were collected from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, representing diverse geographic areas throughout the world. Among the 99mecA-positive isolates, 3 isolates were found negative by the MRSA-Screen. Another two isolates did not grow on OS plates and had MICs of 0.5 and 2 μg/ml with the Vitek GPS card. All 101mecA-negative isolates were also found negative by the MRSA-Screen and were categorized as susceptible by the GPS card. Overall, the MRSA-Screen, GPS card, and OS test had sensitivities of 96.9, 98.0, and 98.0% and specificities of 100.0, 100.0, and 98.0%, respectively. MRSA-Screen was a rapid (≤15 min) and simple test to perform, and the GPS card provided results in <8 h. Both methods were sensitive and specific for detecting staphylococcal oxacillin resistance in the clinical microbiology laboratory.

Characteristics of Patients with Oseltamivir-Resistant Pandemic (H1N1) 2009, United States

During April 2009–June 2010, thirty-seven (0.5%) of 6,740 pandemic (H1N1) 2009 viruses submitted to a US surveillance system were oseltamivir resistant. Most patients with oseltamivir-resistant infections were severely immunocompromised (76%) and had received oseltamivir before specimen collection (89%). No evidence was found for community circulation of resistant viruses; only 4 (unlinked) patients had no oseltamivir exposure.

Comparison of Cefoxitin and Oxacillin Disk Diffusion Methods for Detection of mecA-Mediated Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus in a Large-Scale Study

ABSTRACT The recommended breakpoints for the cefoxitin disk diffusion test for Staphylococcus aureus were recently modified. In this large-sample study, cefoxitin sensitivity and specificity compared to those of oxacillin were 97.3% and 100%, respectively. This study validated the new cefoxitin breakpoints for the detection of mecA-mediated resistance in S. aureus.

Comparison of two commercial systems (Vitek and MicroScan-WalkAway) for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of cystic fibrosis (CF) isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is difficult because the organisms are often mucoid and slow-growing. This study of 498 CF strains examined the correlation of results derived from two commonly used commercial systems (Vitek, MicroScan-WalkAway) with a reference method for 10 antimicrobials. Correlation to reference results was unacceptably low for all agents and both commercial systems had a high rate of very major (false-susceptible) errors. Although mucoid strains produced a 4.8% greater intermethod error, it was not markedly different than non-mucoid strains for the Vitek System. Overall, these tested commercial systems performed poorly for CF isolates in contrast to earlier reported, high correlations with the reference methods (broth microdilution frozen panels and agar dilution) of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, the standardized disk diffusion test, and the Etest (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden).

Antimicrobial activity of cefepime tested against bush group I β-lactamase-producing strains resistant to ceftazidime a multilaboratory national and international clinical isolate study

The potency of cefepime, a parenteral aminothiazolyl methoxyimino cephalosporin, was assessed against 256 ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative bacilli from five medical centers in the United States. In addition, cefepime activity was compared with that of ciprofloxacin and imipenem against 506 ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative bacilli collected during an 11-medical-center international study. All US clinical isolates were susceptible (< or = 8 micrograms/ml) to cefepime except Enterobacter cloacae (94% susceptible) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (19% susceptible). Enterobacteriaceae isolates from the 11-nation sample were > 80% cefepime susceptible with the exception of those from Brazil (48% susceptible) and Italy (55% susceptible). These international, enteric isolates were also very susceptible to ciprofloxacin (55%-100% susceptible) and imipenem (84%-100% susceptible). Nonenteric organisms (Pseudomonas, Xanthomonas, and Acinetobacter) from the same international locations had overall rates of susceptibility of 47% for ciprofloxacin, 28% for imipenem, and only 5% for cefepime. Cross-resistance between the broad-spectrum cephalosporins (cefepime or ceftazidime) with either imipenem or ciprofloxacin was incomplete. Cefepime appears to have a spectrum of use against a significant number of contemporary, ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative bacillus isolates worldwide.

Nosocomial streptococcal blood stream infections in the SCOPE program: Species occurrence and antimicrobial resistance☆

Nosocomial blood stream infections due to streptococci represent an increasingly important problem, particularly among neutropenic cancer patients. This problem is compounded by the emerging resistance to antimicrobial agents commonly used for empiric or prophylactic treatment of hospitalized patients. In this study, we examined the species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of 295 streptococcal nosocomial blood stream isolates from more than 30 U.S. medical centers (SCOPE National Surveillance Program). Streptococci accounted for 5.9% of all nosocomial blood stream isolates reported. The viridans group streptococci (VGS) were the most frequently isolated streptococci (50.8%), followed by the beta-haemolytic streptococci (31.9%) and pneumococci (13.2%). The beta-haemolytic streptococci were dominated by serogroup B strains (63%), followed by serogroups A and G. Of these organisms, 193 strains were referred for subsequent monitor susceptibility testing. Approximately 14% of S. pneumoniae, 9.2% of VGS, and 0% of beta-haemolytic streptococci were resistant to penicillin. Ceftriaxone was highly active against virtually all isolates (93-100% susceptible) except the VGS (77% susceptible). The rank order for activity of the four agents tested against the 193 isolates was vancomycin > ceftriaxone > penicillin > erythromycin. Importantly, 69% of the penicillin intermediate and resistant strains of VGS were also resistant to at least one additional antimicrobial (31% resistant to ceftriaxone, 51% resistant to erythromycin, 15% resistant to both ceftriaxone and erythromycin). The relatively poor activity of erythromycin against virtually all streptococci and the frequent association of macrolide resistance with penicillin resistance among the VGS suggests that both macrolides and beta-lactam agents might have limited value as prophylactic agents for dental procedures and in empiric or prophylactic use in neutropenic patients.

Antimicrobial activity of 12 broad-spectrum agents tested against 270 nosocomial blood stream infection isolates caused by non-Enteric Gram-negative bacilli: Occurrence of resistance, molecular epidemiology, and screening for metallo-enzymes☆

A total of 270 recent nosocomial blood stream isolates of non-Enterobacteriaceae Gram-negative bacilli representing nearly 50 U.S. medical centers were characterized. The numbers of isolates of individual organisms were: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 204), Acinetobacter spp. (n = 48), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 18). MICs were determined using the broth microdilution susceptibility method with 12 antimicrobial agents: piperacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Based on current National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards breakpoints, rates of resistance to cefepime, ceftazidime, and imipenem were as follows: P. aeruginosa, 3, 9, and 5%; Acinetobacter spp., 2, 37, and 0%; and S. maltophilia, 88.7, 35.3, and 100%, respectively. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was the most active agent against S. maltophilia (100% susceptible). Twenty-eight isolates of P. aeruginosa that expressed high levels of resistance to ceftazidime (MIC, > 256 micrograms/mL) and imipenem (MIC, > 32 micrograms/mL) were examined for potential metallo-beta-lactamase production by polymerase chain reaction and were found to be negative. Molecular typing of P. aeruginosa isolates revealed many patient-unique strains, but also noted clustering of infections due to isolates of the same DNA type, suggesting possible nosocomial transmission in 9 of 14 medical centers. Given the resistance profile and pathogenic potential of these non-enteric Gram-negative bacilli, considerable effort should be exerted to develop and enforce infection control and antimicrobial utilization practices that will limit the spread of these organisms in the hospital environment.