Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Steven E. Shladover is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Steven E. Shladover.


vehicular technology conference | 1991

Automated vehicle control developments in the PATH program

Steven E. Shladover; Charles A. Desoer; Masayoshi Tomizuka; Jean Walrand; Wei-Bin Zhang; D. H. Mcmahon; Huei Peng; Shahab Sheikholeslam; N. Mckeown

The accomplishments to date on the development of automatic vehicle control technology in the Program on Advanced Technology for the Highway (PATH) at the University of California, Berkeley, are summarized. The basic principles and assumptions underlying the PATH work are identified, and the work on automating vehicle lateral (steering) and longitudinal (spacing and speed) control is explained. For both lateral and longitudinal control, the modeling of plant dynamics is described, and the development of the additional subsystems needed (communications, reference/sensor systems) and the derivation of the control laws are presented. Plans for testing on vehicles in both near and long term are discussed. >


Vehicle System Dynamics | 1995

REVIEW OF THE STATE OF DEVELOPMENT OF ADVANCED VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEMS (AVCS)

Steven E. Shladover

This paper provides a broad review of the developments that have taken place within the past thirty years in the field now known as Advanced Vehicle Control Systems (AVCS). This long time horizon was chosen to ensure that significant findings from earlier generations of work are not overlooked today. Following a history of the international development of AVCS, several methods of classifying AVCS are introduced. The main body of the paper reviews the relevant literature in lateral, longitudinal and integrated control of road vehicles and summarizes the most significant findings from this work.


IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems | 2014

Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control in Real Traffic Situations

Vicente Milanés; Steven E. Shladover; John Spring; Christopher Nowakowski; Hiroshi Kawazoe; Masahide Nakamura

Intelligent vehicle cooperation based on reliable communication systems contributes not only to reducing traffic accidents but also to improving traffic flow. Adaptive cruise control (ACC) systems can gain enhanced performance by adding vehicle-vehicle wireless communication to provide additional information to augment range sensor data, leading to cooperative ACC (CACC). This paper presents the design, development, implementation, and testing of a CACC system. It consists of two controllers, one to manage the approaching maneuver to the leading vehicle and the other to regulate car-following once the vehicle joins the platoon. The system has been implemented on four production Infiniti M56s vehicles, and this paper details the results of experiments to validate the performance of the controller and its improvements with respect to the commercially available ACC system.


Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems | 2007

Cooperative Collision Warning Systems: Concept Definition and Experimental Implementation

Raja Sengupta; Shahram Rezaei; Steven E. Shladover; Delphine Cody; Susan R Dickey; Hariharan Krishnan

The concept of cooperative collision warning (CCW) systems is introduced and explained, followed by presentation of experimental results showing the performance of a first prototype CCW system. The CCW concept provides warnings or situation awareness displays to drivers based on information about the motions of neighboring vehicles obtained by wireless communications from those vehicles, without use of any ranging sensors. This has the advantages of a potentially inexpensive complement of onboard vehicle equipment (compared to ranging sensors that could provide 360-degree coverage), as well as providing information from vehicles that may be occluded from direct line of sight to the approaching vehicle. The CCW concept has been tested on a fleet of five prototype vehicles, supporting a variety of safety services (forward collision warning, blind spot and lane change situation awareness, and several modes of intersection threat assessment). The performance of the vehicle position estimation and wireless communication subsystems are demonstrated using samples of experimental data from test sites with both good and bad Global Positioning System (GPS) signal availability.


Transportation Research Part C-emerging Technologies | 2001

AN EXPERIMENTAL COMPARATIVE STUDY OF AUTONOMOUS AND CO-OPERATIVE VEHICLE-FOLLOWER CONTROL SYSTEMS

Rajesh Rajamani; Steven E. Shladover

Abstract This paper is a comparative study of the performance of constant-time-gap autonomous control systems and co-operative longitudinal control systems that use inter-vehicle communication. Analytical results show that the minimum time gap that can be achieved in autonomous control is limited by the bandwidth of the internal dynamics of the vehicle. Experimental results from typical sensors and actuators are used to show that in practice it is very difficult to achieve a time gap less than 1 s with autonomous vehicle following. This translates to an inter-vehicle spacing of 30 m at highway speeds and a theoretical maximum traffic flow of about 3000 vehicles per hour. The quality of radar range and range rate measurements pose limitations on the spacing accuracy and ride quality that can be achieved in autonomous control. Dramatic improvements in the trade-off between ride quality and spacing accuracy can be obtained merely by replacing radar range rate in the autonomous control algorithm with the difference between the measured velocities of the two cars (a rudimentary form of co-operation). As a baseline comparison, the experimental performance of fully co-operative control is presented. An inter-vehicle spacing of 6.5 m is maintained in a platoon of 8 co-operative vehicles with an excellent ride quality and an accuracy of ±20 cm. Extending this to a 10-vehicle platoon makes it possible to achieve theoretical maximum traffic flows of about 6400 vehicles per hour. Another issue of importance addressed in the paper is the need to accommodate malfunctions in radar (ranging sensor) measurements. Measurement errors can occur due to hardware malfunctions as well as due to road curves, grades and the highway environment in the case of large inter-vehicle spacing. The ability of a co-operative control system to monitor the health of the radar and correct for such errors and malfunctions is demonstrated experimentally.


Transportation Research Record | 2012

Impacts of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Freeway Traffic Flow

Steven E. Shladover; Dongyan Su; Xiao-Yun Lu

This study used microscopic simulation to estimate the effect on highway capacity of varying market penetrations of vehicles with adaptive cruise control (ACC) and cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC). Because the simulation used the distribution of time gap settings that drivers from the general public used in a real field experiment, this study was the first on the effects of ACC and CACC on traffic to be based on real data on driver usage of these types of controls. The results showed that the use of ACC was unlikely to change lane capacity significantly. However, CACC was able to increase capacity greatly after its market penetration reached moderate to high percentages. The capacity increase could be accelerated by equipping non-ACC vehicles with vehicle awareness devices so that they could serve as the lead vehicles for CACC vehicles.


Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems | 2006

Analysis of Vehicle Positioning Accuracy Requirements for Communication-Based Cooperative Collision Warning

Steven E. Shladover; Swe-Kuang Tan

This article describes an analysis of the use of vehicle positioning and wireless communication technologies to implement collision warning systems without using direct ranging sensors. If the positions and velocities of the vehicles can be known to sufficient accuracy and can be communicated to neighboring vehicles, each vehicle can identify whether it is in danger of colliding with any other vehicle. The probability that useful warnings can be provided is calculated as a function of the accuracy of the vehicle position and velocity information that are available (from Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) and wheel speed sensors, for example). The analyses are reported for forward collision warnings, lane change warnings, and several intersection conflict scenarios. The governing accuracy requirement for all but the intersection scenarios is associated with the need to assign the vehicles to the correct lanes, which requires a standard deviation of positioning accuracy of about 50 cm in order to support reliable and consistent warnings.


Transportation Research Record | 2002

Effects of Adaptive Cruise Control Systems on Highway Traffic Flow Capacity

Joel VanderWerf; Steven E. Shladover; Mark A Miller; Natalia Kourjanskaia

The effects on traffic flow of increasing proportions of both autonomous and cooperative adaptive cruise control (ACC) vehicles relative to manually driven vehicles were studied. Such effects are difficult to estimate from field tests on highways because of the low market penetration of ACC systems. The research approach used Monte Carlo simulations based on detailed models presented in the literature to estimate the quantitative effects of varying the proportions of vehicle control types on lane capacity. The results of this study can help to provide realistic estimates of the effects of the introduction of ACC to the vehicle fleet. Transportation system managers can recognize that the autonomous ACC systems now entering the market are unlikely to have significant positive or negative effects on traffic flow. An additional value of studying ACC systems in this way is that these scenarios can represent the first steps in a deployment sequence that will lead to an automated highway system. Benefits gained at the early stages in this sequence, particularly through the introduction of cooperative ACC with priority access to designated (although not necessarily dedicated) lanes, can help support further investment in and development of automated highway systems.


international conference on intelligent transportation systems | 2006

PATH at 20 -- History and Major Milestones

Steven E. Shladover

The California PATH Program was founded in 1986, as the first research program in North America focused on the subject now known as intelligent transportation systems (ITS). This paper reviews the history of the founding of PATH and of the national ITS program in the U.S., providing perspective on the changes that have occurred during the past twenty years


IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems | 2015

Potential Cyberattacks on Automated Vehicles

Jonathan Petit; Steven E. Shladover

Vehicle automation has been one of the fundamental applications within the field of intelligent transportation systems (ITS) since the start of ITS research in the mid-1980s. For most of this time, it has been generally viewed as a futuristic concept that is not close to being ready for deployment. However, recent development of “self-driving” cars and the announcement by car manufacturers of their deployment by 2020 show that this is becoming a reality. The ITS industry has already been focusing much of its attention on the concepts of “connected vehicles” (United States) or “cooperative ITS” (Europe). These concepts are based on communication of data among vehicles (V2V) and/or between vehicles and the infrastructure (V2I/I2V) to provide the information needed to implement ITS applications. The separate threads of automated vehicles and cooperative ITS have not yet been thoroughly woven together, but this will be a necessary step in the near future because the cooperative exchange of data will provide vital inputs to improve the performance and safety of the automation systems. Thus, it is important to start thinking about the cybersecurity implications of cooperative automated vehicle systems. In this paper, we investigate the potential cyberattacks specific to automated vehicles, with their special needs and vulnerabilities. We analyze the threats on autonomous automated vehicles and cooperative automated vehicles. This analysis shows the need for considerably more redundancy than many have been expecting. We also raise awareness to generate discussion about these threats at this early stage in the development of vehicle automation systems.

Collaboration


Dive into the Steven E. Shladover's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Xiao-Yun Lu

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wei-Bin Zhang

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Han-Shue Tan

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Xiao-Yun Lu

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark A Miller

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Huei Peng

University of Michigan

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pravin Varaiya

University of California

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge