Steven Hodge

Culprit Vessel Versus Multivessel Versus In-Hospital Staged Intervention for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: Stratified Analyses in High-Risk Patient Groups and Anatomic Subsets of Nonculprit Disease.

OBJECTIVESnThis study evaluated revascularization strategies for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease.nnnBACKGROUNDnIn patients with STEMI and multivessel disease, it is unclear whether multivessel intervention (MVI), culprit vessel intervention (CVI) only (CVI-O) or CVI with staged revascularization (CVI-S) is associated with improved outcomes. Whether MVI at primary percutaneous coronary intervention may benefit specific patient groups is unclear.nnnMETHODSnWe compared revascularization strategies (MVI, CVI-O, and CVI-S) in 6,503 patients with STEMI and multivessel disease enrolled in the British Columbia Cardiac Registry (2008 to 2014). We evaluated all-cause mortality and repeat revascularization at 2 years.nnnRESULTSnCompared with MVI, CVI-O (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64 to 0.97; pxa0= 0.023) and CVI-S (HR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.82; pxa0= 0.004) were associated with lower mortality. Comparing CVI-O with CVI-S, CVI-S was associated with lower mortality (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.91; pxa0= 0.013). Compared with MVI, CVI-O was associated with increased repeat revascularization (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.54; pxa0= 0.036). Comparing CVI-O versus CVI-S, CVI-S was associated with lower repeat revascularization (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.90; pxa0= 0.012). CVI was associated with lower mortality in the presence of nonculprit left circumflex artery disease (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.45xa0to 0.89; pxa0= 0.011) and right coronary artery disease (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.99; pxa0= 0.050), but not nonculprit left anterior descending artery disease (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.54 to 1.28; pxa0= 0.399).nnnCONCLUSIONSnIn patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, a strategy of CVI-S seems to be associated with lower mortality and repeat revascularization rates. However, MVI may be considered in selected patients and in the setting of nonculprit left anterior descending artery disease. These findings warrant prospective evaluation in large adequately powered randomized controlled trials.

Long-term outcomes following drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A real-world analysis of 11,181 patients from the british columbia cardiac registry.

Drug eluting stents (DES) are associated with reduced risk of restenosis when compared with bare metal stents (BMS). Their use in ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is debated, owing to concerns about stent thrombosis. There are limited real‐world data comparing DES versus BMS in STEMI. We conducted an observational analysis in this setting and rigorously adjusted for treatment selection bias.

Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Counterpulsation during Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock: Insights from the British Columbia Cardiac Registry

Background Cardiogenic shock complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) era, randomized trials have not shown a survival benefit with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) therapy. This differs to observational data which show a detrimental effect, potentially reflecting bias and confounding. Without robust and valid risk adjustment, findings from non-randomized studies may remain biased. Methods We compared long-term mortality following IABP therapy in patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing PPCI during 2008–2013 from the British Columbia Cardiac Registry. We addressed measured and unmeasured confounding using propensity score and instrumental variable methods. Results A total of 12,105 patients with STEMI were treated with PPCI during the study period. Of these, 700 patients (5.8%) had cardiogenic shock. Of the patients with cardiogenic shock, 255 patients (36%) received IABP therapy. Multivariable analyses identified IABP therapy to be associated with increased mortality up to 3 years (HR = 1.67, 95% CI:1.20–2.67, p<0.001). This association was lost in propensity-matched analyses (HR = 1.23, 95% CI: 0.84–1.80, p = 0.288). When addressing measured and unmeasured confounders, instrumental variable analyses demonstrated that IABP therapy was not associated with mortality at 3 years (Δ = 16.7%, 95% CI: -12.7%, 46.1%, p = 0.281). Subgroup analyses demonstrated IABP was associated with increased mortality in non-diabetics; patients not undergoing multivessel intervention; patients without renal disease and patients not having received prior thrombolysis. Conclusions In this observational analysis of patients with STEMI and cardiogenic shock, when adjusting for confounding, IABP therapy had a neutral effect with no association with long-term mortality. These findings differ to previously reported observational studies, but are in keeping with randomized trial data.

Embolic protection device use and its association with procedural safety and long-term outcomes following saphenous vein graft intervention: An analysis from the British Columbia Cardiac registry

Embolic protection devices (EPDs) have been designed and introduced to reduce distal embolization and peri‐procedural myocardial infarction during saphenous vein graft (SVG) intervention. Current guidelines give a class I recommendation to EPD use during SVG intervention when technically feasible. However, the routine use of these devices has recently been debated.

Prognostic Significance of Polymer Coatings in Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents

Polymer coatings on drug-eluting stents (DES) serve as a vehicle for delivery of antirestenotic drugs. Whether they influence outcomes for contemporary DES is unknown. The evolution of polymer coatings for zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) provides a natural experiment that facilitates such analysis. The Resolute ZES (R-ZES) uses the same antirestenotic drug as the Endeavor ZES (E-ZES) but has a more biocompatible polymer with enhanced drug release kinetics. However, there are limited data on the real-world comparative efficacy of R-ZES and the preceding E-ZES. Thus, we analyzed 17,643 patients who received either E-ZES or R-ZES from 2008 to 2014 from the British Columbia Cardiac Registry. A total of 9,869 patients (56%) received E-ZES and 7,774 patients (44%) received R-ZES. Compared with E-ZES, R-ZES was associated with lower 2-year mortality (4.1% vs 6.4%, p <0.001) and 2-year target vessel revascularization (TVR; 6.8% vs 10.7%, p <0.001). R-ZES use was an independent predictor of lower mortality rate and TVR. This was confirmed in propensity-matched analyses for 2-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.71, p <0.001) and 2-year TVR (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.98, p = 0.032). Instrumental variable analyses demonstrated R-ZES to be associated with lower 2-year mortality (Δ = -2.2%, 95% CI -4.3% to -0.2%, p = 0.032) and 2-year TVR (Δ = -3.3% to 95% CI -6.1% to -0.7%, p = 0.015). Acknowledging the limitations of observational analyses, this study has shown that R-ZES was associated with lower long-term TVR and mortality. These data are reassuring for the newer R-ZES and demonstrate how polymer coatings may influence the clinical performance of DES with wider implications for future DES development and design.

The prognostic impact of revascularization strategy in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: Insights from the British Columbia Cardiac Registry

In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cardiogenic shock (CS), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the culprit vessel is associated with improved outcomes. A large majority of these patients have multivessel disease (MVD). Whether or not PCI of non‐culprit disease in the acute setting improves outcomes continues to be debated. We evaluated the prognostic impact of revascularization strategy for patients presenting with AMI and CS.