Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Steven C. van der Marck is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Steven C. van der Marck.


Fourth International Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology, Volume 2 | 2008

HTR Pebble Fuel Burnup Experimental Benchmark

Aliki van Heek; Florence Charpin; Steven C. van der Marck; Jorrit Wolters; Christos Trakas; Luis Aguiar; Eleonora Bomboni; N. Cerullo; Guglielmo Lomonaco; Daniel Freis; Jan Frybort

The HTR pebble fuel experiment HFR EU1bis was irradiated in the High Flux Reactor, Petten, The Netherlands, in 2004 and 2005. It consisted of five fuel pebbles from the German HTR program (GLE4 type, UO2 fuel, 16.75% enrichment) and six minisamples (UO2 fuel, 9.75% enrichment). Its instrumentation included three flux monitor sets. The experiment was loaded in a REFA-170 rig, surrounded by a strongly moderating filler element. The central fuel temperature was held at 1250°C during the irradiation. In the framework of the European RAPHAEL project, Post Irradiation Examination (PIE) has been done at NRG in Petten, The Netherlands and at JRC ITU in Karlsruhe, Germany. In Petten, flux monitor analysis has been done, whereas in Karlsruhe, a quantitative evaluation of γ-emitters was used to make a burn-up determination. A benchmark description based on this experiment has been written by NRG. Until now, five RAPHAEL project participants have modeled the experiment, each with their own neutronics code system. Participating codes are three versions of MONTEBURNS (MCNP with ORIGEN), MURE/MCNP and OCTOPUS (MCNP with FISPACT). The pebble burnup and isotopic inventories (Bq/gram initial HM) of selected fission products and actinides in the fuel pebble samples are both calculated and determined by gamma spectrometry, mass spectrometry and ion chromatography by JRC-ITU. Additionally, two participants calculated the flux monitor activities that were measured by NRG. A burnup measurement of 11.0 % FIMA by gamma spectrometry could be confirmed by calculation. Differences between the various modeling approaches and the experimental burn-up determination will be discussed.Copyright


ASME 2011 14th International Conference on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste Management, Parts A and B | 2011

Detection of Shielded Sealed Radioactive Sources in Radioactive Waste by Non-Destructive Assay Techniques

Leo van Velzen; Steven C. van der Marck

Experiences dealing are seldom reported on the detection of sealed radioactive sources (SRS) or its shielding in waste by non-destructive assay (NDA) methods in literature. Further the knowledge and experience in this field of waste characterization will vary from specialist till basic. The main aim of this paper is to give some guidance with the aid of an overview or scheme with which the possibility can be assessed of the detection and of a shielded SRS in (historic) waste packages. This aim could be reached by simulating the gamma flux emitted by a SRS at the outline of a standard 220 litres drum. The simulations have been performed with the Monte Carlo Neutron Photon transport code (MCNP). The results, visualized by means of iso-plots, are then be used for assessing the detection probability of the SRS by available NDA techniques. The following conclusions could be made: • “Heavy and dens” objects (e.g. shielded sealed radioactive source) can be detected and an indication of its location can be obtained by a sudden significant decrease of the gamma photon flux (cold-spot) at the outline of the drum. This cold-spot is caused by the “heavy or dens” object itself. A cold-spot can be detected the best by analyzing and visualizing the gamma photon flux from the backscatter area (e.g. range 100 keV up to 200 keV) and second best by analyzing the total gamma flux. • With relative simple radiological equipment (e.g. dose rate meter) the possible presence and an indication of the location of a shielded SRS can be estimated. • The detection possibility of detecting a shielded SRS depends not only on the applied NDA technique, but also on the applied effort (e.g. number of measurements, measuring time, applied measurement grid), the properties of the waste packages (e.g. density of the waste matrix and uniformity of the inside dispersed radioactivity), the location and the properties of the shielding of the SRS (e.g. geometry). • For confirmation and the determining of the exact location advanced NDA techniques (e.g. transmission computer tomography or other NDA that techniques gives three dimensional results) have to be applied.Copyright


Nuclear Data Sheets | 2006

Benchmarking ENDF/B-VII.0

Steven C. van der Marck


Annals of Nuclear Energy | 2014

Calculation of effective point kinetics parameters in the Serpent 2 Monte Carlo code

Jaakko Leppänen; Manuele Aufiero; Emil Fridman; Reuven Rachamin; Steven C. van der Marck


Nuclear Data Sheets | 2012

Benchmarking ENDF/B-VII.1, JENDL-4.0 and JEFF-3.1.1 with MCNP6

Steven C. van der Marck


European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | 2010

The options for the future production of the medical isotope 99Mo

Steven C. van der Marck; A. J. Koning; Kevin E. Charlton


international conference on supercomputing | 2014

Nuclear data uncertainties for local power densities in the Martin-Hoogenboom benchmark

Steven C. van der Marck; D. Rochman


Radiation Protection Dosimetry | 2005

Orange, a new, fast dose engine for radiotherapy treatment planning

Steven C. van der Marck; A. Hogenbirk


EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies | 2018

Efficient use of Monte Carlo: the fast correlation coefficient

Henrik Sjöstrand; Nicola Asquith; Petter Helgesson; D. Rochman; Steven C. van der Marck


International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology | 2017

The TENDL library: Hope, reality and future

D. Rochman; A. J. Koning; Ch J.C. Sublet; Michael Fleming; E. Bauge; Stéphane Hilaire; Pascal Romain; B. Morillon; H. Duarte; Stéphane Goriely; Steven C. van der Marck; Henrik Sjöstrand; Stephan Pomp; N. Dzysiuk; Oscar Cabellos; Hakim Ferroukhi; Alexander Vasiliev; A. Plompen; Franz-Josef Hambsch; J. Heyse; S. Kopecky; W. Mondelaers; P. Schillebeeckx; P. Siegler; S. Oberstedt

Collaboration


Dive into the Steven C. van der Marck's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Rochman

Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Hogenbirk

Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. J. Koning

International Atomic Energy Agency

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Aliki van Heek

Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. Bauge

Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Florence Charpin

Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jaap Oppe

Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jorrit Wolters

Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kevin E. Charlton

Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge