Steven C. Simper

Health outcomes of gastric bypass patients compared to nonsurgical, nonintervened severely obese

Favorable health outcomes at 2 years postbariatric surgery have been reported. With exception of the Swedish Obesity Subjects (SOS) study, these studies have been surgical case series, comparison of surgery types, or surgery patients compared to subjects enrolled in planned nonsurgical intervention. This study measured gastric bypass effectiveness when compared to two separate severely obese groups not participating in designed weight‐loss intervention. Three groups of severely obese subjects (N = 1,156, BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2) were studied: gastric bypass subjects (n = 420), subjects seeking gastric bypass but did not have surgery (n = 415), and population‐based subjects not seeking surgery (n = 321). Participants were studied at baseline and 2 years. Quantitative outcome measures as well as prevalence, incidence, and resolution rates of categorical health outcome variables were determined. All quantitative variables (BMI, blood pressure, lipids, diabetes‐related variables, resting metabolic rate (RMR), sleep apnea, and health‐related quality of life) improved significantly in the gastric bypass group compared with each comparative group (all P < 0.0001, except for diastolic blood pressure and the short form (SF‐36) health survey mental component score at P < 0.01). Diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension resolved much more frequently in the gastric bypass group than in the comparative groups (all P < 0.001). In the surgical group, beneficial changes of almost all quantitative variables correlated significantly with the decrease in BMI. We conclude that Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass surgery when compared to severely obese groups not enrolled in planned weight‐loss intervention was highly effective for weight loss, improved health‐related quality of life, and resolution of major obesity‐associated complications measured at 2 years.

Weight and Metabolic Outcomes 12 Years after Gastric Bypass

BACKGROUND Few long‐term or controlled studies of bariatric surgery have been conducted to date. We report the 12‐year follow‐up results of an observational, prospective study of Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass that was conducted in the United States. METHODS A total of 1156 patients with severe obesity comprised three groups: 418 patients who sought and underwent Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (surgery group), 417 patients who sought but did not undergo surgery (primarily for insurance reasons) (nonsurgery group 1), and 321 patients who did not seek surgery (nonsurgery group 2). We performed clinical examinations at baseline and at 2 years, 6 years, and 12 years to ascertain the presence of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. RESULTS The follow‐up rate exceeded 90% at 12 years. The adjusted mean change from baseline in body weight in the surgery group was ‐45.0 kg (95% confidence interval [CI], ‐47.2 to ‐42.9; mean percent change, ‐35.0) at 2 years, ‐36.3 kg (95% CI, ‐39.0 to ‐33.5; mean percent change, ‐28.0) at 6 years, and ‐35.0 kg (95% CI, ‐38.4 to ‐31.7; mean percent change, ‐26.9) at 12 years; the mean change at 12 years in nonsurgery group 1 was ‐2.9 kg (95% CI, ‐6.9 to 1.0; mean percent change, ‐2.0), and the mean change at 12 years in nonsurgery group 2 was 0 kg (95% CI, ‐3.5 to 3.5; mean percent change, ‐0.9). Among the patients in the surgery group who had type 2 diabetes at baseline, type 2 diabetes remitted in 66 of 88 patients (75%) at 2 years, in 54 of 87 patients (62%) at 6 years, and in 43 of 84 patients (51%) at 12 years. The odds ratio for the incidence of type 2 diabetes at 12 years was 0.08 (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.24) for the surgery group versus nonsurgery group 1 and 0.09 (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.29) for the surgery group versus nonsurgery group 2 (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The surgery group had higher remission rates and lower incidence rates of hypertension and dyslipidemia than did nonsurgery group 1 (P<0.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS This study showed long‐term durability of weight loss and effective remission and prevention of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia after Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others.)

Open vs Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Comparison of Operative Morbidity and Mortality

Background: Open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) has proven to be an effective method for weight control for the morbidly obese patient. With technologic and surgical skill advancement in the application of laparoscopic surgery, laparoscopic RYGBP has also been found to be of value in surgical control of obesity. Risk/benefit ratios in comparison of the 2 methods are undergoing definition by experience. Methods: 779 patients who underwent RYGBP between March 1, 2000 and June 30, 2002 were evaluated retrospectively. 328 patients underwent laparoscopic RYGBP (Group A) and 451 underwent open RYGBP (Group B). All charts and hospital records of these patients were reviewed. Questionnaires were mailed to all patients who had undergone RYGBP. Follow-up was 5-29 months. Results: 89 patients in Group A and 162 patients in Group B experienced significant morbidity. There were no surgical deaths in Group A and one surgical death in Group B.Weight loss profiles were the same. Significant differences in morbidity were noted with respect to gastrojejunal stenosis (Group A = 11.6%, Group B = 4.7%, P=.0012), occurrence of ventral incisonal hernia (A=0%, B=10%, P<.00013), and wound problems (abdominal wall hematoma A=1.5%%, B=0%, P=.013; wound infection A=1.2%, B=6.2%, P=.00037). Gastrojejunal perforation was not significantly different (A=1.5%, B=0.89%, P=.50), as was true of small bowel obstruction (A=2.7%, B=3.3%, P=.68). Conclusions: Each operative approach has associated problems.Wound care problems and ventral hernias are more common in Group B (open) and anas tomotic stenoses are more common in Group A (laparoscopic). Anastomotic leaks and small bowel obstruction are troublesome but not statistically different in occurrence.

Retrograde (reverse) jejunal intussusception might not be such a rare problem: a single group's experience of 23 cases

BACKGROUND Retrograde (reverse) intussusception of the jejunum is thought to be a very rare occurrence, having been reported approximately 15 times (21 patients) in medical studies. A review of our own experience of >15,000 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients found 23 cases treated since 1996. This is the largest single-center report to date. METHODS A chart review dating back to 1996 revealed 23 patients with retrograde intussusception involving the jejunum. Their charts were reviewed. A variety of data was reviewed to identify the risk factors for developing intussusception, as well as the presentation, findings, and treatment. RESULTS We identified 23 patients with retrograde intussusception involving the jejunum. Of these 23 patients, 22 had undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. One patient had undergone Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy. Of the 23 patients, 1 (4%) had a gastrojejunal intussusception and 22 (96%) jejunojejunal intussusceptions. All patients were women, with a median age of 32 years (range 20-50). The mean body mass index at gastric bypass was 45.2 kg/m2 (range 39.4-55). Of the 23 patients, 19 (83%) had undergone open and 4 (17%) laparoscopic gastric bypass. The median duration from gastric bypass to the diagnosis of intussusception was 51 months (range 6-288). Of the 23 patients, 8 (35%) presented with gangrene, perforation, or nonreducable obstruction, 9 (39%) had a spontaneous reduction, and in 6 (26%), the obstruction was successfully reduced at surgery. The treatment was surgical resection in 16 (70%) with 2 recurrences (12.5%), simple reduction in 2 (9%) with 100% recurrence, and plication in 5 patients (22%) with 2 recurrences (40%). CONCLUSION Retrograde intussusception of the jejunum after gastric bypass is probably more common than previously believed. Although resection and revision of the area of intussusception appears to be effective, more information is needed about the treatment and possible prevention of this disorder.

Association of Patient Age at Gastric Bypass Surgery With Long-term All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality

IMPORTANCE Bariatric surgery is effective in reducing all-cause and cause-specific long-term mortality. Whether the long-term mortality benefit of surgery applies to all ages at which surgery is performed is not known. OBJECTIVE To examine whether gastric bypass surgery is equally effective in reducing mortality in groups undergoing surgery at different ages. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS All-cause and cause-specific mortality rates and hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated from a retrospective cohort within 4 categories defined by age at surgery: younger than 35 years, 35 through 44 years, 45 through 54 years, and 55 through 74 years. Mean follow-up was 7.2 years. Patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery seen at a private surgical practice from January 1, 1984, through December 31, 2002, were studied. Data analysis was performed from June 12, 2013, to September 6, 2015. A cohort of 7925 patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery and 7925 group-matched, severely obese individuals who did not undergo surgery were identified through driver license records. Matching criteria included year of surgery to year of driver license application, sex, 5-year age groups, and 3 body mass index categories. INTERVENTION Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES All-cause and cause-specific mortality compared between those undergoing and not undergoing gastric bypass surgery using HRs. RESULTS Among the 7925 patients who underwent gastric bypass surgery, the mean (SD) age at surgery was 39.5 (10.5) years, and the mean (SD) presurgical body mass index was 45.3 (7.4). Compared with 7925 matched individuals not undergoing surgery, adjusted all-cause mortality after gastric bypass surgery was significantly lower for patients 35 through 44 years old (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.38-0.77), 45 through 54 years old (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.30-0.62), and 55 through 74 years old (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31-0.79; P < .003 for all) but was not lower for those younger than 35 years (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.82-1.81; P = .34). The lack of mortality benefit in those undergoing gastric bypass surgery at ages younger than 35 years primarily derived from a significantly higher number of externally caused deaths (HR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.27-5.07; P = .009), particularly among women (HR, 3.08; 95% CI, 1.4-6.7; P = .005). Patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery had a significantly lower age-related increase in mortality than severely obese individuals not undergoing surgery (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Gastric bypass surgery was associated with improved long-term survival for all patients undergoing surgery at ages older than 35 years, with externally caused deaths only elevated in younger women. Gastric bypass surgery is protective against mortality even for older patients and also reduces the age-related increase in mortality observed in severely obese individuals not undergoing surgery.

Laparoscopic reversal of gastric bypass with sleeve gastrectomy for treatment of recurrent retrograde intussusception and Roux stasis syndrome

BACKGROUND We reported on our experience of 23 patients with retrograde intussusception (RINT) in 2007. That series has increased to 54 patients. Surgical resection of the jejunojejunostomy appears to be the most effective treatment. We treated 8 patients with documented or suspected recurrent RINT despite resection, by reversing their gastric bypass with sleeve gastrectomy to avoid weight regain. METHODS The medical records of 8 patients who had undergone treatment of suspected recurrent RINT with reversal of their gastric bypass followed by sleeve gastrectomy were reviewed to evaluate the outcomes, complications, weight loss, and relief of symptoms. RESULTS All 8 patients were women, aged 29-56 years. The mean body mass index at reversal was 22.3-36.5 kg/m(2) (mean 30). The follow-up period was 1-28 months (mean 20.8). The body mass index at the last visit was 21.3-33 kg/m(2) (mean 26). Complications occurred in 5 patients. Patient 1 developed delayed splenic bleeding that required splenectomy on the second postoperative day. Patient 2 developed a gastric fistula 6 weeks after surgery after dilation. Patient 4 developed a superior mesenteric vein thrombosis at 2 weeks postoperatively. Patient 7 developed a proximal small bowel obstruction. Also, 4 patients required dilation of the gastrogastrostomy. At the last follow-up visit, the patients did not have symptoms of recurrent RINT and had not regained their weight. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic reversal of gastric bypass with sleeve gastrectomy for recurrent RINT or RINT-like symptoms (Roux stasis symptoms) resulted in a significant risk of complications in this small group of patients but appears to be effective for relieving the symptoms of RINT with minimal risk of weight regain, at least in the medium term.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes for pregnancies before and after gastric bypass surgery.

Background:Interaction between maternal obesity, intrauterine environment and adverse clinical outcomes of newborns has been described.Methods:Using statewide birth certificate data, this retrospective, matched-control cohort study compared paired birth weights and complications of infants born to women before and after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB) and to matched obese non-operated women in several different groups. Women who had given birth to a child before and after RYGB (group 1; n=295 matches) and women with pregnancies after RYGB (group 2; n=764 matches) were matched to non-operated women based on age, body mass index (BMI) prior to both pregnancy and RYGB, mother’s race, year of mother/s birth, date of infant births and birth order. In addition, birth weights of 13 143 live births before and/or after RYGB of their mothers (n=5819) were compared (group 3).Results:Odds ratios (ORs) for having a large-for-gestational-age (LGA) neonate were significantly less after RYGB than for non-surgical mothers: ORs for groups 1 and 2 were 0.19 (0.08–0.38) and 0.33 (0.21–0.51), respectively. In contrast, ORs in all three groups for risk of having a small for gestational age (SGA) neonate were greater for RYGB mothers compared to non-surgical mothers (ORs were 2.16 (1.00–5.04); 2.16 (1.43–3.32); and 2.25 (1.89–2.69), respectively). Neonatal complications were not different for group 1 RYGB and non-surgical women for the first pregnancy following RYGB. Pregnancy-induced hypertension and gestational diabetes were significantly lower for the first pregnancy of mothers following RYGB compared to matched pregnancies of non-surgical mothers.Conclusion:Women who had undergone RYGB not only had lower risk for having an LGA neonate compared to BMI-matched mothers, but also had significantly higher risk for delivering an SGA neonate following RYGB. RYGB women were less likely than non-operated women to have pregnancy-related hypertension and diabetes.